References
- Anderson, C. A., Allen, J. J., Plante, C., Quigley-McBride, A., Lovett, A., & Rokkum, J. N. (2019). The MTurkification of social and personality psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(6), 842–850. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218798821
- Anderson, C. J. (2003). The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.139
- Anvari, F., Olsen, J., Hung, W. Y., & Feldman, G. (2021). Misprediction of affective outcomes due to different evaluation modes: Replication and extension of two distinction bias experiments by Hsee and Zhang (2004). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 92, 104052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104052
- Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. Harper.
- Ariely, D., & Wallsten, T. S. (1995). Seeking subjective dominance in multidimensional space: An explanation of the asymmetric dominance effect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(3), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1075
- Aust, F., Diedenhofen, B., Ullrich, S., & Musch, J. (2013). Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 527–535. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0265-2
- Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
- Chatterjee, S., Roy, R., & Malshe, A. V. (2011). The role of regulatory fit on the attraction effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(4), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.05.001
- Chen, J., Hui, L. S., Yu, T., Feldman, G., Zeng, S., Ching, T. L., Ng, C. H., Wu, K. W., Yuen, C. M., Lau, T. K., Cheng, B. L., & Ng, K. W. (2020). Foregone opportunities and choosing not to act: Replications of inaction inertia effect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 194855061990057. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619900570
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). L. Erlbaum Associates.
- Collaborative Open-science REsearch (CORE). (2020). Replications and extensions of classic findings in social psychology and judgment and decision making. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5Z4A8
- Connolly, T., & Reb, J. (2012). Regret aversion in reason-based choice. Theory and Decision, 73(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-011-9269-0
- Connolly, T., Reb, J., & Kausel, E. E. (2013). Regret salience and accountability in the decoy effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(2), 136–149. https://sjdm.org/journal/12/12613a/jdm12613a.pdf https://sjdm.org/journal/12/12613a/jdm12613a.pdf
- Connolly, T., & Zeelenberg, M. (2002). Regret in decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(6), 212–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00203
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
- Frederick, S., Lee, L., & Baskin, E. (2014). The limits of attraction. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(4), 487–507. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.12.0061
- Gaudeul, A., & Crosetto, P. (2019). Fast then slow: A choice process explanation for the attraction effect. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02408719/
- Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
- Gilbert, D. T., & Ebert, J. E. J. (2002). Decisions and revisions: The affective forecasting of changeable outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.503
- Herne, K. (1997). Decoy alternatives in policy choices: Asymmetric domination and compromise effects. European Journal of Political Economy, 13(3), 575–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(97)00020-7
- Highhouse, S. (1996). Context-dependent selection: The effects of decoy and phantom job candidates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(1), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0006
- Huber, J., Payne, J. W., & Puto, C. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1086/208899
- Huber, J., Payne, J. W., & Puto, C. P. (2014). Let’s be honest about the attraction effect. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(4), 520–525. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0208
- Huber, J., & Puto, C. (1983). Market boundaries and product choice: Illustrating attraction and substitution effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1086/208943
- Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. Free Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1978-00284-000
- Kaptein, M. C., van Emden, R., & Iannuzzi, D. (2016). Tracking the decoy: Maximizing the decoy effect through sequential experimentation. Palgrave Communications, 2, 16082. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.82
- Keck, S., & Tang, W. (2020). When “decoy effect” meets gender bias: The role of choice set composition in hiring decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 33(2), 240–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2157
- Kivetz, R., Netzer, O., & Srinivasan, V. (2004). Extending compromise effect models to complex buying situations and other context effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(3), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.41.3.262.35993
- Król, M., & Król, M. (2019). Inferiority, not similarity of the decoy to target, is what drives the transfer of attention underlying the attraction effect: Evidence from an eye-tracking study with real choices. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 12(2), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000104
- Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
- LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489
- LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2019). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843
- Lichters, M., Sarstedt, M., & Vogt, B. (2015). On the practical relevance of the attraction effect: A cautionary note and guidelines for context effect experiments. AMS Review, 5(1–2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-015-0066-8
- Luce, R. D. (1977). The choice axiom after twenty years. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90032-3
- McAllister, D. W., Mitchell, T. R., & Beach, L. R. (1979). The contingency model for the selection of decision strategies: An empirical test of the effects of significance, accountability, and reversibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24(2), 228–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(79)90027-8
- Milberg, S. J., Silva, M., Celedon, P., & Sinn, F. (2014). Synthesis of attraction effect research: Practical market implications? European Journal of Marketing, 48(7/8), 1413–1430. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2012-0391
- Mourali, M., Böckenholt, U., & Laroche, M. (2007). Compromise and attraction effects under prevention and promotion motivations. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1086/519151
- Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results. Social Psychology, 45(3), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192
- Olsson-Collentine, A., Wicherts, J. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2020). Heterogeneity in direct replications in psychology and its association with effect size. Psychological Bulletin, 146(10), 922–940. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000294
- Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
- Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414531598
- Pettibone, J. C. (2012). Testing the effect of time pressure on asymmetric dominance and compromise decoys in choice. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(4), 513–523.
- Pettibone, J. C., & Wedell, D. H. (2000). Examining models of nondominated decoy effects across judgment and choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81(2), 300–328. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2880
- Pittarello, A., Caserotti, M., & Rubaltelli, E. (2020). ‘Three is better than two’: Increasing donations with the attraction effect. British Journal of Psychology, 111(4), 805–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12428
- R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/
- Reb, J. (2008). Regret aversion and decision process quality: Effects of regret salience on decision process carefulness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105(2), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.08.006
- Reb, J., Li, A., & Bagger, J. (2018). Decoy effect, anticipated regret, and preferences for work–family benefits. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(3), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12207
- Roe, R. M., Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision making. Psychological Review, 108(2), 370–392. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.370
- Scheel, A. M., Schijen, M., & Lakens, D. (2020). An excess of positive results: Comparing the standard Psychology literature with Registered Reports [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/p6e9c
- Simonson, I. (1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1086/209205
- Simonson, I. (1992). The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1086/209290
- Simonson, I. (2014). Vices and virtues of misguided replications: The case of asymmetric dominance. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(4), 514–519. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0093
- Simonson, I. (2015). Mission (largely) accomplished: What’s next for consumer BDT-JDM researchers? Journal of Marketing Behavior, 1(1), 9–35. https://doi.org/10.1561/107.00000001
- Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379202900301
- Sivakumar, K. (2016). A unified conceptualization of the attraction effect. AMS Review, 6(1–2), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-016-0074-3
- Slaughter, J. E., Bagger, J., & Li, A. (2006). Context effects on group-based employee selection decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.003
- Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384
- Stoffel, S. T., Yang, J., Vlaev, I., & Von Wagner, C. (2019). Testing the decoy effect to increase interest in colorectal cancer screening. PLOS One, 14(3), e0213668. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213668
- Szucs, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature. PLOS Biology, 15(3), e2000797. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000797
- Thomas, K. A., & Clifford, S. (2017). Validity and Mechanical Turk: An assessment of exclusion methods and interactive experiments. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.038
- Trendl, A., Stewart, N., & Mullett, T. L. (2018). A zero attraction effect in naturalistic choice (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3299524). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3299524
- Trueblood, J. S., Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. (2014). The multiattribute linear ballistic accumulator model of context effects in multialternative choice. Psychological Review, 121(2), 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036137
- Trueblood, J. S., Brown, S. D., Heathcote, A., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2013). Not just for consumers: Context effects are fundamental to decision making. Psychological Science, 24(6), 901–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612464241
- Trueblood, J. S., & Pettibone, J. C. (2017). The phantom decoy effect in perceptual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1930
- Tsiros, M., & Mittal, V. (2000). Regret: A model of its antecedents and consequences in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1086/209571
- Tversky, A., & Simonson, I. (1993). Context-dependent preferences. Management Science, 39(10), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1179
- Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamic models of multialternative choice. Psychological Review, 111(3), 757–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.757
- Wedell, D. H. (1991). Distinguishing among models of contextually induced preference reversals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(4), 767–778. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.17.4.767
- Wedell, D. H., & Pettibone, J. C. (1996). Using judgments to understand decoy effects in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0083
- Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag New York. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
- Wiseman, R., Watt, C., & Kornbrot, D. (2019). Registered reports: An early example and analysis. PeerJ, 7, e6232. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6232
- Yang, S., & Lynn, M. (2014). More evidence challenging the robustness and usefulness of the attraction effect. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(4), 508–513. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0020
- Zeelenberg, M., Beattie, J., van der Pligt, J., & de Vries, N. K. (1996). Consequences of regret aversion: Effects of expected feedback on risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(2), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0013
- Ziano, I., Yao, J. D., Gao, Y., & Feldman, G. (2020). Impact of ownership on liking and value: Replications and extensions of three ownership effect experiments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 89, 103972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103972