Experimental Investigation of Tool Wear in Machining of SiC Based Al-MMC

References

• Singh L, Singh B, Saxena KK. Manufacturing techniques for metal matrix composites (MMC): an overview. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2020;6(2):224–240.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla N, Shen YL. Mechanical behavior of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Adv Eng Mater. 2001;3(6):357–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altınkök N. Investigation of mechanical and machinability properties of Al2O3/SiCp reinforced Al-based composite fabricated by stir cast technique. J Porous Mater. 2015;22(6):1643–1654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basavarajappa S, Chandramohan G, Mukund K, et al. Dry sliding wear behavior of Al 2219/SiCp-Gr hybrid metal matrix composites. J Mater Eng Perform. 2006;15(6):668–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain P, Soni S, Baredar P. Review on machining of aluminium metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Res India. 2014;11(2):114–120.
   Google Scholar
• Manna A, Bhattacharayya B. A study on machinability of Al/SiC-MMC. J Mater Process Technol. 2003;140(1–3 SPEC.):711–716.
   Google Scholar
• Paulo Davim J, Monteiro Baptista A. Relationship between cutting force and PCD cutting tool wear in machining silicon carbide reinforced aluminum. J Mater Process Technol. 2000;103(3):417–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls CJ, Boswell B, Davies IJ, et al. Review of machining metal matrix composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2017;90(9–12):2429–2441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basavarajappa S, Chandramohan G, Davim JP. Some studies on drilling of hybrid metal matrix composites based on Taguchi techniques. J Mater Process Technol. 2008;196(1–3):332–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bains PS, Sidhu SS, Payal HS. Fabrication and Machining of Metal Matrix Composites: a Review. Mater Manuf Process. 2016;31(5):553–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pramanik A, Zhang LC, Arsecularatne JA. Machining of metal matrix composites: effect of ceramic particles on residual stress, surface roughness and chip formation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2008;48(15):1613–1625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przestacki D. Conventional and laser assisted machining of composite A359/20SiCp. Procedia CIRP. 2014;14:229–233.
   Google Scholar
• Shetty R, Pai RB, Rao SS, et al. Taguchi’s technique in machining of metal matrix composites. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2009;31(1):12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Gallab M, Sklad M. Machining of Al/SiC particulate metal-matrix composites Part I: tool performance. J Mater Process Technol. 1998;83(1–3):151–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-gallab M, Sklad M. Machining of Al/SiC particulate metal matrix composites Part II : workpiece surface integrity. J Mater Process Technol. 1998;83:277–285.
   Google Scholar
• Ciftci I, Turker M, Seker U. Evaluation of tool wear when machining SiCp-reinforced Al-2014 alloy matrix composites. Mater Des. 2004;25(3):251–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looney LA, Monaghan JM, O’Reilly P, et al. The turning of an Al/SiC metal-matrix composite. J Mater Process Tech. 1992;33(4):453–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Laghari RA. A review on machining and optimization of particle-reinforced metal matrix composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;100(9–12):2929–2943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Seah WKH. Tool wear acceleration in relation to workpiece reinforcement percentage in cutting of metal matrix composites. Wear. 2001;247(2):161–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeman M, Ganesan G, Karthikeyan R, et al. Study on tool wear and surface roughness in machining of particulate aluminum metal matrix composite-response surface methodology approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2010;48(5–8):613–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirubadurai B, Kanagaraja K, Jegadeeswari G. Impact of BUE on surface ruggedness for machining of aluminium matrix composites (6061/fly ash). Adv Mater Process Technol. 2020;1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Karakaş MS, Acir A, Übeyli M, et al. Effect of cutting speed on tool performance in milling of B4Cp reinforced aluminum metal matrix composites. J Mater Process Technol. 2006;178(1–3):241–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiliçkap E, Çakir O, Aksoy M, et al. Study of tool wear and surface roughness in machining of homogenised SiC-p reinforced aluminium metal matrix composite. J Mater Process Technol. 2005;164–165:862–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi SS, Ramakrishnan N, Nagarwalla HE, et al. Wear of rotary carbide tools in machining of Al/SiCp composites. Wear. 1999;230(2):124–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhushan RK, Kumar S, Das S. Effect of machining parameters on surface roughness and tool wear for 7075 Al alloy SiC composite. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2010;50(5–8):459–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding X, Liew WYH, Liu XD. Evaluation of machining performance of MMC with PCBN and PCD tools. Wear. 2005;259(7–12):1225–1234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanming Q, Zehua Z. Tool wear and its mechanism for cutting SiC particle-reinforced aluminium matrix composites. J Mater Process Technol. 2000;100(1):194–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinert K, König W. A consideration of tool wear mechanism when machining metal matrix composites (MMC). CIRP Ann Manuf Technol. 1993;42(1):95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Iyappan SK, Karthikeyan S, Ravikumar K, et al. Mechanical properties and machinability of aluminium and aluminium-silicon carbide composites processed by equal channel angular pressing (ECAP). Adv Mater Process Technol. 2020;1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ong P, Lee WK, Lau RJH. Tool condition monitoring in CNC end milling using wavelet neural network based on machine vision. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;104(1–4):1369–1379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta S, Pal SK, Mukhopadhyay S, et al. Application of digital image processing in tool condition monitoring: a review. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol. 2013;6(3):212–232.
   Google Scholar
• D’Addona DM, Teti R. Image data processing via neural networks for tool wear prediction. Procedia CIRP. 2013;12:252–257.
   Google Scholar