999
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Report

A combination of ceftaroline and daptomycin has synergistic and bactericidal activity in vitro against daptomycin nonsusceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 410-416 | Received 22 Sep 2016, Accepted 16 Dec 2016, Published online: 24 Jan 2017

References

  • Hawkins C, Huang J, Jin N, et al. Persistent Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: an analysis of risk factors and outcomes. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1861–1867.
  • Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, et al. Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children: executive summary. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:285–292.
  • Estabrook M, Bussell B, Clugston SL, et al. In vitro activity of ceftolozane–tazobactam as determined by broth dilution and agar diffusion assays against recent US Escherichia coli isolates from 2010 to 2011 carrying CTX-M-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:4049–4052.
  • Laudano JB. Ceftaroline fosamil: a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(Suppl 3):iii11–iii18.
  • Sader HS, Farrell DJ, Flamm RK, et al. Activity of ceftaroline and comparator agents tested against Staphylococcus aureus from patients with bloodstream infections in US medical centres (2009-13). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:2053–2056.
  • Alm RA, McLaughlin RE, Kos VN, et al. Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility to ceftaroline: an epidemiological and structural perspective. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:2065–2075.
  • Farha MA, Leung A, Sewell EW, et al. Inhibition of WTA synthesis blocks the cooperative action of PBPs and sensitizes MRSA to β-lactams. ACS Chem Biol. 2013;8:226–233.
  • Dhand A, Bayer AS, Pogliano J, et al. Use of antistaphylococcal beta-lactams to increase daptomycin activity in eradicating persistent bacteremia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: role of enhanced daptomycin binding. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:158–163.
  • Berti AD, Sakoulas G, Nizet V, et al. Beta-lactam antibiotics targeting PBP1 selectively enhance daptomycin activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:5005–5012.
  • CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Fifth Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S25. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2015.
  • Barber KE, Werth BJ, McRoberts JP, et al. A novel approach utilizing biofilm time-kill curves to assess the bactericidal activity of ceftaroline combinations against biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:2989–2992.
  • Kullar R, McKinnell JA, Sakoulas G. Avoiding the perfect storm: the biologic and clinical case for reevaluating the 7-day expectation for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia before switching therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:1455–1461.
  • Bassetti M, Nicco E, Ginocchio F, et al. High-dose daptomycin in documented Staphylococcus aureus infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;36:459–461.
  • Carugati M, Bayer AS, Miró JM, et al. High-dose daptomycin therapy for left-sided infective endocarditis. A prospective study from the international collaboration on endocarditis (ICE). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:6213–6222.
  • Kullar R, Davis SL, Levine DP, et al. High‐dose daptomycin for treatment of complicated gram‐positive infections: a large, multicenter, retrospective study. Pharmacotherapy. 2011;31:527–536.
  • Rose WE, Leonard SN, Rybak MJ. Evaluation of daptomycin pharmacodynamics and resistance at various dosage regimens against Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibilities to daptomycin in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:3061–3067.
  • Canut A, Isla A, Rodriguez-Gascon A. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis to evaluate ceftaroline fosamil dosing regimens for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and complicated skin and skin–structure infections in patients with normal and impaired renal function. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015;45:399–405.
  • Ho TT, Cadena J, Childs LM, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and endocarditis treated with ceftaroline salvage therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:1267–1270.
  • Fabre V, Ferrada M, Buckel WR, et al. Ceftaroline in combination with trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole for salvage therapy of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2014;1:ofu046.
  • Sakoulas G, Moise PA, Casapao AM, et al. Antimicrobial salvage therapy for persistent staphylococcal bacteremia using daptomycin plus ceftaroline. Clin Ther. 2014;36:1317–1333.
  • Barber KE, Rybak MJ, Sakoulas G. Vancomycin plus ceftaroline shows potent in vitro synergy and was successfully utilized to clear persistent daptomycin-non-susceptible MRSA bacteraemia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:311–313.
  • Barber KE, Ireland CE, Bukavyn N, et al. Observation of “seesaw effect” with vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin and ceftaroline in 150 unique MRSA strains. Infect Dis Ther. 2014;3:35–43.
  • Yang SJ, Xiong YQ, Boyle-Vavra S, et al. Daptomycin–oxacillin combinations in treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by daptomycin-nonsusceptible strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with evolving oxacillin susceptibility (the "seesaw effect"). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:3161–3169.
  • Rose WE, Schulz LT, Andes D, et al. Addition of ceftaroline to daptomycin after emergence of daptomycin-nonsusceptible Staphylococcus aureus during therapy improves antibacterial activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:5296–5302.
  • Sakoulas G, Rose W, Nonejuie P, et al. Ceftaroline restores daptomycin activity against daptomycin-nonsusceptible vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:1494–1500.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.