Response of eight low-cost particle sensors and consumer devices to typical indoor emission events in a real home (ASHRAE 1756-RP)

References

• Brauer, M. 2010. How much, how long, what, and where: Air pollution exposure assessment for epidemiologic studies of respiratory disease. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society 7 (2):111–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Budde, M., and M. Beigl. 2016. Advances in smartphone based fine dust sensing. Scientific Research Abstracts 5 (23):24649147.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, W. R., J. M. Logue, X. Wu, N. E. Klepeis, W. J. Fisk, F. Noris and B. C. Singer. 2018. Quantifying fine particle emission events from time-resolved measurements: Method description and application to 18 California low-income apartments. Indoor Air 28:89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Holstius, D. M., A. Pillarisetti, K. R. Smith, and E. Seto. 2014. Field calibrations of a low-cost aerosol sensor at a regulatory monitoring site in California. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 7 (4):1121–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, X., O. Le Bihan, O. Ramalho, L. Martinon, M. Nicolas, D. Bard, and J. C. Pairon. 2010. Characterization of particles emitted by incense burning in an experimental house. Indoor Air 20 (2):147–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karami, M., G. V. Mcmorrow, and L. Wang. 2018. Continuous monitoring of indoor environmental quality using an Arduino-based data acquisition system. Journal of Building Engineering 19 (January):412–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, K. E., J. Whitaker, A. Petty, C. Widmer, A. Dybwad, D. Sleeth, R. Martin, and A. Butter. 2017. Ambient and laboratory evaluation of a low-cost particulate matter. Environmental Pollution 221:491–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khlystov, A., C. Stanier, and S. N. Pandis. 2004. An algorithm for combining electrical mobility and aerodynamic size distributions data when measuring ambient aerosol special issue of aerosol science and technology on findings from the fine particulate matter supersites program. Aerosol Science and Technology 38 (Supp1):229–38.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., A. N. Skouloudis, M. Bell, M. Viana, M. C. Carotta, G. Biskos, and L. Morawska. 2016. Real-time sensors for indoor air monitoring and challenges ahead in deploying them to urban buildings. Science of the Total Environment 560–561 (April):150–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu, D., Q. Zhang, J. Jiang, and D. R. Chen. 2017. Performance calibration of low-cost and portable particular matter (PM) sensors. Journal of Aerosol Science 112 (May):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Manikonda, A., P. K. Hopke, and A. R. Ferro. 2016. Laboratory assessment of low-cost PM monitors. Journal of Aerosol Science 102:29–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morawska, L., P. K. X. Thai, A. Liu, G. Asumadu-Sakyi, A. Ayoko, A. Bartonova, F. Bedini, B. Chai, M. Christensen, J. Dunbabin, et al. 2018. Applications of low-cost sensing technologies for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment: How far have they gone? Environment International 116 (February):286–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mukherjee, A., L. G. Stanton, A. R. Graham, and P. T. Roberts. 2017. Assessing the utility of low-cost particulate matter sensors over a 12-week period in the Cuyama valley of California. Sensors 17 (8):1805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., G. A. Wellenius, C. Tonne, and J. D. Marshall. 2018. Performance of low-cost monitors to assess household air pollution. Environmental Research 163 (January):53–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Northcross, A. L., R. J. Edwards, M. A. Johnson, Z. M. Wang, K. Zhu, T. Allen, and K. R. Smith. 2013. A low-cost particle counter as a realtime fine-particle mass monitor. Environmental Sciences: Processes and Impacts 15 (2):433–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Z., and R. P. Singh. 2001. Physical and thermal properties of ground beef during cooking. LWT - Food Science and Technology 444:437–44.
   Google Scholar
• Umezawa, M., K. Sekita, K. Suzuki, M. Kubo-Irie, R. Niki, T. Ihara, M. Sugamata, K. Takeda, I. Article, A. Url, et al. 2013. Effect of aerosol particles generated by ultrasonic humidifiers on the lung in mouse. Particle and Fibre Toxicology 10 (1):64.
   Google Scholar
• Polidori, A., V. Papapostolou, and H. Zhang. 2016. Laboratory evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors: Laboratory setup and testing protocol. Diamond Bar, CA: South Coast AQMD.
   Google Scholar
• Rissler, J., M. E. A. I. Messing, P. T. Malik, Z. Nilsson, M. Erik, M. Bohgard, J. H. Sanati, J. Pagels, M. E. Rissler, A. I. Messing, et al. 2013. Effective density characterization of soot agglomerates from various sources and comparison to aggregation theory. Aerosol Science and Technology 47:792–805.
   Google Scholar
• Schieweck, A., E. Uhde, T. Salthammer, L. C. Salthammer, L. Morawska, M. Mazaheri, and P. Kumar. 2018. Smart homes and the control of indoor air quality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 94 (February):705–18.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, B. C., and W. W. Delp. 2018. Response of consumer and research grade indoor air quality monitors to residential sources of fine particles. Indoor Air 28 (4):624–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P., B. J. Turpin, H. Lim, B. J. Turpin, and H. Lim. 2010. Species contributions to PM2. 5 Mass concentrations: Revisiting common assumptions for estimating organic mass species contributions to PM2. 5 Mass concentrations: Revisiting common assumptions for estimating organic mass. Aerosol Science and Technology 35:37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Vu, T. V., J. Ondracek, V. Zdímal, J. Schwarz, J. M. Delgado-Saborit, and R. M. Harrison. 2017. Physical properties and lung deposition of particles emitted from five major indoor sources. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 10:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, L. 2007. Indoor sources of ultrafine and accumulation mode particles: Size distributions, size-resolved concentrations, and source strengths. Aerosol Science and Technology 40:348–60.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, L., R. Williams, A. Rea, and C. Croghan. 2006. Continuous weeklong measurements of personal exposures and indoor concentrations of fine particles for 37 health-impaired North Carolina residents for up to four seasons. Atmospheric Environment 40 (3):399–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., J. Li, H. Jing, Q. Zhang, J. Jiang, and P. Biswas. 2015. Laboratory evaluation and calibration of three low-cost particle sensors for particulate matter measurement. Aerosol Science and Technology 49 (11):1063–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, T., M. H. Bergin, K. K. Johnson, S. N. Tripathi, S. Shirodkar, M. S. Landis, R. Sutaria, and D. E. Carlson. 2018. Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high-and low-concentration environments. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 11 (8):4823–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zikova, N., P. K. Hopke, and A. R. Ferro. 2017. Evaluation of new low-cost particle monitors for PM2.5concentrations measurements. Journal of Aerosol Science 105:24–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar