Design and optimization of form and facade of an office building using the genetic algorithm

References

• Aksamija, A. 2011. Methods for integrating parametric design with building performance analysis. https://www.arcc-journal.org/index.php/repository/article/view/459/363
   Google Scholar
• Aquilio, A.D., R. Sileryte, D. Yang, and M. Turrin. 2016. Simulating natural ventilation in large sports buildings. Prediction of temperature and airflow patterns in the early design stages. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:f6f90754-f934-42c2-91cf-e4dde827c1f8
   Google Scholar
• Bayraktar, M., E. Fabrizio, and M. Perino. 2014. The “extended building energy hub”: A new method for the simultaneous optimization of energy demand and energy supply in building. HVAC&R Research 18(1–2):67–87. doi:10.1080/10789669.2011.588300
   Google Scholar
• Caruso, G., F. Fantozzi, and F. Leccese. 2013. Optimal theoretical building form to minimize direct solar irradiation. Solar Energy 97:128–37. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2013.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruso, G., and J.H. Kämpf. 2015. Building shape optimisation to reduce air-conditioning needs using constrained evolutionary algorithms. Solar Energy 118:186–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, M.-C., and S.-G. Shih. 2015. A hybrid approach of dynamic programming and genetic algorithm for multi-criteria optimization on sustainable architecture design. Computer-Aided Design and Applications 12(3):310–19. doi:10.1080/16864360.2014.981460
   Google Scholar
• Eltaweel, A., and Y. Su. 2017. Parametric design and daylighting: A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 73:1086–1103. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwy, I., Y. Ibrahim, M. Fahmy, and M. Mahdy. 2018. Outdoor microclimatic validation for hybrid simulation workflow in hot arid climates against ENVI-met and field measurements. Energy Procedia 153:29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Evins, R. 2013. A review of computational optimisation methods applied to sustainable building design. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22:230–45. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara, M., E. Sirombo, E. Fabrizio, M. Ferrara, E. Sirombo, and E. Fabrizio. 2018. Energy-optimized vs. cost optimized design of high-performing dwellings: The case of multi-family buildings dwellings: the case of multi-family buildings. Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 24(5):513–28. doi:10.1080/23744731.2018.1448656
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, D.J., E. Pantazis, and A. Wang. 2017. A multi-agent approach for performance based architecture: Design exploring geometry, user, and environmental agencies in façades. Automation in Construction 76:45–58. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gharouni Jafari, K., E. Noorzai, S.R. Makkiabadi, and R. Heshmat Nezhad. 2014. Providing a model to select a proper delivery system for railway projects in Iran. ISAHP 2014 Conference, Washington, DC, June 29–July 2.
   Google Scholar
• Ghiai, M.M., M. Mahdavinia, F. Parvane, and S. Jafarikhah. 2014. Relation between energy consumption and window to wall ratio in high-rise office buildings in Tehran. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences 3(2):366–75.
   Google Scholar
• Golabchi, M., and E. Noorzai. 2013. Projects Delivery Methods. Tehran, Iran: Tehran University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golabchi, M., E. Noorzai, A. Golabchi, and K. Gharouni Jafari. 2016. Building Information Modeling. Tehran, Iran: Tehran University Press.
   Google Scholar
• González, J., and F. Fiorito. 2015. Daylight design of office buildings: Optimisation of external solar shadings by using combined simulation methods. Buildings 5(2):560–80. doi:10.3390/buildings5020560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachem, C., A. Athienitis, and P. Fazio. 2011. Parametric investigation of geometric form effects on solar potential of housing units. Solar Energy 85(9):1864–77. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2011.04.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi, N., R. Fayaz, and M. Sarshar. 2010. Thermal behaviour of a ventilated double skin facade in hot arid climate. Energy and Buildings 42(10):1823–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lartigue, B., B. Lasternas, and V. Loftness. 2014. Multi-objective optimization of building envelope for energy consumption and daylight. Indoor and Built Environment 23(1):70–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, J.T., and J.W. Jeong. 2014. Optimization of a free-form building shape to minimize external thermal load using genetic algorithm. Energy and Buildings 85:473–82. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.09.080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampf, J.H., and D. Robinson. 2010. Optimisation of building form for solar energy utilisation using constrained evolutionary algorithms. Energy and Buildings 42(6):807–14. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.11.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., P.A., Zadeh, S. Staub-French, T. Froese, and B.T. Cavka. 2016. Assessment of the impact of window size, position and orientation on building energy load using BIM. Procedia Engineering 145:1424–31. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.179
   Google Scholar
• Konis, K., A. Gamas, and K. Kensek. 2016. Passive performance and building form: An optimization framework for early-stage design support. Solar Energy 125:161–79. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2015.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machairas, V., A. Tsangrassoulis, and K. Axarli. 2014. Algorithms for optimization of building design: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 31(1364):101–12. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdavinejad, M., S. Matoor, and N. Feyzmand. 2012. Horizontal distribution of illuminance with reference to window wall ratio (WWR) in office buildings in hot and dry climate, case of Iran, Tehran. Applied Mechanics and Materials 110:72–76. Trans Tech Publications. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.110-116.72
   Google Scholar
• Mahdavinejad, M., and S. Mohammadi. 2016. Parametric optimization of daylight and thermal performance through louvers in hot and dry climate of Tehran. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences 8(3):1221–36.
   Google Scholar
• Mahdavinejad, M., and N.S. Nazar. 2017. Daylightophil high-performance architecture: Multi-objective optimization of energy efficiency and daylight availability in BSk climate. Energy Procedia 115:92–101. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.010
   Google Scholar
• Miles, J.C., G.M. Sisk, and C.J. Moore. 2001. The conceptual design of commercial buildings using a genetic algorithm. Computers & Structures 79(17):1583–92. doi:10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00040-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad, S., and A. Shea. 2013. Performance evaluation of modern building thermal envelope designs in the semi-arid continental climate of Tehran. Buildings 3(4):674–88. doi:10.3390/buildings3040674
   Google Scholar
• Moraes, L.N., and F.O.R. Pereira. 2015. Design process for optimization of buildings façades for solar irradiation in the Brazilian context. Proceedings of International Conference CISBAT 2015 Future Buildings and Districts Sustainability from Nano to Urban Scale (No. CONF, pp. 729–734). LESO-PB, EPFL.
   Google Scholar
• Nedhal, A.-T., S.F. Syed Fadzil, and W.M. Wan Harun. 2011. The effects of orientation, ventilation, and varied WWR on the thermal performance of residential rooms in the Tropics. Journal of Sustainable Development 4(2):142–49. doi: 10.5539/jsd.v4n2p142
   Google Scholar
• Noorzai, E., A. Hoseini, K. Gharouni Jafari, and M. Aghaeipoor. 2016. Providing a model to select an optimum multifamily housing method in Iran. Journal of Architectural Engineering 23(2):1–10. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostergard, T., R.L. Jensen, and S.E. Maagaard. 2016. Building simulations supporting decision making in early design—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 61:187–201. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouarghi, R., and M. Krarti. 2006. Building shape optimization using neural network and genetic algorithm approach. Ashrae Transactions 112(1).
   Google Scholar
• Parchami Jalal, M., E. Noorzai, and T. Yavari Roushan. 2019. Root cause analysis of the most frequent claims in the building industry through the SCoP3E Ishikawa diagram. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction 11(2):1–10. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peronato, G., J.H. Kämpf, E. Rey, and M. Andersen. 2013. Integrating urban energy simulation in a parametric environment: A Grasshopper interface for CitySim (No. CONF). PLEA 2017 PROCEEDINGS.
   Google Scholar
• Raimondi, A., D. Santucci, S. Bevilacqua, and A. Corso. 2016. Daylight autonomy as a driver for office building retrofitting. Energy Procedia 96:180–89. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.119
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghipour Roudsari, M., M. Pak, and A. Smith. 2013. Ladybug: A parametric environmental plugin for Grasshopper to help designers create an environmentally-conscious design. Proceedings of the 13th International Building Performance Simulation Association, August, Lyon, France. http://www.ibpsa.org/proceedings/bs2013/p_2499.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sun, C., Y. Han, and H. Feng. 2015. Multi-objective building form optimization method based on GANN-BIM model. Next Generation Building 2(1):141–54. doi:10.7480/NGB.2.1.1517
   Google Scholar
• Taghizade, K., A. Heidari, and E. Noorzai. 2019. Environmental impact profiles for glazing systems: Strategies for early design process. Journal of Architectural Engineering 25(2):1–2. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touloupaki, E., and T. Theodosiou. 2017. Optimization of building form to minimize energy consumption through parametric modelling. Procedia Environmental Sciences 38:509–14. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.114
   Google Scholar
• Tuhus-Dubrow, D., and M. Krarti. 2010. Genetic-algorithm based approach to optimize building envelope design for residential buildings. Building and Environment 45(7):1574–1581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., and Z. Zhai. 2016. Advances in building simulation and computational techniques: A review between 1987 and 2014. Energy and Buildings 128:319–35. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.06.080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., R. Zmeureanu, and H. Rivard. 2005. Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green building design optimization. Building and Environment 40(11):1512–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, D., W.O. Brien, T. Hong, X. Feng, H.B. Gunay, F. Tahmasebi, and A. Mahdavi. 2015. Occupant behavior modeling for building performance simulation: Current state and future challenges. Energy & Buildings 107:264–78. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.08.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, A., R. Bokel, A. van den Dobbelsteen, Y. Sun, Q. Huang, and Q. Zhang. 2017. Optimization of thermal and daylight performance of school buildings based on a multi-objective genetic algorithm in the cold climate of China. Energy and Buildings 139:371–84. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., L. Zhang, and Y. Wang. 2016. Shape optimization of free-form buildings based on solar radiation gain and space efficiency using a multi-objective genetic algorithm in the severe cold zones of China. Solar Energy 132:38–50. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2016.02.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Znouda, E., N. Ghrab-Morcos, and A. Hadj-Alouane. 2007. Optimization of Mediterranean building design using genetic algorithms. Energy and Buildings 39(2):148–53. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2005.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar