On Ethically Informing Citizens About Political Conspiracies

References

• Alfano, M., & Huijts, N. (2020). Trust in institutions and governance. In J. Simon (Ed.), The routledge handbook of trust and philosophy (pp. 256–270). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ansah, T. (2021). Violent words: Strategies and legal impacts of white supremacist language. Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 28(3), 305–340.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, B. (2021). Defeating fake news: On journalism, knowledge, and democracy. Moral Philosophy and Politics, 8(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2019-0033
   Google Scholar
• Bangerter, A., Wagner-Egger, P., & Delouvée, S. (2020). How conspiracy theories spread. In M. Butter & P. Knight (Eds.), RoutlEdge handbook of conspiracy theories (pp. 206–218). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baurmann, M., & Cohnitz, D. (2021). Trust no one? The (social) epistemological consequences of belief in conspiracy theories. In S. Bernecker, A. K. Flowerree, & T. Grundmann (Eds.), The Epistemology of Fake News (pp. 334–357). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biddlestone, M., Green, R., Cichocka, A., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analytic synthesis of the motives associated with conspiracy beliefs. PsyArxiv. 2022. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rxjqc
   Google Scholar
• Blazak, R. (2022). Revisiting the white boys from Portland to Ukraine: Anomie and right-wing extremism. The American Behavioral Scientist. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642221108940
   Google Scholar
• Boudry, M. (2022). Why we should be suspicious of conspiracy Theories: A novel demarcation problem. Episteme, forthcoming, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2022.34
   Google Scholar
• Brison, S. J. (2021). Free speech skepticism. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 31(2), 101–132. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2021.0008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, É. (2023). Free speech and the legal prohibition of fake news. Social Theory and Practice, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract202333179
   Google Scholar
• Cassam, Q. (2019). Conspiracy Theories. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. (2023). Is there a new conspiracism? Social Epistemology, 37(1), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2022.2057369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coady, D. (2018). Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule on conspiracy theories. Argumenta, 3(2), 291–302.
   Google Scholar
• Cίbik, M., & Hardoš, P. (2022). Conspiracy theories and reasonable pluralism. European Journal of Political Theory, 21(3), 445–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, L. J., & Satta, M. (2021). Justified social distrust. In K. Vallier & M. Weber (Eds.), Social Trust (pp. 122–147). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M. R. X. (2021). Debunking conspiracy theories. Synthese, 198(10), 9897–9911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02694-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2015). Global warming: Why the conspiracy theories are dangerous. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 71(2), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340215571908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2018). Why conspiracy theories matter: A social psychological analysis. European Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 256–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1537428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein, K. L., & Glick, D. M. (2015). Do I think BLS data are BS? The consequences of conspiracy theories. Political Behavior, 37(3), 679–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-014-9287-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerick, B. (2021). The limits of the rights to free thought and expression. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 31(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2021.0009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritts, M., & Cabrera, F. (2022). Fake news and epistemic vice: Combating a uniquely noxious market. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 8(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2021.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, N. (2016). Harm: Omission, preemption, freedom. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 93(2), 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon, M. (2022). Are knowledgeable voters better voters? Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 21(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X211065080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, C. (2022). What was the legacy of the Watergate scandal? History Today, 72(6). accessed 28 October 2022 https://www.historytoday.com/archive/head-head/what-was-legacy-Watergate-scandal
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herf, J. (2006). The Jewish Enemy: Nazi Propaganda during world war II and the Holocaust. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ichino, A., & Räikkä, J. (2021). Non-doxastic conspiracy theories. Argumenta, 7(1), 247–263.
   Google Scholar
• Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014a). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. Plos One, 9(2), e89177. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014b). The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one’s carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley, D., Meleady, R., & Douglas, K. M. (2020). Exposure to intergroup conspiracy theoriespromotes prejudice which spreads across groups. British Journal of Psychology, 111(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, B. (1999). Of conspiracy theories. The Journal of Philosophy, 96(3), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2564659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogelmann, B. (2021). Secrecy and transparency in political philosophy. Philosophy Compass, 16(4), e12733. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantian, A., Wood, M., & Gjoneska, B. (2020). Personality traits, cognitive styles and worldviews associated with beliefs in conspiracy theories. In M. Butter & Knight, P. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Conspiracy Theories, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lavik, T. (2016). Climate change denial, freedom of speech and global justice. Etikk I Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 10(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.5324/eip.v10i2.1923
   Google Scholar
• Mercier, H. (2020). Not born yesterday: The Science of who we trust and what we believe. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1978). On Liberty. Hackett Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., & Farhart, C. E. (2016). Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 824–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napolitano, M. G., & Reuter, K. (2021). What is a conspiracy theory? Erkenntnis, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00441-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obaidi, M., Kunst, J., Ozer, S., & Kimel, S. Y. (2022). The “Great Replacement” conspiracy: How the perceived ousting of whites can evoke violent extremism and Islamophobia. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(7), 1675–1695. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211028293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2022). Trust in government (indicator). accessed on 16 November. 2022. 10.1787/1de9675e-en
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E., & Wood, T. J. (2014a). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 952–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E., & Wood, T. J. (2014b). Medical conspiracy theories and health behaviors in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(5), 817–818. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmsted, K. (2018). Fringe paranoia goes mainstream. Modern American History, 1(2), 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/mah.2018.8
   Google Scholar
• Parks, P. (2022). Senses of truth and journalism’s epistemic crisis. Journal of Media Ethics, 37(3), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2022.2107523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigden, C. (2018). Conspiracy theories, deplorables, and defectibility: A reply to Patrick Stokes. In M. R. X. Dentith (Ed.), Taking conspiracy theories seriously. (pp. 203–216). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pitcovski, E. (2022). Explaining harm. Philosophical Studies, 01909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-022-
   Google Scholar
• Prooijen van, J. -W. (2019). Belief in conspiracy theories: Gullibility or rational skepticism? In the. In J. P. Forgas & R. Baumeister (Eds.), Social Psychology of gullibility: Conspiracy theories, Fake News and Irrational beliefs (pp. 319–332). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prooijen van, J. -W. (2022). Psychological benefits of believing conspiracy theories. Current Opinion in Psychology, 47, 101352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prooijen van, J. -W., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017701615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prooijen van, J. -W., Klein, O., & Milošević Đorđević, J. (2020). Social-cognitive processes underlying belief in conspiracy theories. In M. Butter & P. Knight (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of conspiracy theories (pp. 168–180). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rabenberg, M. (2014). Harm. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 8(3), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v8i3.84
   Google Scholar
• Radnitz, S. (2022). Why democracy fuels conspiracy theories. Journal of Democracy, 33(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2022.0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, N. L., & Muirhead, R. (2020). A lot of people are saying: The new conspiracism and the assault on democracy. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothschild, M. (2022). The storm is upon us: How QAnon became a movement, Cult, and Conspiracy theory of everything. Melville House.
   Google Scholar
• Shoaibi, N. (2022). Responding to the spread of conspiracy theories. Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2126393 .
   Google Scholar
• Society of Professional Journalists. (2014). SPJ Code of Ethics. Available at https://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp accessed 1 November.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(2), 202–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaine, L. (2018). Freedom of thought as a basic liberty. Political Theory, 46(3), 405–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591716676293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., Furnham, A. (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition, 133(3), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E., Enders, A. M., Klofstad, C., Seelig, M., Funchion, J., Everett, C., Wuchty, S., Premaratne, K., Murthi, M. (2021). Why do people believe COVID-19 conspiracy theories?, Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. Special Issue on COVID-19 and Misinformation,1–12. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-015
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. (2019). What we mean when we say “conspiracy theory. In J. E. Uscinski (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 53–61). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, S. J. A. (2020). Ethics and the Media: An introduction, 2^nd ed. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. (2022). Nostalgia, entitlement and victimhood: The synergy of white genocide and misogyny. Terrorism and Political Violence, 34(8), 1810–1825. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2020.1839428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611434786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar