References
- Alexander, R. D. (1987). The biology of moral systems. Transaction Publishers.
- Alicke, M. D. (1992). Culpable causation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.368
- Alicke, M. D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 556–574.
- Alicke, M. D., Buckingham, J., Zell, E., & Davis, T. (2008). Culpable control and counterfactual reasoning in the psychology of blame. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(10), 1371–1381.
- Alicke, M. D., & Rose, D. (2012). Culpable control and causal deviance. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(10), 723–735.
- Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 574–601.
- Bai, F. (2017). Beyond dominance and competence: A moral virtue theory of status attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(3), 203–227.
- Bartneck, C., Duenser, A., Moltchanova, E., & Zawieska, K. (2015). Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in amazon’s mechanical turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment. PloS One, 10(4), e0121595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121595
- Beebe, J. R., & Buckwalter, W. (2010). The epistemic side‐effect effect. Mind & Language, 25(4), 474–498.
- Beebe, J. R., & Jensen, M. (2012). Surprising connections between knowledge and action: The robustness of the epistemic side-effect effect. Philosophical Psychology, 25(5), 689–715.
- Blader, S. L., & Chen, Y. R. (2012). Differentiating the effects of status and power: A justice perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 994–1014.
- Blader, S. L., & Chen, Y. R. (2014). What’s in a name? Status, power, and other forms of social hierarchy. In The psychology of social status (pp. 71–95). New York, NY: Springer.
- Cheng, J. T., & Tracy, J. L. (2014). Toward a unified science of hierarchy: Dominance and prestige are two fundamental pathways to human social rank. In The psychology of social status (pp. 3–27). New York, NY: Springer.
- Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103–125.
- Cohen, T. R., & Morse, L. (2014). Moral character: What it is and what it does. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2014.08.003
- Cohen, T. R., Panter, A. T., Turan, N., Morse, L., & Kim, Y. (2014). Moral character in the workplace. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 943–963. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037245
- Fleeson, W., Furr, R. M., Jayawickreme, E., Meindl, P., & Helzer, E. G. (2014). Character: The prospects for a personality-based perspective on morality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(4), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12094
- Giner-Sorolla. (2018, January 24). Powering your interaction. [blog post]. https://approachingblog.wordpress.com/2018/01/24/powering-your-interaction-2/.
- Goodwin, G. P., Piazza, J., & Rozin, P. (2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034726
- Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107(3), 1144–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004
- Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872
- Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z
- Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4
- Jayawickreme, E., & Fleeson, W. (2017). Does whole trait theory work for the virtues? In W. Sinnott-Armstrong & C. Miller (Eds.), Moral psychology, volume 5: Virtue and character (pp. 75–104). MIT Press.
- Knobe, J. (2003). Intentional action in folk psychology: An experimental investigation. Philosophical Psychology, 16(2), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080307771
- Knobe, J. (2006). The concept of intentional action: A case study in the uses of folk psychology. Philosophical Studies, 130(2), 203–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-4510-0
- Knobe, J., & Mendlow, G. S. (2004). The good, the bad and the blameworthy: Understanding the role of evaluative reasoning in folk psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 24(2), 252.
- Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stages in the development of moral thought and action. Rinehart & Winston.
- Leslie, A. M., Knobe, J., & Cohen, A. (2006). Acting intentionally and the side-effect effect: Theory of mind and moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17(5), 421–427.
- MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Routledge.
- Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). 8 social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351–398.
- Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(4), 806–834.
- Miller, C. (2013). Moral character: An empirical theory. Oxford University Press.
- Miller, C. (2016). Empirical approaches to moral character. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-character-empirical/
- Nadelhoffer, T. (2006). Desire, foresight, intentions, and intentional actions: Probing folk intuitions. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 6(1–2), 133–157.
- Nowak, M. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314(5805), 1560–1563. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133755
- Ohtsuki, H., & Iwasa, Y. (2004). How should we define goodness?—reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 231(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.06.005
- Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child (1932). The Free.
- Pizarro, D. A., & Tannenbaum, D. (2012). Bringing character back: How the motivation to evaluate character influences judgments of moral blame. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Herzliya series on personality and social psychology. The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 91–108). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13091-005
- Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Miller, C. (2017). Moral psychology, volume 5: Virtue and character. MIT Press.
- Snow, N. E. (2010). Virtue as social intelligence: An empirically grounded theory. Routledge.
- Sripada, C. S. (2012). Mental state attributions and the side-effect effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.008
- Sripada, C. S., & Konrath, S. (2011). Telling more than we can know about intentional action. Mind & Language, 26(3), 353–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2011.01421.x
- Tannenbaum, D., Ditto, P. H., & Pizarro, D. A. (2007). Different moral values produce different judgments of intentional action [Unpublished manuscript]. University of California-Irvine.
- Tannenbaum, D., Uhlmann, E. L., & Diermeier, D. (2011). Moral signals, public outrage, and immaterial harms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1249–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.010
- Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., & Diermeier, D. (2015). A person-centered approach to moral judgment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614556679
- Woo, S. E., Keith, M., & Thornton, M. A. (2015). Amazon mechanical turk for industrial and organizational psychology: Advantages, challenges, and practical recommendations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(2), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.21