Bringing the citizen back into EU democracy: against the input-output model and why deliberative democracy might be the answer

References

• Agustín, Ó. G. (2012). Transnational deliberative democracy in the context of the European Union: The institutionalisation of the European Integration Forum. European Integration Online Papers, 16, Article 10. Retrieved from http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2012-010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Armingeon, K., & Guthmann, K. (2014). Democracy in crisis? The declining support for national democracy in European countries, 2007–2011. European Journal of Political Research, 53(3), 423–442. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, D. (2016, January 11). Hard evidence: This is the age of dissent – And there’s much more to come. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/hard-evidence-this-is-the-age-of-dissent-and-theres-much-more-to-come-52871
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D., & Lord, C. (1998). Legitimacy and the EU. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, S. (1996). Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference (pp. 67–94). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cassese, S. (2002). Is there really a “democratic deficit”? In Institutional reforms in the European Union. Memorandum for the convention (pp. 1–44). Brussels: EuropEos.
   Google Scholar
• Cengiz, F. (2010). Multi-level governance in competition policy: The European competition network. European Law Review, 35(5), 660–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cengiz, F. (2016). Legitimacy and multi-level governance in European Union competition law: A deliberative discursive approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(4), 826–845. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for European Policy Studies. (2007). Making antitrust damages actions for effective in the EU: Welfare impact and potential scenarios. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Chalániová, D. (2013). Turn the other Greek. How the Eurozone crisis changes the image of Greeks and what visual representations of Greeks tell us about European identity. Perspectives: Central European Review of International Affairs, 21(1), 5–41. doi: 10.1080/0907676X.2012.722651
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D. (2012). The European redistributive state and a European law of struggle. European Law Journal, 18(5), 667–693. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00623.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespy, A. (2014). Deliberative democracy and the legitimacy of the European Union: A reappraisal of conflict. Political Studies, 62(1), 81–98. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12058
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1986). Democracy, liberty and equality. Michigan: Norwegian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, M., & de Witte, F. (2013). Constitutional balance in the EU after the Euro-crisis. The Modern Law Review, 76(5), 817–844. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.12037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, N. J. (2014). Governance and democratic legitimacy: The European Union’s crisis of de-politicisation. In B. Isakhan & S. Steven (Eds.), Democracy and crisis (pp. 108–124). New York, NY: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. (1996). Democracy in capitalist times. New York, NY: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J., & Niemeyer, S. (2010). Deliberative turns. In J. Dryzek (Ed.), Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance (pp. 3–18). New York, NY: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2001). European Governance: A White Paper, COM(2001) 428, Brussels, 25.7.2001.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. (2011). When the people speak. New York, NY: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. (2014). Deliberative democracy in context: Reflections on theory and practice. In K. Grönlund, A. Bächtiger, & M. Setälä (Eds.), Deliberative mini-publics (pp. 27–39). Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, D. (2013). European governance and the deliberative challenge. In R. Kies & P. Nanz (Eds.), Is Europe listening to us?: Successes and failures of EU citizen consultations (pp. 35–59). London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2003). Survey article: Recipes for public spheres: Eight institutional design choices and their consequences. Journal of Political Philosophy, 11(3), 338–367. doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geissel, B., & Gherghina, S. (2016). Constitutional deliberative democracy and democratic innovations. In M. Reuchamps & J. Suiter (Eds.), Constitutional deliberative democracy in Europe (pp. 75–91). Colchester: ECPR.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, M., Bächtiger, A., & Shikano, S. (2012). Deliberative abilities of ordinary citizens. Evidence from a transnational deliberative poll. Brussels: Mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Grönlund, K., Bächtiger, A., & Setälä, M. (2014). Towards a new era of deliberative mini-publics. In K. Grönlund, A. Bächtiger, & M. Setälä (Eds.), Deliberative mini-publics (pp. 225–247). Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2012). Between facts and norms. New York, NY: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2015). The lure of technocracy. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Harlow, C. (2002). Accountability in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, V. (2001). Constitution-making and the transformation of conflict. Peace & Change, 26(2), 153–176. doi: 10.1111/0149-0508.00185
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S. (2008). What’s wrong with the European Union and how to fix it? Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. F. (2015). Democratic illusion. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karatzia, A. (2017). The European citizens’ initiative and the EU institutional balance: On realism and the possibilities of affecting EU lawmaking. Common Market Law Review, 54(1), 177–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karolewski, I. P. (2011). Pathologies of deliberation in the EU. European Law Journal, 17(1), 66–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00539.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassam, A. (2015, 13 July). ThisIsACoup: How a hashtag born in Barcelona spread across globe. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/jul/13/greeksupporters-social-media-backlash-germany
   Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B. (2013). Civil society and democracy in the EU. In B. Kohler-Koch & C. Qiuttkat (Eds.), De-mystification of participatory democracy: EU governance and civil society (pp. 1–17). Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Kutay, A. (2015). Limits of participatory democracy in European governance. European Law Journal, 21(6), 803–818. doi: 10.1111/eulj.12156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macartney, H. (2013). The debt crisis and the European democratic legitimacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1996). Regulating Europe. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, L., & Wilks, S. (1995). The first supranational policy in the European Union: Competition policy. European Journal of Political Research, 28(2), 141–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1995.tb00808.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaïdis, K. (2013). European demoicracy and its crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(2), 351–369. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offe, C. (2014). The Europolis experiment and its lessons for deliberation on Europe. European Union Politics, 15(3), 430–441. doi: 10.1177/1465116514532557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimbert, M. (2009). Towards food sovereignty. London: IIED.
   Google Scholar
• Pimbert, M., & Wakefort, T. (2002). Prajateerpu: A citizens jury/scenario workshop on food and farming futures for Andhra Pradesh, India. London: IIED.
   Google Scholar
• Qiuttkat, C. (2013). Consultation in daily practice. In B. Kohler-Koch & C. Quitkatt (Eds.), De-mystification of participatory democracy: EU governance and civil society (pp. 62–81). Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (2013). Monetary union, fiscal crisis and the disabling of democratic accountability. In A. Schäfer & W. Streeck (Eds.), Politics in the age of austerity (pp. 108–142). Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (2015). After the crash: A perspective on multilevel European democracy. European Law Journal, 21(3), 384–405. doi: 10.1111/eulj.12127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2013). Democracy in the European Union revised: Input, output and ‘throughput’. Political Studies, 61(1), 2–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2013). Designing democratic innovations at the European level: Lessons from the experiments. In R. Kies & P. Nanz (Eds.), Is Europe listening to us?: Successes and failures of EU citizen consultations (pp. 201–217). London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W. (2015). The crisis in context: Democratic capitalism and its contradictions. In A. Schäfer & W. Streeck (Eds.), Politics in the age of austerity (pp. 262–287). Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Streit, M. E., & Mussler, W. (1995). The economic constitution of the European community: From ‘Rome’ to ‘Maastricht’. European Law Journal, 1(1), 5–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.1995.tb00002.x
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M. (2013). Europe’s new communication policy and the introduction of transnational deliberative citizens’ involvement projects. In R. Kies & P. Nanz (Eds.), Is Europe listening to us?: Successes and failures of EU citizen consultations (pp. 17–35). London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1996). Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference (pp. 120–135). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. New York, NY: OUP.
   Google Scholar