The (im)possibilities of addressing election interference and the public core of the internet in the UN GGE and OEWG: a mid-process assessment

References

• Adamson, L. 2020. “International Law and International Cyber Norms: A Continuum?” In Governing Cyberspace: Behaviour, Power and Diplomacy, edited by D. Broeders, and B. van den Berg. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y., R. Faris, and H. Roberts. 2018. Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, S., and P. Howard. 2019. The Global Disinformation Order. 2019 Global Inventory of Organised Social Media Manipulation. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Broeders, D. 2015. The Public Core of the Internet. An International Agenda for Internet Governance. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broeders, D. 2017. “Aligning the International Protection of ‘The Public Core of the Internet’ with State Sovereignty and National Security.” Journal of Cyber Policy 2 (3): 366–376.
   Google Scholar
• Broeders, D. 2019. “Mutually Assured Diplomacy: Governance, ‘Unpeace’ and Diplomacy in Cyberspace.” Global Policy – Digital Debates 6: 26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Broeders, D. 2020. “Creating Consequences for Election Interference” (15 May) Directions. Cyber Digital Europe. https://directionsblog.eu/creating-consequences-for-election-interference/.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B. 2020. The Hacker and the State. Cyber Attacks and the New Normal of Geopolitics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corera, G. 2015. Intercept. The Secret History of Computers and Spies. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• DeNardis, L. 2014. The Global War for Internet Governance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, W., V. Cerf, and W. Kleinwächter. 2016. Internet Fragmentation: An Overview. Future of the Internet Initiative White Paper, January 2016. World Economic Forum. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_FII_Internet_Fragmentation_An_Overview_2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2020. The EU's Cybersecurity Strategy for the Digital Decade. Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Brussels, 16 Dec. JOIN (2020) 18 final.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, B. 2016. Remarks on International Law and Stability in Cyberspace. Remarks by Brian J. Egan, Legal Adviser to the US Department of State. 10 November.
   Google Scholar
• Eggenschwiler, J., and J. Kulesza. 2020. ““Non-State Actors as Shapers of Customary Standards of Responsible Behaviour in Cyberspace.”.” In Governing Cyberspace: Behaviour, Power and Diplomacy, edited by D. Broeders, and B. van den Berg. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Egloff, F. 2020. “Contested Public Attributions of Cyber Incidents and the Role of Academia.” Contemporary Security Policy 41 (1): 55–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU. 2019. Regulation (EU) 2019/881 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on ENISA (the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity) and on information and communications technology cybersecurity certification and repealing Regulation (EU) No 526/2013 (Cybersecurity Act).
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., and D. Hollis. 2016. “Constructing Norms for Global Cybersecurity.” American Journal of International Law 110 (3): 425–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (4): 887–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G7. 2017. Declaration on Responsible States Behavior in Cyberspace (Lucca, 11 April). https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/000246367.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• GCSC. 2017a. Call to Protect the Public Core of the Internet. New Delhi, November. https://cyberstability.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/call-to-protect-the-public-core-of-the-internet.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• GCSC. 2017b. Definition of the Public Core, to Which the Norm Applies. Bratislava, May. https://cyberstability.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Definition-of-the-Public-Core-of-the-Internet.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• GCSC. 2018. Call to Protect the Electoral Infrastructure. Bratislava, May. https://cyberstability.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/GCSC-Call-to-Protect-Electoral-Infrastructure.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• GCSC. 2019. Advancing Cyberstability. Final Report of the Global Commission on the Stability of Cyberspace. November.
   Google Scholar
• Géry, A., and F. Delerue. 2020. “A New UN Path to Cyber Stability.” (6 October) Directions. Cyber Digital Europe. https://directionsblog.eu/a-new-un-path-to-cyber-stability/.
   Google Scholar
• Government of the Netherlands. 2017. “Building Digital Bridges.” International Cyber Strategy: towards an integrated international cyber policy. https://www.government.nl/documents/parliamentary-documents/2017/02/12/international-cyber-strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Hollis, D., and J. Neutze. 2021. ““Defending Democracies via Cybernorms.”.” In Defending Democracies: Combatting Foreign Election Interference in a Digital Age, edited by D. B. Hollis, and J. D. Ohlin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurel, L. M., and L. Cruz Lobato. 2018. “Unpacking Cyber Norms: Private Companies as Norm Entrepreneurs.” Journal of Cyber Policy 3 (1): 61–76.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowicz, N. 2020. How to Lose the Information War. Russia, Fake News and the Future of Conflict. London: I.B. Taurus and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kaul, I., I. Grunberg, and M. Stern. 1999. “Defining Global Public Goods.” In Global Public Goods. International Cooperation in the 21st Century, edited by I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, and M. Stern, 2–19. New York: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• Kello, L. 2017. The Virtual Weapon and International Order. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kilovaty, I. 2018. “Doxfare: Politically Motivated Leaks and the Future of the Norm on Non-Intervention in the Era of Weaponized Information.” Harvard National Security Journal 146.
   Google Scholar
• Kurowska, X. 2019. “The Politics of Cyber Norms: Beyond Norm Construction towards Strategic Narrative Contestation.” EU Cyber Direct: Research in Focus.
   Google Scholar
• Kurowska, X. 2020. “On the Geopolitics of Russia’s Sovereign Internet Law.” ISPI Dossier, 2 April. https://www.ispionline.it/en/pubblicazione/geopolitics-russias-sovereign-internet-law-25428.
   Google Scholar
• Markoff, M. 2017. “Explanation of Position at the Conclusion of the 2016-2017 UN Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security (United States Mission to the United Nations.” 23 June. https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-position-at-the-conclusion-of-the-2016-2017-un-group-of-governmental-experts-gge-on-developments-in-the-field-of-information-and-tele.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, T. 2019. “A Dose of Realism: The Contestation and Politics of Cyber Norms.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 12: 283–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, H. 2020. “The Vital Role of International law in the Framework for Responsible State Behaviour in Cyberspace.” Journal of Cyber Policy, online first, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, M. 2019. “Against Sovereignty in Cyberspace.” International Studies Review, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, R. S., III. 2019. Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election (2 vols). https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, L. H. 2020. “A Broken Piece of Internet Backbone Might Finally Get Fixed.” Wired, 12.02.2020. https://www.wired.com/story/bgp-routing-manrs-google-fix/.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). 2017. Background to “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US elections”: The Analytic Process and Cyber Incident Attribution. US Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlin, J. 2018. Election Interference: The Real Harm and The Only Solution. Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-50. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3276940.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlin, J. 2020. Election Interference. International Law and the Future of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, N., A. Osula, et al. 2019. “The Rise of the Regionals: How Regional Organisations Contribute to International Cyber Stability Negotiations at the United Nations Level.” In 11th International Conference on Cyber Conflict: Silent Battle, edited by T. Minarik, 321–346. Tallinn: CCDCOE.
   Google Scholar
• Paris Call for Trust and Security in Cyberspace. 2018. 12 November. https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/paris_call_cyber_cle443433-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rid, Th. 2020. Active Measures. The Secret History of Disinformation and Political Warfare. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, M. 2017. Declaration by Miguel Rodríguez, Representative of Cuba, at the Final Session of Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security. 23 June. https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Cuban-Expert-Declaration.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Roguski, P. 2020. Application of International Law to Cyber Operations: A Comparative Analysis of States’ Views. The Hague Program for Cyber Norms Policy Brief. March.
   Google Scholar
• Schia, N. N., and L. Gjesvik. 2020. “Hacking Democracy: Managing Influence Campaigns and Disinformation in the Digital age.” Journal of Cyber Policy, online first, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. 2018. “‘Virtual’ Disenfranchisement: Cyber Election Meddling in the Grey Zones of International Law.” Chicago Journal of International Law 19 (1): 30–67.
   Google Scholar
• Schneier, B. 2016. “Someone Is Learning How to Take Down the Internet.” Lawfare, 13 September. https://www.lawfareblog.com/someone-learning-how-take-down-internet.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. W., and E. T. Brooking. 2018. LikeWar. The Weaponization of Social Media. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publising.
   Google Scholar
• Timberg, G. 2015. “A flaw in the design. The Internet’s founders saw its promise but didn’t foresee users attacking one another.” Washington Post, 25 May.
   Google Scholar
• Tsagourias, N. 2020. “Electoral Cyber Interference, Self-Determination, and the Principle of Non-Intervention in Cyberspace.” In Governing Cyberspace: Behaviour, Power and Diplomacy, edited by Dennis Broeders, and Bibi van den Berg, 45–63. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• UN GA. 2021. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 31 December 2020 on Advancing Responsible State Behaviour in Cyberspace in the Context of International Security. A/Res/75/240, 4 January.
   Google Scholar
• UN GGE. 2010. Report of the Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security. UNGA. A/65/201 New York: UN.
   Google Scholar
• UN GGE. 2013. Report of the Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security. UN Doc A/68/98, 24 June. https://undocs.org/A/68/98.
   Google Scholar
• UNGGE. 2015. Report of the Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security. UN Doc A/70/174, 22 July. https://undocs.org/A/70/174.
   Google Scholar
• UNGA. 2018a. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 5 December 2018 on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security. A/RES/73/27.
   Google Scholar
• UNGA. 2018b. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 22 December 2018 on Advancing Responsible State behaviour in Cyberspace in the Context of International Security. A/RES/73/266.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, C. 2020. “Cyber Conflict or Democracy ‘Hacked’? How Cyber Operations Enhance Information Warfare.” Journal of Cybersecurity 6 (1): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, J. 2018. Cyber and International Law in the 21st Century. Speech by Attorney General Jeremy Wright QC MP at Chatham House London on 23 May.
   Google Scholar
• OEWG documents
   Google Scholar
• Australia. 2019. Australian paper – Open Ended Working Group on developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security, September 2020. https://unoda-web.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/fin-australian-oewg-national-paper-Sept-2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Australia. 2020. Australia Non Paper: Case Studies on the Application of International Law in Cyberspace. 5 February. https://unoda-web.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/australian-international-law-case-studies-final-5-february-2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brazil. 2020. Comments submitted by Brazil to the Initial ‘Pre-draft’ of the report of the OEWG on developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security. https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/comments-by-brazil-on-the-pre-draft-report-of-cyber-oewg-8-apr-2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chair of the OEWG. 2020a. Initial ‘Pre-draft’ of the report of the OEWG on developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security. 27 April. https://unoda-web.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/200311-Pre-Draft-OEWG-ICT.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chair of the OEWG. 2020b. Second ‘Pre-draft’ of the report of the OEWG on developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security. 27 May. https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/200527-oewg-ict-revised-pre-draft.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chair of the OEWG. 2021a. Draft Substantive Report (Zero Draft) of the report of the OEWG on developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security. 19 January. https://undocs.org/A/AC.290/2021/L.2.
   Google Scholar
• Chair of the OEWG. 2021b. Substantive Report (First Draft) of the report of the OEWG on developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security. 1 March. https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/210301-First-Draft.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chair of the OEWG. 2021c. Final Substantive Report of the report of the OEWG on developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security. 10 March. https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Final-report-A-AC.290-2021-CRP.2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chair of the OEWG. 2021d. Chair’s Summary of the OEWG on developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security. 10 March. https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Chairs-Summary-A-AC.290-2021-CRP.3-technical-reissue.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• China. 2020. China’s Contribution to the Initial Pre-Draft of OEWG Report. https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/china-contribution-to-oewg-pre-draft-report-final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EU. 2020. Joint comments from the EU and its Member States on the initial ‘pre-draft’ report of the Open-Ended Working Group on developments in the field of Information and Telecommunication in the context of international security. https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/eu-contribution-alignments-oewg.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ecuador. 2020. Ecuador preliminary comments to the Chair’s ‘Initial pre-draft’ of the Report of the United Nations Open Ended Working Group on developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security (OEWG). https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/ecuador-comments-on-initial-pre-draft-oewg.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Estonia. 2020. Estonia’s comments to the ‘Initial “Pre-draft” of the report of the OEWG on developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security’. https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/comments-to-the-oewg-pre-draft-report-estonia.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• France. 2020. France’s response to the pre-draft report from the OEWG Chair. https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/contribution-fr-oewg-eng-vf.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Germany. 2020. Initial ‘Pre-draft’ of the report of the OEWG on developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security and non-paper listing specific language proposals under agenda item ‘Rules, norms and principles’ from written submissions received before 2 March 2020. Comments from Germany. https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/20200401-oewg-german-written-contribution-to-pre-draft-report-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Japan. 2020. Japan’s Position Paper on the Initial ‘Pre-draft’ of the Report of the United Nations Open-Ended Working Group on ‘Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security’. https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/japan-comments-on-oewg-pre-draft.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand. 2020. Position Paper on New Zealand’s Participation in the February 2020 Session of the 2019-2020 Open Ended Working Group on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security. https://unoda-web.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/nz-position-paper-on-oewg.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Singapore. 2020. Singapore’s written comment on the chair’s pre-draft of the OEWG report. https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/singapore-written-comment-on-pre-draft-oewg-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Switzerland. 2020. UN Open-ended working group on developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security, 2019/2020 Written feedback by Switzerland to the first pre-draft report of the OEWG. https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/20200409-switzerland-remarks-oewg-pre-draft.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Netherlands. 2020a. Appendix: International law in cyberspace. https://unoda-web.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/appendix-Internaional-law-in-cyberspace-kingdom-of-the-netherlands.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Netherlands. 2020b. The Netherlands’ Position Paper on the UN Open-ended Working Group ‘on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security’ and the UN Group of Governmental Experts ‘on Advancing responsible State behavior in cyberspace in the context of international security’. https://unoda-web.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/letter-to-chair-of-oewg-kingdom-of-the-netherlands.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Netherlands. 2020c. The Kingdom of the Netherlands’ response to the pre-draft report of the OEWG. https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/kingdom-of-the-netherlands-response-pre-draft-oewg.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pakistan. 2020. Pakistan’s inputs in response to the letter dated 11 March 2020 from the Chair of the Open-ended Working Group on developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security (OEWG). https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/inputs-on-pre-draft-of-oewg-report-revised.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The UK. 2020. Contribution by United Kingdom to the Open-Ended Working Group on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the context of International Security, February. https://unoda-web.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/20200303-uk-national-contribution-oewg2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The US. 2020. United States Comments on the Chair’s Pre-draft of the Report of the UN Open Ended Working Group (OEWG). https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/oewg-pre-draft-usg-comments-4-6-2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zimbabwe. 2020. Considerations on the initial pre-draft of the open-ended working group (OEWG) on developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security. https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/zimbabwe-position-on-pre-draft-of-oweg-final-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar