Multi-response optimisation and performance evaluation of Inconel 625 superalloy machining under cryogenic cooling environment

References

• Ezugwu EO. Key improvements in the machining of difficult-to-cut aerospace superalloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2005;45(12–13):1353–1367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiselstein HL, Tillack DJ. The invention and definition of alloy 625. Superalloys. 1991;718(625):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ezugwu EO. Improvements in the machining of aero-engine alloys using self-propelled rotary tooling technique. J Mater Process Technol. 2007;185(1–3):60–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narutaki N, Yamane Y, Tashima S, et al. A new advanced ceramic for dry machining. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol. 1997;46(1):43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman ST. Environmentally conscious machining of difficult-to-machine materials with regard to cutting fluids. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2012;57:83–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong SY, Ding Y. Cooling approaches and cutting temperatures in cryogenic machining of Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2001;41(10):1417–1437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Muñoz-Escalona P, et al. State-of-the-art cryogenic machining and processing. Int J Comput Integr Manuf. 2013;26(7):616–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong SY. Lubrication mechanisms of LN2 in ecological cryogenic machining. Mach Sci Technol. 2006;10(1):133–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ZY, Rajurkar KP. Cryogenic machining of hard-to-cut materials. Wear. 2000;239(2):168–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anburaj R, Pradeep Kumar M. Influences of cryogenic CO2 and LN2 on surface integrity of inconel 625 during face milling. Mater Manuf Process. 2021;36(16):1829–1839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulutan D, Ozel T. Machining induced surface integrity in titanium and nickel alloys: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2011;51(3):250–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pusavec F, Hamdi H, Kopac J, et al. Surface integrity in cryogenic machining of nickel based alloy-Inconel 718. J Mater Process Technol. 2011;211(4):773–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umbrello D, Micari F, Jawahir IS. The effects of cryogenic cooling on surface integrity in hard machining: a comparison with dry machining. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol. 2012;61(1):103–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivaiah P, Chakradhar D. Effect of cryogenic coolant on turning performance characteristics during machining of 17-4 PH stainless steel: a comparison with MQL, wet, dry machining. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol. 2018;21:86–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul S, Chattopadhyay AB. Effects of cryogenic cooling by liquid nitrogen jet on forces, temperature and surface residual stresses in grinding steels. Cryogenics. 1995;35(8):515–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jawahir IS, Attia H, Biermann D, et al. Cryogenic Manufacturing Processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol. 2016;65(2):713–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar NR, Kishore NS, Paul S, et al. The effects of cryogenic cooling on chips and cutting forces in turning AISI 1040 and AISI 4320 steels. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf. 2002;216(5):713–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhananchezian M, Kumar MP, Rajaduari A. Experimental investigation of cryogenic cooling by liquid nitrogen in the orthogonal machining process. Int J Recent Trends Eng. 2009;1(5):55–59.
   Google Scholar
• Sivaiah P, Chakradhar D. Machinability studies on 17-4 PH stainless steel under cryogenic cooling environment. Mater Manuf Process. 2017;32(15):1775–1788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pusavec F, Kramar D, Krajnik P, et al. Transitioning to sustainable production–part II: evaluation of sustainable machining technologies. J Clean Prod. 2010;18(12):1211–1221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann D, Abrahams H, Metzger M. Experimental investigation of tool wear and chip formation in cryogenic machining of titanium alloys. Adv Manuf. 2015;3(4):292–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermingham MJ, Kirsch J, Sun S, et al. New observations on tool life, cutting forces and chip morphology in cryogenic machining Ti-6al-4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2011;51(6):500–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul S, Chattopadhyay AB. Environmentally conscious machining and grinding with cryogenic cooling. Mach Sci Technol. 2006;10(1):87–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar NR, Paul S, Chattopadhyay AB. Role of cryogenic cooling on cutting temperature in turning steel. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2002;124(1):146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadhav PS, Mohanty CP. Performance assessment of energy efficient and eco-friendly turning of Nimonic C-263: a comparative study on MQL and cryogenic machining. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf. 2022;236(8):1125–1140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna N, Shah P. Comparative analysis of dry, flood, MQL and cryogenic CO2 techniques during the machining of 15-5-PH SS alloy. Tribol Int. 2020;146:106196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldırım ÇV, Kıvak T, Sarıkaya M, et al. Evaluation of tool wear, surface roughness/topography and chip morphology when machining of Ni-based alloy 625 under MQL, cryogenic cooling and CryoMQL. J Mater Res Technol. 2020;9(2):2079–2092.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta MK, Korkmaz ME, Sarıkaya M, et al. In-process detection of cutting forces and cutting temperature signals in cryogenic assisted turning of titanium alloys: an analytical approach and experimental study. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2022;169:108772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Pang S, Yan P, et al. Experimental research on cryogenic cutting performance of Ni-based superalloy GH4169. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2022;121(1–2):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Caudill J, Chen S, et al. Machining-induced surface integrity in titanium alloy Ti-6al-4V: an investigation of cutting edge radius and cooling/lubricating strategies. J Manuf Process. 2022;74:353–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish M, Aslantas K, Hascelik A, et al. An experimental investigations on effects of cooling/lubrication conditions in micro milling of additively manufactured Inconel 718. Tribol Int. 2022;173:107620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivaiah P, Chakradhar D. Modeling and optimization of sustainable manufacturing process in machining of 17-4 PH stainless steel. Measurement. 2019;134:142–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheth M, Gajjar K, Jain A, et al. Multi-objective optimization of inconel 718 using combined approach of taguchi—grey relational analysis. In: Advances in mechanical engineering. Singapore: Springer; 2021. pp. 229–235.
   Google Scholar
• Chopard B, Tomassini M. Performance and limitations of metaheuristics. In: Bäck T, Kari L, Stepney S, editors. An introduction to metaheuristics for optimization. Natural Computing Series (NCS). Cham: Springer; 2018. p. XII, 226.
   Google Scholar
• Sarıkaya M, Güllü A. Multi-response optimization of minimum quantity lubrication parameters using Taguchi-based grey relational analysis in turning of difficult-to-cut alloy Haynes 25. J Clean Prod. 2015;91:347–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senthilkumar N, Tamizharasan T, Anandakrishnan V. Experimental investigation and performance analysis of cemented carbide inserts of different geometries using Taguchi based grey relational analysis. Measurement. 2014;8:520–536.
   Google Scholar
• Li N, Chen YJ, Kong DD. Multi-response optimization of Ti-6al-4V turning operations using Taguchi-based grey relational analysis coupled with kernel principal component analysis. Adv Manuf. 2019;7(2):142–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakesh PR, Chakradhar D. Investigation on the effect of graphene nano-cutting fluid minimum quantity lubrication on the machining performance of inconel 625. Arab J Sci Eng. 2022 7;47:8469–8483. DOI:10.1007/s13369-021-06299-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gok A. A new approach to minimization of the surface roughness and cutting force via fuzzy TOPSIS, multi-objective grey design and RSA. Measurement. 2015;70:100–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CL. Use of the Taguchi method and grey relational analysis to optimize turning operations with multiple performance characteristics. Mater Manuf Process. 2004;19(2):209–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzeng CJ, Lin YH, Yang YK, et al. Optimization of turning operations with multiple performance characteristics using the Taguchi method and Grey relational analysis. J Mater Process Technol. 2009;209(6):2753–2759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap TC, El-Tayeb NSM, Von Brevern P. Cutting forces, friction coefficient and surface roughness in machining Ti-5al-4V-0.6 Mo-0.4 Fe using carbide tool K313 under low pressure liquid nitrogen. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2013;35(1):11–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mia M, Bashir MA, Khan MA, et al. Optimization of MQL flow rate for minimum cutting force and surface roughness in end milling of hardened steel (HRC 40). Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2017;89(1):675–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mia M, Rifat A, Tanvir MF, et al. Multi-objective optimization of chip-tool interaction parameters using Grey-Taguchi method in MQL-assisted turning. Measurement. 2018;129:156–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranganathan S, Senthilvelan T. Multi-response optimization of machining parameters in hot turning using grey analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2011;56(5):455–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo AK, Sahoo B. Performance studies of multilayer hard surface coatings (TiN/TiCN/Al2O3/TiN) of indexable carbide inserts in hard machining: part-II (RSM, grey relational and techno economical approach). Measurement. 2013;46(8):2868–2884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kıvak T. Optimization of surface roughness and flank wear using the Taguchi method in milling of Hadfield steel with PVD and CVD coated inserts. Measurement. 2014;50:19–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulyana T, Abd Rahim E, Yahaya SN. The influence of cryogenic supercritical carbon dioxide cooling on tool wear during machining high thermal conductivity steel. J Clean Prod. 2017;164:950–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar