Evaluation of particle size distribution, mechanical properties, microstructure and electrochemical studies of AA1050/fly ash metal matrix composite

References

• Prasanna SC, Selvan TT. Method and evaluation microstructural, mechanical properties and numerical analysis. Int J Mech Prod Eng Dev. 2018;8(2):677–682.
   Google Scholar
• Sirahbizu Yigezu B, Mahapatra MM, Jha PK. Influence of reinforcement type on microstructure, hardness, and tensile properties of an aluminum alloy metal matrix composite. J Miner Mater Charact Eng. 2013;1(4):124–130.
   Google Scholar
• Alaneme KK, Bodunrin MO, Awe AA. Microstructure, mechanical and fracture properties of groundnut shell ash and silicon carbide dispersion strengthened aluminium matrix composites. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences. 2018;30(1):96–103.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma PK, Dwivedi SP, Kumar A, et al. Effect of magnesium addition on mechanical properties of al-fly ash green composite produced under green ultrasonic vibration process. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol. 2019;6(3):559–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association American Coal Ash. Fly ash facts for highway engineers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Vinod B, Ramanathan S, Anandajothi M. A novel approach for utilization of agro-industrial waste materials as reinforcement with Al–7Si–0.3Mg matrix hybrid composite on tribological behaviour. SN Appl Sci. 2019;1(62):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hemalatha T, Ramaswamy A. A review on fly ash characteristics – towards promoting high volume utilization in developing sustainable concrete. J Clean Prod. 2017;147:546–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirubadurai B, Kanagaraja K, Jegadeeswari G. Impact of BUE on surface ruggedness for machining of aluminium matrix composites (6061/fly ash). Adv Mater Process Technol. 2020;1–8. DOI:10.1080/2374068X.2020.1823656
   Google Scholar
• Akinwamide SO, Abe BT, Akinribide OJ, et al. Characterization of microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion response of aluminium-based composites fabricated via casting — a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;109:975–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry Ononiwu N, Akinlabi ET, Ozoegwu CG. Sustainability in production and selection of reinforcement particles in aluminium alloy metal matrix composites: a review. J Phys. 2019;1378(042015):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Singh L, Singh B, Saxena KK. Manufacturing techniques for metal matrix composites (MMC): an overview. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2020;6(2):441–457.
   Google Scholar
• Bilal M, Shaikh N, Arif S. Fabrication and characterization of aluminium hybrid composites reinforced with fly ash and silicon carbide through powder metallurgy. Mater Res Express. 2018;5(046506):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Ramkumar Venkatasamy T, Venkatesa Prabu D, Baskaran S. Fabrication and mechanical behaviour evaluation of A7075 basalt fly ash MMCs prepared by stir casting method. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2020;764(012019):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Nagaraj N, Mahendra KV, Nagaral M. Microstructure and evaluation of mechanical properties of Al-7Si-fly ash composites. Mater Today Proc. 2018;5(1):3109–3116.
   Google Scholar
• Fan LJ, Juang SH. Reaction effect of fly ash with Al-3Mg melt on the microstructure and hardness of aluminum matrix composites. Mater Des. 2016;89:941–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oghenevweta JE, Aigbodion VS, Nyior GB, et al. Mechanical properties and microstructural analysis of Al–Si–Mg/carbonized maize stalk waste particulate composites. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences. 2016;28(2):222–229.
   Google Scholar
• Ononiwu NH, Akinlabi ET. Effects of ball milling on particle size distribution and microstructure of eggshells for applications in metal matrix composites. Mater Today Proc. 2020;26(2020):1049–1053.
   Google Scholar
• Ononiwu NH, Ozoegwu CG, Jeremiah O, et al. Effect of particle size on the microstructure and distribution of fly ash for metal matrix composite applications. Mater Today Proc. 2021;26(2):1049–1053.
   Google Scholar
• Akinwamide SO, Lemika SM, Obadele BA, et al. Characterization and mechanical response of novel Al- (Mg – tiFe – siC) metal matrix composites developed by stir casting technique. J Compos Mater. 2019;53(28–30):3929–3938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalera-Lozano R, Gutiérrez CA, Pech-Canul MA, et al. Corrosion characteristics of hybrid Al/SiCp/MgAl2O4 composites fabricated with fly ash and recycled aluminum. Mater Charact. 2007;58(10):953–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan SB, Aigbodion VS. Effects of eggshell on the microstructures and properties of Al–Cu–Mg/eggshell particulate composites. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences. 2013;27(1):49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Chandla NK, Kant S, Goud MM. Experimental analysis and mechanical characterization of Al 6061/alumina/bagasse ash hybrid reinforced metal matrix composite using vacuum-assisted stir casting method. J Compos Mater. 2020;1–15. DOI:10.1177/0021998320929417
   Google Scholar
• Dwivedi SP, Sharma S. Influence of precipitation hardening parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of extruded AA2014/eggshells green composites. J Compos Mater. 2017;51(30):4261–4271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu JSS, Srinivasan A, Kang CG. Nano and macromechanical properties of aluminium (A356) based hybrid composites reinforced with multiwall carbon nanotubes/alumina fiber. J Compos Mater. 2017;51(11):1631–1642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanayo K, Apata P. Corrosion and wear behaviour of rice husk ash — alumina reinforced Al – mg – si alloy matrix hybrid composites. J Mater Res Technol. 2013;2(2):188–194.
   Google Scholar
• Kanayo K, Moyosore T, Apata P. Corrosion and wear behaviour of Al – mg – si alloy matrix hybrid composites reinforced with rice husk ash and silicon carbide. J Mater Res Technol. 2013;3(1):9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sethi D, Kumar S, Choudhury S, et al. Synthesis and characterization of AA7075/TiB2 aluminum matrix composite formed through stir casting method. Mater Today Proc. 2020;26(2):1908–1913.
   Google Scholar