Radical right and radical left party ideologies: a pan-European mapping of necessary attributes, differences and similarities

References

• Abedi, A. (2004). Anti-political establishment parties: A comparative analysis. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, T., de Lange, S. L., & Rooduijn, M. (Eds.). (2016). Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Into the mainstream? Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Backes, U. (2010). Political extremes: A conceptual history from antiquity to the present. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, R., de Vries, C., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., & Vachudova, M. A. (2015). Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010. Party Politics, 21(1), 143–152. doi: 10.1177/1354068812462931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobbio, N. (1996). Left and right: The significance of a political distinction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, N. (2007). The politics of the environment: Ideas, activism, policy. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charalambous, G. (2011). All the shades of red: Examining the radical left’s Euroscepticism. Contemporary Politics, 17(3), 299–320. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2011.597142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J., Farrell, D. M., & McAllister, I. (2011). Political parties and democratic linkage: How parties organize democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Lange, S. L. (2007). A new winning formula? The programmatic appeal of the radical right. Party Politics, 13(4), 411–435. doi: 10.1177/1354068807075943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, C. E., & Edwards, E. E. (2009). Taking Europe to its extremes: Extremist parties and public Euroscepticism. Party Politics, 15(1), 5–28. doi: 10.1177/1354068808097889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalona, F., & Vieira, M. (2013). La gauche radicale en Europe, ou l’émergence d’une famille de partis. Paris: Fondation Jean-Jaurès. (Observatoire de la vie politique, note no 2).
   Google Scholar
• Fagerholm, A. (2017). What is left for the radical left? A comparative examination of the policies of radical left parties in Western Europe before and after 1989. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 25(1), 16–40. doi: 10.1080/14782804.2016.1148592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerholm, A. (2018). The radical right and the radical left in contemporary Europe: Two min--max definitions. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J., & Barresi, P. A. (2003). Putting ordinary language to work: A min–max strategy of concept formation in the social sciences. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(2), 201–232. doi: 10.1177/0951629803015002647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goertz, G. (2006). Social science concepts: A user’s guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, R., Morales, L., & Ramiro, L. (2016). Varieties of radicalism: Examining the diversity of radical left parties and voters in Western Europe. West European Politics, 39(2), 351–379. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2015.1064245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halikiopoulou, D., Nanou, K., & Vasilopoulou, S. (2012). The paradox of nationalism: The common denominator of radical right and radical left Euroscepticism. European Journal of Political Research, 51(4), 504–539. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02050.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, S. (2004). Getting the right right: Redefining the centre-right in post-communist Europe. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 20(3), 9–27. doi: 10.1080/1352327042000260788
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Wilson, C. J. (2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35(8), 965–989. doi: 10.1177/001041402236310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., & Fording, R. (1998). Voter ideology in western democracies, 1946–1989. European Journal of Political Research, 33(1), 73–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2006). Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research, 45(6), 921–956. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00644.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, M. J., & Budge, I. (1992). Measuring policy distances and modeling coalition formation. In M. J. Laver & I. Budge (Eds.), Party policy and government coalitions (pp. 15–40). New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laver, M., & Garry, J. (2000). Estimating policy positions from political texts. American Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 619–634. doi: 10.2307/2669268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, W., Benoit, K., Mikhaylov, S., & Laver, M. (2011). Scaling policy preferences from coded political texts. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36(1), 123–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-9162.2010.00006.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, L. (2012). Radical left parties in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• March, L., & Mudde, C. (2005). What’s left of the radical left? The European radical left after 1989: Decline and mutation. Comparative European Politics, 3(1), 23–49. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110052
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, M. D., & Mendes, S. M. (2001). The policy space of party manifestos. In M. Laver (Ed.), Estimating the policy position of political actors (pp. 90–114). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Minkenberg, M. (2017). The radical right in Eastern Europe: Democracy under siege? New York, NY: Palgrave Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2000). The ideology of the extreme right. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2005). Politischer Extremismus und Radikalismus in Westeuropa – Typologie und Bestandsaufnahme. In U. Backes & E. Jesse (Eds.), Gefährdungen der Freiheit: Extremistische Ideologien im Vergleich (pp. 87–104). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy set social science. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2006). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 14(3), 291–310. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpj019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., & Akkerman, T. (2017). Flank attacks? Populism and left–right radicalism in Western Europe. Party Politics, 23(2), 193–204. doi: 10.1177/1354068815596514
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033–1053. doi: 10.2307/1958356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1984). Guidelines for concept analysis. In G. Sartori (Ed.), Social science concepts: A systematic analysis (pp. 15–85). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, M., & Verkuilen, J. (2006). Fuzzy set theory: Applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Szczerbiak, A., & Taggart, P. (2008). Theorizing party-based Euroscepticism: Problems of definition, measurement and causality. In A. Szczerbiak & P. Taggart (Eds.), Opposing Europe? The comparative party politics of euroscepticism: Comparative and theoretical perspectives (vol. 2, pp. 238–262). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tavits, M., & Letki, N. (2009). When left is right: Party ideology and policy in post-communist Europe. American Political Science Review, 103(4), 555–569. doi: 10.1017/S0003055409990220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiem, A. (2016a). QCApro: Professional functionality for performing and evaluating qualitative comparative analysis. (R Package Version 1.1-0). Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/package=QCApro.
   Google Scholar
• Thiem, A. (2016b). Standards of good practice and the methodology of necessary conditions in qualitative comparative analysis. Political Analysis, 24(4), 478–484. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpw024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kessel, S. (2015). Populist parties in Europe: Agents of discontent? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilopoulou, S. (2011). European integration and the radical right: Three patterns of opposition. Government and Opposition, 46(2), 223–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2010.01337.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkuilen, J. (2005). Assigning membership in a fuzzy-set analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 33(4), 462–496. doi: 10.1177/0049124105274498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkens, A., Lehmann, P., Matthieß, T., Merz, N., Regel, S., & Werner, A. (2016). The Manifesto data collection: Manifesto project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR) version 2016a. Retrieved from https://manifestoproject.wzb.eu/.
   Google Scholar