Adjusting venues and voices: populist and right-wing parties, the European Parliament and civil society equality organizations 2014–2019

References

• Abels, G. (2019). The powers of the European Parliament: Implications for gender equality policy. In P. Ahrens, & L. Rolandsen Agustín (Eds.), Gendering the European Parliament. Structures, policies, and practices (pp. 19–34). Rowman & Littlefield/ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abels, G. (2020). Gendering the 2019-2024 European Parliament. In M. Kaeding, M. Müller, & J. Schmälter (Eds.), Die Europawahl 2019 (pp. 407–421). Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Abels, G., & Mushaben, J. M. (2012). Conclusion: Rethinking the double democratic deficit of the EU. In G. Abels, & J. M. Mushaben (Eds.), Gendering the European Union: New approaches to old democratic deficits (pp. 228–247). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ahrens, P. (2016). The committee on women’s rights and gender equality in the European Parliament: Taking advantage of institutional power play. Parliamentary Affairs, 69(4), 778–793. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsw005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrens, P. (2018a). Actors, institutions and the making of EU gender equality programs. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ahrens, P. (2018b). Anti-feministische Politiker*innen im Frauenrechtsausschuss des Europäischen parlaments – Wendepunkt oder Resilienz in der EU Gleichstellungspolitik? Feministische Studien, 36(2), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1515/fs-2018-0042
   Google Scholar
• Ahrens, P. (2019a). The birth, life, and death of policy instruments: 35 years of EU gender equality policy programmes. West European Politics, 42(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1490561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrens, P. (2019b). Gender equality and intersectionality in supranational “equality CSOs”: A mountain skyline? In J. Irvine, S. Lang, & C. Montoya (Eds.), Gendered mobilization and intersectional challenges: Social movements in Europe and the United States (pp. 244–261). Rowman & Littlefield/ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahrens, P. (2019c). Working against the tide? Gender mainstreaming in the European Parliament. In P. Ahrens, & L. Rolandsen Agustín (Eds.), Gendering the European Parliament. Structures, policies, and practices (pp. 85–101). Rowman & Littlefield/ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahrens, P., & Abels, G. (2017). Die Macht zu gestalten – die Mutterschutzrichtlinie im legislativen Bermuda-Dreieck der Europäischen Union. Femina Politica, 26(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.3224/feminapolitica
   Google Scholar
• Ahrens, P., & Rolandsen Agustín, L. (Eds.). (2019). Gendering the European Parliament. Structures, policies, and practices. Rowman & Littlefield/ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahrens, P., & Van der Vleuten, A. (2019a). Fish fingers and measles? Assessing complex gender equality in the scenarios for the future of Europe. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(2), 292–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrens, P., & Van der Vleuten, A. (2019b, September). The strategic use of the subsidiarity argument in the European Parliament in debates about gender equality. Paper presented at the General Conference of the European Consortium on Political Research, Wroclaw, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Ayoub, P. M. (2016). When states come out: Europe’s sexual minorities and the politics of visibility. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cengiz, F. (2019). Gendering the EU budget. Can European Parliament play the role of a gender budgeting advocate? In P. Ahrens, & L. Rolandsen Agustín (Eds.), Gendering the European Parliament. Structures, policies, and practices (pp. 103–120). Rowman & Littlefield/ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crespy, A., & Parks, L. (2019). The European Parliament and civil society. In O. Costa (Ed.), The European Parliament in times of EU crisis. Dynamics and transformations (pp. 203–223). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, P. (2010). The platform of European social NGOs: Ideology, division and coalition. The Journal of Political Ideologies, 15(3), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2010.513876
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, P. (2015). Feminist NGOs and the European Union: Contracting opportunities and strategic response. Social Movement Studies, 14(4), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2014.965674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, P. (2019). The European parliament and Irish female MEPs. Female political agency for gender equality. In P. Ahrens & L. Rolandsen Agustín (Eds.), Gendering the European parliament. Structures, Policies and practices (pp. 159–175). Rowman & Littlefield/ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• D’Agostino, S. (2018). Intersectional mobilization and the EU: Which political opportunities are there for Romani women’s activism? European Yearbook of Minority Issues Online, 15(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1163/22116117_01501003
   Google Scholar
• Debusscher, P., & van der Vleuten, A. (2017). Equality policies in the EU through a feminist Historical Institutionalist Lens. In H. MacRae, & E. Weiner (Eds.), Towards gendering institutionalism equality in Europe (pp. 3–24). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Della Sala, V., & Ruzza, C. (2007). Governance and civil society in the European Union, Volume 1&2. MUP.
   Google Scholar
• European Civic Forum. (2019). Activizenship#4: Civic space watch report 2019: Success stories of resistance. Paris: European Civic Forum/Creative Commons.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament Committee on Budgetary Control. (2017). Draft report on budgetary control of financing NGOs from the EU budget (2015/2345 (INI)) Rappporteur Markus Pieper EPP 16.3.2017 downloaded 4 December 2019. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-589138_EN.pdf?redirect
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, D. (2011). Democratic participation and civil society in the European Union. MUP.
   Google Scholar
• Golembiewiski, R. T. (1985). Humanizing public organizations: Perspectives on doing better-than-average when average ain't at all bad. Lomond Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, J. (2011). Interest representation in the European Union. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hentges, G., & Nottbohm, K. (2017). Die Verbindung von Antifeminismus und Europakritik. Positionen der Parteien „alternative für Deutschland“ und „front national“. In G. Hentges, K. Nottbohm, & H.-W. Platzer (Eds.), Europäische Identität in der Krise? Europäische Identitätsforschung und Rechtspopulismusforschung im Dialog (pp. 167–208). Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Hubert, A., & Stratigaki, M. (2016). Twenty years of EU gender mainstreaming: Rebirth out of the ashes? Femina Politica, 25(2), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.3224/feminapolitica
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, J., Lang, S., & Montoya, C. (Eds.). (2019). Gendered mobilizations. Intersectional challenges in North American and European social movements. Rowman & Littlefield/ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacquot, S. (2015). Transformations in EU gender equality. From emergence to dismantling. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, T. (2013). Die Europäisierung der rechten EU-Gegner. Rechte europäische Parteien und rechte Fraktionen im Europäischen Parlament vor den Europawahlen 2014. Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, H., & Kalm, S. (Eds.). (2015). EU civil society. Patterns of cooperation, competition and conflict. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (Eds.). (2017). Gender and the economic crisis in Europe. Politics, institutions and intersectionality. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kantola, J., & Rolandsen-Agustín, L. (2016). Gendering transnational party politics. Party Politics, 22(5), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816654321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantola, J., & Rolandsen Agustín, L. (2019). Gendering the representative work of the European Parliament: A political analysis of women MEP’s perceptions of gender equality in party groups. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(4), 768–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamessini, M., & Rubery, J. (Eds.). (2014). Women and austerity. The economic crisis and the future for gender equality. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kemper, A. (2014). Keimzelle der Nation II. Wie sich in Europa Parteien und Bewegungen für konservative Familienwerte, gegen Toleranz und Vielfalt und gegen eine progressive Geschlechterpolitik radikalisieren. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Kluger Dionigi, M. (2017). Lobbying in the European Parliament. The battle for influence. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B., & Quittkat, C. (2013). De-mystification of participatory democracy: EU-governance and civil society. OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Köttig, M., Bitzan, R., & Petö, A. (Eds.). (2017). Gender and far right politics in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kováts, E. (2018). Questioning consensuses: Right-wing populism, anti-populism, and the threat of ‘gender ideology’. Sociological Research Online, 23, 528–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418764735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krizsan, A., & Siim, B. (2018). Gender equality and family in populist radical right agendas: European parliamentary debates 2014. In T. Knijn, & M. Naldini (Eds.), Gender and generational division in EU citizenship (pp. 39–59). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhar, R., & Paternotte, D. (Eds.). (2017). Anti-gender campaigns. Mobilizing against equality. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Landorff, L. (2019). Inside European politics. Informality, information and intergroups. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, S. (2009). Assessing advocacy: European transnational women’s networks and gender mainstreaming. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 16(3), 327–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxp016
   Google Scholar
• Lang, S. (2013). NGOs, civil society, and the public sphere. CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organizations. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mushaben, J. M. (2019). Undermining critical mass: The impact of trilogues and treaty reforms on gender-sensitive decision-making in the European Parliament. In P. Ahrens, & L. Rolandsen Agustín (Eds.), Gendering the European Parliament. Structures, policies, and practices (pp. 69–93). Rowman & Littlefield/ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, A., & Rolandsen Agustín, L. (2018). Rights for women, migrants, and minorities: Consensus and silences in the European Parliament. In T. Knijn, & M. Naldini (Eds.), Gender and generational division in EU citizenship (pp. 21–38). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, M. K. (2019). ‘Feminist to its fingertips’? Gendered divisions of labour and the committee on women’s rights and gender equality. In P. Ahrens, & L. Rolandsen Agustín (Eds.), Gendering the European Parliament. Structures, policies, and practices (pp. 123–140). Rowman & Littlefield/ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, L. (2009). Improving accountability in the European Union: The potential role of NGOs. In S. Gustavsson, C. Persson, & T. Karlsson (Eds.), The illusion of accountability in the European Union (pp. 155–169). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pristed Nielsen, H. (2013). Collaborating on combating anti-discrimination? Anti-racist and gender equality organisations in Europe. In B. Siim, & M. Mokre (Eds.), Negotiating gender and diversity in an emergent European public sphere (pp. 179–200). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pristed Nielsen, H., & Rolandsen Agustín, L. (2013). Women, participation and the European Parliament. In B. Siim, & M. Mokre (Eds.), Negotiating gender and diversity in an emergent European public sphere (pp. 201–222). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, S. (2017). Gendering EU sustainable development policy: Political opportunities for women’s groups. In H. MacRae, & E. Weiner (Eds.), Towards gendering institutionalism. Equality in Europe (pp. 183–205). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Roggeband, C. (2018). The good, the bad, and the ugly. Making sense of opposition to feminism from a social-movement perspective. In M. Verloo (Ed.), Varieties of opposition to gender equality in Europe (pp. 19–37). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roggeband, C., & Krizsan, A. (2018). Reversing gender policy progress: Patterns of backsliding in central and Eastern European new democracies. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1(3), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510818X15311219732356
   Google Scholar
• Rolandsen Agustín, L. (2013a). Gender equality, intersectionality, and diversity in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rolandsen Agustín, L. (2013b). Transnational collective mobilisation: Challenges for women’s movements in Europe. In B. Siim, & M. Mokre (Eds.), Negotiating gender and diversity in an emergent European public sphere (pp. 161–178). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ruzza, C. (2004). Europe and civil society: Movement coalitions and European governance. MUP.
   Google Scholar
• Ruzza, C. (2015). Changes in the field of EU civil society organisations: Institutionalisation, differentiation, and challengers. In H. Johansson, & S. Kalm (Eds.), EU civil society. Patterns of cooperation, competition and conflict (pp. 23–42). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez Salgado, R. (2014). Europeanizing civil society. How the EU shapes civil society organizations. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez Salgado, R. (2017). Europeanization of civil society organizations in times of crisis? Exploring the evolution grant-seeking strategies in the EU multi-level system. European Politics and Society, 18(4), 511–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2017.1286283
   Google Scholar
• Seibicke, H. (2019). Gender expertise in public policymaking: The European women’s Lobby and the EU maternity leave directive. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxz007
   Google Scholar
• Strid, S. (2014). Gendered interests in the EU: The European women's Lobby and the organization and representation of women's interests. GlobeEdit.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbergaard, Y. (2015). Conflict and cooperation: Interactions among EU-level civil society organisations in the field of gender equality. In H. Johansson, & S. Kalm (Eds.), EU civil society. Patterns of cooperation, competition and conflict (pp. 119–126). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tamma, P. (2017, September 17). Who is behind the EPP’s latest attempt to tighten rules for NGO’s? Euroactiv. Retrieved December 2, 2019. https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/who-is-behind-the-epps-latest-attempt-to-tighten-rules-for-ngos /.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Vleuten, A. (2019). The European Parliament as a constant promoter of gender equality: Another European myth? In P. Ahrens, & L. Rolandsen Agustín (Eds.), Gendering the European Parliament. Structures, policies, and practices (pp. 35–49). Rowman & Littlefield/ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verloo, M. (Ed.). (2018). Varieties of opposition to gender equality in Europe. Theory, evidence and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Verloo, M., & Paternotte, D. (2018). The feminist project under threat in Europe. Politics and Governance, 6(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i3.1736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walby, S. (2015). Crisis. Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Walby, S. (2018). Gender in the crisis and remaking of Europe: Re-gendering subsidiarity. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510818X15395100824731
   Google Scholar
• Warasin, M., Kantola, J., Rolandsen Agustín, L., & Coughlan, C. (2019). Politicisation of gender equality in the European Parliament. Cohesion and inter-group coalitions in plenary and committees. In P. Ahrens, & L. Rolandsen Agustín (Eds.), Gendering the European Parliament. Structures, policies and Practices (pp. 141–158). Rowman & Littlefield/ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, A. E. (2004). Building velvet triangles: Gender and informal governance. In T. Christiansen, & S. Piattoni (Eds.), Informal Governance and the European Union (pp. 76–93). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, A. E. (2007). Challenges for intersectionality in the transnational organization of European equality movements: Forming platforms and maintaining turf in today’s European Union. In I. Lenz, C. Ullrich, & B. Fersch (Eds.), Gender borders unbound? Globalisation, restructuring and reciprocity (pp. 167–185). Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, A. E. (2016). EU civil society and the crisis: Changing channels and organizational patterns in European transnational civil society’. In P. I. Roudrigues, A. Triandafyllidour, & R. Gropas (Eds.), Shifting Paradigms after the crisis: Legal, economic and political Perspectives (pp. 241–268). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Zacharenko, E. (2019). Political reshuffle of European Parliament – What consequences for gender equality in Europe? https://www.fes.de/themenportal-gender-jugend-senioren/gender-matters/gender-blog/beitrag-lesen/politische-umstrukturierung-der-europaeischen-kommission-und-des-europaeischen-parlaments.
   Google Scholar