Contemporary changes and civil society in Portugal and the Russian FederationFootnote^*

* This text includes results from the project Civil Engagement in Social Work: Developing Global Models project funded by FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IRSES, Marie Curie Actions – International Research Staff Exchange Scheme.

References

• Agg, C. (2006). Trends in government support for non-governmental organizations: Is the ‘Golden Age’ of the NGO behind us?. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, J. C. (2006). The civil sphere. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bindman, E. (2018). Social rights in Russia – from imperfect past to uncertain future. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, C., & Konovalova, E. (2012). Russian civil society: History, today, and future prospects. International NGO Training and Research Centre, Briefing Paper 37.
   Google Scholar
• CIA The World Fact Book. (2018).
   Google Scholar
• CIVICUS State of Civil Society Report. (2018). Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. (2008). Biennal report on social services of general interest. Commission Staff Working Document.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A. F. da., Machado, F. L., & Almeida, J. F. (2009). Social classes and educational assets: A transnational analysis. In A. F. da Costa, F. L. Machado, & P. Ávila (Eds.), Knowledge and society – Portugal in the European context (Vol. 2, pp. 5–20). Oeiras: Celta Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Coston, J. M. (1998). A model and typology of government-NGO relationships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 358–382. doi: 10.1177/0899764098273006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, R. (2001). Monitoring and evaluating NGO achievements. In R. B. Potter & B. Desaid (Eds.), Companion to development studies (pp. 1–9). Cambridge: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1996). Non-governmental organizations – performance and accountability: Beyond the magic bullet. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• European Economic and Social Committee. (2018). The EU’s Human Rights Civil Society Organizations report more difficulties in their work, 22/1/2018.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, T. (2014). Rethinking pathways to democracy: Civil society in Spain and Portugal, 1960s-2000s. Democratization, 22(6), 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, R. C. (coord.) (2015). Diagnóstico das ONG em Portugal. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
   Google Scholar
• Fries, R. (2005). The Legal Environment of Civil Society. Chapter 9. Document of the European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Garton, J. (2009). Towards a theory of regulation. In J. Garton (Ed.), The regulation of organised civil society (pp. 225–227). Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1977). Quaderni del Carcere, Vol. III. Torino: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Green, E. G. T., Deschamps, J. C., & Paez, D. (2005). Variation of individualism and collectivism within and between 20 countries – a typological analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(3), 321–339. doi: 10.1177/0022022104273654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, S. A. (2011). La Sociedad Civil Rusa, Veinte Años Después. Revista CIDOB D’Afers Internacionals, 96, 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Hamann, K., & Manuel, P. C. (1999). Regime changes and civil society in twentieth-century Portugal. South European Society and Politics, 4(1), 71–96. doi: 10.1080/13608740408539560
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi, H. (2007). Uniqueness of Russian middle class and its future. The Journal of Comparative Economic Studies, 3, 29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, M. M. (2003). The weakness of civil society in post-communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch – World Report. (2017).
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51. doi: 10.2307/2657288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Labour Office. (2017). World Social Protection Report 2017-19: Universal social protection to achieve the sustainable development goal. Geneva: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Janoski, T. (1998). Citizenship and civil society: A framework of rights and obligations in liberal, traditional and social democratic regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehr-Lehnardt, R. (2005). NGO Legitimacy: Reassessing Democracy, Accountability and Transparency. Columbia Law School, Digital Repository Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Liebfried, S. (2010). Social policy: Left to the judges and the markets? In H. Wallace, M. A. Pollack, & A. R. Young (Eds.), Policy making on the European Union (pp. 269–293). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magun, V., & Rudnev, M. (2012). Basic values of Russians and other Europeans. Problems of Economic Transition, 54(10), 31–64. doi: 10.2753/PET1061-1991541003
   Google Scholar
• Mauritti, R., Martins, S. C., Nunes, N., Romão, A. L., & da Costa, A. F. (2016). The social structure of European inequality: A multidimensional perspective. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 81, 75–93.
   Google Scholar
• McGann, J., & Johnstone, M. (2006). The power shift and the NGO credibility crisis. International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 8(2), 159–172.
   Google Scholar
• Meagher, G., & Szebehely, M. (2013). Marketisation in Nordic eldercare: A research report on legislation, oversight, extent and consequences. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Narozhna, T. (2004). Civil society in the post-communist context: Linking theoretical concept and social transformation. Demokratizatsiya, 12(2), 294–310. doi: 10.3200/DEMO.12.2.294-310
   Google Scholar
• Nash, R., Hudson, A., & Luttrell, C. (2006). Mapping political context: A toolkit for civil society organisations. London: Research and Policy in Development, Overseas Development Institute.[AQ31].
   Google Scholar
• Nyssens, M. (Ed.). (2006). Social enterprise – at the cross roads of market, public policies and civil society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• OECD Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• OSCE – News and Press Releases. (2018, March 19). Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Pedraza-Fariña, L. (2013). Conceptions of civil society in international lawmaking and implementation: A theoretical framework. Michigan Journal of International Law, 34, 101–173.
   Google Scholar
• Quintão, C. (2011). O Terceiro Sector e a sua Renovação em Portugal. Uma Abordagem Preliminar (Working Papers, 2ª série, n° 2), Instituto de Sociologia da Universidade do Porto.
   Google Scholar
• Rinne, T., Steel, G. D., & Fairweather, J. (2012). Hofstede and Shane revisited: The role of power distance and individualism in national-level innovation success. Cross-Cultural Research, 46(2), 91–108. doi: 10.1177/1069397111423898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ROSSTAT – Russian Statistics. Federal State Statistics Service.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W., & List, R. (2003). Global civil society – An overview. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., Anheier, H. K., List, R., Toepler, S., Sokolowski, S. W., & Associates. (1999). Global civil society. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies. Retrieved from http://ccss.jhu.edu/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2011/08/Global-Civil-Society-I.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Universalism values and the inclusiveness of our moral universe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(6), 711–728. doi: 10.1177/0022022107308992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Cultural value orientations: Nature and implications of national differences. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel Science Foundation Grant No. 921/02.
   Google Scholar
• Sundstrom, L. M., & Henry, L. A. (2006). Concluding thoughts. In A. B. Evans, L. A. Henry, & L. M. Sundstrom (Eds.), Russian civil society: A critical assessment (pp. 305–322). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2012). UN-DESA Survey of Civil Society Organizations. UN Paper.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Reports. (2016). New York.
   Google Scholar
• Voicu, M., & Tufis, C. (2013). Religion and social participation in postcommunist Europe. In J. De Hart, P. Dekker, & L. Halman (Eds.), Religion and civil society in Europe (pp. 203–217). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel, C., Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H. D. (2003). The theory of human development: A cross-cultural analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 42, 341–379. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.00086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank – IBRD-IDA, 2017. (2017).
   Google Scholar
• World Bank – World Development Indicators.
   Google Scholar
• Data bases
   Google Scholar
• European Social Survey, 2014, 2016. (2016).
   Google Scholar
• European Values Survey, 2008. (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Social Progress Index, 2017. (2017).
   Google Scholar
• World Values Survey, 1981-1998. (1998).
   Google Scholar