Cyber information operations: Cambridge Analytica’s challenge to democratic legitimacy

References

• ABC. 2021. “SA Privacy Committee to Look at Redirected Links as Premier Denies Data Collection.” ABC News, March 31. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-03-30/sa-premier-says-no-data-collected-privacy-committee-to-assess/100037222.
   Google Scholar
• Allcott, Hunt, and Matthew Gentzkow. 2017. “Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31 (2): 211–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, R. Michael, and Thad E. Hall. 2010. Electronic Elections: The Perils and Promises of Digital Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amer, Karim, and Jehane Noujaim. 2019. The Great Hack. USA: Netflix.
   Google Scholar
• Aragon, Jorge. 2008. “Political Legitimacy and Democracy.” In Encyclopedia of Campaigns, Elections and Electoral Behavior, edited by Kenneth Warren, 520–521. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bakir, Vian. 2020. “Psychological Operations in Digital Political Campaigns: Assessing Cambridge Analytica’s Psychographic Profiling and Targeting.” Frontiers in Communication 5: 67.
   Google Scholar
• Baldassarri, Delia, and Andrew Gelman. 2008. “Partisans Without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion.” American Journal of Sociology 114 (2): 408–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC. 2018. “Cambridge Analytica Planted Fake News.” BBC News, March 20 Accessed April 17, 2021. https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-43472347.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2021. “Three Years of GDPR: The Biggest Fines so Far.” BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-57011639.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. Lance, and Steven Livingston. 2018. “The Disinformation Order: Disruptive Communication and the Decline of Democratic Institutions.” European Journal of Communication 33 (2): 122–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghel, Hal. 2018. “Malice Domestic: The Cambridge Analytica Dystopia.” Computer 51 (5): 84–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, Mark. 2010. Democratic Governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, A. H. 2001. The Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Birkland, Thomas A. 2019. An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Briant, Emma L. 2020. “We Need Tougher Action against Disinformation and Propaganda.” Brookings (blog), July 15. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2020/07/15/we-need-tougher-action-against-disinformation-and-propaganda/.
   Google Scholar
• Briant, Emma, and Brittany Kaiser. 2020. “Propaganda Machine: The Military Roots of Cambridge Analytica’s Psychological Manipulation of Voters.” January. https://www.democracynow.org/2020/1/7/cambridge_analytica_data_manipulation_john_bolton.
   Google Scholar
• Cadwalladr, Carole. 2018. “Revealed: Graphic Video Used by Cambridge Analytica to Influence Nigerian Election.” Guardian, April 4. http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/04/cambridge-analytica-used-violent-video-to-try-to-influence-nigerian-election.
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge Analytica. 2016. “CA Political.” https://twitter.com/hindsightfiles?lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• “Cambridge Analytica: Better Audience Targeting”. 2016. Wayback Machine. https://web.archive.org/web/20210320164149/https://cambridgeanalytica.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Cerovac, I. 2020. Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy. Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policy. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, Simone. 2020. “Truth, Deliberative Democracy, and the Virtues of Accuracy: Is Fake News Destroying the Public Sphere?” Political Studies 69 (1): 147–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chester, Jeff, and Kathryn C. Montgomery. 2017. “The Role of Digital Marketing in Political Campaigns.” Internet Policy Review 6 (4): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coakley, Mathew. 2011. “On the Value of Political Legitimacy.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 10 (4): 345–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Joshua. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State, edited by Alan Hamlin and Philip Pettit, 17–34. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cosentino, G. 2020. Social Media and the Post-Truth World Order: The Global Dynamics of Disinformation. Springer International Publishing. https://books.google.com.au/books?id=cyfXDwAAQBAJ.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. 2005. “What Political Institutions Does Large-Scale Democracy Require?” Political Science Quarterly 120 (2): 187–197. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20202514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. 2008. On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DCMS (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport). 2018a. Oral Evidence: Fake News, Christopher Wylie. London: House of Commons. http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/digital-culture-media-and-sport-committee/fake-news/oral/81022.html.
   Google Scholar
• DCMS (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport). 2018b. Oral Evidence: Fake News, Brittany Kaiser HC363. London: House of Commons. http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/digital-culture-media-and-sport-committee/disinformation-and-fake-news/oral/81592.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DCMS (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport). 2018c. Oral Evidence: Fake News, Alexander Nix HC 363. London: House of Commons. http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/digital-culture-media-and-sport-committee/disinformation-and-fake-news/oral/84838.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DCMS (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport). 2018d. Disinformation and ‘Fake News’: Interim Report. London: House of Commons. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmcumeds/363/363.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DCMS (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport). 2019. Disinformation and Fake News: Final Report. Vol. HC1791. London. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmcumeds/1791/1791.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, Tom. 1995. The Two Faces of Political Apathy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, Melissa-Ellen. 2021a. “Democracy Under Siege: Foreign Interference in a Digital Era.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 75 (4): 383–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, Melissa-Ellen. 2021b. “Foreign Interference and Australian Electoral Security in the Digital Era.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 76 (1): 40–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, John S. 2001. “Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy.” Political Theory 29 (5): 651–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, John S. 2004. “Democratic Political Theory.” In Handbook of Political Theory, edited by Gerald Gaus and Chandran Kukathas, 143–154. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ekdale, Brian, and Melissa Tully. 2019. “African Elections as a Testing Ground: Comparing Coverage of Cambridge Analytica in Nigerian and Kenyan Newspapers.” African Journalism Studies 40 (4): 27–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, Henry, and Bruce Schneier. 2018. “Common-Knowledge Attacks on Democracy.” Berkman Klein Center Research Publication, 2018–7.
   Google Scholar
• Freedom House. 2021. Nations In Transit. https://freedomhouse.org/issues/democracies-decline.
   Google Scholar
• General Data Protection Regulation. 2018. (EU) 2016/679.
   Google Scholar
• Gorton, William A. 2016. “Manipulating Citizens: How Political Campaigns’ Use of Behavioral Social Science Harms Democracy.” New Political Science 38 (1): 61–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green v SCL Group Ltd and others [2019] EWHC 954 (Ch). 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, Fergus, Sarah O’Connor, Mali Walker, and Luke Courtois. 2019. “Hacking Democracies: Cataloguing Cyber-Enabled Attacks on Elections.” 16/2019. ASPI.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, Daniel M, and Brynn Welch. 2010. “Debate: To Nudge or Not to Nudge*.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1): 123–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heawood, Jonathan. 2018. “Pseudo-Public Political Speech: Democratic Implications of the Cambridge Analytica Scandal.” Information Polity 23 (4): 429–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henn, Matt, Mark Weinstein, and Dominic Wring. 2002. “A Generation Apart? Youth and Political Participation in Britain.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4 (2): 167–192. doi:10.1111/1467-856X.t01-1-00001.
   Google Scholar
• Henschke, Adam, Matthew Sussex, and Courteney O’Connor. 2020. “Countering Foreign Interference: Election Integrity Lessons for Liberal Democracies.” Journal of Cyber Policy 5 (2): 180–198.
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, Joanne, Emma J. Williams, and Adam N. Joinson. 2020. “‘It Wouldn’t Happen to Me’: Privacy Concerns and Perspectives Following the Cambridge Analytica Scandal.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 143: 102498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Margaret. 2020. “Cambridge Analytica’s Black Box.” Big Data & Society 7 (2): 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, Jennifer S. 2021. “Countering Cyber-Enabled Disinformation: Implications for National Security.” Australian Journal of Defence and Strategic Studies 3 (1): 83–88.
   Google Scholar
• ICO. 2021a. “Register of Fee Payers.” Information Commissioner’s Office. https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/what-we-do/register-of-fee-payers/.
   Google Scholar
• ICO. 2021b. “Regulatory Action Policy.” UK. https://ico.org.uk/media/about-the-ico/documents/2259467/regulatory-action-policy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• In the Matter of Cambridge Analytica LLC. 2019. Federal Trade Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Information Commissioner’s Office. 2018. “Investigation into the Use of Data Analytics in Political Campaigns.” UK. https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/2259371/investigation-into-data-analytics-for-political-purposes-update.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Intelligence Security Committee. 2020. Russia Report. https://docs.google.com/a/independent.gov.uk/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=aW5kZXBlbmRlbnQuZ292LnVrfGlzY3xneDo1Y2RhMGEyN2Y3NjM0OWFl.
   Google Scholar
• Iosifidis, Petros, and Nicholas Nicoli. 2020. Digital Democracy, Social Media and Disinformation. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Isaak, Jim, and Mina J. Hanna. 2018. “User Data Privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and Privacy Protection.” Computer 51 (8): 56–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, Michael, and Paul Lieber. 2020. “Countering Disinformation.” Cyber Defense Review 5 (2): 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, Will, Valgarosson Viktor, Gerry Stoker, Dan Devine, Jen Gaskell, and Mark Evans. 2020. “Political Trust and the COVID-19 Crisis.” Museum of Australian Democracy. https://www.democracy2025.gov.au/documents/Final%20Pushing%20populism%20to%20the%20backburner.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, B. 2019. Targeted: The Cambridge Analytica Whistleblower’s Inside Story of How Big Data, Trump, and Facebook Broke Democracy and How It Can Happen Again. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Kanakia, Harshil, Giridhar Shenoy, and Jimit Shah. 2019. “Cambridge Analytica – A Case Study.” Indian Journal of Science and Technology 12 (29): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Sylvia I. 2016. “Legitimacy.” In Handbook on Theories of Governance, edited by Christopher Ansell and Jacob Torfing, 197–205. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kefford, G. 2021. Political Parties and Campaigning in Australia: Data, Digital and Field. Political Campaigning and Communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, Richard R, and Ivy Brown Rovner. 2009. “Negative Campaigning.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 285–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomas, Natasha. 2018. “Cambridge Analytica’s Nix Said It Licensed ‘Millions of Data Points’ from Acxiom, Experian, Infogroup to Target US Voters.” Techcrunch, June 7. https://techcrunch.com/2018/06/06/cambridge-analyticas-nix-said-it-licensed-millions-of-data-points-from-axciom-experian-infogroup-to-target-us-voters/.
   Google Scholar
• Maddox, G. 2005. Australian Democracy in Theory and Practice. Sydney: Pearson Education Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Mavriki, Paola, and Maria Karyda. 2019. “Big Data Analytics: From Threatening Privacy to Challenging Democracy.” In E-Democracy Safeguarding Democracy and Human Rights in the Digital Age, edited by Sokratis Katsikas and Vasilios Zorkadis, 3–17. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, Spencer, and Chris Tenove. 2021. “Disinformation as a Threat to Deliberative Democracy.” Political Research Quarterly 74 (3): 703–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migchelbrink, Koen, and Steven Van de Walle. 2020. “When Will Public Officials Listen? A Vignette Experiment on the Effects of Input Legitimacy on Public Officials’ Willingness to Use Public Participation.” Public Administration Review 80 (2): 271–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, Susan. 2018. “Fake News, Disinformation, Manipulation and Online Tactics to Undermine Democracy.” Journal of Cyber Policy 3 (1): 39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, Robert S. 2019. The Mueller Report: Report on the Investigation Into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election. New York: Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Murtfield, Robert. 2017. “Bolton Video Ads,” April 25, 2017. https://twitter.com/hindsightfiles?lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, Deepa. 1999. “Bonds and Bridges: Social Capital and Poverty.” World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/989601468766526606/107507322_20041117172515/additional/multi-page.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• New York Times. 2018. “Cambridge Analytica and Facebook: The Scandal and the Fallout So Far.” April 4. Accessed April 17, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-scandal-fallout.html.
   Google Scholar
• OAIC. 2020. “Privacy Assessments.” OAIC. https://www.oaic.gov.au/about-us/our-regulatory-approach/guide-to-privacy-regulatory-action/chapter-7-privacy-assessments.
   Google Scholar
• OAIC. 2021. “Political Parties and Elections.” OAIC. https://www.oaic.gov.au/privacy/your-privacy-rights/political-parties-and-elections.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2020. “Transparency, Communication and Trust: The Role of Public Communication in Responding to the Wave of Disinformation about the New Coronavirus.” OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/transparency-communication-and-trust-the-role-of-public-communication-in-responding-to-the-wave-of-disinformation-about-the-new-coronavirus-bef7ad6e/.
   Google Scholar
• Pamment, James. 2020. The EU’s Role in Fighting Disinformation: Crafting a Disinformation Framework. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, Carole. 2012. “Participatory Democracy Revisited.” Perspectives on Politics 10 (1): 7–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, Moira, and Normann Witzleb. 2019. “Voter Privacy in an Era of Big Data: Time to Abolish the Political Exemption in the Australian Privacy Act.” In Big Data, Political Campaigning and the Law, edited by Norman Witzleb, Moira Paterson, and Janice Richardson, 164–185. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Persily, Nathaniel. 2017. “Can Democracy Survive the Internet?” Journal of Democracy 28 (2): 63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, Fabienne. 2013. “The Procedural Epistemic Value of Deliberation.” Synthese 190 (7): 1253–1266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porche, Isaac R., Christopher Paul, Michael York, Chad Serena, Jerry M Sollinger, Elliot Axelband, Endy Min, and Bruce Held. 2013. Redefining Information Warfare Boundaries for an Army in a Wireless World. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/MG1100/MG1113/RAND_MG1113.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 2005. Political Liberalism. Columbia Classics in Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, Andrew. 2021. “Disinformation, Deepfakes and Democracies: The Need for Legislative Reform.” University of New South Wales Law Journal 44 (3): 983–1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuters. 2021. “Taiwan Accuses China of Spreading Fake News about Covid Outbreak.” Guardian, May 22. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/may/22/taiwan-accuses-china-of-spreading-fake-news-about-covid-outbreak.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, Matthew, Nicholas Confessore, and Carole Cadwalladr. 2018. “How Trump Consultants Exploited the Facebook Data of Millions.” New York Times, March 17. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/17/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-trump-campaign.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberger, Laura. 2020. “Disinformation Disorientation.” Journal of Democracy 31 (1): 203–207.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberger, Laura, and Lindsay Gorman. 2020. “How Democracies Can Win the Information Contest.” The Washington Quarterly 43 (2): 75–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schapals, Aljosha Karim, Axel Bruns, and Brian McNair. 2018. Digitizing Democracy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, Fritz. 2009. “Legitimacy in the Multilevel European Polity.” European Political Science Review 1 (2): 173–204.
   Google Scholar
• Schia, Niels Nagelhus, and Lars Gjesvik. 2020. “Hacking Democracy: Managing Influence Campaigns and Disinformation in the Digital Age.” Journal of Cyber Policy 5 (3): 413–428.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien. 2013. “Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Outputand‘Throughput’.” Political Studies 61 (1): 2–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCL Group. 2014. “Kenya: Proposal for TNA/Jubilee Alliance.” https://twitter.com/hindsightfiles?lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Ian. 2009. The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegelman, Wendy. 2018. “Cambridge Analytica is Dead – but its Obscure Network Is Alive and Well.” Guardian, May 5. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/may/05/cambridge-analytica-scl-group-new-companies-names.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, Matthew. 2018. “Delegating Away Democracy: How Good Representation and Policy Successes Can Undermine Democratic Legitimacy.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (13): 1754–1788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Naomi, and Tim Graham. 2019. “Mapping the Anti-Vaccination Movement on Facebook.” Information, Communication & Society 22 (9): 1310–1327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelzenmuller, Constanze. 2017. “The Impact of Russian Interference on Germany’s 2017 Elections.” Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Strebel, Michael Andrea, Daniel Kübler, and Frank Marcinkowski. 2019. “The Importance of Input and Output Legitimacy in Democratic Governance: Evidence from a Population-Based Survey Experiment in Four West European Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 58 (2): 488–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Margaret. 2019. “Combating Disinformation and Foreign Interference in Democracies: Lessons from Europe.” Brookings, July 31.
   Google Scholar
• Tenove, Chris, Jordan Buffie, Spencer McKay, and David Moscrop. 2018. “Digital Threats to Democratic Elections: How Foreign Actors Use Digital Techniques to Undermine Democracy”.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. 2007. Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ventre, Daniel. 2016. Information Warfare. London: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Vilmer, Jean-Baptiste Jeangène, and Heather A. Conley. 2018. Successfully Countering Russian Electoral Interference. Washington: Center for Strategic & International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, Ken. 2018. “Social Networks, the 2016 US Presidential Election, and Kantian Ethics: Applying the Categorical Imperative to Cambridge Analytica’s Behavioral Microtargeting.” Journal of Media Ethics 33 (3): 133–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, Christopher. 2020. “Deepfake News: AI-Enabled Disinformation as a Multi-Level Public Policy Challenge.” Journal of Cyber Policy 5 (2): 199–217.
   Google Scholar
• Wilding, Derek. 2021. “Regulating News and Disinformation on Digital Platforms” Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy 9 (2): 11–46.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Patricia A. H. 2010. Information Warfare: Time for a Redefinition. Perth: Edith Cowan University. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/isw/37/.
   Google Scholar
• Witzleb, N., M. Paterson, and J. Richardson. 2019. Big Data, Political Campaigning and the Law: Democracy and Privacy in the Age of Micro-Targeting. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, Christopher. 2019. Mindf*ck: Inside Cambridge Analytica’s Plot to Break the World. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zuiderveen Borgesius, Frederik, Judith Möller, Sanne Kruikemeier, Ronan Ó. Fathaigh, Kristina Irion, Tom Dobber, Balazs Bodo, and Claes H. de Vreese. 2018. “Online Political Microtargeting: Promises and Threats for Democracy.” Utrecht Law Review 14 (1): 82–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar