A review on the evaluation of formability in sheet metal forming

References

• Keeler SP. Plastic instability and fracture in sheets stretched over rigid punches, (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin GM. Application of strain analysis to sheet metal forming problems in the press shop. SAE Trans. 1968 Jan 1:380–387.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Shao Z, Lin J. A review on modelling techniques for formability prediction of sheet metal forming. Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf. 2018 Sep 1;1(3):115–125.
   Google Scholar
• Stoughton TB, Zhu X. Review of theoretical models of the strain-based FLD and their relevance to the stress-based FLD. Int J Plast. 2004 Aug 1;20(8–9):1463–1486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ablat MA, Qattawi A. Numerical simulation of sheet metal forming: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2017 Mar 1;89(1–4):1235–1250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh SK, Limbadri K, Singh AK, et al. Studies on texture and formability of Zircaloy-4 produced by pilgering route. J Mater Res Technol. 2019 Apr 1;8(2):2120–2129.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Wang J. Modeling the localized necking in anisotropic sheet metals. Int J Plast. 2012 Dec;1(39):103–118.
   Google Scholar
• Min J, Stoughton TB, Carsley JE, et al. Compensation for process-dependent effects in the determination of localized necking limits. Int J Mech Sci. 2016 Oct;1(117):115–134.
   Google Scholar
• Akpama HK, Bettaieb MB, Abed-Meraim F. Localized necking predictions based on rate-independent self-consistent polycrystal plasticity: bifurcation analysis versus imperfection approach. Int J Plast. 2017 Apr;1(91):205–237.
   Google Scholar
• Mirnia MJ, Shamsari M. Numerical prediction of failure in single-point incremental forming using a phenomenological ductile fracture criterion. J Mater Process Technol. 2017 Jun;1(244):17–43.
   Google Scholar
• Park N, Huh H, Yoon JW. Anisotropic fracture forming limit diagram considering non-directionality of the equi-biaxial fracture strain. Int J Solids Struct. 2018 Oct;15(151):181–194.
   Google Scholar
• Gang FA, QJ LIU, LEI LP, et al. Comparative analysis between stress-and strain-based forming limit diagrams for aluminum alloy sheet 1060. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2012 Dec 1;22:s343–s349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida K, Kuwabara T, Kuroda M. Path-dependence of the forming limit stresses in a sheet metal. Int J Plast. 2007 Mar 1;23(3):361–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng D, Chappuis L, Xia ZC, et al. A path independent forming limit criterion for sheet metal forming simulations. SAE Int J Mater Manuf. 2008;1:809–817.
   Google Scholar
• Stoughton TB, Yoon JW. Path independent forming limits in strain and stress spaces. Int J Solids Struct. 2012 Dec 1;49(25):3616–3625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grumbach M, Sanz G. Influence of various parameters on forming limit curves. Revue de Metallurgie. 1972;61:273–290.
   Google Scholar
• Shi BQ, Liang J. Circular grid pattern based surface strain measurement system for sheet metal forming. Opt Lasers Eng. 2012 Sep 1;50(9):1186–1195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandivelan C, Jeevanantham AK, Sathiyanarayanan C. Optimization study on incremental forming of sheet metal AA5052 for variable wall angle using CNC milling machine. Mater Today Proc. 2018 Jan 1;5(5):12832–12836.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM E2218-15. Standard test method for determining forming limit curves. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2015. www.astm.org
   Google Scholar
• Ozturk F, Dilmec M, Turkoz M, Ece RE, Halkaci HS. Grid marking and measurement methods for sheet metal formability. In5th International Conference and Exhibition on Design and Production of MACHINES and DIES/MOLDS, Kuşadası, Aydın, Turkey, 2009 Jun 18;41-49.
   Google Scholar
• Ji YH, Park JJ. Formability of magnesium AZ31 sheet in the incremental forming at warm temperature. J Mater Process Technol. 2008 May 26;201(1–3):354–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satheeshkumar V, Narayanan RG. Experimental evaluation and prediction of formability of adhesive bonded steel sheets at different adhesive properties. J Test Eval. 2016 Jul 13;44(3):1294–1306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay K, Basak S, Panda SK, et al. Use of stress based forming limit diagram to predict formability in two-stage forming of tailor welded blanks. Mater Des. 2015 Feb;15(67):558–570.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad KS, Panda SK, Kar SK, et al. Microstructures, forming limit and failure analyses of inconel 718 sheets for fabrication of aerospace components. J Mater Eng Perform. 2017 Apr 1;26(4):1513–1530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• www.fmtisystems.com,FMTI SYSTEMS Inc., Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Ab Ghani AF, Ali MB, DharMalingam S, et al. Digital image correlation (DIC) technique in measuring strain using opensource platform Ncorr. J Adv Res Appl Mech. 2016;26(1):10–21.
   Google Scholar
• Harilal RRamji M. Adaptation of Open Source 2D DIC Software Ncorr for Solid Mechanics Applications, Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Advanced Science and Technology in Experimental Mechanics, 1–6 November 2014: New Delhi, India
   Google Scholar
• Olufsen SN, Andersen ME, Fagerholt E. μDIC: an open-source toolkit for digital image correlation. SoftwareX. 2020 Jan 1;11:100391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• https://gitlab.com/damien.andre/pydic
   Google Scholar
• Vanderesse N, Lagacé M, Bridier F, et al. An open source software for the measurement of deformation fields by means of digital image correlation. Microsc Microanal. 2013 Aug;19(S2):820–821.
   Google Scholar
• Boesemann W, Godding R, Huette H. Photogrammetric measurement techniques for quality control in sheet metal forming. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens. 2000 May 1;33:PARTB5.
   Google Scholar
• Khoo SW, Karuppanan S, Tan CS. A review of surface deformation and strain measurement using two-dimensional digital image correlation. Metrol Meas Syst. 2016 Sep 1;23(3):461–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick NJ, Lord J. Digital image correlation. Mater Today. 2010 Dec;13(12):52–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton MA, Orteu JJ, Schreier H. Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements: basic concepts, theory and applications. Springer-Verlag New York Inc; 2009 Apr 21.
   Google Scholar
• Barnwal VK, Tewari A, Narasimhan K, et al. Effect of plastic anisotropy on forming behavior of AA-6061 aluminum alloy sheet. J Strain Anal Eng Des. 2016 Oct;51(7):507–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omar A, Harisankar KR, Tewari A, et al. Study of fracture behaviour and strain path during tube hydrforming process. J Phys. 2016 Aug;734(3):032105.
   Google Scholar
• Bhargava M, Tewari A, Mishra SK. Forming limit diagram of advanced high strength steels (AHSS) based on strain-path diagram. Mater Des. 2015 Nov 15;85:149–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erichsen AM. A new test for thin sheets. Stahl und Eisen. 1914;34:879–882.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen TY. Machines for ductility testing. Proc Am Soc Mater. 1920;20:398–403.
   Google Scholar
• Hecker SS. A cup test for assessing stretchability. Metals Eng Q. 1974;14:30–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Almeida L, Schön CG. Evaluation of the formability of 90/10 brass produced by different casting processes and investigation of the effect of forming limit diagram determination procedure. J Mater Res Technol. 2019 Sep 1;8(5):4163–4172.
   Google Scholar
• Jovignot C. Method and testing device for the study the fracture of the sheet metals. Revue de Metallurgie. 1930;27:287–291.
   Google Scholar
• Kotkunde N, Srinivasan S, Krishna G, et al. Influence of material models on theoretical forming limit diagram prediction for Ti–6Al–4V alloy under warm condition. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2016 Mar 1;26(3):736–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakazima K, Kikuma T, Hasuka K. Study on the formability of steel sheets. Yawata Tech Rep. 1968;264:8517–8530.
   Google Scholar
• Marciniak Z, Kuczyński K. Limit strains in the processes of stretch-forming sheet metal. Int J Mech Sci. 1967 Sep 1;9(9):609–620.
   Google Scholar
• International Standard ISO/DIS 12004-2. Metallic materials- sheet and strip- determination of forming limit curve-part 2: determination of forming limit curve in laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Min J, Carsley JE, et al. Experimental and theoretical investigation on the role of friction in nakazima testing. Int J Mech Sci. 2017 Nov 1;133:217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basak S, Prasad KS, Sidpara AM, et al. Single point incremental forming of AA6061 thin sheet: calibration of ductile fracture models incorporating anisotropy and post forming analyses. Int J Mater Form. 2019 Jul 1;12(4):623–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma BL, Wan M, Cai ZY, et al. Investigation on the forming limits of 5754-O aluminum alloy sheet with the numerical Marciniak–Kuczynski approach. Int J Mech Sci. 2018 Jul 1;142:420–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad KS, Kamal T, Panda SK, et al. Finite element validation of forming limit diagram of IN-718 sheet metal. Mater Today Proc. 2015 Jan 1;2(4–5):2037–2045.
   Google Scholar
• Basak S, Panda SK. Implementation of Yld96 anisotropy plasticity theory for estimation of polar effective plastic strain-based failure limit of pre-strained thin steels. Thin Walled Struct. 2018 May 1;126:26–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeler SP, Keeler SP, Brazier WG. Relationship between laboratory material characterization and press-shop formability. in:ProcConf on Microalloying. 1977;75:517–528.
   Google Scholar
• Swift H. Plastic instability under plane stress. J Mech Phys Solids. 1952 Oct 1;1(1):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill RT. On discontinuous plastic states, with special reference to localized necking in thin sheets. J Mech Phys Solids. 1952 Oct 1;1(1):19–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stören S, Rice JR. Localized necking in thin sheets. J Mech Phys Solids. 1975 Dec 1;23(6):421–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hora P, Tong L, Berisha B. Modified maximum force criterion, a model for the theoretical prediction of forming limit curves. Int J Mater Form. 2013 Jun 1;6(2):267–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hora P, Tong L Theoretical prediction of the influence of curvature and thickness on the FLC by the enhanced modified maximum force criterion. InProc. of the NUMISHEET 2008 Conf.; 2008 Sep; Interlaken, Switzerland.p. 205–210.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson JW, Neale KW. Sheet necking-III. Strain-rate effects. In: Donald P Koistinen and Neng-Ming Wang. (Eds)., Mechanics of sheet metal forming. Springer, Boston, MA, 1978. p. 269–285.
   Google Scholar
• Butuc MC, Gracio JJ, Da Rocha AB. A theoretical study on forming limit diagrams prediction. J Mater Process Technol. 2003 Dec 10;142(3):714–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banabic D, Comsa S, Jurco P, et al. FLD theoretical model using a new anisotropic yield criterion. J Mater Process Technol. 2004 Dec 20;157:23–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butuc MC, Banabic D, da Rocha AB, et al. The performance of Yld96 and BBC2000 yield functions in forming limit prediction. J Mater Process Technol. 2002 Sep 9;125:281–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YW, Majlessi SA, Ning J, et al. The strain gradient approach for deformation localization and forming limit diagrams. J Mech Behav Mater. 1996;7(4):265–278.
   Google Scholar
• Sing WM, Rao KP. Prediction of sheet-metal formability using tensile-test results. J Mater Process Technol. 1993 Feb 1;37(1–4):37–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi R, Mamusi H, Masoumi A. A simulation-based approach to the determination of forming limit diagrams. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B. 2014 Dec;228(12):1582–1591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Situ Q. A new approach to obtain forming limits of sheet materials (Doctoral dissertation).
   Google Scholar
• Assempour A, Nejadkhaki HK, Hashemi R. Forming limit diagrams with the existence of through-thickness normal stress. Comput Mater Sci. 2010 May 1;48(3):504–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narasimhan K, Wagoner RH. Finite element modeling simulation of in-plane forming limit diagrams of sheets containing finite defects. Metall Trans A. 1991 Nov 1;22(11):2655–2665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan X, Jain M, Wilkinson DS. Development of a heterogeneous microstructurally based finite element model for the prediction of forming limit diagram for sheet material. Metall Mater Trans A. 2006 Dec 1;37(12):3489.
   Google Scholar
• Wu PD, Graf A, MacEwen SR, et al. On forming limit stress diagram analysis. Int J Solids Struct. 2005 Apr 1;42(8):2225–2241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrieux R, Boivin M, Le Maître F. Determination of the forming limit stress curve for anisotropic sheets. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol. 1987 Jan 1;36(1):195–198.
   Google Scholar
• Kleemola HJ, Pelkkikangas MT. Effect of predeformation and strain path on the forming limits of steel, copper and brass. Sheet Met Ind. 1977;64(6):591–592.
   Google Scholar
• He J, Zeng D, Zhu X, et al. Effect of nonlinear strain paths on forming limits under isotropic and anisotropic hardening. Int J Solids Struct. 2014;51(2):402–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derov MJ, Kinsey BL, Tsukrov I The effect of model parameters on predicted stress-based failure criterion for sheet metal. InASME 2008 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference collocated with the 3rd JSME/ASME International Conference on Materials and Processing. American society of mechanical engineers digital collection;Evanston, Illinois, USA. 2008 Jan 1; 571–576.
   Google Scholar
• Paul SK. Theoretical analysis of strain-and stress-based forming limit diagrams. J Strain Anal Eng Des. 2013 Apr;48(3):177–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tvergaard V, Needleman A. Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall. 1984 Jan 1;32(1):157–169.
   Google Scholar
• Xue L. Constitutive modeling of void shearing effect in ductile fracture of porous materials. Eng Fract Mech. 2008 Jul 1;75(11):3343–3366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcher L, Pires FA, De Sá JC. An extended GTN model for ductile fracture under high and low stress triaxiality. Int J Plast. 2014 Mar 1;54:193–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClintock FA. Erratum:“A criterion for ductile fracture by the growth of holes”. J Appl Mech. 1968;35:363–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clift SE, Hartley P, Sturgess CE, et al. Fracture prediction in plastic deformation processes. Int J Mech Sci. 1990 Jan 1;32(1):1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockcroft MG, Latham DJ. Ductility and the workability of metals. J Inst Metals. 1968 Feb;96(1):33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Rice JR, Tracey DM. On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. J Mech Phys Solids. 1969 Jun 1;17(3):201–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brozzo P, Deluca B, Rendina R. A new method for the prediction of formability limits in metal sheets. In Proc. 7th biennal Conf. IDDR, Amsterdam, Oct 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Chen CC, Oh SI, Kobayashi S. Ductile Fracture in Axisymmetric Extrusion and Drawing—Part 1: Deformation Mechanics of Extrusion and Drawing. ASME J. Eng. Ind. Feb 1979, 101(1): 23-35.
   Google Scholar
• Ko YK, Lee JS, Huh H, et al. Prediction of fracture in hub-hole expanding process using a new ductile fracture criterion. J Mater Process Technol. 2007 Jun 12;187:358–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson GR, Cook WH. Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech. 1985;21(1):31–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins ML, Streit RD, Reaugh JE. Cumulative-strain-damage model of ductile fracture: simulation and prediction of engineering fracture tests. Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (USA); Science Applications, Inc., San Leandro, CA (USA), 1980 Oct 3.
   Google Scholar
• Oyane M, Sato T, Okimoto K, et al. Criteria for ductile fracture and their applications. J Mech Working Technol. 1980 Apr 1;4(1):65–81.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicki T, Bao Y, Lee YW, et al. Calibration and evaluation of seven fracture models. Int J Mech Sci. 2005 Apr 1;47(4–5):719–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins AG, Mai YW. Crack and craze nucleation. In: Elastic and plastic fracture. Chichester: Ellis Horwood; 1985. p. 369–431.
   Google Scholar
• Lou Y, Huh H, Lim S, et al. New ductile fracture criterion for prediction of fracture forming limit diagrams of sheet metals. Int J Solids Struct. 2012 Dec 1;49(25):3605–3615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deole AD, Barnett MR, Weiss M. The numerical prediction of ductile fracture of martensitic steel in roll forming. Int J Solids Struct. 2018 Jul 1;144:20–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park N, Huh H, Nam JB, et al. Anisotropy effect on the fracture model of DP980 sheets considering the loading path. Int J Automot Technol. 2015 Feb 1;16(1):73–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basak S, Panda SK. Necking and fracture limit analyses of different pre-strained sheet materials in polar effective plastic strain locus using Yld2000-2d yield model. J Mater Process Technol. 2019 May 1;267:289–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basak S, Panda SK. Failure strains of anisotropic thin sheet metals: experimental evaluation and theoretical prediction. Int J Mech Sci. 2019 Feb 1;151:356–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorji M, Berisha B, Hora P, et al. Modeling of localization and fracture phenomena in strain and stress space for sheet metal forming. Int J Mater Form. 2016 Nov 1;9(5):573–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isik K, Silva MB, Tekkaya AE, et al. Formability limits by fracture in sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol. 2014 Aug 1;214(8):1557–1565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park N, Huh H, Lim SJ, et al. Fracture-based forming limit criteria for anisotropic materials in sheet metal forming. Int J Plast. 2017 Sep 1;96:1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen NT, Lee E, Lee MG, et al. Hydroformability assessment of AA6063 tubes using the polar effective plastic strain diagram. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B. 2015 Apr;229(4):647–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar