Distinctive characteristics of carrier-phonon interactions in optically driven semiconductor quantum dots

References

• Woggon U. Optical properties of semiconductor quantum dots. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Jacak L, Hawrylak P, Wojs A. Quantum dots. Berlin: Springer; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Michler P (ed). Single quantum dots: Fundamentals, applications and new concepts. Vol. 90. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wang ZM, editor. Self-assembled quantum dots. (Lecture notes in nanoscale science and technology). Vol. 1. New York: Springer; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira R, Bastard G. Capture and relaxation in self-assembled semiconductor quantum dots. San Rafael, US-CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bimberg D, Grundmann M, Ledentsov N. Quantum dot heterostructures. Chichester: Wiley; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Selig M, Berghäuser G, Raja A, et al. Excitonic linewidth and coherence lifetime in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat Commun. 2016;7:718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brem S, Selig M, Berghaeuser G, et al. Exciton relaxation cascade in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Sci Rep. 2018;8:8238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bockelmann U, Bastard G. Phonon scattering and energy relaxation in two-, one-. and zero-dimensional electron gases. Phys Rev B. 1990;42:8947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benisty H, Sotomayor-Torres CM, Weisbuch C. Intrinsic mechanism for the poor luminescence properties of quantum-box systems. Phys Rev B. 1991;44:10945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitz R, Born H, Guffarth F, et al. Existence of a phonon bottleneck for excitons in quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2001;64:241305(R).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urayama J, Norris TB, Singh J, et al. Observation of phonon bottleneck in quantum dot electronic relaxation. Phys Rev Lett. 2001;86:4930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besombes L, Kheng K, Marsal L, et al. Acoustic phonon broadening mechanism in single quantum dot emission. Phys Rev B. 2001;63:155307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krummheuer B, Axt VM, Kuhn T. Theory of pure dephasing and the resulting absorption line shape in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2002;65:195313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förstner J, Weber C, Danckwerts J, et al. Phonon-assisted damping of Rabi oscillations in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys Rev Lett. 2003;91:127401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machnikowski P, Jacak L. Resonant nature of phonon-induced damping of Rabi oscillations in quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2004;69:193302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krügel A, Axt VM, Kuhn T, et al. The role of acoustic phonons for Rabi oscillations in semiconductor quantum dots. Appl Phys B. 2005;81:897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogilevtsev D, Nisovtsev AP, Kilin S, et al. Non-Markovian damping of Rabi oscillations in semiconductor quantum dots. J Phys Condens Matter. 2009;21:055801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsay AJ, Gopal AV, Gauger EM, et al. Damping of exciton Rabi rotations by acoustic phonons in optically excited InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;104:17402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCutcheon DPS, Dattani NS, Gauger EM, et al. A general approach to quantum dynamics using a variational master equation: application to phonon-damped Rabi rotations in quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2011;84:081305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glässl M, Croitoru MD, Vagov A, et al. Influence of the pulse shape and the dot size on the decay and reappearance of Rabi rotations in laser driven quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2011;84:125304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsay AJ. A review of the coherent optical control of the exciton and spin states of semiconductor quantum dots. Semicond Sci Technol. 2010;25:103001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glässl M, Barth AM, Axt VM. Proposed robust and high-fidelity preparation of excitons and biexcitons in semiconductor quantum dots making active use of phonons. Phys Rev Lett. 2013;110:147401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter DE, Kuhn T, Glässl M, et al. The role of phonons for exciton and biexciton generation in an optically driven quantum dot. J Phys Condens Matter. 2014;26(42):423203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardelt PL, Hanschke L, Fischer KA, et al. Dissipative preparation of the exciton and biexciton in self-assembled quantum dots on picosecond time scales. Phys Rev B. 2014;90:241404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bounouar S, Müller M, Barth AM, et al. Phonon-assisted robust and deterministic two-photon biexciton preparation in a quantum dot. Phys Rev B. 2015;91:161302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quilter JH, Brash AJ, Liu F, et al. Phonon-assisted population inversion of a single InGaAs/GaAs quantum dot by pulsed laser excitation. Phys Rev Lett. 2015;114:137401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ates S, Ulrich SM, Ulhaq A, et al. Non-resonant dot–cavity coupling and its potential for resonant single-quantum-dot spectroscopy. Nat Photon. 2009;3:724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naesby A, Suhr T, Kristensen PT, et al. Influence of pure dephasing on emission spectra from single photon sources. Phys Rev A. 2008;78:045802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenester U, Laucht A, Kaniber M, et al. Phonon-assisted transitions from quantum dot excitons to cavity photons. Phys Rev B. 2009;80:201311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenester U. Cavity quantum electrodynamics with semiconductor quantum dots: role of phonon-assisted cavity feeding. Phys Rev B. 2010;81:155303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar A, Kim E, Gong Y, et al. Phonon mediated off-resonant quantum dot–cavity coupling under resonant excitation of the quantum dot. Phys Rev B. 2011;84:085309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes S, Yao P, Milde F, et al. Influence of electron-acoustic phonon scattering on off-resonant cavity feeding within a strongly coupled quantum-dot cavity system. Phys Rev B. 2011;83:165313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florian M, Gartner P, Gies C, et al. Phonon-mediated off-resonant coupling effects in semiconductor quantum-dot lasers. New J Phys. 2013;15:035019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calic M, Gallo P, Felici M, et al. Phonon-mediated coupling of InGaAs/GaAs quantum-dot excitons to photonic crystal cavities. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;106:227402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laucht A, Hauke N, Neumann A, et al. Nonresonant feeding of photonic crystal nanocavity modes by quantum dots. J Appl Phys. 2011;109:102404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cygorek M, Barth AM, Ungar F, et al. Nonlinear cavity feeding and unconventional photon statistics in solid-state cavity QED revealed by many-level real-time path-integral calculations. Phys Rev B. 2017;96:201201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steer MJ, Mowbray DJ, Tribe WR, et al. Electronic energy levels and energy relaxation mechanisms in self-organized InAs/GaAs quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 1996;54:17738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitz R, Veit M, Ledentsov NN, et al. Energy relaxation by multiphonon processes in InAs/GaAs quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 1997;56:10435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignatiev IV, Kozin IE, Davydov VG, et al. Phonon resonances in photoluminescence spectra of self-assembled quantum dots in an electric field. Phys Rev B. 2001;63:075316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcinkevičius S, Gaarder A, Leon R. Rapid carrier relaxation by phonon emission in In0.6Ga0.4As/GaAs quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2001;64:115307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameau S, Guldner Y, Verzelen O, et al. Strong electron-phonon coupling regime in quantum dots: evidence for everlasting resonant polarons. Phys Rev Lett. 1999;83:4152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameau S, Isaia JN, Guldner Y, et al. Far-infrared magnetospectroscopy of polaron states in self-assembled InAs/GaAs quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2002;65:085316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verzelen O, Ferreira R, Bastard G. Polaron lifetime and energy relaxation in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2000;62:R4809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacak L, Krasnyj J, Jacak D, et al. Anharmonicity induced polaron relaxation in GaAs/InAs quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2002;65:113305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacak L, Krasnyj J, Jacak D, et al. Magneto-polaron in a weakly elliptical InAs/GaAs quantum dot. Phys Rev B. 2003;67:035303.
   Google Scholar
• Zibik EA, Wilson LR, Green RP, et al. Intraband relaxation via polaron decay in InAs self-assembled quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2004;70:161305(R).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michler P, Kiraz A, Becher C, et al. A quantum dot single-photon turnstile device. Science. 2000;290:2282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzano O, Michaelis De Vasconcellos S, Arnold C, et al. Bright solid-state sources of indistinguishable single photons. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsleber S, He YM, Gerhardt S, et al. Highly indistinguishable on-demand resonance fluorescence photons from a deterministic quantum dot micropillar device with 74% extraction efficiency. Opt Express. 2016;24:8539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding X, He Y, Duan ZC, et al. On-demand single photons with high extraction efficiency and near-unity indistinguishability from a resonantly driven quantum dot in a micropillar. Phys Rev Lett. 2016;116:020401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He YM, Liu J, Maier S, et al. Deterministic implementation of a bright, on-demand single-photon source with near-unity indistinguishability via quantum dot imaging. Optica. 2017;4:802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senellart P, Solomon G, White A. High-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources. Nat Nanotech. 2017;12:1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller M, Vural H, Schneider C, et al. Quantum-dot single-photon sources for entanglement enhanced interferometry. Phys Rev Lett. 2017;118:257402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reindl M, Weber JH, Huber D, et al. Highly indistinguishable single photons from incoherently and coherently excited GaAs quantum dots. 2019. arXiv:190111251.
   Google Scholar
• Akopian N, Lindner NH, Poem E, et al. Entangled photon pairs from semiconductor quantum dots. Phys Rev Lett. 2006;96:130501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winik R, Cogan D, Don Y, et al. On-demand source of maximally entangled photon pairs using the biexciton-exciton radiative cascade. Phys Rev B. 2017;95:235435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orieux A, Versteegh MAM, Jöns KD, et al. Semiconductor devices for entangled photon pair generation: a review. Rep Prog Phys. 2017;80:076001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Zopf M, Keil R, et al. Highly-efficient extraction of entangled photons from quantum dots using a broadband optical antenna. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heindel T, Thoma A, von Helversen M, et al. A bright triggered twin-photon source in the solid state. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber D, Reindl M, Huo Y, et al. Highly indistinguishable and strongly entangled photons from symmetric GaAs quantum dots. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinze D, Zrenner A, Schumacher S. Polarization-entangled twin photons from two-photon quantum-dot emission. Phys Rev B. 2017;95:245306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber D, Reindl M, Aberl J, et al. Semiconductor quantum dots as an ideal source of polarization-entangled photon pairs on-demand: a review. J Opt. 2018;20:073002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delteil A, Sun Z, Fält S, et al. Realization of a cascaded quantum system: heralded absorption of a single photon qubit by a single-electron charged quantum dot. Phys Rev Lett. 2017;118:177401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannor DJ. Introduction to quantum mechanics. Sausalito, California: University Science Books; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Jaynes ET, Cummings FW. Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser. Proc IEEE. 1963;51:89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore BW, Knight PL. The Jaynes-Cummings Model. J Mod Opt. 1993;40(7):1195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerry CC, Knight PL. Introductory quantum optics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Poem E, Kodriano Y, Tradonsky C, et al. Accessing the dark exciton with light. Nat Phys. 2010;6:993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüker S, Kuhn T, Reiter DE. Direct optical state preparation of the dark exciton in a quantum dot. Phys Rev B. 2015;92:201305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüker S, Kuhn T, Reiter DE. Phonon-assisted dark exciton preparation in a quantum dot. Phys Rev B. 2017;95:195305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüker S, Reiter DE. A review on optical excitation of semiconductor quantum dots under the influence of phonons. Semicond Sci Technol. 2019;34:063002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtkemper M, Reiter DE, Kuhn T. Influence of quantum dot geometry on p-shell transitions in differently charged quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2018;97:075308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagov A, Axt VM, Kuhn T, et al. Nonmonotonous temperature dependence of the initial decoherence in quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2004;70:201305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsay AJ, Godden TM, Boyle SJ, et al. Phonon-induced Rabi-frequency renormalization of optically driven single InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;105:177402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krummheuer B, Axt VM, Kuhn T, et al. Pure dephasing and phonon dynamics in GaAs- and GaN-based quantum dot structures: interplay between material parameters and geometry. Phys Rev B. 2005;71:235329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostapenko I, Hönig G, Rodt S, et al. Exciton acoustic-phonon coupling in single GaN/AlN quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2012;85:081303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuh K, Seebeck J, Lorke M, et al. Rabi oscillations in semiconductor quantum dots revisited: influence of LO-phonon collisions. Appl Phys Lett. 2009;94:201108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuh K, Jahnke F, Lorke M. Rapid adiabatic passage in quantum dots: influence of scattering and dephasing. Appl Phys Lett. 2011;99:011105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimov VI, Ivanov SA, Nanda J, et al. Single-exciton optical gain in semiconductor nanocrystals. Nature. 2007;447:441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer S, Daniels JM, Reiter DE, et al. Lattice fluctuations at a double phonon frequency with and without squeezing: an exactly solvable model of an optically excited quantum dot. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;105:157401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora AK, Rajalakshmi M, Ravindran TR, et al. Raman spectroscopy of optical phonon confinement in nanostructured materials. J Raman Spectrosc. 2007;38:604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woggon U, Gindele F, Wind O, et al. Exchange interaction and phonon confinement in CdSe quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 1996;54:1506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fomin VM, Gladilin VN, Devreese JT, et al. Photoluminescence of spherical quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 1998;57:2415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav HK, Gupta V, Sreenivas K, et al. Low frequency raman scattering from acoustic phonons confined in ZnO nanoparticles. Phys Rev Lett. 2006;97:085502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimov VI, McBranch DW. Femtosecond 1P-to- 1S electron relaxation in strongly confined semiconductor nanocrystals. Phys Rev Lett. 1998;80:4028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandakumar P, Vijayan C, Rajalakshmi M, et al. Raman spectra of CdS nanocrystals in nafion: longitudinal optical and confined acoustic phonon modes. Physica E. 2001;11:377.
   Google Scholar
• Klimov VI, McBranch DW, Leatherdale CA, et al. Electron and hole relaxation pathways in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 1999;60:13740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooney RR, Sewall SL, Anderson KEH, et al. Breaking the phonon bottleneck for holes in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;98:177403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyeon-Deuk K, Prezhdo OV. Photoexcited electron and hole dynamics in semiconductor quantum dots: phonon-induced relaxation, dephasing, multiple exciton generation and recombination. J Phys Condens Matter. 2012;24:363201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennehan ER, Doucette GS, Marshall AR, et al. Electron-phonon coupling and resonant relaxation from 1d and 1p states in PbS quantum dots. ACS Nano. 2018;12:6263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartland GV. Coherent excitation of vibrational modes in metallic nanoparticles. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2006;57:403–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüker S, Kuhn T, Reiter DE. Phonon impact on optical control schemes of quantum dots: role of quantum dot geometry and symmetry. Phys Rev B. 2017;96:245306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munch M, Wüst G, Kuhlmann AV, et al. Manipulation of the nuclear spin ensemble in a quantum dot with chirped magnetic resonance pulses. Nat Nanotech. 2014;9:671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nysteen A, Kaer P, Mørk J. Proposed quanching of phonon-induced processes in photoexcited quantum dots due to electron-hole asymmetries. Phys Rev Lett. 2013;110:087401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calarco T, Datta A, Fedichev P, et al. Spin-based all-optical quantum computation with quantum dots: understanding and suppressing decoherence. Phys Rev A. 2003;68:012310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagov A, Croitoru M, Glässl M, et al. Real-time path integrals for quantum dots: quantum dissipative dynamics with superohmic environment coupling. Phys Rev B. 2011;83:094303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellingham R, Kent A, Akimov A, et al. Acoustic phonon emission by optically excited carriers in the InAs/GaAs quantum dot system. Phys Status Solidi B. 2001;224:659.
   Google Scholar
• Kent A, Akimov A, Cavill S, et al. Phonon emission by optically pumped indium arsenide quantum dots in gallium arsenide. Physica B. 2002;316–317:198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen KH, Kaer P, Kreiner-Møller A, et al. Measuring the effective phonon density of states of a quantum dot in cavity quantum electrodynamics. Phys Rev B. 2013;88:045316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahan GD. Many-particle physics. New York: Kluwer; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lax M. The Franck-Condon principle and its application to crystals. J Chem Phys. 1950;20:1752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang K, Rhys A. Theory of light absorption and non-radiative transitions in f-centres. Proc R Soc London (A). 1950;204:406.
   Google Scholar
• Roszak K, Machnikowski P. Complete disentanglement by partial pure dephasing. Phys Rev A. 2006;73:022313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axt VM, Herbst M, Kuhn T. Coherent control of phonon quantum beats. Superlattices Microstruct. 1999;26:117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagov A, Axt VM, Kuhn T. Electron-phonon dynamics in optically excited quantum dots: exact solution for multiple ultrashort laser pulses. Phys Rev B. 2002;66:165312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axt VM, Kuhn T, Vagov A, et al. Phonon-induced pure dephasing in exciton-biexciton quantum dot systems driven by ultrafast laser pulse sequences. Phys Rev B. 2005;72:125309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter DE, Wigger D, Axt VM, et al. Generation and dynamics of phononic cat states after optical excitation of a quantum dot. Phys Rev B. 2011;84:195327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigger D, Reiter DE, Axt VM, et al. Fluctuation properties of acoustic phonons generated by ultrafast optical excitation of a quantum dot. Phys Rev B. 2013;87:085301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagov A, Axt VM, Kuhn T. Impact of pure dephasing on the nonlinear optical response of single quantum dots and dot ensembles. Phys Rev B. 2003;67:115338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krügel A, Vagov A, Axt VM, et al. Monitoring the buildup of the quantum dot polaron: pump-probe and four-wave mixing spectra from excitons and biexcitons in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2007;76:195302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huneke J, Krügel A, Kuhn T, et al. Impact of strain waves traveling across a quantum dot on the optical response of the dot: distinction between strain waves of different origin. Phys Rev B. 2008;78:85316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenu A, Shiau SY, Combescot M. Two-level system coupled to phonons: full analytical solution. Phys Rev B. 2019;99:014302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krügel A, Axt VM, Kuhn T. Back action of nonequilibrium phonons on the optically induced dynamics in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2006;73:035302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter M, Carmele A, Sitek A, et al. Few-photon model of the optical emission of semiconductor quantum dots. Phys Rev Lett. 2009;103:87407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagov A, Croitoru MD, Axt VM, et al. Dynamics of quantum dots with strong electron phonon coupling: correlation expansion vs. path integrals. Phys Status Solidi B. 2011;248:839.
   Google Scholar
• Lüker S, Gawarecki K, Reiter DE, et al. Influence of acoustic phonons on the optical control of quantum dots driven by adiabatic rapid passage. Phys Rev B. 2012;85:121302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigger D, Lüker S, Reiter DE, et al. Energy transport and coherence properties of acoustic phonons generated by optical excitation of a quantum dot. J Phys Condens Matter. 2014;26:255802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter DE. Time-resolved pump-probe signals of a continuously driven quantum dot affected by phonons. Phys Rev B. 2017;95:125308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubo R. Generalized cumulant expansion method. J Phys Soc Jpn. 1962;17:1100.
   Google Scholar
• Breuer HP, Petruccione F. The theory of open quantum systems. Vol. 28. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael H. Statitical methods in quantum optics 1 - Master Equation and Fokker-Planck equations. Berlin: Springer; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• McCutcheon DPS, Nazir A. Quantum dot Rabi rotations beyond the weak exciton–phonon coupling regime. New J Phys. 2010;12:113042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy C, Hughes S. Influence of electron–acoustic-phonon scattering on intensity power broadening in a coherently driven quantum-dot–cavity system. Phys Rev X. 2011;1:021009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaer P, Nielsen TR, Lodahl P, et al. Microscopic theory of phonon-induced effects on semiconductor quantum dot decay dynamics in cavity QED. Phys Rev B. 2012;86:085302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy C, Hughes S. Polaron master equation theory of the quantum-dot Mollow triplet in a semiconductor cavity-QED system. Phys Rev B. 2012;85:115309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCutcheon DPS, Nazir A. Model of the optical emission of a driven semiconductor quantum dot: phonon-enhanced coherent scattering and off-resonant sideband narrowing. Phys Rev Lett. 2013;110:217401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes S, Carmichael H. Phonon-mediated population inversion in a semiconductor quantum-dot cavity system. New J Phys. 2013;15:053039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karwat P, Machnikowski P. Decay and persistence of spatial coherence during phonon-assisted relaxation in double quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2015;91:125428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy-Choudhury K, Hughes S. Quantum theory of the emission spectrum from quantum dots coupled to structured photonic reservoirs and acoustic phonons. Phys Rev B. 2015;92:205406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manson R, Roy-Choudhury K, Hughes S. Polaron master equation theory of pulse-driven phonon-assisted population inversion and single-photon emission from quantum-dot excitons. Phys Rev B. 2016;93:155423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazir A, McCutcheon DPS. Modelling exciton–phonon interactions in optically driven quantum dots. J Phys Condens Matter. 2016;28:103002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustin C, Hughes S. Pulsed excitation dynamics in quantum-dot–cavity systems: limits to optimizing the fidelity of on-demand single-photon sources. Phys Rev B. 2018;98:045309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozbicki E, Machnikowski P. Quantum kinetic theory of phonon-assisted excitation transfer in quantum dot molecules. Phys Rev Lett. 2008;100:27401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roszak K, Machnikowski P. Phonon-induced dephasing of singlet-triplet superpositions in double quantum dots without spin-orbit coupling. Phys Rev B. 2009;80:195315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roszak K, Machnikowski P. Phonon-induced pure dephasing of two-electron spin states in vertical quantum dot molecules. Acta Phys Pol A. 2009;116:877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagheri Harouni M, Roknizadeh R, Naderi MH. Influence of phonons on exciton-photon interaction and photon statistics of a quantum dot. Phys Rev B. 2009;79:165304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawarecki K, Lüker S, Reiter DE, et al. Dephasing in the adiabatic rapid passage in quantum dots: role of phonon-assisted biexciton generation. Phys Rev B. 2012;86:235301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaer P, Mørk J. Decoherence in semiconductor cavity QED systems due to phonon couplings. Phys Rev B. 2014;90:035312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoshita T, Sakaki H. Density of states and phonon-induced relaxation of electrons in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 1997;56:R4355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilevskiy MI, Anda EV, Makler SS. Electron-phonon interaction effects in semiconductor quantum dots: a nonperturabative approach. Phys Rev B. 2004;70:035318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilner EY, Wang H, Thoss M, et al. Nonequilibrium quantum systems with electron-phonon interactions: transient dynamics and approach to steady state. Phys Rev B. 2014;89:205129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornecker G, Auffèves A, Grange T. Influence of phonons on solid-state cavity-QED investigated using nonequilibrium Green’s functions. Phys Rev B. 2017;95:035404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilina SV, Kilin DS, Prezhdo OV. Breaking the phonon bottleneck in PbSe and CdSe quantum dots: time-domain density functional theory of charge carrier relaxation. ACS Nano. 2009;3:93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makri N, Makarov DE. Tensor propagator for iterative quantum time evolution of reduced density matrices. I. Theory. J Chem Phys. 1995;102:4600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makri N, Makarov DE. Tensor propagator for iterative quantum time evolution of reduced density matrices. II. Numerical methodology. J Chem Phys. 1995;102:4611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang XT. Non-Markovian dynamics and phonon decoherence of a double quantum dot charge qubit. Phys Rev B. 2005;72:245328.
   Google Scholar
• Thorwart M, Eckel J, Mucciolo ER. Non-Markovian dynamics of double quantum dot charge qubits due to acoustic phonons. Phys Rev B. 2005;72:235320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagov A, Croitoru MD, Axt VM, et al. High pulse area undamping of Rabi oscillations in quantum dots coupled to phonons. Phys Status Solidi B. 2006;243:2233.
