The influence of nudge transparency on the experience of autonomy

References

• Arno, A., & Thomas, S. (2016). The efficacy of nudge theory strategies in influencing adult dietary behaviour: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 676. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3272-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, H. M., Shu, S. B., & Weber, E. U. (2018). The role of perceived effectiveness on the acceptability of choice architecture. Behavioural Public Policy, 4(1), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, L. (2009). The ethics of nudge. In Preference change (pp. 207–219). Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, H., Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E., Klement, K., Jonsson, M. L., & Rahali, B. (2018). Can nudges be transparent and yet effective? Journal of Economic Psychology, 65, 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2018.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehler, R., & McFarland, C. (2001). Intensity bias in affective forecasting: The role of temporal focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1480–1493. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, E. W., Forrin, N. D., & Ashton-James, C. E. (2009). On the excessive rationality of the emotional imagination: A two-systems account of affective forecasts and experiences. In K. D. Markman, W. M. P. Klein, & J. A. Suhr (Eds.), Handbook of Imagination and Mental Simulation (pp. 331–346). Psychology Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-07500-022
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2000). “Miswanting: Some problems in the forecasting of future affective states.” In Joseph P. Forgas (Ed.), Thinking and feeling: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 178–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2012). Old wine in new casks: Libertarian paternalism still violates liberal principles. Social Choice and Welfare, 38(4), 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0636-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, P. G., & Jespersen, A. M. (2013). Nudge and the manipulation of choice: A framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behaviour change in public policy. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 4(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00002762
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. M., & Welch, B. (2010). Debate: To nudge or not to nudge. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00351.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kroese, F. M., Marchiori, D. R., & de Ridder, D. T. (2015). Nudging healthy food choices: A field experiment at the train station. Journal of Public Health, 38(2), e133–e137. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdv096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t-tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 272–292. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G., Bryce, C., Hagmann, D., & Rajpal, S. (2015). Warning: You are about to be nudged. Behavioral Science & Policy, 1(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1353/bsp.2015.0000
   Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Projection bias in predicting future utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1209–1248. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matjasko, J. L., Cawley, J. H., Baker-Goering, M. M., & Yokum, D. V. (2016). Applying behavioral economics to public health policy: Illustrative examples and promising directions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 50(5), S13–S19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paunov, Y., Wänke, M., & Vogel, T. (2018). Transparency effects on policy compliance: Disclosing how defaults work can enhance their effectiveness. Behavioural Public Policy, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.40.
   Google Scholar
• Paunov, Y., Wänke, M., & Vogel, T. (2020). Combining defaults and transparency information to increase policy compliance. Social Psychology, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000419
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Sainfort, F., & Booske, B. C. (2000). Measuring post-decision satisfaction. Medical Decision Making, 20(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X0002000107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffel, M., Williams, E. F., & Pogacar, R. (2016). Ethically deployed defaults: Transparency and consumer protection through disclosure and preference articulation. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 865–880. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlachopoulos, S. P., & Michailidou, S. (2006). Development and initial validation of a measure of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in exercise: The basic psychological needs in exercise scale. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 10(3), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee1003_4
   Google Scholar
• Wachner, J., Adriaanse, M., & de Ridder, D. T. 2020 (manuscript under review).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. D., Wheatley, T., Meyers, J. M., Gilbert, D. T., & Axsom, D. (2000). Focalism: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 821. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirtz, D., Kruger, J., Scollon, C. N., & Diener, E. (2003). What to do on spring break? The role of predicted, on-line, and remembered experience in future choice. Psychological Science, 14(5), 520–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.03455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar