Within- and cross-domain effects of environmental factors on students’ perception in educational buildings

References

• Andersen, R. V., J. Toftum, K. K. Andersen, and B. W. Olesen. 2009. Survey of occupant behaviour and control of indoor environment in Danish dwellings. Energy and Buildings 41 (1):11–6. 10.1610/j.enbuild.2008.07.004 10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASHRAE 2017. ASHRAE standard 55:2017 – Thermal environment conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta, USA: ASHRAE.
   Google Scholar
• Astolfi, A., and F. Pellerey. 2008. Subjective and objective assessment of acoustical and overall environmental quality in secondary school classrooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123 (1):163–73. doi:10.1121/1.2816563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azmoon, H., H. Dehghan, J. Akbari, and S. Souri. 2013. The relationship between thermal comfort and light intensity with sleep quality and eye tiredness in shift work nurses. Journal of Environmental and Public Health 2013:1–5. doi:10.1155/2013/639184, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Berglund, L., and W. S. Cain. 1989. Perceived air quality and the thermal environment. In Proceedings of IAQ '89, The Human Equation: Health and Comfort, 93–9. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Buratti, C., E. Belloni, F. Merli, and P. Ricciardi. 2018. A new index combining thermal, acoustic, and visual comfort of moderate environments in temperate climates. Building and Environment 139:27–37. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candido, C. M., J. Kim, R. de Dear, and L. Thomas. 2016. BOSSA: A multidimensional post-occupancy evaluation tool. Building Research & Information 44 (2):214–28. 10.1080/09613218.2015.1072298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, B., Q. Ouyang, Y. Zhu, L. Huang, H. Hu, and G. Deng. 2012. Development of a multivariate regression model for overall satisfaction in public buildings based on field studies in Beijing and Shanghai. Building and Environment 47:394–9. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.06.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2005. EN ISO 7730:2005, Ergonomics of the thermal environment—Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria.
   Google Scholar
• Chinazzo, G., J. Wienold, and M. Andersen. 2018a. Combined effects of daylight transmitted through coloured glazing and indoor temperature on thermal responses and overall comfort. Building and Environment 144:583–97. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.08.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinazzo, G., J. Wienold, and M. Andersen. 2019. Daylight affects human thermal perception. Scientific Reports 9 (1):13690. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-48963-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chinazzo, G., L. Pastore, J. Wienold, et al. 2018b. A field study investigation on the influence of light level on subjective thermal perception in different seasons. In Proceedings of 10th Windsor Conference: Rethinking Comfort, NCEUB 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Dascalaki, E., and V. Sermpetzoglou. 2011. Energy performance and indoor environmental quality in Hellenic schools. Energy and Buildings 43 (2–3):718–27. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.11.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Giuli, V., O. Da Pos, and M. De Carli. 2012. Indoor environmental quality and pupil perception in Italian primary schools. Building and Environment 56:335–45. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Giuli, V., R. Zecchin, L. Corain, and L. Salmaso. 2015. Measurements of indoor environmental conditions in Italian classrooms and their impact on childrens comfort. Indoor and Built Environment 24 (5):689–712. doi:10.1177/1420326X14530586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz, M., M. B. Piderit, and S. Attia. 2021. Parameters and indicators used in Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) studies: A review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2042 (1):012132. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2042/1/012132.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2001. EN ISO 7726:2001. Ergonomics of the thermal environment – Instruments for measuring physical quantities.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2011. EN ISO 12464-1:2011. Light and lightling – Lighting of work places – Part 1: Indoor work places.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2012. EN ISO 28802:2012. Ergonomics of the physical environment—Assessment of environments by means of an environmental survey involving physical measurements of the environment and subjective responses of people. International organization for standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2019a. EN 16798-1:2019. Energy performance of buildings – Ventilation for buildings – Part 1: Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics – Module M1-6.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2019b. EN ISO 10551:2019. Ergonomics of the physical environment—Subjective judgement scales for assessing physical environments. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2019c. EN/TR 16798-2:2019. Energy performance of buildings—Part 2: Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics—Module M1-6—Technical report—Interpretation of the requirements in EN 16798–1.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, L., G. Clausen, and P. O. Fanger. 1998. Impact of temperature and humidity on the perception of indoor air quality. Indoor Air 8 (2):80–90. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.1998.t01-2-00003.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, L., G. Clausen, and P. O. Fanger. 2000. Temperature and humidity: Important factors for perception of air quality and for ventilation requirements. ASHRAE Trans 100 (2):503–10.
   Google Scholar
• Fanger, P. O., N. O. Breum, and E. Jerking. 1977. Can colour and noise influence man’s thermal comfort? Ergonomics 20 (1):11–8. 10.1080/00140137708931596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassio, F., A. Fanchiotti, and R. Vollaro. 2014. Linear, non-linear and alternative algorithms in the correlation of IEQ factors with global comfort: A case study. Sustainability 6 (11):8113–27. doi:10.3390/su6118113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, Y., W. Ji, B. Lin, and Y. Zhu. 2017. The impact of thermal environment on occupant IEQ perception and productivity. Building and Environment 121:158–67. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.05.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, H., S. Hu, G. Liu, and L. Zhang. 2020. The combined effects of temperature and noise on the comfort perceptions of young people with a normal Body Mass Index. Sustainable Cities and Society 54:101993. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, T., S. Hu, and G. Liu. 2017. Evaluation model of specific indoor environment overall comfort based on effective-function method. Energies 10 (10):1634. 201710.3390/en10101634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldi, F., and D. Robinson. 2010. On the unification of thermal perception and adaptive actions. Building and Environment 45 (11):2440–57. 201010.1016/j.buildenv.2010.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., Y. Zhu, Q. Ouyang, and B. Cao. 2012. A study on the effects of thermal, luminous, and acoustic environments on indoor environmental comfort in offices. Building and Environment 49:304–9. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.07.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, M. A., and J. Fergus Nicol. 2002. The validity of ISO-PMV for predicting comfort votes in every-day thermal environments. Energy and Buildings 34 (6):667–84. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00018-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., and W. Jeong. 2002. Influence of illumination on autonomic thermoregulation and choice of clothing. International Journal of Biometeorology 46 (3):141–4. 10.1007/s00484-002-0126-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsavi, S. S., A. Montazami, and D. Mumovic. 2021. Perceived indoor air quality in naturally ventilated primary schools in the UK: Impact of environmental variables and thermal sensation. Indoor Air 31 (2):480–501. doi: 10.1111/ina.12740 10.1111/ina.12740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krawczyk, D. A., K. Gładyszewska-Fiedoruk, and A. Rodero. 2017. The analysis of microclimate parameters in the classrooms located in different climate zones. Applied Thermal Engineering 113:1088–96. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.11.089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurentin, C., V. Bermtto, and M. Fontoynont. 2000. Effect of thermal conditions and light source type on visual comfort appraisal. Lighting Research and Technology 32 (4):223–33. 10.1177/096032710003200406.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. C., K. W. Mui, L. T. Wong, W. Y. Chan, E. W. M. Lee, and C. T. Cheung. 2012. Student learning performance and indoor environmental quality (IEQ) in air-conditioned university teaching rooms. Building and Environment 49:238–44. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebl, A., J. Haller, B. Jödicke, H. Baumgartner, S. Schlittmeier, and J. Hellbrück. 2012. Combined effects of acoustic and visual distraction on cognitive performance and well-being. Applied Ergonomics 43 (2):424–34. 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihai, T., and V. Iordache. 2016. Determining the indoor environment quality for an educational building. Energy Procedia 85:566–74. 2016doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2015.12.246.
   Google Scholar
• Molhave, L., Z. Liu, A. H. Jorgensen, O. F. Pedersen, and S. K. Kjaegaard. 1993. Sensory and physiological effects on humans of combined exposures to air temperatures and volatile organic compounds. Indoor Air 3 (3):155–69. 10.1111/j.1600-0668.1993.t01-1-00002.x
   Google Scholar
• Mongkolsawat, D., A. A. Marmot, and M. Ucci. 2014. A comparison of perceived learning performance of Thai university students in fan-assisted naturally ventilated and air-conditioned classrooms. Intelligent Buildings International 6 (2):93–111. doi: 10.1080/17508975.2014.893863 10.1080/17508975.2014.893863
   Google Scholar
• Morandi, F., I. Pittana, F. Cappelletti, A. Gasparella, and A. Tzempelikos. 2022. Assessing the overall indoor environmental comfort and satisfaction: Evaluation of a questionnaire proposal by means of statistical analysis of responses. In Proceedings of ASHRAE IAQ Conference, Athens, May 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Nagano, K., and T. Horikoshi. 2001. New index of combined effect of temperature and noise on human comfort: Summer experiments on hot ambient temperature and traffic noise. Archives of Complex Environmental Studies 13 (3–4):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Nagano, K., and T. Horikoshi. 2005. New comfort index during combined conditions of moderate low ambient temperature and traffic noise. Energy and Buildings 37 (3):287–94. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Z., S. K. Kjaergaard, and L. Mølhave. 2003. A chamber-experiment investigation of the interaction between perceptions of noise and odor in humans. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 76 (8):598–604. doi:10.1007/s00420-003-0464-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellerin, N., and V. Candas. 2003. Combined effects of temperature and noise on human discomfort. Physiology & Behavior 78 (1):99–106. 10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00956-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellerin, N., and V. Candas. 2004. Effects of steady-state noise and temperature conditions on environmental perception and acceptability. Indoor Air 14 (2):129–36. 10.1046/j.1600-0668.2003.00221.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pistore, L., G. Pernigotto, F. Cappelletti, A. Gasparella, and P. Romagnoni. 2019. A stepwise approach integrating feature selection, regression techniques and cluster analysis to identify primary retrofit interventions on large stocks of buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society 47:101438. 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittana, I., F. Morandi, F. Cappelletti, A. Gasparella, and A. Tzempelikos. 2022a. Understanding the effects of environmental factors on human perception by means of surveys and in field measurements. In Proceedings of ASHRAE IAQ Conference, Athens, May 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Pittana, I., F. Morandi, F. Cappelletti, and A. Gasparella. 2022b. Investigating the quality of the correlation between indoor environmental factors and human perception. In Proceedings of International High Performance Buildings Conference, Purdue, July 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Reinikainen, L. M., and J. J. K. Jaakkola. 2003. Significance of humidity and temperature on skin and upper airway symptoms. Indoor Air 13 (4):344–52. 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2003.00155.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricciardi, P., and C. Buratti. 2018. Environmental quality of university classrooms: Subjective and objective evaluation of the thermal, acoustic, and lighting comfort conditions. Building and Environment 127:23–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.10.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweiker, M., E. Ampatzi, M. S. Andargie, R. K. Andersen, E. Azar, V. M. Barthelmes, C. Berger, L. Bourikas, S. Carlucci, G. Chinazzo, et al. 2020. Review of multi-domain approaches to indoor environmental perception and behaviour. Building and Environment 176:106804. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, M. K., R. Ooka, H. B. Rijal, S. Kumar, A. Kumar, and S. Mahapatra. 2019. Progress in thermal comfort studies in classrooms over last 50 years and way forward. Energy and Buildings 188–189:149–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, H., Y. Ding, and B. Singer. 2020. Interactions and comprehensive effect of indoor environmental quality factors on occupant satisfaction. Building and Environment 167:106462. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiller, D., L. M. Wang, A. Musser, and M. J. Radik. 2010. Combined effects of noise and temperature on human comfort and performance. Journal of Building Engineering 116:522–40.
   Google Scholar
• Toftum, J., A. S. Jørgensen, and P. O. Fanger. 1998. Effect of humidity and temperature of inspired air on perceived comfort. Energy and Buildings 28 (1):15–23. 10.1016/S0378-7788(97)00018-2
   Google Scholar
• Toftum, J., A. Thorseth, J. Markvart, and A. Logadottir. 2018. Occupant response to different correlated color temperatures of white LED lighting. Building and Environment 143:258–68. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torresin, S., G. Pernigotto, F. Cappelletti, and A. Gasparella. 2018. Combined effects of environmental factors on human perception and objective performance: A review of experimental laboratory works. Indoor Air 28 (4):525–38. 10.1111/ina.12457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilcekova, S., L. Meciarova, E. K. Burdova, J. Katunska, D. Kosicanova, and S. Doroudiani. 2017. Indoor environmental quality of classrooms and occupants’ comfort in a special education school in Slovak Republic. Building and Environment 120:29–40. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., X. Sun, and Y. Wu. 2020. Investigation of the relationships between thermal, acoustic, illuminous environments and human perceptions. Journal of Building Engineering 32:101839. 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, D., and C. M. Mak. 2020. Relationships between indoor environmental quality and environmental factors in university classrooms. Building and Environment 186:107331. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, W., and H. J. Moon. 2018. Cross-modal effects of noise and thermal conditions on indoor environmental perception and speech recognition. Applied Acoustics 141:1–8. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.06.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, W., H. J. Moon, and M. J. Kim. 2018. Combined effects of short-term noise exposure and hygrothermal conditions on indoor environmental perceptions. Indoor and Built Environment. 27 (8):1119–33. 10.1177/1420326X17703774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, W., and H. J. Moon. 2019. Combined effects of acoustic, thermal, and illumination conditions on the comfort of discrete senses and overall indoor environment. Building and Environment 148:623–33. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.11.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, W., M. J. Kim, and H. J. Moon. 2019. Effects of indoor temperature and background noise on floor impact noise perception. Indoor and Built Environment 28 (4):454–69. 10.1177/1420326X17753708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zomorodian, Z. S., M. Tahsildoost, and M. Hafezi. 2016. Thermal comfort in educational buildings: A review article. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 59:895–906. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar