Analysis of subjective responses for the evaluation of the indoor environmental quality of an educational building

References

• ASHRAE. 2017. ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55. Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Astolfi, A., and F. Pellerey. 2008. Subjective and objective assessment of acoustical and overall environmental quality in secondary school classrooms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123(1):163–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buratti, C., E. Belloni, F. Merli, and P. Ricciardi. 2018. A new index combining thermal, acoustic, and visual comfort of moderate environments in temperate climates. Build and Environment 139:27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buratti, C., and P. Ricciardi. 2009. Adaptive analysis of thermal comfort in university classrooms: Correlation between experimental data and mathematical models. Building and Environment 44(4): 674–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN. 2001. Ergonomics of the thermal environment – Assessment of the influence of the thermal environment using subjective scales. EN ISO 10551 Standard. Bruxelles: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. 2007. Indoor Environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings addressing indoor quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics. EN 15251 Standard. Bruxelles: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C.P., R.L. Hwang, W. Liu, W.M. Shih, and S.Y. Chang. 2014. The influence of air-conditioning managerial scheme in hybrid-ventilated classrooms on students’ thermal perception. Indoor and Built Environment 26(6):761–770.
   Google Scholar
• Corgnati, S., M. Filippi, and S. Viazzo. 2007. Perception of the thermal environment in high school and university classrooms: Subjective preferences and thermal comfort. Building and Environment 42(2): 951–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, M., H. Bernardo, J. Ramos, and M. Egido. 2011. Indoor Environment and Energy Efficiency in School Buildings - Part 1: Indoor Air Quality. Proceedings of the 2011 3rd International Youth Conference on Energetics (IYCE).
   Google Scholar
• Fassio, F., A. Fanchiotti, and R. Vollaro. 2014. Linear, non-linear and alternative algorithms in the correlation of IEQ factors with global comfort: A case study. Sustainability 6(11):8113–8127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, M., D. Wolfe, and E. Chicken. 2014. Nonparametric Statistical Methods. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini, H., M. Yunos, S. Ismail, and M. Yaman. 2018. A structural regression model for relationship between indoor air quality with dissatisfaction of occupants in education environment. Proceedings of the International Conference on Architecture and Civil Engineering (ICACE 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Jamaludin, N., N. Mahyuddin, and F. Akashah. 2016. Assessment of indoor environmental quality (IEQ): Students well-being in university classroom with the application of landscaping. MATEC Web of Conference, IBCC 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., and R. de Dear. 2018. Thermal comfort expectations and adaptive behavioural characteristics of primary and secondary school students. Building and Environment 127:13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolokotsa, D., K. Niachou, V. Geros, K. Kalaitzakis, G.S. Stavrakakis, and M. Santamouris. 2005. Implementation of an integrated indoor environment and energy management system. Energy and Buildings 37(1):93–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal, W.H. and W.A. Wallis. 1952. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 47(260):583–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., J. Jiang, D. Wang, and J. Liu. 2016. The indoor thermal environemnt of rural school classrooms in Northwestern China. Indoor and Built Environment 26(5):662–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, H.B., and D.R. Whitney. 1947. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 18(1):50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Molina, A., P. Boarin, I. Tort-Ausin, and J. Vivancos. 2017. Post-occupancy evaluation of a historic primary school in Spain: Comparing PMV, TSV and PD for teachers' and pupils' thermal comfort. Building and Environment 117:248–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, K., and M. Ramgopal. 2015. A comparison of student performance between conditioned and naturally ventilated classrooms. Building and Environment, 84:181–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongkolsawat, D., A. Marmot, and M. Ucci. 2014. A comparison of perceived learning performance of Thai university students in fan-assised naturally ventilated and air-conditioned classrooms. Intelligent Buildings International 6(2):93–111.
   Google Scholar
• Mors, S., J. Hensen, M. Loomans, and A. Boerstra. 2011. Adaptive thermal comfort in primary school classrooms: Creating and validating PMV-based comfort charts. Building and Environment 46(12):2454–2461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nematchoua, M., R. Tchinda, and J. Orosa. 2014. Adaptation and comparative study of thermal comfort in naturally ventilated classrooms and buildings in the wet tropical zones. Energy and Buildings 85:321–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, L., D. Raimondo, P. Corgnati, and M. Gameiro. 2014. Assessment of indoor air quality and thermal comfort in Portuguese secondary classrooms: Methodology and results. Building and Environment 81:69–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pistore, L., G. Pernigotto, F. Cappelletti, A. Gasparella, and P. Romagnoni. 2019. A stepwise approach integrating feature selection, regression techniques and cluster analysis to identify primary retrofit interventions on large stocks of buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society 47(2019):101438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricciardi, P., and C. Buratti. 2018. Environmental quality of university classrooms: Subjective and objective evaluation of the thermal, acoustic, and lighting comfort conditions. Building and Environment 127:23–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salleh, N., N. Salim, and S. Kamaruzzaman. 2016. Occupant expectations on the main IEQ Factors at workspace: The studies of private preschool buildings. MATEC Web of Conference, IBCC 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Teli, D., M. Jentsch, J. Patrick, and A. Bahaj. 2012. Field study on thermal comfort in a UK primary school. Proceedings of 7th Windsor Conference: The changing context of comfort in an unpredictable world Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, 12-15 April 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Y. Ji, and X. Su. 2018. Influence of outdoor and indoor microclimate on human thermal adaptation in winter in the severe cold area, China, Building and Environment 133:91–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wargocki, P., and N. Silva. 2015. Use of CO2 feedback as a retrofit solution for improving air quality in naturally ventilated classrooms. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Healthy Builjdings - Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre, Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, N.H., and S.S. Khoo. 2003. Thermal comfort in classrooms in the tropics. Energy and Buildings 35(4):337–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, R., J. Liu, and B. Li. 2010. Occupants’ adaptive responses and perception of thermal environment in naturally conditioned university classrooms. Applied Energy 87(3):1015–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yatim, S., M. Zain, F. Darus, and Z. Ismail. 2011. Thermal comfort in air-conditioned learning environment, 2011 3rd International Symposium & Exhibition in Sustainable Energy & Environment (ISESEE).
   Google Scholar
• Zinzi, M., S. Agnoli, G. Battistini, and G. Bernabini. 2016. Deep energy retrofit of the T.M. Plauto School in Italy- A five years experience. Energy and Buildings 126:239–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar