Search in:

Infectious Diseases Volume 49, 2017 - Issue 3

Submit an article Journal homepage

266

Views

CrossRef citations to date

Altmetric

Brief Report

Analysis of the costs for the laboratory of flow cytometry screening of urine samples before culture

Eeva-Liisa PaattiniemiDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Microbiology, Päijät-Häme Centre for Laboratory Services, Päijät-Häme Social and Health Care Group, Lahti, Finland; Correspondence[email protected]

Santra KarumaaDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Microbiology, Päijät-Häme Centre for Laboratory Services, Päijät-Häme Social and Health Care Group, Lahti, Finland;

Anna-Mari ViitaRoche Oy, Espoo, Finland;

Pauliina KärpänojaDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Microbiology, Päijät-Häme Centre for Laboratory Services, Päijät-Häme Social and Health Care Group, Lahti, Finland;

Marjukka MäkeläNational Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland

Jaana IsojärviNational Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland

Hannu SarkkinenDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Microbiology, Päijät-Häme Centre for Laboratory Services, Päijät-Häme Social and Health Care Group, Lahti, Finland;

show all

Pages 217-222 | Received 04 May 2016, Accepted 09 Sep 2016, Published online: 21 Oct 2016

Cite this article
https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2016.1239028
CrossMark

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Reprints & Permissions

References

dos Santos JC, Weber LP, Perez LR. Evaluation of urinalysis parameters to predict urinary-tract infection. Braz J Infect Dis. 2007;11:479–481.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Manoni F, Fornasiero L, Ercolin M, et al. Cutoff values for bacteria and leukocytes for urine flow cytometer Sysmex UF-1000i in urinary tract infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;65:103–107.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Pieretti B, Brunati P, Pini B, et al. Diagnosis of bacteriuria and leukocyturia by automated flow cytometry compared with urine culture. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:3990–3996.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Wu TC, Williams EC, Koo SY, et al. Evaluation of three bacteriuria screening methods in a clinical research hospital. J Clin Microbiol. 1985;21:796–799.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Evans R, Davidson MM, Sim LR, et al. Testing by Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and with bacterial culture in a diagnostic laboratory: a comparison. J Clin Pathol. 2006;59:661–662.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Kadkhoda K, Manickam K, Degagne P, et al. UF-1000i flow cytometry is an effective screening method for urine specimens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;69:130–136.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Okada H, Sakai Y, Miyazaki S, et al. Detection of significant bacteriuria by automated urinalysis using flow cytometry. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:2870–2872.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Kim SY, Kim YJ, Lee SM, et al. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 urine cell analyzer as a screening test to reduce the need for urine cultures for community-acquired urinary tract infection. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007;128:922–925.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Ben-Ezra J, Bork L, McPherson RA. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer. Clin Chem. 1998;44:92–95.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Hannemann-Pohl K, Kampf SC. Automation of urine sediment examination: a comparison of the Sysmex UF-100 automated flow cytometer with routine manual diagnosis (microscopy, test strips, and bacterial culture). Clin Chem Lab Med. 1999;37:753–764.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Langlois MR, Delanghe JR, Steyaert SR, et al. Automated flow cytometry compared with an automated dipstick reader for urinalysis. Clin Chem. 1999;45:118–122.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Okada H, Shirakawa T, Gotoh A, et al. Enumeration of bacterial cell numbers and detection of significant bacteriuria by use of a new flow cytometry-based device. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:3596–3599.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Roggeman S, Zaman Z. Safely reducing manual urine microscopy analyses by combining urine flow cytometer and strip results. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;116:872–878.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Zaman Z, Roggeman S, Verhaegen J. Unsatisfactory performance of flow cytometer UF-100 and urine strips in predicting outcome of urine cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:4169–4171.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Manoni F, Valverde S, Antico F, et al. Field evaluation of a second-generation cytometer UF-100 in diagnosis of acute urinary tract infections in adult patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002;8:662–668.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Koken T, Aktepe OC, Serteser M, et al. Determination of cut-off values for leucocytes and bacteria for urine flow cytometer (UF-100) in urinary tract infections. Int Urol Nephrol. 2002;34:175–178.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Broeren MA, Bahceci S, Vader HL, et al. Screening for urinary tract infection with the Sysmex UF-1000i urine flow cytometer. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:1025–1029.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Dai Q, Jiang Y, Shi H, et al. Evaluation of the automated urine particle analyzer UF-1000i screening for urinary tract infection in nonpregnant women. Clin Lab. 2014;60:275–280.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Jolkkonen S, Paattiniemi EL, Karpanoja P, et al. Screening of urine samples by flow cytometry reduces the need for culture. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:3117–3121.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Ikäheimo R, Uhari M, Lumio J, et al. Urinary tract infections: Finnish clinical practice guidelines. Duodecim. 2000;116:782–796 (in Finnish).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Wang J, Zhang Y, Xu D, et al. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-1000i for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;133:577–582.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
De Rosa R, Grosso S, Bruschetta G, et al. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF1000i flow cytometer for ruling out bacterial urinary tract infection. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411:1137–1142.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
van der Zwet WC, Hessels J, Canbolat F, et al. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-1000i® urine flow cytometer in the diagnostic work-up of suspected urinary tract infection in a Dutch general hospital. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48:1765–1771.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Li J, Ulvin K, Biboh H, et al. Cost-effectiveness of supplementing a broth-enriched culture test with the Xpert meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) assay for screening inpatients at high risk of MRSA. J Hosp Infect. 2012;82:227–233.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Goldenberg SD, Bacelar M, Brazier P, et al. A cost benefit analysis of the Luminex xTAG Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel for detection of infectious gastroenteritis in hospitalised patients. J Infect. 2015;70:504–519.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Analysis of the costs for the laboratory of flow cytometry screening of urine samples before culture

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Analysis of the costs for the laboratory of flow cytometry screening of urine samples before culture

References

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date