Chemical assisted ultrasonic machining of polycarbonate glass and optimization of process parameters by Taguchi and grey relational analysis

References

• Jain NK, Jain VK. Modeling of material removal in mechanical type of advanced machining processes- a state of the art review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2001;41:1573–1635. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00010-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain NK, Jain VK. Modeling of material removal in mechanical type advanced machining processes: a state of art review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2001;41(11):1573–1635. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00010-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain VK. Advanced machining processes. New Delhi: Allied Publishers Private Limited; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar J. Ultrasonic machining? A comprehensive review. Mach Sci Technol. 2013;17(3):325–379. doi:10.1080/10910344.2013.806093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azarhoushang B, Akbari J. Ultrasonic assisted drilling of Inconel 738-LC. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2007;47:1027–1033. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvivedi A, Kumar P. Surface quality evaluation in ultrasonic drilling through the Taguchi technique. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2007;34(1–2):131–140. doi:10.1007/s00170-006-0586-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauri SK, Chakravorty R, Chakraborty S. Optimization of correlated multiple responses of ultrasonic machining (USM) process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2011;53:1115–1127. doi:10.1007/s00170-010-2905-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore R. Ultrasonic machining- a case study. J Mater Process Technol. 1991;28(1–2):139–148. doi:10.1016/0924-0136(91)90213-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghahramani B, Wang ZY. Precision ultrasonic machining process: A case study of stress analysis of ceramic (Al2O3). Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2001;41(8):1189–1208. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00011-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetze D. Effect of vibration amplitude, frequency, and composition of the abrasive slurry on the rate of ultrasonic machining in ketos tool steel. J Acoust Soc Am. 1956;28(6):1033–1037. doi:10.1121/1.1908545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy DC, Grieve RJ. Ultrasonic machining- a review. Prod Eng. 1975;54(9):481–486. doi:10.1049/tpe:19750245.
   Google Scholar
• Rao RV, Pawar PJ, Davim JP. Parameter optimization of ultrasonic machining process using nontraditional optimization algorithms. Mater Manuf Processes. 2010;25(10):1120–1130. doi:10.1080/10426914.2010.489788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiercigroch M, Neilson RD, Player MA. Material removal rate prediction for ultrasonic drilling of hard materials using an impact oscillator approach. Phys Lett. 1999;259:91–96. doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(99)00416-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soundararajan V, Radhakrishnan V. An experimental investigation on the basic mechanisms involved in ultrasonic machining. Int J Mach Tool Des Res. 1986;26(3):307–321. doi:10.1016/0020-7357(86)90008-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh K, Ahuja IPS. Ultrasonic machining processes- review paper. Int J Multi-discip Eng Bus Manage. 2014;2(3):57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Singh K, Ahuja IPS, Kapoor J. Ultrasonic machining of glass brittle material. In: Proceeding, National Conference Latest Development in Materials, Manufacturing and Quality Control; February 19–20; 2015. India: GZSCCET, BTI. ISBN 978-93-5196-055-3.
   Google Scholar
• Singh K, Ahuja IPS, Kapoor J. Study the effect of abrasive and hydrofluoric acid in ultrasonic machining of plain glass material. In: Proceeding, National Conference Latest Development in Materials, Manufacturing and Quality Control; February 19–20. India: GZSCCET, BTI. ISBN 978-93-5196-055-3.
   Google Scholar
• Choi JP, Jeon BH, Kim BH. Chemical-assisted ultrasonic machining of glass. J Mater Process Technol. 2007;191:153–156. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.03.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzo PL, Shinohara AH, Raslan AA. A comparative study on ultrasonic machining of hard and brittle materials. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Science & Engineering. 26(1):56–61. ISSN 1806-3691. doi:10.1590/S1678-58782004000100010.
   Google Scholar
• Thoe TB, Aspinwall DK, Wise MLH. Review on ultrasonic machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 1998;38(4):239–255. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(97)00036-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar J, Khamba JS. An investigation into the effect of work material properties, tool geometry and abrasive properties on performance indices of ultrasonic machining. Int J Mach Mach Mater. 2009;5(2/3):347–365. doi:10.1504/IJMMM.2009.023399.
   Google Scholar
• Weilong C, Zhijian P. Process of ultrasonic machining. London: Handbook of manufacturing Engineering & Technology; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hong H, Hung TY, Advanced analysis of Nontraditional machining. London: Springer; 1956. p. 325–339. ISBN 978-1-4614-4054-3. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4054-3
   Google Scholar
• Haslehurst M. Manufacturing technology. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Viva Book; 1981. p. 270–271.
   Google Scholar
• Weller EJ. Non-traditional machining processes. 2nd ed. American Society of tool & Manufacturing Engineers; 1984. p. 15–71.
   Google Scholar
• Adithan M. Tool wear studies in ultrasonic drilling. Wear. 1974;29:81–93. doi:10.1016/0043-1648(74)90136-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahay C, Ghosh S, Kammila HK. Analysis of ultrasonic machining using monte carlo simulation. Proceedings of the ASME 2011 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition; Denver, Colorado, USA; Nov 10–11, 2011. p. 1–9. doi:10.1115/IMECE2011-63240.
   Google Scholar
• Kainth GS, Nandy A, Singh K. On the mechanics of material removal in ultrasonic machining. Int J Mach Toll Des Res. 1979;19(1):33–41. doi:10.1016/0020-7357(79)90019-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh K, Ahuja IPS, Kapoor J. Comparative study between conventional machining, chemical ultrasonic machining (CUSM) and ultrasonic machining (USM) of plain glass, polycarbonate, acrylic, bullet proof and heat resistant glass. In: Proceeding, International conference in latest development in materials, manufacturing and quality control; Feb 12–13; 2016. GZSCCET BTI India. ISSN 978-93-5212-858-7.
   Google Scholar
• Adithan M. Tool wear characteristics in ultrasonic drilling. Tribol Int. 1981;14(6):351–356. doi:10.1016/0301-679X(81)90103-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair EV, Ghosh A. A fundamental approach to the study of mechanics of ultrasonic machining. Int J Prod Res. 1985;23:731–753. doi:10.1080/00207548508904741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komaraiah M, Narasimha Reddy PN. A study on the influence of work-piece properties in ultrasonic machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 1993;33(3):495–505. doi:10.1016/0890-6955(93)90055-Y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland MA. Ultrasonic machining and finishing. ASM Handbook, Ceramics and Glasses; 1989. 16: p. 359–362. ISBN 978-0-87170-022-3.
   Google Scholar
• Graff KF. Macrosonics in industry. 5. Ultrasonic machining. Ultrasonics. 1975;13:103–109. doi:10.1016/0041-624X(75)90060-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prewo KM, Brennan JJ. High Strength silicon carbide fiber-reinforced glass-matrix composites. J Mater Sci. 1980;15(2):463–468. doi:10.1007/BF00551699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey PC, Shan HS. Modern machining processes. Tata McGraw-Hill; 1980. Chapter 2. p. 7–38.
   Google Scholar
• Morteza AS, Maohammad NR. Development of design & manufacturing support tool for optimization of ultrasonic machining (USM) and Rotary USM. J Modern Processes Manuf Prod. 2014;3(2):59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Thoe TB, Aspinwall DK, Wise MLH. The effect of operating parameters when ultrasonic contour machining. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Irish Manufacturing Committee (IMC-12); September; Cork, Ireland; 1995. p. 305–312.
   Google Scholar
• Singh K, Kumar V. A study on the tool geometry and stresses induced in tool in ultrasonic machining process applied for the tough and brittle materials. Int J Multi-Discip Eng Bus Manage. 2014;2(3):67–71.
   Google Scholar
• Singh K, Kumar VS. Finite element analysis of ultrasonic machine tool. Int J Eng Res Technol. 2014;3(7):1647–1650.
   Google Scholar
• Adithan M, Venkatesh VC. Parameter influence on tool wear in ultra-sonic drilling. Tribol Int. 1974;7(6):260–264. doi:10.1016/0041-2678(74)90106-7.
   Google Scholar
• Babitsky VI, Astashev VK. Ultrasonic processes and machine. Berlin: Springer; 2007. ISBN 978-3-540-72060-7.
   Google Scholar
• Vinod Y, Aniruddha D. Design of horn for rotary ultrasonic machining using the finite element method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2008;39(1):9–20. doi:10.1007/s00170-007-1193-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain V, Sharma AK, Kumar P. Investigations on tool wear in micro Ultrasonic machining. Appl Mech Mater. 2012;110–116:1561–1566. Tranc Tech Publication Switzerland. https://www.scientific.net/AMM.110-116.1561.
   Google Scholar
• Adithan M. Abrasive wear in ultrasonic drilling. Tribol Int. 1983;16(5):253–255. doi:10.1016/0301-679X(83)90083-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drozda TJ, Wick C. Non-traditional machining, tool and manufacturing engineers handbook. Vol. 1. Dearborn (MI): Society of Manufacturing Engineers; 1983. p. 1–23, ISBN No. 0872633519
   Google Scholar
• Neppiras EA. Macrosonics in industry 1. Introduction. Ultrasonics. 1972;10(1):9–13. doi:10.1016/0041-624X(72)90207-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin SG, Ahmed MHM, Youssef HA. Computer aided design of acoustic horns for ultrasonic machining using finite element analysis. J Mater Process Technol. 1995;55:254–260. doi:10.1016/0924-0136(95)02015-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremer D. The state of the art of ultrasonic machining. CIRP Ann – Manuf Technol. 1981;30(1):107–110. doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60905-6.
   Google Scholar
• Miller GE. Special theory of ultrasonic machining. J Appl Phys. 1957;28(2):149–156. doi:10.1063/1.1722698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczmarek. Impact Grinding (Ultrasonic machining)—book chapter: 21 principles of machining by cutting Abrasion and Erosion. Stevenage: Peter Peregrinus Ltd; 1976. p. 448–462, ISBN 0901223662.
   Google Scholar
• Dharmadhikari SW, Sharma CS. Optimization of abrasive life in ultrasonic machining. J Manuf Sci Eng. 1985;107(4):361–364. doi:10.1115/1.3186010.
   Google Scholar
• Bekrenev, N.V.; Muldasheva, G.K.; Petrovskii, A.P, et al. Influence of the thermal effect on the cutting forces in the ultrasonic machining of high strength material. Russ Eng Res. 2015;35(10):758–759. ISSN 1068-798X. doi: 10.3103/S1068798X15100056
   Google Scholar
• Cook NH. Manufacturing Analysis. New York (NY): Addison-Wesley; 1966. p. 133–138.
   Google Scholar
• Fan WH, Chao CL, Chou WC, et al. Study on the surface integrity of micro-ultrasonic machined glass-ceramic material. Key Eng Mater. 2009;407–408:731–734. https://www.scientific.net/KEM.407-408.731.
   Google Scholar
• Seah KHW, Wong, YS, Lee, LC. Design of tool holders for ultra-sonic machining using FEM. J Mater Process Technol. 1993;37(1–4):801–816. doi:10.1016/0924-0136(93)90138-V.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neppiras EA, Foskett RD. Ultrasonic machining. Phillips Tech Rev. 1957;18(11):325–368.
   Google Scholar
• Khairy ABE. Assessment of some dynamic parameters for the ultra-sonic machining process. Wear. 1990;137:187–198. doi:10.1016/0043-1648(90)90135-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain VK. Advanced machining process. India: Allied Publisher Pvt Limited; 2002. p. 28–56.
   Google Scholar
• Chang S, Bone GM. Burr size reduction in drilling by ultrasonic assistance. Rob Comp-Integr Manuf. 2005;21:442–450.10.1016/j.rcim.2004.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoe TB, Aspinwall DK. Combined ultrasonic and electric discharge machining of ceramic coated nickel alloy. J Mater Process Technol. 1999;92–93:323–328. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00117-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neppiras EA. Ultrasonic machining and forming. Ultrasonics. 1964;2(4):167–173. doi:10.1016/0041-624X(64)90110-6.
   Google Scholar
• Scholze H. Glass – nature, structure, and properties. New York, NY: Springer, Verlag; 1991. ISBN 978-1-4613-9069-5. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-9069-5.
   Google Scholar
• Folmer JCW, Franzen S. Study of polymer glasses by modulated differential scanning calorimetry in the undergraduate physical chemistry laboratory. J Chem Educ. 2003;80(7):813–818. doi:10.1021/ed080p813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips DC, Sambell RAJ, Bowen DH. The mechanical properties of carbon fiber reinforced Pyrex glass. J Mater Sci. 1972;7(12):1454–1464. doi:10.1007/BF00574937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel W, Kreidl N. Chemistry of glass. Wiley; 1985. ISBN 978-0-916094-73-7.
   Google Scholar
• Noel C. The glass and glazing handbook. Standards Association of Australia; 1998. ISBN 073372468X.
   Google Scholar
• Stookey SD, Beall GH. Explorations in glass: an autobiography. Wiley-Blackwell; 2006. p. 34–42. ISBN 978-1-57498-124-7.
   Google Scholar
• Rozenberg LD, Physical principles of ultrasonic technology. New York, NY: 1973, Vol. 1: p. 319–326. ISBN 978-1-4684-8217-1. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-8217-1.
