An experimental study on geometric accuracy in hybrid incremental sheet forming

References

• Micari F, Ambrogio G, Filice L. Shape and dimensional accuracy in single point incremental forming: state of the art and future trends. J Mater Process Technol. 2007;191(1–3):390–395.
   Google Scholar
• Duflou JR, Callebaut B, Verbert J, et al. Laser assisted incremental forming: formability and accuracy Improvement. CIRP Annals Manuf Technol. 2007;56(1):273–276.
   Google Scholar
• Attanasio A, Cerettia E, Giardinib C, et al. Asymmetric two points incremental forming: improving surface quality and geometric accuracy by tool path optimization. J Mater Process Technol. 2008;7(1–3):59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Meier H, Buff B, Laurischkat R, et al. Increasing the part accuracy in dieless robot-based incremental sheet metal forming. CIRP Annals Manuf Technol. 2009;58(1):233–238.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrogio G, De Napoli L, Filice L. A novel approach based on multiple back-drawing incremental forming to reduce geometry deviation. Int J Mater Form. 2009;2(Suppl. 1):9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Allwood JM, Braun D, Music O. The effect of partially cut-out blanks on geometric accuracy in incremental sheet forming. J Mater Process Technol. 2010;210(11):1501–1510.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrogio G, Filice L. On the use of Back-drawing Incremental Forming (BIF) to improve geometrical accuracy in sheet metal parts. Int J Mater Form. 2012;5(4):269–274.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra LR, Cao J, Ren F, et al. Improvement of geometric accuracy in incremental forming by using a squeezing toolpath strategy with two forming tools. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2011;133(6):061019.
   Google Scholar
• Shi X, Gao L, Khalatbari H, et al. Electric hot incremental forming of low carbon steel sheet: accuracy improvement. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2013;68(1–4):241–247.
   Google Scholar
• Radu C, Tampu C, Cristea I, et al. the effect of residual stresses on the accuracy of parts processed by SPIF. Mater Manuf Processes. 2013;28(5):572–576.
   Google Scholar
• Asghar J, Lingam R, Shibin E, et al. Tool path design for enhancement of accuracy in single-point incremental forming. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B. 2013;228(9):1027–1035.
   Google Scholar
• Behera AK, Bert L, Duflou JR. Tool path generation framework for accurate manufacture of complex 3D sheet metal parts using single point incremental forming. Comput Ind. 2014;65(Suppl. 4):563–584.
   Google Scholar
• Fan G, Gao L. Numerical simulation and experimental investigation to improve the dimensional accuracy in electric hot incremental forming of Ti–6Al–4V titanium sheet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2014;72(5–8):1133–1141.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadi A, Vanhove H, Bael AV, et al. Towards accuracy improvement in single point incremental forming of shallow parts formed under laser assisted conditions. Int J Mater Form. 2016;9(3):339–351.
   Google Scholar
• Cui XH, Mo JH, Li JJ, et al. Electromagnetic incremental forming (EMIF): A novel aluminum alloy sheet and tube forming technology. J Mater Process Technol. 2014;214(2):p. 409–427.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Ren H, Xu R, et al. A mixed double-sided incremental forming toolpath strategy for improved geometric accuracy. J Manufact Sci and Engg. 2015;137(5):051007.
   Google Scholar
• Lu H, Kearney M, Li Y, et al. Model predictive control of incremental sheet forming for geometric accuracy improvement. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;82(9–12):1781–1794.
   Google Scholar
• Formisano A, Boccarusso L, Capece Minutolo F, et al. Negative and positive incremental forming: comparison by geometrical, experimental, and FEM considerations. Mater Manuf Processes. 2017;32(5):530–536.
   Google Scholar
• Lochner RH. Pros and cons of Taguchi. Qual Eng. 1991;3(4):p. 537–549.
   Google Scholar
• Maqbool F, Bambach M. Dominant deformation mechanisms in single point incremental forming (SPIF) and their effect on geometrical accuracy. Int J Mech Sci. 2018;136:p. 279–292.
   Google Scholar