Cationic micellar structural growth and their viscoelastic behaviour in mixed surfactants system

References

• Karsa DR. What are surfactants? ChemTechnol Surf. 2006;1.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg K, et al. Microemulsions. surfactants and polymers in aqueous solution. Second ed. 2002. p. 139.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathy DB, et al. Biodegradability of laundry detergent surfactants. Int J. 2017;5(1):130.
   Google Scholar
• Drew M. Surfactant science and technology. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Salager JL. Surfactants types and uses. FIRP booklet; 2002. p. E300A.
   Google Scholar
• Doehlert DC, Moreau RA, Welti R, et al. Polar lipids from oat kernels. Cereal Chem. 2010;87(5):467. DOI:10.1094/CCHEM-04-10-0060.
   Google Scholar
• Romantsov T, Wood J. Contributions of membrane lipids to bacterial cell homeostasis upon osmotic challenge. Biogenesis of Fatty Acids, Lipids and Membranes. 2016;1.
   Google Scholar
• Foley P, Beach ES, Zimmerman JB. Derivation and synthesis of renewable surfactants. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41(4):1499.
   Google Scholar
• Willcox M. Soap. In: Poucher’s perfumes, cosmetics and soaps. Springer; 2000. p. 453.
   Google Scholar
• Cetin S, Nasr-El-Din H. Rheological study of a novel sulfobetaine surfactant-based acid system. in SPE Middle East oil & gas show and conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty T, Ghosh S, Moulik SP. Micellization and related behavior of binary and ternary surfactant mixtures in aqueous medium: cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB), and polyoxyethylene (10) cetyl ether (Brij-56) derived system. J Phys Chem A. 2005;109(31):14813.
   Google Scholar
• Farías T, de Ménorval LC, Zajac J, et al. Solubilization of drugs by cationic surfactants micelles: conductivity and 1 H NMR experiments. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2009;345(1):51. DOI:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.04.022.
   Google Scholar
• Islam MN, Kato T. Temperature dependence of the surface phase behavior and micelle formation of some nonionic surfactants. J Phys Chem A. 2003;107(4):965.
   Google Scholar
• Islam MN, Kato T. Thermodynamic study on surface adsorption and micelle formation of poly (ethylene glycol) mono-n-tetradecyl ethers. Langmuir. 2003;19(18):7201.
   Google Scholar
• Roy JC, Islam MN, Aktaruzzaman G. The effect of NaCl on the Krafft temperature and related behavior of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide in aqueous solution. J Surfactants Deterg. 2014;17(2):231.
   Google Scholar
• Sigoillot JC, Nguyen MH. Complete oxidation of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate by bacterial communities selected from coastal seawater. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992;58(4):1308.
   Google Scholar
• Park KH, et al. Fluorinated and hemifluorinated surfactants as alternatives to detergents for membrane protein cell-free synthesis. Biochem J. 2007;403(1):183. DOI:10.1042/BJ20061473.
   Google Scholar
• Sadegh F, Naghash HJ. Synthesis of monoallyl-end-capped polydimethylsiloxane-based polymerizable surfactant. Prog Org Coat. 2015;78:381.
   Google Scholar
• Abdel-Raouf M, Maysour NE, Abdul-Raheim AM, et al. Synthesis and study of the surface properties of alkylnaphthalene and alkylphenanthrene sulfonates. J Surfactants Deterg. 2011;14(1):23. DOI:10.1007/s11743-010-1197-4.
   Google Scholar
• Clint JH. Surfactant aggregation. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Khan MN. Micellar Catalysis: surfactant Science Series. New York, London: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group LLC, Boca Raton; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Cullum D. Surfactant types; classification, identification, separation. In: Introduction to surfactant analysis. Springer; 1994. p. 17.
   Google Scholar
• Deda DK, Araki K. Nanotechnology, light and chemical action: an effective combination to kill cancer cells. J Braz Chem Soc. 2015;26(12):2448.
   Google Scholar
• Otzen DE. Proteins in a brave new surfactant world. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2015;20(3):161.
   Google Scholar
• McBain JW. Solutions of soaps and detergents as colloidal electrolytes. Alexanders Colloid Chem. 1944;5:144.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent B. McBain and the centenary of the micelle. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2014;203:51.
   Google Scholar
• Menger FM. The structure of micelles. Acc Chem Res. 1979;12(4):111.
   Google Scholar
• Clint JH. Surfactant aggregation, blackie, glasgow. Search PubMed; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Evans DF, Wennerstrom H. The colloid domain, where physics, chemistry and biology meet. New York: Wiley-VCH; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Crook E, Trebbi G, Fordyce D. Thermodynamic properties of solutions of homogeneous p, t-octylphenoxyethoxyethanols (OPE1-10). J Phys Chem. 1964;68(12):3592.
   Google Scholar
• Anacker E, Ghose H. Counterions and micelle size. II. Light scattering by solutions of cetylpyridinium salts. J Am Chem Soc. 1968;90(12):3161.
   Google Scholar
• Lin I, Moudgil B, Somasundaran P. Estimation of the effective number of—CH 2-groups in long-chain surface active agents. Colloid Polym Sci. 1974;252(5):407.
   Google Scholar
• Ali A, Malik NA, Uzair S, et al. Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide micellization in glycine, diglycine, and triglycine aqueous solutions as a function of surfactant concentration and temperatures. Russ J Phys Chem A. 2014;88(6):1053. DOI:10.1134/S003602441406003X.
   Google Scholar
• Ruckenstein E, Beunen J. Effect of counterion binding on micellization. Langmuir. 1988;4(1):77.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng Y, Sun L, Luo G. The effect of salts on micellization in C12. Colloid J. 2015;77(4):532.
   Google Scholar
• Rathman JF, Scamehorn JF. Counterion binding on mixed micelles. J Phys Chem. 1984;88(24):5807.
   Google Scholar
• Alargova R, Kochijashky II, Sierra ML, et al. Mixed micellization of dimeric (gemini) surfactants and conventional surfactants: II. CMC and micelle aggregation numbers for various mixtures. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2001;235(1):119. DOI:10.1006/jcis.2000.7311.
   Google Scholar
• Esumi K, Miyazaki M, Arai T, et al. Mixed micellar properties of a cationic gemini surfactant and a nonionic surfactant. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 1998;135(1–3):117. DOI:10.1016/S0927-7757(97)00216-1.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Moulik S. Interfacial and micellization behaviors of binary and ternary mixtures of amphiphiles (Tween-20, Brij-35, and sodium dodecyl sulfate) in aqueous medium. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1998;208(2):357.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths P, Whatton ML, Abbott RJ, et al. Small-angle neutron scattering and fluorescence studies of mixed surfactants with dodecyl tails. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1999;215(1):114. DOI:10.1006/jcis.1999.6231.
   Google Scholar
• Islam MN, Okano T, Kato T. Surface phase behavior of a mixed system of anionic− nonionic surfactants studied by brewster angle microscopy and polarization modulation infrared reflection− absorption spectroscopy. Langmuir. 2002;18(26):10068.
   Google Scholar
• Turmine PM, Letellier P. Mixtures of nonionic and ionic surfactants: determination of mixed micelle composition using cross-differentiation relations. J Phys Chem A. 1998;102(30):5886.
   Google Scholar
• Shiloach A, Blankschtein D. Measurement and prediction of ionic/nonionic mixed micelle formation and growth. Langmuir. 1998;14(25):7166.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida K, Dubin PL. Complex formation between polyacrylic acid and cationic/nonionic mixed micelles: effect of pH on electrostatic interaction and hydrogen bonding. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 1999;147(1):161.
   Google Scholar
• Khan MN. Kinetics and mechanism of mixed micellar catalysis. In: Encyclopedia of surface and colloid science. Taylor & Francis; 2005. p. 3502.
   Google Scholar
• Schramm LL, Stasiuk EN, Marangoni DG. 2 Surfactants and their applications1. Annual Reports Section” C” (Physical Chemistry). 2003;99:3.