   Google Scholar
• Smith WF, Jayad H. Foundation of material science and engineering. 4th edition. Richmond, Taxis, USA:McGraw-Hill; 1996. p. 512–518. ISBN: 9780-0729-535-89.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh VC. Machining of glass by impact processes. J Mech Working Technol. 1983;8:247–260. doi:10.1016/0378-3804(83)90042-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo KL. Experimental investigation of brittle material milling using rotary ultrasonic machining. In: Proceedings of the 35th International MATADOR Conference; 2007. London: Springer. p. 195–198. doi: 10.1007/978-1-84628-988-0_43
   Google Scholar
• Clark DE, Pantano CG Jr, Hench LL. Corrosion of glass. Books for Industry; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Harper CA, Petrie EM. Plastic materials and processes: a concise encyclopaedia. Wiley. p. 9, ISBN 978-0471-45920-0. 10.1002/0471459216
   Google Scholar
• Guzzo PL, Raslan AA, DeMello, JDB. Ultrasonic abrasion of quartz crystals. Wear. 2003;255:67–77. doi:10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00094-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JC. Topology of covalent non-crystalline solids I: Short-range order in chalcogenide alloys. J Non-Cryst Solids. 1979;34(2):153–181.10.1016/0022-3093(79)90033-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutra ZE. Do cathedral glasses flow? Am J Phys. 1998;66(5):392–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul A. Chemistry of glasses. 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall; 1990. ISBN 0-412-27820-0.
   Google Scholar
• Hasani H, Tabatabaei SA, Amiri G. Grey relational analysis to determine the optimum process parameters for open end sprnning yarns. J Eng Fibers Fabr 2012;7(2):81–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komaraiah M, Manan MA, Reddy PN, et al. Investigation of surface roughness and accuracy in ultrasonic machining. Precis Eng. 1988;10(2):59–65. doi:10.1016/0141-6359(88)90001-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasiao YF, Tarng YS, Huang WJ. Optimization of plasma are welding parameters by using the Taguchi method with the Grey relational analysis. Mater Manuf Processes. 2008;23:51–58. doi:10.1080/10426910701524527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CL, Lin JL, Ko TC. Optimisation of EDM process based on the orthogonal array with fuzzy logic and grey relational analysis method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2002;19:271–277. doi:10.1007/s001700200034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You ML, Shu CM, Chen WT, et al Analysis of cardinal grey relational grade and grey entropy on achievement of air pollution reduction by evaluating air quality trend in Japan. J Cleaner Prod. 2017;142(4):3883–3889. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.072.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad N, Kamal S, Raza ZA, et al Multi-response optimization in the development of oleo-hydrophobic cotton fabric using Taguchi based grey relational analysis. Appl Surf Sci. 2016;367:370–381. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin HL. The use of the Taguchi method with grey relational analysis and a neural network to optimize a novel GMA welding process. J Intell Manuf. 2012;23(5):1671–1680. doi:10.1007/s10845-010-0468-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manivannan S, Devi SP, Arumugam R, et al. Multi-objective optimization of flat plate heat sink using Taguchi-based Grey relational analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2011;52:739–749. doi:10.1007/s00170-010-2754-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meena VK, Azad MS. Grey relational analysis of micro-EDM machining of Ti-6Al-4 V alloy. Mater Manuf Processes. 2012;27:973–977. doi:10.1080/10426914.2011.610080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh PN, Raghukandan K, Pai BC. Optimization by Grey relational analysis of EDM parameters on machining Al?10%SiCP composites. J Mater Process Technol. 2004;155–156:1658–1661. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin YH, Lee PC, Chang TP. Practical expert diagnosis modal based on the grey relational analysis technique. Expert Syst Appl. 2009;36:1523–1528. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil PJ, Patil CR. Analysis of process parameters in surface grinding using single objective Taguchi and multi-objective grey relational grade. Perspect Sci. 2016;8:367–369. doi:10.1016/j.pisc.2016.04.077.
   Google Scholar
• Schorderet A, Deghilage E, Agbeviade K. Tool type and hole diameters influence in deep ultrasonic drilling of micro holes in glass. Procedia CIRP. 2013;565–570. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2013.03.072.
   Google Scholar
• Dr. Karl’s Homework: Glass Flows” Australia: ABC; 2000 January 26. [cited 24 Oct 2009].
   Google Scholar
• Elliot SR. Physics of amorphous materials. Vol. 20 (9). London: Longman Group Ltd; 1984. ISBN 0-582-44636-8.
   Google Scholar
• Sreenivasulu R, Srinivasarao C. Application of Grey relational analysis for surface roughness and roundness error in drilling of AL 6061 alloy. Int J Lean Thinking. 2012;3(2):68–78.
   Google Scholar