An integrated method and web tool to assess visual environment in spaces with window shades

References

• Amundadottir, M.L., S. Rockcastle, M.S. Khanie, and M. Andersen. 2017. A human-centric approach to assess daylight in buildings for non-visual health potential, visual interest and gaze behavior. Building and Environment 113:5–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aries, M.B., J.A. Veitch, and G.R. Newsham. 2010. Windows, view, and office characteristics predict physical and psychological discomfort. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(4):533–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atzeri, A.M., F. Cappelletti, A. Tzempelikos, and A. Gasparella. 2016. Comfort metrics for an integrated evaluation of buildings performance. Energy and Buildings 127:411–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, Y.-C., and A. Tzempelikos. 2012. A hybrid ray-tracing and radiosity method for calculating radiation transport and illuminance distribution in spaces with venetian blinds. Solar Energy 86(11):3109–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, Y.-C., A. Tzempelikos, and I. Konstantzos. 2015. A systematic method for selecting roller shade properties for glare protection. Energy and Buildings 92:81–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, B.L. 1975. Windows and people: A literature survey. Psychological reaction to environments with and without windows. Washington, DC: NUS Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Institute for Applied Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Downie, N. 2015. Chart.js: Open source HTML5 Charts for your website. http://www.chartjs.org
   Google Scholar
• EnergyPlus. 2015. Energyplus Engineering Reference—The reference for Energyplus Calculations. Larwence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL).
   Google Scholar
• Galasiu, A.D., and J.A. Veitch. 2006. Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: A literature review. Energy and Buildings 38(7):728–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellinga, H., and T. Hordijk. 2014. The D&V analysis method: a method for the analysis of daylight access and view quality. Building and Environment 79:101–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirning, M., G. Isoardi, and I. Cowling. 2014. Discomfort glare in open plan green buildings. Energy and Buildings 70:427–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IESNA. 2012. Standard LM-83-12. Approved Method: IES Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA) and Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE). Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• Jakubiec, J.A., and C.F. Reinhart. 2012. The adaptive zone—A concept for assessing discomfort glare throughout daylit spaces. Lighting Research and Technology 44(2):149–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubiec, J.A., and C.F. Reinhart. 2016. A concept for predicting occupants' long term visual comfort within daylit spaces. Leukos 12(4):185–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• jQuery Foundation. 2016. http://jqueryui.com
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen, L., P. Heiselberg, I. Bryn, and H. Johra. 2015. Verification of simple illuminance based measures for indication of discomfort glare from windows. Building and Environment 92:615–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, M.G., S. Altomonte, R. Wilson, and P.R. Tregenza. 2017. Temporal effects on glare response from daylight. Building and Environment 113:49–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konis, K. 2013. Evaluating daylighting effectiveness and occupant visual comfort in a side-lit open-plan office building in San Francisco, California. Building and Environment 59:662–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstantzos, I., A. Tzempelikos, and Y.-C. Chan. 2015a. Experimental and simulation analysis of daylight glare probability in offices with dynamic window shades. Building and Environment 87:244–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstantzos, I., Y.-C. Chan, J. Seibold, A. Tzempelikos, R.W. Proctor, and B. Protzman. 2015b. View Clarity Index: A new metric to evaluate clarity of view through window shades. Building and Environment 90:206–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstantzos, I., and A. Tzempelikos. 2017. Daylight glare evaluation with the sun in the field of view through window shades. Building and Environment 113:65–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotey, N.A., J. Wright, and M.R. Collins. 2009. Determining off-normal solar optical properties of roller blinds. ASHRAE Transactions 115(1):145–54.
   Google Scholar
• LBNL. 2013. WINDOW 7 simulation manual. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. https://windows.lbl.gov/software/window/
   Google Scholar
• Lutron Electronics. 2017. Performance Shading Advisor. http://performanceshadingadvisor.com
   Google Scholar
• Moeseke, G., I. Bruyere, and A.D. Herde. 2007. Impact of control rules on the efficiency of shading devices and free cooling for office buildings. Building and Environment 42:784–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M.V., S. Svendsen, and L.B. Jensen. 2011. Quantifying the potential of automated dynamic solar shading in office buildings through integrated simulations of energy and daylight. Solar Energy 85(5):757–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, B.-C., A.-S. Choi, J.-W. Jeong, and E.S. Lee. 2011. Performance of integrated systems of automated roller shade systems and daylight responsive dimming systems. Building and Environment 46(3):747–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, R., R. Seals, P. Ineichen, R. Stewart, and D. Menicucci. 1987. A new simplified version of the Perez diffuse irradiance model for tilted surfaces. Solar Energy 39(3):221–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resig, J. 2017. JQuery. http://jquery.com/
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Z. 2006. Daylighting Metric Development Using Daylight Autonomy Calculations in the Sensor Placement Optimization Tool. Boulder, CO: Architectural Energy Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, A., P. Karava, I. Konstantzos, and A. Tzempelikos. 2016. Occupant interactions with shading and lighting systems using different control interfaces: A pilot field study. Building and Environment 97:177–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, H., and A. Tzempelikos. 2012. Daylighting and energy analysis of private offices with automated interior roller shades. Solar Energy 86(2):681–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, J.Y., G.Y. Yun, and T.J. Kim. 2012. View types and luminance effects on discomfort glare assessment from windows. Energy and Buildings 46:139–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, R., I.J. Lazarus, and V.V.N. Kishore. 2015. Effect of internal woven roller shade andglazing on the energy and daylighting performances of an office building in the cold climate of Shillong. Applied Energy 159:317–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuaycharoen, N., and P. Tregenza. 2007. View and discomfort glare from windows. Lighting Research and Technology 39(2):185–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzempelikos, A. 2017. Advances on daylighting and visual comfort research. Building and Environment 113:1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzempelikos, A., and A.K. Athienitis. 2007. The impact of shading design and control on building cooling and lighting demand. Solar Energy 81(3):369–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzempelikos, A., and H. Shen. 2013. Comparative control strategies for roller shades with respect to daylighting and energy performance. Building and Environment 67:179–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzempelikos, A., and Y.-C. Chan. 2016. Estimating detailed optical properties of window roller shades from basic available data and modeling implications on daylighting and visual comfort. Energy and Buildings 126:396–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University Innsbruck, Bartenbach and Zumtobel Lighting. 2017. DALEC online tool. www.dalec.net
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Wymelenberg, K., M. Inanici, and P. Johnson. 2010. The effect of luminance distribution patterns on occupant preference in a daylit office environment. Leukos 7(2):103–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wienold, J. 2007. Dynamic simulation of blind control strategies for visual comfort and energy balance analysis. Proceedings of IBPSA 2007 Conference, Beijing, China, September 3–6, 2007, pp. 1197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Wienold, J. 2009. Dynamic daylight glare evaluation. Proceedings of IBPSA 2009 Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, July 27–30, 2009, pp. 944–51.
   Google Scholar
• Wienold, J., and J. Christoffersen. 2006. Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energy and Buildings 38(7):743–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, J., and A. Tzempelikos. 2016. Model-based shading and lighting control considering visual comfort and energy use. Solar Energy 134:416–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, J. 2014. An investigation into the impact of movable solar shades on energy, indoor thermal and visual comfort improvements. Building and Environment 71:24–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar