Jesus Comes to South Africa: Black Twitter as Citizen Journalism in South African Politics

References

• Basson, A. 2012. Zuma Exposed. Johannesburg: Jonathan Ball.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, J.C. 2008. “Editorial cartoons 2.0: The effects of digital political satire on presidential candidate evaluations”. Presidential Studies Quarterly 38 (4): 735–758.
   Google Scholar
• Bickford, S. 2011. “Emotion talk and political judgment”. The Journal of Politics 73 (4): 1025–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackmore, S. 1999. The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. 2010. “Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications”. In Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, edited by Z. Papachirissi, 39–58. New York: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cammaets, B., and L. van Audenhove. 2005. “Online political debate, unbounded citizenship, and the problematic nature of a transnational public sphere”. Political Communication 22 (2): 179–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, C. 2016. “African governments versus social media: Why the uneasy relationship?” Accessed July 20, 2018. https://theconversation.com/african-governments-versus-social-media-why-the-uneasy-relationship-73292.
   Google Scholar
• Downey, F., and N. Fenton. 2003. “New media, counter publicity and the public sphere”. New Media and Society 5 (2): 185–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esralew, S., and D. Young. 2012. “The influence of parodies on mental models: Exploring the Tina Fey–Sarah Palin phenomenon”. Communication Quarterly 60 (3): 338–352.
   Google Scholar
• Florini, S. 2014. “Tweets, Tweeps, and Signifyin’: Communication and cultural performance on ‘Black Twitter’”. Television and New Media 15 (3): 223–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 1990. “Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy”. Social Text (25/26): 56–80.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 1992. Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In Calhoun, C. (ed). Habermas and the Public Sphere. Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillmor, D. 2006. We the Media: Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly
   Google Scholar
• Goode, Luke. 2009. “Social News, Citizen Journalism and Democracy.” New Media & Society 11 (8): 1287–1305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guobin, Y. 2009. The Power of the Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hammett, D. 2010. “Political cartoons, post-colonialism and critical African studies”. Critical African Studies 2 (4): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., N. Johnson, and G. Auld. 2013. “Silences of ethical practice: dilemmas for researchers using social media”. Educational Research and Evaluation an International Journal of Theory and Practice 19 (6): 546–560.
   Google Scholar
• Holton, A.E., M. Coddington and H.G. de Zúñiga. 2013. Whose news? Whose values? Citizen journalism and journalistic values through the lens of content creators and consumers. Journalism Practice 7(6): 720–737.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C., and I. Shapiro. 1995. “South Africa’s negotiated transition: Democracy, opposition and the new constitutional order”. Politics and Society 23 (2): 269–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A., H. Schoen, and P. Jürgens. 2016. “The mediation of politics through twitter: an analysis of messages posted during the campaign for German Federal Election 2013”. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 21 (1): 50–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A.M. & Haenlein, M. 2010. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53: 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macková, A., and J. Macek. 2014. “‘Žít Brno’: Czech online political activism from jokes and tactics to politics and strategies”. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 8 (3) Article 5.
   Google Scholar
• Maluleke, T. 2016. “Electorate has delivered a sermon for the ANC”. The Sunday Independent, August 17, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Mangcu, X. 2016. “The Black middle classes say No: JZ will hammer final nail in ANC’s coffin”. The Sunday Independent, August 7, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Mbembe, A. 2001. On the Postcolony. Berkley, CA: California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melancon, J.P., and V. Dalakas. 2018. “Consumer social voices in the age of social media: Segmentation profiles and relationship marketing strategies”. Business Horizons 61 (1): 157–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micó, J.L., and Casero-Ripollés, A. 2014. Political activism online: organization and media relations in the case of 15M in Spain. Information, Communication & Society, 17 (7): 858–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, A. 2001. “Marginal voices in cyberspace”. New Media and Society 3 (1): 29–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, A. and Watts, E. 2001. Theorizing cyberspace: the idea of voice applied to the internet discourse. New Media and Society, 4 (4): 479–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, A and Watts, E. 2002. “Theorizing cyberspace: the idea of voice applied to the internet discourse”. New Media and Society, 4(4): 479–498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, A, and E. Watts. 2004. “Theorizing cyberspace: The idea of voice applied to the internet discourse”. New Media and Society 4 (4): 479–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen, M. 2011. “When citizen photojournalism sets the news agenda: Neda Agha Soltan as a Web 2.0 icon of post-election unrest in Iran”. Global Media and Communication 7(1) 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Mottiar, S. 2015. “The democratic alliance and the role of opposition parties in South Africa”. Journal of African Elections: South Africa’s 2014 Elections 14 (1): 106–123.
   Google Scholar
• Mpofu, Shepherd. 2015. “When the subaltern speaks: citizen journalism and genocide ‘victims’' voices online”, African Journalism Studies, 36(4), 82–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mpofu, S. 2016. “Toxification of national holidays and national identity in Zimbabwe's post-2000 nationalism”. Journal of African Cultural Studies 28 (1): 28–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak, J. 2016. “Internet meme as meaningful discourse: Towards a theory of multiparticipant popular online content”. Central European Journal of Communication 1: 73–89.
   Google Scholar
• Ogude, J. 2009. “The state as a site of eating: literary representation and the dialectics of ethnicity, class and the nation state in Kenya”. Africa Insight 39 (1): 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Pal, J., and A. Gonawala. 2017. “Studying political communication on Twitter: the case for small data”. Current Option in Behavioural Sciences 18 (1): 97–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poell, T. 2014. Social Media Activism and State Censorship. In Trottier, D. & Fuchs, C. (eds). Social Media, Politics and the State: Protests, Revolutions, Riots, Crime and Policing in an Age of Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Posel, D. 2010. “Races to consume: Revisiting South Africa’s history of race, consumption and the struggle for freedom”. Ethnic and Racial Studies 33 (2): 157–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qunta, C. 2016. Why We Are Not a Nation. Cape Town: Sariti Sechaba Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rauchfleisch, A., and M.S. Schäfer. 2015. “Multiple public spheres of Weibo: A typology of forms and potentials of online public spheres in China”. Information, Communication & Society 18 (2): 139–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shifman, L. 2014. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shirky, C. 2011. “The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change”. Foreign Affairs 90 (1): 28–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skågeby, J. 2011. “Online ethnographic methods: Towards a qualitative understanding of virtual community practices”. In Handbook of Research on Methods and Techniques for Studying Virtual Communities: Paradigms and Phenomena, edited by Ben Kei Daniel, 410–428. Hershley: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, Catherine R. 2002. “Rethinking the black public sphere: An alternative vocabulary for multiple public spheres”. Communication Theory 12 (4): 446–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista. 2018. “Number of monthly active Twitter users worldwide from 1st quarter 2010 to 1st quarter 2018 (in millions)”. Accessed July 20, 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/282087/number-of-monthly-active-twitter-users/.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, L. 2013. “Policy and participation on social media: The case of YouTube, Facebook, and Wikipedia”. Communication, Culture & Critique 6 (3): 353–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theocharis, Y; Jan van Deth, WL & García-Albacete, G. 2015. Using Twitter to mobilize protest action: online mobilization patterns and action repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados, and Aganaktismenoi movements. Information, Communication and Society 18(2): 202–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, A. 2010. “Does internet create democracy?” African Journalism Studies 22 (2): 126–147.
   Google Scholar
• Tumasjan, A., T.O. Sprenger, P.G. Sandner, and I.M. Welpe. 2010. “Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment”. Proceedings of the Fourth International Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 178–185.
   Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, S., A. Arriagada, and A. Scherman. 2012. “The social media basis of youth protest behaviour: The case of Chile”. Journal of Communication 62 (2): 299–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnali, K., and V. Gorgulu. 2015. “A social influence perspective on expressive political participation in Twitter: The case of #OccupyGezi”. Information, Communication & Society 18 (1): 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteman, N. 2010. “Control and contingency: Maintaining ethical stances in research”. International Journal of Internet Research 3 (1): 6–22.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A., and D. Domoszlai. 2013. “#BlackTwitter: a networked cultural identity”. Accessed July 20, 2018. http://harmony-institute.org/latest/2013/08/06/blacktwitter-a-networked-cultural-identity/.
   Google Scholar
• Young, D.G., and L. Hoffman. 2012. “Acquisition of current-events knowledge from political satire programming: An experimental approach”. Atlantic Journal of Communication 20 (5): 290–304.
   Google Scholar