Investigation, optimising the MQL-Turning parameters of Nimonic 75 using weighted Mayfly algorithm

References

• Chethan YD, Ravindra HV, Krishnegowda YT. Optimization of machining parameters in turning Nimonic-75 using machine vision and acoustic emission signals by Taguchi technique. Measurement. 2019;144:144–154.
   Google Scholar
• Swain N, Venkatesh V, Kumar P, et al. CIRP journal of manufacturing science and technology an experimental investigation on the machining characteristics of Nimonic 75 using uncoated and TiAlN coated tungsten carbide micro-end mills. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol. 2016;16:34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Padhan S, Das SR, Das A, et al. Machinability investigation of Nitronic 60 steel turning using SiAlON ceramic tools under different cooling/lubrication conditions. Materials. 2022;15(7):2368. DOI:10.3390/ma15072368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das A, Padhan S, Das SR, et al. Performance assessment and chip morphology evaluation of austenitic stainless steel under sustainable machining conditions. Metals. 2021;11:2021.
   Google Scholar
• Virdi RL, Chatha SS, Singh H. Processing characteristics of different vegetable oil-based nanofluid MQL for grinding of Ni-Cr alloy. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2020;8:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Jahani M, Alizadeh M, Pirozifard M, et al. Optimization of enzymatic degumming process for rice bran oil using response surface methodology. LWT - Food Sci Technol. 2008;41(10):1892–1898.
   Google Scholar
• Lawal SA, Choudhury IA, Nukman Y. Evaluation of vegetable and mineral oil-in-water emulsion cutting fluids in turning AISI 4340 steel with coated carbide tools. J Clean Prod. 2014;66:610–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojolo SJ, Amuda MOH, Ogunmola OY, et al. Experimental determination of the effect of some straight biological oils on cutting force during cylindrical turning. Matéria (Rio Janeiro). 2008;13(4):650–663.
   Google Scholar
• Xavior MA, Adithan M. Determining the influence of cutting fluids on tool wear and surface roughness during turning of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. J Mater Process Technol. 2009;209(2):900–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MMA, Mithu MAH, Dhar NR. Effects of minimum quantity lubrication on turning AISI 9310 alloy steel using vegetable oil-based cutting fluid. J Mater Process Technol. 2009;209(15–16):5573–5583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamsi Krishna P, Srikant RR, Nageswara Rao D. Experimental investigation on the performance of nanoboric acid suspensions in SAE-40 and coconut oil during turning of AISI 1040 steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2010;50(10):911–916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojolo SJ, Ohunakin OS. Study of rake face action on cutting using palm-kernel oil as lubricant. J Emerg Trends Eng Appl Sci. 2011;2(1):30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bedi SS, Behera GC, Datta S. Effects of cutting speed on MQL machining performance of AISI 304 stainless steel using uncoated carbide insert: application potential of coconut oil and rice bran oil as cutting fluids. Arab J Sci Eng. 2020;45(11):8877–8893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasu V, Reddy GPK. Effect of minimum quantity lubrication with Al 2O 3 nanoparticles on surface roughness, tool wear and temperature dissipation in machining Inconel 600 alloy. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part N J Nanoeng Nanosyst. 2012;225(1):3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha MK, Madarkar R, Ghosh S, et al. Application of eco-friendly nanofluids during grinding of Inconel 718 through small quantity lubrication. J Clean Prod. 2017;141:1359–1375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavan RB, Venu Gopal A, Amrita M, et al. Experimental investigation of graphene nanoplatelets–based minimum quantity lubrication in grinding Inconel 718. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf. 2019;233(2):400–410.
   Google Scholar
• Hegab H, Umer U, Soliman M, et al. Effects of nano-cutting fluids on tool performance and chip morphology during machining Inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;96(9–12):3449–3458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsheikh AH, Abd M, Ranjan S, et al. A new optimized predictive model based on political optimizer for eco-friendly MQL-turning of AISI 4340 alloy with nano-lubricants. J Manuf Processes. 2021;67(May):562–578.
   Google Scholar
• Shuang Y, John M, Songlin D. Experimental investigation on the performance and mechanism of graphene oxide nanofluids in turning Ti-6Al-4V. J Manuf Process. 2019;43(April):164–174.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta MK, Sood PK, Sharma VS. Optimization of machining parameters and cutting fluids during nano-fluid based minimum quantity lubrication turning of titanium alloy by using evolutionary techniques. J Clean Prod. 2016;135:1276–1288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Li C, Jia D, et al. Experimental study on the effect of nanoparticle concentration on the lubricating property of nanofluids for MQL grinding of ni-based alloy. J Mater Process Technol. 2016;232:100–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael TME, Andre HD. A tutorial on multiobjective optimization: fundamentals and evolutionary methods. Nat Comput. 2018;17:585–609.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aydin M, Karakuzu C, Uçar M, et al. Prediction of surface roughness and cutting zone temperature in dry turning processes of AISI304 stainless steel using ANFIS with PSO learning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2013;67(1–4):957–967.
   Google Scholar
• Badiger PV, Desai V, Ramesh MR, et al. Cutting forces, surface roughness and tool wear quality assessment using ANN and PSO approach during machining of MDN431 with TiN/AlN-Coated cutting tool. Arab J Sci Eng. 2019;44(9):7465–7477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han F, Li L, Cai W, et al. Parameters optimization considering the trade-off between cutting power and MRR based on linear decreasing particle swarm algorithm in milling. J Clean Prod. 2020;262:121388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zervoudakis K, Tsafarakis S. A mayfly optimization algorithm. vol. 145. Elsevier Ltd; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Abd Elaziz M, Senthilraja S, Zayed ME, et al. A new random vector functional link integrated with mayfly optimization algorithm for performance prediction of solar photovoltaic thermal collector combined with electrolytic hydrogen production system. Appl Therm Eng. 2021;193(May):117055.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Chai Y, Liu B, et al. Bearing fault diagnosis based on energy spectrum statistics and modified mayfly optimization algorithm. Sensors. 2021;21(6). DOI:10.3390/s21062245
   Google Scholar
• Gupta MK, Sood PK, Sharma VS. Machining parameters optimization of titanium alloy using response surface methodology and particle swarm optimization under minimum-quantity lubrication environment. Mater Manuf Process. 2016;31(13):1671–1682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dash L, Padhan S, Das A, et al. Machinability investigation and sustainability assessment in hard turning of AISI D3 steel with coated carbide tool under nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication-cooling condition. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci. 2021;235(22):6496–6528.
   Google Scholar
• Tamang SK, Chandrasekaran M. Multiobjective optimization of turning performance characteristics using GA coupled with AHP based approach. Int J Integr Eng. 2021;13(6):126–136.
   Google Scholar
• Cai J, Zhang W, Deng J, et al. Optimization method of machining parameters based on intelligent algorithm. Distrib Parallel Databases. 2021;40(4):737–752.
   Google Scholar
• Bouacha K, Terrab A. Hard turning behavior improvement using NSGA-II and PSO-NN hybrid model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;86(9–12):3527–3546.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh G, Mandal P, Mondal SC. Modeling and optimization of surface roughness in keyway milling using ANN, genetic algorithm, and particle swarm optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;100(5–8):1223–1242.
   Google Scholar