Experimental study of the mechanical and durability properties of Slag and Calcined Clay based geopolymer composite

References

• Andrew RM. Global CO2 emissions from cement production. Earth Syst Sci Data Discuss. 2017;1–52. DOI:10.5194/essd-2017-77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidovits J. Geopolymers. J Therm Anal. 1991;37(8):1633–1656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheah CB, Part WK, Ramli M. The long term engineering properties of cementless building block work containing large volume of wood ash and coal fly ash. Constr Build Mater. 2017;143:522–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yurt Ü. High performance cementless composites from alkali activated GGBFS. Constr Build Mater. 2020;264:120222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang J, Dai JG, Zhao TJ, et al. Alternation of traditional cement mortars using fly ash-based geopolymer mortars modified by slag. J Clean Prod. 2018;203:746–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong Y, Yum WS, Moon J, et al. Utilization of precipitated CaCO3 from carbon sequestration of industrially emitted CO2 in cementless CaO-activated blast-furnace slag binder system. J Clean Prod. 2017;166:649–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolz J, Boluk Y, Bindiganavile V. Mechanical, thermal and acoustic properties of cellular alkali activated fly ash concrete. Cem Concr Compos. 2018;94:24–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie J, Wang J, Rao R, et al. Effects of combined usage of GGBS and fly ash on workability and mechanical properties of alkali activated geopolymer concrete with recycled aggregate. Elsevier Ltd; 2019. DOI:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.067.
   Google Scholar
• Gomaa E, Sargon S, Kashosi C, et al. Effect of different class C fly ash compositions on the properties of the alkali-activated concrete.Int Congr Polym Concr, (ICPIC 2018). 2018;541–547. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-78175-4_69.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan A, Arif M, Shariq M. Mechanical behaviour and microstructural investigation of geopolymer concrete after exposure to elevated temperatures. Arab J Sci Eng. 2020;45(5):3843–3861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jindal BB, Parveen DS, Goyal A. Predicting relationship between mechanical properties of low calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Trans Indian Ceram Soc. 2017;76(4):258–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadi MNS, Farhan NA, Sheikh MN. Design of geopolymer concrete with GGBFS at ambient curing condition using Taguchi method. Constr Build Mater. 2017;140:424–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbarasan I, Soundarapandian N. Investigation of mechanical and micro structural properties of geopolymer concrete blended by dredged marine sand and manufactured sand under ambient curing conditions. Struct Concr. 2020;21(3):992–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheah CB, Samsudin MH. Optimization on the hybridization ratio of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag and High Calcium Wood Ash (GGBS – HCWA) for the fabrication of geopolymer mortar. Adv Environ Biol. 2015;9:22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Huseien GF, Mirza J, Ismail M, et al. Effect of metakaolin replaced granulated blast furnace slag on fresh and early strength properties of geopolymer mortar. Ain Shams Eng J. 2018;9(4):1557–1566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karthik A, Sudalaimani K, Vijayakumar CT. Durability study on coal fly ash-blast furnace slag geopolymer concretes with bio-additives. Ceram Int. 2017;43(15):11935–11943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh B, Rahman MR, Paswan R, et al. Effect of activator concentration on the strength, ITZ and drying shrinkage of fly ash/slag geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2016;118:171–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puertas F, González-Fonteboa B, González-Taboada I, et al. Alkali-activated slag concrete: fresh and hardened behaviour. Cem Concr Compos. 2018;85:22–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancio Díaz Y, Sánchez Berriel S, Heierli U, et al. Limestone calcined clay cement as a low-carbon solution to meet expanding cement demand in emerging economies. Dev Eng. 2017;2:82–91.
   Google Scholar
• Karthikeyan R, Senthil Kumar V, Punitha A, et al. An Integrated ANN–GA approach to maximise the material removal rate and surface roughness of wire cut EDM on Titanium alloy. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2020;1–11. DOI:10.1080/2374068X.2020.1793267
   Google Scholar
• Hemmat Esfe M, Wongwises S, Naderi A, et al. Thermal conductivity of Cu/TiO2-water/EG hybrid nanofluid: experimental data and modeling using artificial neural network and correlation. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2015;66:100–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh PK, Rajput SK, Kumar S. Prediction of HAZ width and toughness of HY85 steel using artificial neural network. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2020;1–15. DOI:10.1080/2374068X.2020.1860498
   Google Scholar
• Shafiq N, Kumar R, Zahid M, et al. Effects of modified metakaolin using nano-silica on the mechanical properties and durability of concrete. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(14):1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MSH, Nguyen QD, Castel A. Performance of limestone calcined clay blended cement-based concrete against carbonation. Adv Cem Res. 2020;32(11):481–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreiro S, Herfort D, Damtoft JS. Effect of raw clay type, fineness, water-to-cement ratio and fly ash addition on workability and strength performance of calcined clay – limestone Portland cements. Cem Concr Res. 2017;101:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen QD, Khan MSH, Castel A. Engineering properties of limestone calcined clay concrete. J Adv Concr Technol. 2018;16(8):343–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamed N, El-Feky MS, Kohail M, et al. Effect of nano-clay de-agglomeration on mechanical properties of concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2019;205:245–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamdi N, Ben Messaoud I, Srasra E. Production of geopolymer binders using clay minerals and industrial wastes. Comptes Rendus Chim. 2019;22(2–3):220–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhar S, Luhar I, Gupta R. Durability performance evaluation of green geopolymer concrete. Eur J Environ Civ Eng. 2020;1–49. DOI:10.1080/19648189.2020.1847691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najimi M, Ghafoori N, Sharbaf M. Alkali-activated natural pozzolan/slag mortars: a parametric study. Constr Build Mater. 2018;164:625–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta A, Siddique R. Properties of low-calcium fly ash based geopolymer concrete incorporating OPC as partial replacement of fly ash. Constr Build Mater. 2017;150:792–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubba Z, Fahim Huseien G, Sam ARM, et al. Impact of curing temperatures and alkaline activators on compressive strength and porosity of ternary blended geopolymer mortars. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2018;9:e00205.
   Google Scholar