   Google Scholar
• Wennerström H, Lindman B. Micelles. Physical chemistry of surfactant association. Phys Rep. 1979;52(1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Cates M, Candau S. Statics and dynamics of worm-like surfactant micelles. J Phys. 1990;2(33):6869.
   Google Scholar
• Davies TS, Ketner AM, Raghavan SR. Self-assembly of surfactant vesicles that transform into viscoelastic wormlike micelles upon heating. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128(20):6669.
   Google Scholar
• Kern F, Zana R, Candau S. Rheological properties of semidilute and concentrated aqueous solutions of cetyltrimethylammonium chloride in the presence of sodium salicylate and sodium chloride. Langmuir. 1991;7(7):1344.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Aswal VK, Goyal PS. Effect of the addition of n-alkylamines on the growth of sodium decyl sulfate micelles. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans. 1996;92(13):2413.
   Google Scholar
• Patel V, Dharaiya N, Ray D, et al. pH controlled size/shape in CTAB micelles with solubilized polar additives: a viscometry, scattering and spectral evaluation. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2014;455:67.
   Google Scholar
• Yin H, Lei S, Zhu S, et al. Micelle-to-Vesicle transition induced by organic additives in catanionic surfactant systems. Chem - A European J. 2006;12(10):2825. DOI:10.1002/chem.200501053.
   Google Scholar
• Karayil J, Kumar S, Talmon Y, et al. Micellar growth in cetylpyridinium chloride/alcohol system: role of long chain alcohol, electrolyte and surfactant head group. J Surfactants Deterg. 2016;19(4):849. DOI:10.1007/s11743-016-1826-7.
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi S, Ikeda S. Micelle size and shape of sodium dodecyl sulfate in concentrated sodium chloride solutions. J Phys Chem. 1980;84(7):744.
   Google Scholar
• Bijma K, Rank E, Engberts JBFN. Effect of counterion structure on micellar growth of alkylpyridinium surfactants in aqueous solution. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1998;205(2):245.
   Google Scholar
• Hirata H, Sato M, Sakaiguchi Y, et al. Small angle X-ray scattering study of an extremely elongated micelle system of CTAB-p-toluidine solution. Colloid Polym Sci. 1988;266(9):862. DOI:10.1007/BF01417871.
   Google Scholar
• Dorshow R, Briggs J, Bunton CA, et al. Dynamic light scattering from cetyltrimethylammonium bromide micelles. Intermicellar interactions at low ionic strengths. J Phys Chem. 1982;86(13):2388. DOI:10.1021/j100210a028.
   Google Scholar
• Kuperkar KC, Mata JP, Bahadur P. Effect of 1-alkanols/salt on the cationic surfactant micellar aqueous solutions—a dynamic light scattering study. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2011;380(1):60.
   Google Scholar
• Nemoto N, Kuwahara M. Dynamic light scattering of CTAB/sodium salicylate long threadlike micelles in the semidilute regime: applicability of the dynamic scaling law. Langmuir. 1993;9(2):419.
   Google Scholar
• Inoue T, Inoue Y, Watanabe H. Nonlinear rheology of CTAB/NaSal aqueous solutions: finite extensibility of a network of wormlike micelles. Langmuir. 2005;21(4):1201.
   Google Scholar
• Kim W-J, Yang S-M. Microstructures and rheological responses of aqueous CTAB solutions in the presence of benzyl additives. Langmuir. 2000;16(15):6084.
   Google Scholar
• Aswal V, Goyal P, Thiyagarajan P. Small-angle neutron-scattering and viscosity studies of CTAB/NaSal viscoelastic micellar solutions. J Phys Chem A. 1998;102(14):2469.
   Google Scholar
• Mata J, Aswal VK, Hassan PA, et al. A phenol-induced structural transition in aqueous cetyltrimethylammonium bromide solution. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2006;299(2):910. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2006.02.032.
   Google Scholar
• Brown W, Johansson K, Almgren M. Threadlike micelles from cetyltrimethylammonium bromide in aqueous sodium naphthalenesulfonate solutions studied by static and dynamic light scattering. J Phys Chem. 1989;93(15):5888.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann H, Pössnecker G. The mixing behavior of surfactants. Langmuir. 1994;10(2):381.
   Google Scholar
• Holland PM, Rubingh DN. Mixed surfactant systems. ACS Publications; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen MJ. Molecular interaction and synergism in binary mixtures of surfactants. ACS Publications; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Anand P, Kunnumakkara AB, Newman RA, et al. Bioavailability of curcumin: problems and promises. Mol Pharm. 2007;4(6):807. DOI:10.1021/mp700113r.
   Google Scholar
• Ganguly R, Kunwar A, Dutta B, et al. Heat-induced solubilization of curcumin in kinetically stable pluronic P123 micelles and vesicles: an exploit of slow dynamics of the micellar restructuring processes in the aqueous pluronic system. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2017;152:176.
   Google Scholar
• Hatcher H, Planalp R, Cho J, et al. Curcumin: from ancient medicine to current clinical trials. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65(11):1631. DOI:10.1007/s00018-008-7452-4.
   Google Scholar
• Batrakova EV, Kabanov AV. Pluronic block copolymers: evolution of drug delivery concept from inert nanocarriers to biological response modifiers. J Control Release. 2008;130(2):98.
   Google Scholar
• Batrakova EV, Li S, Brynskikh AM, et al. Effects of pluronic and doxorubicin on drug uptake, cellular metabolism, apoptosis and tumor inhibition in animal models of MDR cancers. J Control Release. 2010;143(3):290. DOI:10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.01.004.
   Google Scholar
• Liang X, Guo C, Liao C, et al. Drivers and applications of integrated clean-up technologies for surfactant-enhanced remediation of environments contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Environ Pollut. 2017;225:129.
   Google Scholar
• Mao X, Jiang R, Xiao W, et al. Use of surfactants for the remediation of contaminated soils: a review. J Hazard Mater. 2015;285:419.
   Google Scholar
• Shah A, Shahzad S, Munir A, et al. Micelles as soil and water decontamination agents. Chem Rev. 2016;116(10):6042. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00132.
   Google Scholar
• Dar AA, Rather GM, Das AR. Mixed micelle formation and solubilization behavior toward polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of binary and ternary cationic−nonionic surfactant mixtures. J Phys Chem A. 2007;111(12):3122.
   Google Scholar
• Bunton C. Reaction kinetics in aqueous surfactant solutions. Catal Rev Sci Eng. 1979;20(1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Vera S, Rodenas E. Influence of N-cetyl-N, N, N-trimethylammonium bromide counterions in the basic hydrolysis of negatively charged aromatic esters. J Phys Chem. 1986;90(15):3414.
   Google Scholar
• Bunton CA, Savelli G. Organic reactivity in aqueous micelles and similar assemblies. Adv Phys Org Chem. 1986;22:213.
   Google Scholar
• Menger FM, Portnoy CE. Chemistry of reactions proceeding inside molecular aggregates. J Am Chem Soc. 1967;89(18):4698.
   Google Scholar
• Bunton CA, Nome F, Quina FH, et al. Ion binding and reactivity at charged aqueous interfaces. Acc Chem Res. 1991;24(12):357. DOI:10.1021/ar00012a001.
   Google Scholar
• Rathman JF. Micellar catalysis. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 1996;1(4):514.
   Google Scholar
• Bunton CA. Micellar rate effects: what we know and what we think we know. In: Surfactants in solution. Springer; 1991. p. 17.
   Google Scholar
• Bunton CA. Reactivity in aqueous association colloids. Descriptive utility of the pseudophase model. J Mol Liq. 1997;72(1–3):231.
   Google Scholar
• Bunton CA, Wright S, Holland PM, et al. SN2 reactions of a sulfonate ester in mixed cationic/nonionic micelles. Langmuir. 1993;9(1):117. DOI:10.1021/la00025a027.
   Google Scholar
• Quina FH, Chaimovich H. Ion exchange in micellar solutions. 1. Conceptual framework for ion exchange in micellar solutions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1979;83(14):1844.
   Google Scholar
• Quina FH, Chaimovich H. Ion exchange in micellar solutions. 1. Conceptual framework for ion exchange in micellar solutions. J Phys Chem. 1979;83(14):1844.
   Google Scholar
• El Seoud OA, Chinelatto AM. Acid-base indicator equilibria in aerosol-OT reversed micelles in heptane. The use of buffers. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1983;95(1):163.
   Google Scholar
• Pal S, Vishal G, Gandhi KS, et al. Ion exchange in reverse micelles. Langmuir. 2005;21(2):767. DOI:10.1021/la048771u.
   Google Scholar
• Khan MN, Ismail E. An apparent weakness of the pseudophase ion-exchange (PIE) model for micellar catalysis by cationic surfactants with nonreactive counterions. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans. 2001;2(8):1346.
   Google Scholar
• Abuin EB, Lissi E, Araujo PS, et al. Selectivity coefficients for ion exchange in micelles of hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide and chloride. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1983;96(1):293. DOI:10.1016/0021-9797(83)90031-0.
   Google Scholar
• Blasko A, Bunton CA, Cerichelli G, et al. A nuclear magnetic resonance study of ion exchange in cationic micelles: successes and failures of models. J Phys Chem. 1993;97(43):11324. DOI:10.1021/j100145a034.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert BA, Kaler EW, Wagner NJ. The microstructure and rheology of mixed cationic/anionic wormlike micelles. Langmuir. 2003;19(10):4079.
   Google Scholar
• Yang J. Viscoelastic wormlike micelles and their applications. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2002;7(5–6):276.
   Google Scholar
• Ideta R, Yanagi Y, Tamaki Y, et al. Effective accumulation of polyion complex micelle to experimental choroidal neovascularization in rats. FEBS Lett. 2004;557(1–3):21. DOI:10.1016/S0014-5793(03)01315-2.
   Google Scholar
• Kabanov AV, Batrakova EV, Alakhov VY. Pluronic® block copolymers as novel polymer therapeutics for drug and gene delivery. J Control Release. 2002;82(2):189.
   Google Scholar
• Kataoka K, Harada A, Nagasaki Y. Block copolymer micelles for drug delivery: design, characterization and biological significance. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001;47(1):113.
   Google Scholar
• Nishiyama N, Bae Y, Miyata K, et al. Smart polymeric micelles for gene and drug delivery. Drug Discov Today. 2005;2(1):21. DOI:10.1016/j.ddtec.2005.05.007.
   Google Scholar
• Nishiyama N, Kataoka K. Current state, achievements, and future prospects of polymeric micelles as nanocarriers for drug and gene delivery. Pharmacol Ther. 2006;112(3):630.
   Google Scholar
• Rangel-Yagui CO, Jr P, Tavares LC. Micellar solubilization of drugs. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2005;8(2):147.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton D, Nasongkla N, Blanco E, et al. Functionalized micellar systems for cancer targeted drug delivery. Pharm Res. 2007;24(6):1029. DOI:10.1007/s11095-006-9223-y.
   Google Scholar
• Qi Y, Zakin JL. Chemical and rheological characterization of drag-reducing cationic surfactant systems. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2002;41(25):6326.
   Google Scholar
• Ali AA, Makhloufi R. Linear and nonlinear rheology of an aqueous concentrated system of cethyltrimethylammonium chloride and sodium salicylate. Phys Rev E. 1997;56(4):4474.
   Google Scholar
• Shikata T, Hirata H, Kotaka T. Micelle formation of detergent molecules in aqueous media: viscoelastic properties of aqueous cetyltrimethylammonium bromide solutions. Langmuir. 1987;3(6):1081.
   Google Scholar
• Soltero J, Puig J, Manero O. Rheology of the cetyltrimethylammoniumtosilate− water system. 2. Linear viscoelastic regime. Langmuir. 1996;12(11):2654.
   Google Scholar
• Gamez-Corrales R, Berret J-F, Walker LM, et al. Shear-thickening dilute surfactant solutions: equilibrium structure as studied by small-angle neutron scattering. Langmuir. 1999;15(20):6755.
   Google Scholar