   Google Scholar
• Vagov A, Croitoru MD, Axt VM, et al. Nonmonotonic field dependence of damping and reappearance of Rabi oscillations in quantum dots. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;98:227403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glässl M, Vagov A, Lüker S, et al. Long-time dynamics and stationary nonequilibrium of an optically driven strongly confined quantum dot coupled to phonons. Phys Rev B. 2011;84:195311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glässl M, Croitoru MD, Vagov A, et al. Impact of dark superpositions on the relaxation dynamics of an optically driven phonon-coupled exciton-biexciton quantum-dot system. Phys Rev B. 2012;85:195306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glässl M, Axt VM. Polarization dependence of phonon influences in exciton-biexciton quantum dot systems. Phys Rev B. 2012;86:245306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagov A, Glässl M, Croitoru M, et al. Competition between pure dephasing and photon losses in the dynamics of a dot-cavity system. Phys Rev B. 2014;90:075309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahri DG, Mathkoor FHA, Ooi CHR. Real-time path-integral approach for dissipative quantum dot-cavity quantum electrodynamics: impure dephasing-induced effects. J Phys Condens Matter. 2016;29:055701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth AM, Vagov A, Axt VM. Path-integral description of combined Hamiltonian and non-Hamiltonian dynamics in quantum dissipative systems. Phys Rev B. 2016;94:125439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathearn A, Kirton P, Kilda D, et al. Efficient non-Markovian quantum dynamics using time-evolving matrix product operators. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feynman RP. Space-time approach to non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Rev Mod Phys. 1948;20:367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feynman RP, Vernon F. The theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system. Ann Phys. 1963;24:118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosacchi M, Cygorek M, Ungar F, et al. Path-integral approach for nonequilibrium multitime correlation functions of open quantum systems coupled to Markovian and non-Markovian environments. Phys Rev B. 2018;98:125302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarnieri G, Smirne A, Vacchini B. Quantum regression theorem and non-markovianity of quantum dynamics. Phys Rev A. 2014;90:022110.
   Google Scholar
• McCutcheon DPS. Optical signatures of non-Markovian behavior in open quantum systems. Phys Rev A. 2016;93:022119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodahl P, Mahmoodian S, Stobbe S. Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures. Rev Mod Phys. 2015;87:347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favero I, Cassabois G, Ferreira R, et al. Acoustic phonon sidebands in the emission line of single InAs/GaAs quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2003;68:233301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rol F, Founta S, Mariette H, et al. Probing exciton localization in nonpolar GaN/AlN quantum dots by single-dot optical spectroscopy. Phys Rev B. 2007;75:125306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock E, Dachner M, Warming T, et al. Acoustic and optical phonon scattering in a single In(Ga)As quantum dot. Phys Rev B. 2011;83:041304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubczyk T, Delmonte V, Fischbach S, et al. Impact of phonons on dephasing of individual excitons in deterministic quantum dot microlenses. ACS Photonics. 2016;3:2461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grange T, Somaschi N, Antón C, et al. Reducing phonon-induced decoherence in solid-state single-photon sources with cavity quantum electrodynamics. Phys Rev Lett. 2017;118:253602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitzenstein S, Forchel A. Quantum dot micropillars. J Phys D. 2010;43:033001.
   Google Scholar
• Axt VM, Machnikowski P, Kuhn T. Reducing decoherence of the confined exciton state in a quantum dot by pulse-sequence control. Phys Rev B. 2005 Apr;71:155305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkedal D, Leosson K, Hvam JM. Long lived coherence in self-assembled quantum dots. Phys Rev Lett. 2001;87:227401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer M, Forchel A. Temperature dependence of the exciton homogeneous linewidth in In0.60Ga0.40As/GaAs self-assembled quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2002;65:041308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muljarov EA, Zimmermann R. Exciton dephasing in quantum dots due to LO-phonon coupling: an exactly solvable model. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;98:187401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagahara T. Theory of exciton dephasing in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 1999;60:2638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudin S, Reinecke TL, Bayer M. Temperature dependence of optical linewidth in single InAs quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2006;74:161305(R).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favero I, Berthelot A, Cassabois G, et al. Temperature dependence of the zero-phonon linewidth in quantum dots: an effect of the fluctuating environment. Phys Rev B. 2007;75:073308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortner G, Yakovlev DR, Bayer M, et al. Temperature dependence of the zero-phonon linewidth in InAsGaAs quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2004;70:201301(R).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machnikowski P. Change of decoherence scenario and appearance of localization due to reservoir anharmonicity. Phys Rev Lett. 2006;96:140405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machnikowski P. Pure dephasing of carriers in quantum dots due to anharmonicity-induced phonon scattering. Phys Status Solidi B. 2006;243:2247.
   Google Scholar
• Ridley BK. Quantum processes in semiconductors. 5th edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Borri P, Langbein W, Schneider S, et al. Ultralong dephasing time in InGaAs quantum dots. Phys Rev Lett. 2001;87:157401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borri P, Langbein W, Woggon U, et al. Exciton dephasing via phonon interactions in InAs quantum dots: dependence on quantum confinement. Phys Rev B. 2005;71:115328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mermillod Q, Wigger D, Delmonte V, et al. Dynamics of excitons in individual InAs quantum dots revealed in four-wave mixing spectroscopy. Optica. 2016;3:377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulhaq A, Ates S, Weiler S, et al. Linewidth broadening and emission saturation of a resonantly excited quantum dot monitored via an off-resonant cavity mode. Phys Rev B. 2010;82:045307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich SM, Ates S, Reitzenstein S, et al. Dephasing of triplet-sideband optical emission of a resonantly driven InAs/GaAs quantum dot inside a microcavity. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;106:247402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabuss J, Carmele A, Richter M, et al. Microscopic equation-of-motion approach to the multiphonon assisted quantum emission of a semiconductor quantum dot. Phys Rev B. 2011;84:125324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulhaq A, Weiler S, Roy C, et al. Detuning-dependent Mollow triplet of a coherently-driven single quantum dot. Opt Express. 2013;21:4382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei YJ, He Y, He YM, et al. Temperature-dependent Mollow triplet spectra from a single quantum dot: Rabi frequency renormalization and sideband linewidth insensitivity. Phys Rev Lett. 2014;113:097401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morreau A, Muljarov E. Phonon-induced dephasing in quantum dot-cavity QED. arXiv preprint. 2018. arXiv:180710977.
   Google Scholar
• Wei YJ, He YM, Chen MC, et al. Deterministic and robust generation of single photons from a single quantum dot with 99.5% indistinguishability using adiabatic rapid passage. Nano Lett. 2014;14:6515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmele A, Reitzenstein S. Non-markovian features in semiconductor quantum optics: quantifying the role of phonons in experiment and theory. Nanophotonics. 2019;8:655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamada H, Gotoh H, Temmyo J, et al. Exciton Rabi oscillation in a single quantum dot. Phys Rev Lett. 2001;87:246401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stievater TH, Li X, Steel DG, et al. Rabi oscillations of excitons in single quantum dots. Phys Rev Lett. 2001;87:133603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borri P, Langbein W, Schneider S, et al. Rabi oscillations in the excitonic ground-state transition of InGaAs quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2002;66:081306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Htoon H, Takagahara T, Kulik D, et al. Interplay of Rabi oscillations and quantum interference in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys Rev Lett. 2002;88:087401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zrenner A, Beham E, Stufler S, et al. Coherent properties of a two-level system based on a quantum-dot photodiode. Nature. 2002;418:612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unold T, Mueller K, Lienau C, et al. Optical control of excitons in a pair of quantum dots coupled by the dipole-dipole interaction. Phys Rev Lett. 2005;94:137404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danckwerts J, Ahn K, Förstner J, et al. Theory of ultrafast nonlinear optics of Coulomb-coupled semiconductor quantum dots: Rabi oscillations and pump-probe spectra. Phys Rev B. 2006;73:165318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stufler S, Machnikowski P, Ester P, et al. Two-photon Rabi oscillations in a single Inx Ga1-x As/GaAs quantum dot. Phys Rev B. 2006;73:125304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson J, Moya-Cessa H. Rabi oscillations in a quantum dot-cavity system coupled to a nonzero temperature phonon bath. Phys Scr. 2008;77:065704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaibley JR, Burgers AP, McCracken GA, et al. Direct detection of time-resolved Rabi oscillations in a single quantum dot via resonance fluorescence. Phys Rev B. 2013;87:115311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth AM, Lüker S, Vagov A, et al. Fast and selective phonon-assisted state preparation of a quantum dot by adiabatic undressing. Phys Rev B. 2016;94:045306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen L, Eberly JH. Optical resonance and two-level atoms. Vol. 28. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Machnikowski P, Axt VM, Kuhn T. Quantum-information encoding in dressed qubits. Phys Rev A. 2007;75:052330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krummheuer B, Axt VM, Kuhn T. Coupled polarization and acoustic-phonon dynamics after optical excitation of quantum dots near surfaces. Phys Rev B. 2005;72:245336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldewey T, Lüker S, Kuhlmann AV, et al. Demonstrating the decoupling regime of the electron-phonon interaction in a quantum dot using chirped optical excitation. Phys Rev B. 2017;95:241306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidgall ER, Eastham PR, Phillips RT. Population inversion in quantum dot ensembles via adiabatic rapid passage. Phys Rev B. 2010;81:195306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon CM, Belhadj T, Chatel B, et al. Robust quantum dot exciton generation via adiabatic passage with frequency-swept optical pulses. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;106:166801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Piper IM, Ediger M, et al. Population inversion in a single InGaAs quantum dot using the method of adiabatic rapid passage. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;106:067401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debnath A, Meier C, Chatel B, et al. Chirped laser excitation of quantum dot excitons coupled to a phonon bath. Phys Rev B. 2012;86:161304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastham PR, Spracklen AO, Keeling J. Lindblad theory of dynamical decoherence of quantum-dot excitons. Phys Rev B. 2013;87:195306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathew R, Dilcher E, Gamouras A, et al. Subpicosecond adiabatic rapid passage on a single semiconductor quantum dot: phonon-mediated dephasing in the strong-driving regime. Phys Rev B. 2014;90:035316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glässl M, Barth AM, Gawarecki K, et al. Biexciton state preparation in a quantum dot via adiabatic rapid passage: comparison between two control protocols and impact of phonon-induced dephasing. Phys Rev B. 2013;87:085303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debnath A, Meier C, Chatel B, et al. High-fidelity biexciton generation in quantum dots by chirped laser pulses. Phys Rev B. 2013;88:201305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldewey T, Lüker S, Kuhlmann AV, et al. Coherent and robust high-fidelity generation of a biexciton in a quantum dot with rapid adiabatic passage. Phys Rev B. 2017;95:161302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter DE, Lüker S, Gawarecki K, et al. Phonon effects on population inversion in quantum dots: resonant, detuned and frequency-swept excitations. Acta Phys Pol A. 2012;122:1065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitanov NV, Halfmann T, Shore BW, et al. Laser-induced population transfer by adiabatic passage techniques. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2001;52(1):763–809. PMID: 11326080.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reindl M, Jons KD, Huber D, et al. Phonon-assisted two-photon interference from remote quantum emitters. Nano Lett. 2017;17:4090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu F, Martins LMP, Brash AJ, et al. Ultrafast depopulation of a quantum dot by LA-phonon-assisted stimulated emission. Phys Rev B. 2016;93:161407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brash AJ, Martins LMPP, Barth AM, et al. Dynamic vibronic coupling in InGaAs quantum dots. J Opt Soc Am B. 2016;33:C115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeilinger A. Light for the quantum. entangled photons and their applications: a very personal perspective. Phys Scr. 2017;92:072501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson RM, Thompson RM, Shields AJ, et al. Quantum dots as a photon source for passive quantum key encoding. Phys Rev B. 2002;66:081302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gisin N, Ribordy G, Tittel W, et al. Quantum cryptography. Rev Mod Phys. 2002;74:145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiraz A, Atatüre M, Imamoğlu A. Quantum-dot single-photon sources: prospects for applications in linear optics quantum-information processing. Phys Rev A. 2004;69:032305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan JW, Chen ZB, Lu CY, et al. Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry. Rev Mod Phys. 2012;84:777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn SC, Knorr A, Reitzenstein S, et al. Cavity assisted emission of single, paired and heralded photons from a single quantum dot device. Opt Express. 2016;24:25446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brian JL, Furusawa A, Vučković J. Photonic quantum technologies. Nat Photon. 2009;3:687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reithmaier JP, Sek G, Löffler A, et al. Strong coupling in a single quantum dot–semiconductor microcavity system. Nature. 2004;432:197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshie T, Scherer A, Hendrickson J, et al. Vacuum Rabi splitting with a single quantum dot in a photonic crystal nanocavity. Nature. 2004;432:200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khitrova G, Gibbs HM, Kira M, et al. Vacuum Rabi splitting in semiconductors. Nat Phys. 2006;2:81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glässl M, Sörgel L, Vagov A, et al. Interaction of a quantum-dot cavity system with acoustic phonons: stronger light-matter coupling can reduce the visibility of strong coupling effects. Phys Rev B. 2012;86:035319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmele A, Knorr A, Milde F. Stabilization of photon collapse and revival dynamics by a non-Markovian phonon bath. New J Phys. 2013;15:105024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson-Rae I, Imamoğlu A. Quantum dot cavity-QED in the presence of strong electron-phonon interactions. Phys Rev B. 2002;65:235311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laucht A, Hauke N, Villas-Bôas JM, et al. Dephasing of exciton polaritons in photoexcited ingaas quantum dots in gaas nanocavities. Phys Rev Lett. 2009;103:087405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milde F, Knorr A, Hughes S. Role of electron-phonon scattering on the vacuum Rabi splitting of a single-quantum dot and a photonic crystal nanocavity. Phys Rev B. 2008;78:035330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopfmann C, Musiał A, Strauß M, et al. Compensation of phonon-induced renormalization of vacuum Rabi splitting in large quantum dots: towards temperature-stable strong coupling in the solid state with quantum dot-micropillars. Phys Rev B. 2015;92:245403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberly JH, Narozhny NB, Sanchez-Mondragon JJ. Periodic spontaneous collapse and revival in a simple quantum model. Phys Rev Lett. 1980;44:1323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rempe G, Walther H, Klein N. Observation of quantum collapse and revival in a one-atom maser. Phys Rev Lett. 1987;58:353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy K, Badolato A, Winger M, et al. Quantum nature of a strongly coupled single quantum dot-cavity system. Nature. 2007;445:896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press D, Götzinger S, Reitzenstein S, et al. Photon antibunching from a single quantum-dot-microcavity system in the strong coupling regime. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;98:117402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaniber M, Laucht A, Neumann A, et al. Investigation of the nonresonant dot-cavity coupling in two-dimensional photonic crystal nanocavities. Phys Rev B. 2008;77:161303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laucht A, Hofbauer F, Hauke N, et al. Electrical control of spontaneous emission and strong coupling for a single quantum dot. New J Phys. 2009;11:023034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suffczyński J, Dousse A, Gauthron K, et al. Origin of the optical emission within the cavity mode of coupled quantum dot-cavity systems. Phys Rev Lett. 2009;103:027401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englund D, Majumdar A, Faraon A, et al. Resonant excitation of a quantum dot strongly coupled to a photonic crystal nanocavity. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;104:073904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalacu D, Mnaymneh K, Sazonova V, et al. Deterministic emitter-cavity coupling using a single-site controlled quantum dot. Phys Rev B. 2010;82:033301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laucht A, Kaniber M, Mohtashami A, et al. Temporal monitoring of nonresonant feeding of semiconductor nanocavity modes by quantum dot multiexciton transitions. Phys Rev B. 2010;81:241302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winger M, Volz T, Tarel G, et al. Explanation of photon correlations in the far-off-resonance optical emission from a quantum-dot–cavity system. Phys Rev Lett. 2009;103:207403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santori C, Pelton M, Solomon G, et al. Triggered single photons from a quantum dot. Phys Rev Lett. 2001;86:1502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santori C, Fattal D, Vučković J, et al. Indistinguishable photons from a single-photon device. Nature. 2002;419:594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He YM, He Y, Wei YJ, et al. On-demand semiconductor single-photon source with near-unity indistinguishability. Nat Nanotech. 2013;8:213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somaschi N, Giesz V, De Santis L, et al. Near-optimal single-photon sources in the solid state. Nat Photon. 2016;10:340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweickert L, Jöns KD, Zeuner KD, et al. On-demand generation of background-free single photons from a solid-state source. Appl Phys Lett. 2018;112:093106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlehahn A, Fischbach S, Schmidt R, et al. A stand-alone fiber-coupled single-photon source. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanbury Brown R, Twiss RQ. A test of a new type of stellar interferometer on Sirius. Nature. 1956;178:1046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaer P, Gregersen N, Mork J. The role of phonon scattering in the indistinguishability of photons emitted from semiconductor cavity QED systems. New J Phys. 2013;15:035027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong CK, Ou ZY, Mandel L. Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference. Phys Rev Lett. 1987;59:2044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoma A, Schnauber P, Gschrey M, et al. Exploring dephasing of a solid-state quantum emitter via time-and temperature-dependent Hong-Ou-Mandel experiments. Phys Rev Lett. 2016;116:033601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaer P, Lodahl P, Jauho AP, et al. Microscopic theory of indistinguishable single-photon emission from a quantum dot coupled to a cavity: the role of non-Markovian phonon-induced decoherence. Phys Rev B. 2013;87:081308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iles-Smith J, McCutcheon DPS, Nazir A, et al. Phonon scattering inhibits simultaneous near-unity efficiency and indistinguishability in semiconductor single-photon sources. Nat Photon. 2017;11:521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portalupi SL, Hornecker G, Giesz V, et al. Bright phonon-tuned single-photon source. Nano Lett. 2015;15:6290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanschke L, Fischer KA, Appel S, et al. Quantum dot single-photon sources with ultra-low multi-photon probability. Npj Quantum Inf. 2018;4:43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson RM, Young RJ, Atkinson P, et al. A semiconductor source of triggered entangled photon pairs. Nature. 2006;439:179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafenbrak R, Ulrich SM, Michler P, et al. Triggered polarization-entangled photon pairs from a single quantum dot up to 30K. New J Phys. 2007;9:315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dousse A, Suffczyński J, Beveratos A, et al. Ultrabright source of entangled photon pairs. Nature. 2010;466:217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Valle E. Distilling one, two and entangled pairs of photons from a quantum dot with cavity QED effects and spectral filtering. New J Phys. 2013;15:025019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller M, Bounouar S, Jöns KD, et al. On-demand generation of indistinguishable polarization-entangled photon pairs. Nat Photon. 2014;8:224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez Muñoz C, Laussy FP, Tejedor C, et al. Enhanced two-photon emission from a dressed biexciton. New J Phys. 2015;17:123021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmele A, Milde F, Dachner MR, et al. Formation dynamics of an entangled photon pair: a temperature-dependent analysis. Phys Rev B. 2010;81:195319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmele A, Knorr A. Analytical solution of the quantum-state tomography of the biexciton cascade in semiconductor quantum dots: pure dephasing does not affect entanglement. Phys Rev B. 2011;84:075328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cygorek M, Ungar F, Seidelmann T, et al. Comparison of different concurrences characterizing photon pairs generated in the biexciton cascade in quantum dots coupled to microcavities. Phys Rev B. 2018;98:045303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young RJ, Stevenson RM, Atkinson P, et al. Improved fidelity of triggered entangled photons from single quantum dots. New J Phys. 2006;8:29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson RM, Young RJ, See P, et al. Magnetic-field-induced reduction of the exciton polarization splitting in InAs quantum dots. Phys Rev B. 2006;73:033306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Wildmann JS, Ding F, et al. High yield and ultrafast sources of electrically triggered entangled-photon pairs based on strain-tunable quantum dots. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher S, Förstner J, Zrenner A, et al. Cavity-assisted emission of polarization-entangled photons from biexcitons in quantum dots with fine-structure splitting. Opt Express. 2012;20:5335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harouni MB. Phonon-induced effects on exciton dynamics and photon emission from a semiconductor quantum dot microcavity: phonon coherent state representation. Laser Phys. 2014;24:045201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidelmann T, Ungar F, Cygorek M, et al. From strong to weak temperature dependence of the two-photon entanglement resulting from the biexciton cascade inside a cavity. Phys Rev B. 2019;99:245301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidelmann T, Ungar F, Barth AM, et al. Phonon-induced enhancement of photon entanglement in quantum dot-cavity systems. 2019. arXiv:190204933.
   Google Scholar
• Hopfmann C, Carmele A, Musiał A, et al. Transition from Jaynes-Cummings to Autler-Townes ladder in a quantum dot–microcavity system. Phys Rev B. 2017;95:035302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, von Helversen M, López M, et al. Photon-number-resolving transition-edge sensors for the metrology of quantum light sources. J Low Temp Phys. 2018;193(5):1243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaas M, Schlottmann E, Flayac H, et al. Photon-number-resolved measurement of an exciton-polariton condensate. Phys Rev Lett. 2018;121:047401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlottmann E, von Helversen M, Leymann HAM, et al. Exploring the photon-number distribution of bimodal microlasers with a transition edge sensor. Phys Rev Appl. 2018;9:064030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Helversen M, Böhm J, Schmidt M, et al. Quantum metrology of solid-state single-photon sources using photon-number-resolving detectors. New J Phys. 2019;21:035007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanzillotti-Kimura N, Fainstein A, Balseiro C, et al. Phonon engineering with acoustic nanocavities: theoretical considerations on phonon molecules, band structures, and acoustic Bloch oscillations. Phys Rev B. 2007;75:024301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabuss J, Carmele A, Brandes T, et al. Optically driven quantum dots as source of coherent cavity phonons: a proposal for a phonon laser scheme. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;109:054301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmann M, Lamberti FR, Senellart P, et al. Topological nanophononic states by band inversion. Phys Rev B. 2018;97:155422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerfoot ML, Govorov AO, Czarnocki C, et al. Optophononics with coupled quantum dots. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volz S, Ordonez-Miranda J, Shchepetov A, et al. Nanophononics: state of the art and perspectives. Eur Phys J B. 2016;89:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosacchi M, Ungar F, Cygorek M, et al. Emission-frequency separated high quality single-photon sources enabled by phonons. Phys Rev Lett. 2019;123:017403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brüggemann C, Akimov AV, Scherbakov AV, et al. Laser mode feeding by shaking quantum dots in a planar microcavity. Nat Photon. 2011;6:30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czerniuk T, Wigger D, Akimov AV, et al. Picosecond control of quantum dot laser emission by coherent phonons. Phys Rev Lett. 2017;118:133901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigger D, Czerniuk T, Reiter DE, et al. Systematic study of the influence of coherent phonon wave packets on the lasing properties of a quantum dot ensemble. New J Phys. 2017;19:073001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fons R, Osterkryger AD, Stepanov P, et al. All-optical mapping of the position of quantum dots embedded in a nanowire antenna. Nano Lett. 2018;18:6434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kataoka M, Schneble RJ, Thorn AL, et al. Single-electron population and depopulation of an isolated quantum dot using a surface-acoustic-wave pulse. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;98:046801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gell JR, Ward MB, Young RJ, et al. Modulation of single quantum dot energy levels by a surface-acoustic-wave. Appl Phys Lett. 2008;93:081115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blattmann R, Krenner HJ, Kohler S, et al. Entanglement creation in a quantum-dot–nanocavity system by Fourier-synthesized acoustic pulses. Phys Rev A. 2014;89:012327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiß M, Hörner AL, Zallo E, et al. Multiharmonic frequency-chirped transducers for surface-acoustic-wave optomechanics. Phys Rev Appl. 2018;9:014004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar