Investigations on the influence of printing parameters during processing of biocompatible polymer in Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM)

References

• Anzolin D, Carvalho GAP, Franco ABG, et al. Biomechanical behavior of an implant system of carbon fiber-reinforced polyether ether ketone (PEEK) bars with different designs: finite elements analysis. InterAm J Medi Health. 2019;2: e201901003–e201901003.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Wardle BL, Arif MF. Strength and performance enhancement of bonded joints by spatial tailoring of adhesive compliance via 3D printing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(1):884–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam R, Idapalapati S, Feih S. Printing and characterisation of Kagome lattice structures by fused deposition modelling. Mater Des. 2018;137:266–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsouknidas A, Pantazopoulos M, Katsoulis I, et al. Impact absorption capacity of 3D-printed components fabricated by fused deposition modelling. Mater Des. 2016;102:41–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanikella NG, Wittbrodt B, Pearce JM. Tensile strength of commercial polymer materials for fused filament fabrication 3D printing. Addit Manuf. 2017;15:40–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning F, Cong W, Hu Z, et al. Additive manufacturing of thermoplastic matrix composites using fused deposition modeling: a comparison of two reinforcements. J Compos Mater. 2017;51(27):3733–3742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey A, Awasthi A, Saxena KK. Metallic implants with properties and latest production techniques: a review. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2020;6(2):405–440.
   Google Scholar
• Banoriya D, Purohit R, Dwivedi RK. Wear performance of titanium reinforced biocompatible TPU. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2020;6(2):284–291.
   Google Scholar
• Berretta S, Evans K, Ghita O. Additive manufacture of PEEK cranial implants: manufacturing considerations versus accuracy and mechanical performance. Mater Des. 2018;139:141–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dave HK, Prajapati AR, Rajpurohit SR, et al. Investigation on tensile strength and failure modes of FDM printed part using in-house fabricated PLA filament. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2020;1–22. DOI:10.1080/2374068X.2020.1829951
   Google Scholar
• Sahai N, Saxena KK, Gogoi M. Modelling and simulation for fabrication of 3D printed polymeric porous tissue scaffolds. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2020;6(3):530–539.
   Google Scholar
• Oladapo BI, Zahedi SA, Chong S, et al. 3D printing of surface characterisation and finite element analysis improvement of PEEK-HAP-GO in bone implant. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2020;106(3):829–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Ramesha CM, Sharanraj V. Finite element analysis of polyether ether ketone 450G biomaterial used as cardiovascular stent implant. In: Vessel plus; OAE Publishing Inc;2019;3:35:1-13.
   Google Scholar
• D’Amico A, Peterson AM. An adaptable FEA simulation of material extrusion additive manufacturing heat transfer in 3D. Addit Manuf. 2018;21:422–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Shapiro V. Linear-time thermal simulation of as-manufactured fused deposition modeling components. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2018;140(7):7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Hsieh SJ, Sun Y. Experimental and numerical investigation of the thermal behaviour of polylactic acid during the fused deposition process. Virtual Phys Prototyping. 2017;12(3):221–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Hsieh SJ. Thermal analysis of fused deposition modeling process using infrared thermography imaging and finite element modeling. In Thermosense: Thermal Infrared Applications XXXIX. International Society for Optics and Photonics; Anaheim, California, United States. 2017 May. vol. 10214, p. 1021409.
   Google Scholar
• Deng X, Zeng Z, Peng B, et al. Mechanical properties optimization of poly-ether-ether-ketone via fused deposition modeling. Materials. 2018;11(2):216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramgobin A, Fontaine G, Bourbigot S. A case study of polyether ether ketone (I): investigating the thermal and fire behavior of a high-performance material. Polymers. 2020;12(8):1789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osswald TA, Puentes J, Kattinger J. Fused filament fabrication melting model. Addit Manuf. 2018;22:51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawi FT, Daud R, Ayu HM, et al. Design and analysis of lightweight polyetheretherketone (PEEK) front lower control arm. In AIP Conference Proceedings. 3rd International Conference on Automotive Innovation Green Energy Vehicle, Kuantan, Malaysia. AIP Publishing LLC; 2019 Jan. vol. 2059, no. 1, p. 020026.
   Google Scholar
• Sikder P, Ferreira JA, Fakhrabadi EA, et al. Bioactive amorphous magnesium phosphate-polyetheretherketone composite filaments for 3D printing. Dent Mater. 2020;36(7):865–883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soni A, Singh B. Simulation and analysis of polyetheretherketone implants for diaphysis femur fracture. Int J Med Health Sci. 2020;14(4):97–102.
   Google Scholar
• Wu WZ, Geng P, Zhao J, et al. Manufacture and thermal deformation analysis of semicrystalline polymer polyether ether ketone by 3D printing. Mater Res Innovations. 2014;18(sup5):S5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Xiaoyong S, Liangcheng C, Honglin M, et al. Experimental analysis of high temperature PEEK materials on 3D printing test. In 2017 9th International conference on measuring technology and mechatronics automation (ICMTMA). Changsha, Hunan, China: IEEE; 2017 Jan. p. 13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Vasudevarao B, Natarajan DP, Henderson M, et al. Sensitivity of RP surface finish to process parameter variation 251. In Solid freeform fabrication proceedings, pp. 251–258. Austin, TX: The University of Texas, USA, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Cross MM. Relation between viscoelasticity and shear-thinning behaviour in liquids. Rheol Acta. 1979;18(5):609–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hieber CA, Chiang HH. Shear-rate-dependence modeling of polymer melt viscosity. Polym Eng Sci. 1992;32(14):931–938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalaznik M, Kalin M, Novak S. Influence of the processing temperature on the tribological and mechanical properties of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) polymer. Tribol Int. 2016;94:92–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Tian X, Li D, et al. Influence of thermal processing conditions in 3D printing on the crystallinity and mechanical properties of PEEK material. J Mater Process Technol. 2017;248:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, P, Zou B, Xiao H, Ding S, Huang C. Effects of printing parameters of fused deposition modeling on mechanical properties, surface quality, and microstructure of PEEK. J. Mater. Process.Technol. 2019;271:62–74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS. Parametric appraisal of fused deposition modelling process using the grey Taguchi method. Proc Inst Mech Eng. Part B: J Eng Manufacture. 2010;224(1):135–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar