The missing piece in human-centric approaches to cybernorms implementation: the role of civil society

References

• Scholte, Jan Aart. 2007. “Civil Society and the Legitimation of Global Governance.” Journal of Civil Society 3 (3): 305–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17448680701775796.
   Google Scholar
• Scholte, Jan Aart. 2011. “Towards Greater Legitimacy in Global Governance.” Review of International Political Economy 18 (1): 110–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2011.545215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Access Now. 2019. https://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/other/icts/oewg/documents/comment-accessnow.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Boulanin, Vincent. 2016. “Information and Communication Technology, Cybersecurity and Human Development.” Sipri. https://www.sipri.org/yearbook/2016/10. Accessed March 5, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Deborah. 2020. “It’s Time to Treat Cybersecurity as a Human Rights Issue.” (blog) HRW, May 26. https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/05/26/its-time-treat-cybersecurity-human-rights-issue.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Deborah, and Anriette Esterhuysen. 2017. A Rights-Based Approach To Cybersecurity: A Pipe Dream Or A Critical Means To A Secure And Stable Internet? Recommendations And Considerations. Creative Commons Licence: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0): Association of Progressive Communications. https://www.apc.org/sites/default/files/IGF17-_A_rights-based_approach_to_cybersecurity_-_recommendations_201807018.df.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Deborah, and Anriette Esterhuysen. 2019. “Why cybersecurity is a human rights issue, and it is time to start treating it like one.” (blog) APC, November 28. https://www.apc.org/en/news/why-cybersecurity-human-rights-issue-and-it-time-start-treating-it-one.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Deborah, Anriette Esterhuysen, and Sheetal Kumar. 2019. Review of Unpacking the GGE’s Framework on Responsible State Behaviour: Cyber Norms. Global Partners Digital and Association of Progressive Communications. https://www.gp-digital.org/publication/unpacking-the-gges-framework-on-responsible-state-behaviour-cyber-norms/.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Deborah, and Allison Pytlak. 2020. “Why Gender Matters in Cybersecurity”. Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom and the Association for Progressive Communication. Reaching Critical Will. https://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/resources/publications-and-research/publications/14677-why-gender-matters-in-international-cyber-security.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Internet and Society. 2020. Comments on the ‘Pre-Draft’ Report of the United Nations Open-Ended Working Group. https://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/other/icts/oewg/documents/comment-accessnow.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Citizen Lab. 2019. “NSO Group/Q Cyber Technologies: Over One Hundred New Abuse Cases.” Citizen Lab, October 29. https://citizenlab.ca/2019/10/nso-q-cyber-technologies-100-new-abuse-cases/.
   Google Scholar
• Consejo Nacional De Política Económica Y Social República De Colombia, Departamento Nacional De Planeació. 2020. Política Nacional De Confianza Y Seguridad Digital. https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Conpes/Econ%C3%B3micos/3995.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Deibert, Ronald J. 2018. “Toward a Human-Centric Approach to Cybersecurity.” Ethics & International Affairs 32 (4): 411–424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0892679418000618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deibert, Ronald. 2020. Reset: Reclaiming the Internet for Civil Society. Toronto: House Of Anansi Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn Cavelty, Myriam. 2012. “The Militarisation of Cyberspace: Why Less May be Better”. 2012 4th International Conference on Cyber Conflict, edited by C. Czosseck, R. Ottis, and K. Ziolkowski. NATO CCD COE Publications. https://ccdcoe.org/uploads/2012/01/2_6_Dunn-Cavelty_TheMilitarisationOfCyberspace.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dunn Cavelty, Myriam. 2014. “Breaking the Cyber-Security Dilemma: Aligning Security Needs and Removing Vulnerabilities.” Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (3): 701–715. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9551-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU Cyber Direct. 2019. “Strengthening the Multi-stakeholder Approach”. EU Cyber Direct, November 25. https://eucyberdirect.eu/content_events/strengthening-the-multi-stakeholder-approach/.
   Google Scholar
• Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams (FIRST). 2019. Position paper by the Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams on cybersecurity developments within the UN context, submitted to Informal intersessional consultative meeting of the OEWG with industry, non-governmental organizations and academia (2–4 December 2019). https://www.un.org/disarmament/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/oewg-position-paper-first-v20191209.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Freedom Online Coalition. 2020. “Joint Statement on the Human Rights Impact of Cybersecurity Laws, Practices and Policies”. https://freedomonlinecoalition.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/FOC-Statement-on-Human-Rights-and-Cyber-Security-07.02.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Glasius, Marlies. 2008. “Global Justice Meets Local Civil Society: The International Criminal Court’s Investigation in the Central African Republic.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 33 (4): 413–433. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540803300402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Partners Digital. 2020a. “Pre-draft of the OEWG's report on ICTs: Global Partners Digital response”. Reaching Critical Will, March. https://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/other/icts/oewg/documents/comment-gpd.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Global Partners Digital. 2020b. “Toolkit for Inclusive and Value-based Cybersecurity Policymaking.” Global Partners Digital, August 26. https://www.gp-digital.org/publication/toolkit-for-inclusive-and-value-based-cybersecurity-policymaking/.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, Jason. 2020. “The Cyber Budget Shows What the U.S. Values – And It Isn’t Defense.” Lawfare Blog, June 1. https://www.lawfareblog.com/cyber-budget-shows-what-us-values%E2%80%94and-it-isnt-defense.
   Google Scholar
• ICT4 Peace Foundation. 2020a. “Comments on the Initial “Pre-draft” of the report of the OEWG on developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security.” Reaching Critical Will, March. https://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/other/icts/oewg/documents/comment-ict4peace.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ICT4 Peace Foundation. 2020b. ICT4Peace Proposed States Cyber Peer Review Mechanism for State-Conducted Foreign Cyber Operations. https://ict4peace.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/ICT4Peace-Proposed-States-Cyber-Peer-Review-3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, Camino, and Paul Cornish. 2019. Geneva Dialogue on Responsible Behaviour in Cyberspace: Phase 1 Report. https://genevadialogue.ch/wp-content/uploads/Geneva-Dialogue-Final-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, Camino, and Paul Cornish. 2020. “Cyber Operations and Inter-State Competition and Conflict: The Persisting Value of Preventive Diplomacy.” EU Cyber Direct, September 7. https://eucyberdirect.eu/content_research/cyber-operations-and-inter-state-competition-and-conflict-the-persisting-value-of-preventive-diplomacy/.
   Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, Camino, and Daniel Stauffacher. 2014. A Role for Civil Society? ICTs, Norms and Confidence Building Measures in the Context of International Security. Geneva: ICT4Peace Foundation. https://ict4peace.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/ICT4Peace-2104-A-Role-For-Civil-Society.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Khagram, Sanjeev, James Riker, and Kathryn Sikkink. 2005. Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kilovaty, Ido. 2019. “An Extraterritorial Human Right to Cybersecurity.” Papers.Ssrn.Com, July 19. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3422938.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, Joëlle, and Kamrul Hossain. 2020. “Conceptualising Human-centric Cyber Security in the Arctic in Light of Digitalisation and Climate Change.” Arctic Review on Law and Politics 11: 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.1936.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, David, and Nazneen Kanji. 2009. Non-governmental Organizations and Development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liaropoulos, A. 2015. “A Human-centric Approach to Cybersecurity: Securing the Human in the Era of Cyberphobia.” Journal of Information Warfare 14 (4): 15–24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26487503.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, Nate. 2018. “What is Incident Response?” Digital Guardian, September 7. Accessed October 15, 2020. https://digitalguardian.com/blog/what-incident-response.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Information, Communications and Technology (ICT) Policy, Kenya. 2019. National ICT Policy. Ministry of Information, Communications and Technology, Kenya. https://www.ict.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NATIONAL-ICT-POLICY-2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, Milton, Karl Grindal, Brenden Kuerbis, and Farzaneh Badiei. 2019. “Cyber Attribution: Can a New Institution Achieve Transnational Credibility?” The Cyber Defense Review 4 (1): 107–122. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26623070?seq=1.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 2019. Summary Report: A Human Rights-centred Approach to Technology and Security. Vienna, November 8. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/e/b/442384.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, Conrad. 2020. “On the Offensive: The UK’s New Cyber Force”. RUSI, November 23. https://rusi.org/commentary/offensive-uk-new-cyber-force.
   Google Scholar
• Pytlak, Allison. 2020. “In Search of Human Rights in Multilateral Cybersecurity Dialogues.” In Routledge Handbook of International Cybersecurity, edited by Eneken Tikk and Mika Kerttunen, 65–78. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351038904-7.
   Google Scholar
• Reaching Critical Will. 2020. “Cyber Peace & Security Monitor, Vol.1, No. 7”, Reaching Critical Will, March 30 2021. https://reachingcriticalwill.org/disarmament-fora/ict/oewg/cyber-monitor/14659-cyber-peace-security-monitor-vol-1-no-7
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly resolution 70/237. 2015. Report of the First Committee (A/70/455). https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/70/237.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA). 2017. Civil Society and Disarmament: 2017. Voluntary, Non-Binding Norms for Responsible State Behaviour in the Use of Information and Communications Technology: A Commentary. https://www.un.org/disarmament/publications/civilsociety/civil-society-and-disarmament-2017/.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security. 2018. “What Is Human Security?” The Human Security Unit. https://www.un.org/humansecurity/what-is-human-security/.
   Google Scholar
• Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom. 2020. “Responses to the pre-draft of the Final Report of the UN OEWG on developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security.” Reaching Critical Will, April. https://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/other/icts/oewg/documents/WILPF_OEWG_response_April2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• WSIS Executive Secretariat. 2005. Wo.1rld Summit on the Information Society – Tunis Agenda for the Information Society. Tunis: ITU. Accessed October 15, 2020. http://www.itu.int/wsis/docs2/tunis/off/6rev1.doc.
   Google Scholar