Role of additive manufacturing and various reinforcements in MMCs related to biomedical applications

References

• Blanco AM, Krauel L, Artés FF. Development of a patients-specific 3D-printed preoperative planning and training tool, with functionalized internal surfaces, for complex oncologic cases. Rapid Prototyping J. 2017; 24(2), 145-150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaman JJ, Bourell DL, Seepersad CC, et al. Additive manufacturing review: early past to current practice. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2020;142(11). DOI:10.1115/1.4048193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock CJ, Bussy C. Biocompatibility considerations in the design of graphene biomedical materials. Adv Mater Interfaces. 2019;6(11):1900229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagarajan N, Dupret-Bories A, Karabulut E, et al. Enabling personalized implant and controllable biosystem development through 3D printing. Biotechnol Adv. 2018;36(2):521–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh DD, Mahender T, Reddy AR. Powder bed fusion process: a brief review. Mater Today Proc. 2021;46:350–355.
   Google Scholar
• Attaran M. The rise of 3-D printing: the advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing. Bus Horiz. 2017;60(5):677–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller C, Kleer R, Piller FT. Economic implications of 3D printing: market structure models in light of additive manufacturing revisited.International. J Prod Econ. 2015;164:43–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, et al. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem Rev. 2017;117(15):10212–10290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karunakaran R, Ortgies S, Tamayol A, et al. Additive manufacturing of magnesium alloys. Bioact Mater. 2020;5(1):44–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma SK, Saxena KK, Malik V, et al. Significance of alloying elements on the mechanical characteristics of Mg-based materials for biomedical applications. Crystals. 2022;12:1138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk K, Schaeken HG, Maree CHM, et al. Influence of Ar pressure on rf magnetron-sputtered Ca5 (PO4) 3OH layers. Surf Coat Technol. 1995;76:206–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim NF, Mohamad H, Noor Fazliah Mohd Noor S, et al. Apatite formation on melt-derived bioactive glass powder based on SiO2-CaO-Na2O-P2O5 system. Ceram Int. 2017;43(15):11676–11685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma SK, Saxena KK. An outlook on the influence on mechanical properties of AZ31 reinforced with graphene nanoparticles using powder metallurgy technique for biomedical application. Mater Today Proc. 2022;56:2278–2287.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma SK, Saxena KK, Kumar KB, et al. The effect of reinforcements on the mechanical properties of AZ31 composites prepared by powder metallurgy: an overview. Mater Today Proc. 2022;56:2293–2299.
   Google Scholar
• Patel V, Ahmed I, Podbielski D, et al. Cost-Effectiveness analysis of standalone trabecular micro-bypass stents in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma in Canada. J Med Econ. 2019;22(4):390–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh S, Ramakrishna S. Biomedical applications of additive manufacturing: present and future. Curr Opin Biomed Eng. 2017;2:105–115.
   Google Scholar
• Singh R, Gupta A, Tripathi O, et al. Powder bed fusion process in additive manufacturing: an overview. Mater Today Proc. 2020;26:3058–3070.
   Google Scholar
• Zafar MQ, Wu CC, Zhao H, et al. Finite element framework for electron beam melting process simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2020;109(7):2095–2112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruth J-P. Material incress manufacturing by rapid prototyping techniques. CIRP Ann. 1991;40(2):603–614.
   Google Scholar
• Kavimani V, Prakash KS, Thankachan T. Investigation of graphene-reinforced magnesium metal matrix composites processed through a solvent-based powder metallurgy route. Bull Mater Sci. 2019;42(1):39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambrone L, Rincón-Castro MV, Poveda-Marín AE, et al. Histological healing outcomes at the bone–titanium interface of loaded and unloaded dental implants installed in humans: a systematic review of controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Implantol. 2020;13(4):1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Thakkar V, Kolte DR, Solanki N, et al. Stereolithography-an overview. J Indian Dent Assoc. 2014;8(1), 18-21.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen DN, Dao TP, Prakash C, et al. Machining parameter optimization in shear thickening polishing of gear surfaces. J Mater Res Technol. 2020;9(3):5112–5126.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta NK, Somani N, Prakash C, et al. Revealing the WEDM process parameters for the machining of pure and heat-treated titanium (Ti-6al-4V) alloy. Materials. 2021;14(9):2292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey A, Singh G, Singh S, et al. 3D printed biodegradable functional temperature-stimuli shape memory polymer for customized scaffoldings. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;108:103781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma SK, Saxena KK. Effects on microstructure and mechanical properties of AZ31 reinforced with CNT by powder metallurgy: an overview. Mater Today Proc. 2022; 56(4), 2038–2042.
   Google Scholar
• Zang Q, Chen H, Zhang J, et al. Microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of AZ31/GNPs composites prepared by friction stir processing. J Mater Res Technol. 2021; 14: 195-201.
   Google Scholar
• Rashad M, Pan F, Liu Y, et al. High temperature formability of graphene nanoplatelets-AZ31 composites fabricated by stir-casting method. J Magnesium Alloys. 2016;4(4):270–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja KS, Srikanth S, Arif S, et al. Mechanical and micro-structural behaviour of graphene coated with magnesium alloy. Mater Today Proc. 2021;44:3589–3594.
   Google Scholar
• Wu L, Wu R, Hou L, et al. Microstructure, mechanical properties and wear performance of AZ31 matrix composites reinforced by graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs). J Alloys Compd. 2018;750:530–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavimani V, Prakash KS, Thankachan T. Surface characterization and specific wear rate prediction of r-GO/AZ31 composite under dry sliding wear condition. Surf Interfaces 2017;6:143–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aboudzadeh N, Dehghanian C, Shokrgozar MA. In vitro degradation and cytotoxicity of Mg-5zn-0.3 Ca/nHA biocomposites prepared by powder metallurgy. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2018;28(9):1745–1754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Campo R, Savoini B, Munoz A, et al. Mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of Mg–HAP composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;39:238–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanra AK, Jung HC, Yu SH, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg-HAP composites. Bull Mater Sci. 2010;33(1):43–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saremi M, Kavusi N. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg-nano/micro hydroxy apatite composites made by powder metallurgy method. AIP Conf Proc. 2017;1896(1):200011.
   Google Scholar
• Lakshmanan PA, Raghuvaran JG, Karthikeyan G. Fabrication and tribological behaviour of mg -TiO2 composites. Trans Famena. 2017;41(4): 61–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhoU H, Zhang C, Han B, et al. Microstructures and mechanical properties of nanocrystalline AZ31 magnesium alloy powders with submicron TiB2 additions prepared by mechanical milling. Crystals. 2020;10(6):550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvakumar A, Vengatesan A. Study on mechanical behavior of nanoparticulate reinforced magnesium matrix composite. Int J Innov Sci Res Technol. 2019; 4(2): 363-368.
   Google Scholar
• Gokhale AM, Patel GR. Analysis of variability in tensile ductility of a semi-solid metal cast A356 Al-alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2005;392(1–2):184–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakshmanan Pillai A, Jinu GR. Synthesis of titanium oxide particles reinforced with magnesium by argon controlled stir casting process and characterization. Chem Miner. 2017;5(2):26–33.
   Google Scholar