Analytical and finite element modelling of hydraulic bulge test on extra deep drawing steel with fractography study

References

• Kotkunde N, Deole AD, Gupta AK, et al. Failure and formability studies in warm deep drawing of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Mater Des. 2014;60:540–547.
   Google Scholar
• Lin YC, Chen X-M. A critical review of experimental results and constitutive descriptions for metals and alloys in hot working. Mater Des. 2011;32:1733–1759.
   Google Scholar
• Lunge K, Lange K, Pöhlandt K. Handbook of metal forming. J Mech Work Technol. 1985;16:1210.
   Google Scholar
• Koç M, Billur E, Cora ÖN. An experimental study on the comparative assessment of hydraulic bulge test analysis methods. Mater Des. 2011;32:272–281.
   Google Scholar
• Altan T, Palaniswamy H, Bortot P, et al. 2006. Determination of sheet material properties using biaxial bulge tests, 2nd Int. Conference on Accuracy in Forming Technol., Germany, p. 79–92.
   Google Scholar
• Keller S, Hotz W, Friebe H, et al. 2009. Yield curve determination using the bulge test combined with optical measurement. Proceeding IDDRG 2009 Conference Golden, Colorado USA, Color. p. 319–330.
   Google Scholar
• Janbakhsh M, Djavanroodi F, Riahi M. Utilization of bulge and uniaxial tensile tests for determination of flow stress curves of selected anisotropic alloys. J.Mater Des Appl. 2012;227:38–51.
   Google Scholar
• Güner A, Brosius A, Tekkaya A. E. Analysis of the hydraulic bulge test with FEA concerning the accuracy of the determined flow curves. In: Key Engineering Material, Trans Tech Publ; 2009. p. 439–447.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson M. Accurate determination of biaxial stress—strain relationships from hydraulic bulging tests of sheet metals. Int J Mech Sci. 1997;39:761–769.
   Google Scholar
• Gutscher G, Wu HC, Ngaile G, et al. Determination of flow stress for sheet metal forming using the viscous pressure bulge (VPB) test. J Mater Process Technol. 2004;146:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Koç M, Altan T. On the characteristics of tubular materials for hydroforming—experimentation and analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2001;41:761–772.
   Google Scholar
• Koc M, Altan T. 2001. An overall review of the tube hydroforming (THF) technology. J Mater Process Technol. 108:384–393.
   Google Scholar
• Dziallach S, Bleck W, Blumbach M, et al. Sheet metal testing and flow curve determination under multiaxial conditions. Adv Eng Mater. 2007;9:987–994.
   Google Scholar
• Koh CW. Design of a hydraulic bulge test apparatus. 2008. 88. Available from: http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/43132.
   Google Scholar
• Sigvant M, Mattiasson K, Vegter H, et al. A viscous pressure bulge test for the determination of a plastic hardening curve and equibiaxial material data. Int J Mater Form. 2009;2:235–242.
   Google Scholar
• Banabic D, Vulcan M, Siegert K. Bulge testing under constant and variable strain rates of superplastic aluminium alloys. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol. 2005;54:205–208.
   Google Scholar
• Jocham D, Norz R, Volk W. Strain rate sensitivity of DC06 for high strains under biaxial stress in hydraulic bulge test and under uniaxial stress in tensile test. Int J Mater Form. 2016;1–9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-016-1293-8
   Google Scholar
• Skuncal M, Math MD, Grizelj B. Modified hydraulic bulging in acquisition of stress strain curve. Int J Mater Form. 2010;3:299–302.
   Google Scholar
• Reis LC, Prates PA, Oliveira MC, et al. Inverse identification of the Swift law parameters using the bulge test. Int J Mater Form. 2016;1–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-016-1296-5
   Google Scholar
• Hill R. A theory of the plastic bulging of a metal diaphragm by lateral pressure. London Edinburgh Dublin Philos Mag J Sci. 1950;41: 1133–1142.
   Google Scholar
• Panknin W. The hydraulic bulge test and the determination of the flow stress curves.Dissertation, Inst Met Form Technol Univ Stuttgart Ger. 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty J, Alexander JM. Hydrostatic bulging of circular diaphragms. J Strain Anal Eng Des. 1970;5: 155–161.
   Google Scholar
• Kruglov AA, Enikeev FU, Lutfullin RY. Superplastic forming of a spherical shell out a welded envelope. Mater Sci Eng A. 2002;323:416–426.
   Google Scholar
• Smith LM, Wanintrudal C, Yang W, et al. A new experimental approach for obtaining diffuse-strain flow stress curves. J Mater Process Technol. 2009;209:3830–3839.
   Google Scholar
• Ranta-Eskola AJ. Use of the hydraulic bulge test in biaxial tensile testing. Int J Mech Sci. 1979;21:457–465.
   Google Scholar
• Liu K, Lang L, Cai G, et al. A novel approach to determine plastic hardening curves of AA7075 sheet utilizing hydraulic bulging test at elevated temperature. Int J Mech Sci. 2015;100:328–338.
   Google Scholar
• Pham QT, oh SH, Kim YS. An efficient method to estimate the post-necking behavior of sheet metals. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;98:2563–2578.
   Google Scholar
• Kong Z, Zhang J, Li H, et al. Deep drawing and bulging forming limit of dual-phase steel under different mechanical properties. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;97:2111–2124.
   Google Scholar
• Alharthi H, Hazra S, Alghamdi A, et al. Determination of the yield loci of four sheet materials (AA6111-T4, AC600, DX54D+Z, and H220BD+Z) by using uniaxial tensile and hydraulic bulge tests. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;98:1307–1319.
   Google Scholar
• Nasser A, Yadav A, Pathak P, et al. Determination of the flow stress of five AHSS sheet materials (DP 600, DP 780, DP 780-CR, DP 780-HY and TRIP 780) using the uniaxial tensile and the biaxial viscous pressure bulge (VPB) tests. J Mater Process Technol. 2010;210:429–436.
   Google Scholar
• Djavanroodi F, Janbakhsh M. Formability characterization of titanium alloy sheets. Titan Alloy Adv Prop Control. 2013;81–113. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5772/55889.
   Google Scholar
• Hill R. A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc R Soc London A Math Phys Eng Sci. 1948;193:281–297.
   Google Scholar
• Barlat F, Lian K. Plastic behaviour and stretchability of sheet metals. Part I: A yield function for orthotropic sheets under plane stress conditions. Int J Plast. 1989;5:51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Barlat F, Brem JC, Yoon JW, et al. Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets—part 1: theory. Int J Plast. 2003;19:1297–1319.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Nielsen KB, Lang L, et al. Investigation into bulging-pressing compound forming for sheet metal parts with very small radii. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;95:445–457.
   Google Scholar
• Yu H, Zheng Q. Forming limit diagram of DP600 steel sheets during electrohydraulic forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;104:743–756.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel BL. Scanning electron microscopy. In: Fractography. Vol. 12. ASM Handbook; 1998. p. 173.
   Google Scholar
• Valente Tigrinho LM, Chemin Filho RA, Prestes Marcondes PV. Fracture analysis approach of DP600 steel when subjected to different stress/strain states during deformation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2013;69:1017–1024.
   Google Scholar
• Barsoum I, Faleskog J. Rupture mechanisms in combined tension and shear-micromechanics. Int J Solids Struct. 2007;44:5481–5498.
   Google Scholar
• Ghajar R, Mirone G, Keshavarz A. Ductile failure of X100 pipeline steel - Experiments and fractography. Mater Des. 2013;43:513–525.
   Google Scholar
• Swaminathan K, Date PP, Padmanabhan KA. Room temperature formability and fracture behaviour of a high strength Al-Zn-Mg alloy. J Eng Mater Technol. 1991;113(2):236–243.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta AK, Ravi Kumar D. Formability of galvanized interstitial-free steel sheets. J Mater Process Technol. 2006;172(2):225–237.
   Google Scholar