Cells nanomechanics by atomic force microscopy: focus on interactions at nanoscale

References

• Li M, Xi N, Wang Y, et al. Advances in atomic force microscopy for single-cell analysis. Nano Res. 2018;12:p. p. 703–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris MJ, Wirtz D, Wu PH. Dissecting cellular mechanics: implications for aging, cancer, and immunity. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2019;93:p. p. 16–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillip JM, Aifuwa I, Walston J, et al. The mechanobiology of aging. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2015;17:p. p. 113–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel E, Michiardi A, Navarro M, et al. Nanotechnology in regenerative medicine: the materials side. Trends Biotechnol. 2008;26:p. p. 39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markert CD, Guo X, Skardal A, et al. Characterizing the micro-scale elastic modulus of hydrogels for use in regenerative medicine. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013;27:p. p. 115–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard TD, Cooper JA. Actin, a central player in cell shape and movement. Science. 2009;326:p. p. 1208–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plodinec M, Loparic M, Monnier CA, et al. The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer. Nat Nanotechnol. 2012;7:p. p. 757–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crick SL, Yin FC. Assessing micromechanical properties of cells with atomic force microscopy: importance of the contact point. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2007;6:p. p. 199–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh S. Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. Acta Biomater. 2007;3:p. p. 413–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragovich MA, Fortoul N, Jagota A, et al. Biomechanical characterization of TIM protein-mediated Ebola virus-host cell adhesion. Sci Rep. 2019;9:p. 267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon S, Lee D-H, Han S-J, et al. Biomechanical properties of red blood cells infected by Plasmodium berghei ANKA. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:p. p. 20546–20553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh S, Spatz J, Mills JP, et al. Reprint of: connections between single-cell biomechanics and human disease states: gastrointestinal cancer and malaria. Acta Biomater. 2015;23 Suppl:p. S3–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim M-Y, Kim J-H, Cho JY. Cytochalasin B modulates macrophage-mediated inflammatory responses. Biomolecules & Therapeutics. 2014;22:p. p. 295–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel NR, Bole M, Chen C, et al. Cell elasticity determines macrophage function. PLoS One. 2012;7:p. e41024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu PH, Aroush DR, Asnacios A, et al. A comparison of methods to assess cell mechanical properties. Nat Methods. 2018;15:p. p. 491–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt H-J, Cappella B, Kappl M. Force measurements with the atomic force microscope: technique, interpretation and applications. Surf Sci Rep. 2005;59:p. p. 1–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia R. Nanomechanical mapping of soft materials with the atomic force microscope: methods, theory and applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2020;49:5850–5884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lekka M, Laidler P, Gil D, et al. Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studied by scanning force microscopy. Eur Biophys J. 1999;28:p. p. 312–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemla J, Danilkiewicz J, Orzechowska B, et al. Atomic force microscopy as a tool for assessing the cellular elasticity and adhesiveness to identify cancer cells and tissues. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2018;73:p. p. 115–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alibert C, Goud B, Manneville JB. Are cancer cells really softer than normal cells? Biol Cell. 2017;109:p. p. 167–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang G, Galluzzi M, Zhang B, et al. Biomechanical heterogeneity of living cells: comparison between atomic force microscopy and finite element simulation. Langmuir. 2019;35:p. p. 7578–7587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case LB, Waterman CM. Integration of actin dynamics and cell adhesion by a three-dimensional, mechanosensitive molecular clutch. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17:p. p. 955–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella B, Dietler G. Force-distance curves by atomic force microscopy. Surf Sci Rep. 1999;34:p. p. 1–3, 5-104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt HJ, Jaschke M. Calculation of thermal noise in atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology. 1995;6:p. p. 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sader JE, Lu J, Mulvaney P. Effect of cantilever geometry on the optical lever sensitivities and thermal noise method of the atomic force microscope. Rev Sci Instrum. 2014;85:p. 113702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirzer T, Hugel T. Atomic force microscopy spring constant determination in viscous liquids. Rev Sci Instrum. 2009;80:p. 035110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillers H, Rianna C, Schäpe J, et al. Standardized nanomechanical atomic force microscopy procedure (snap) for measuring soft and biological samples. Sci Rep. 2017;7:p. 5117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galluzzi M, Tang G, Biswas CS, et al. Atomic force microscopy methodology and AFMech Suite software for nanomechanics on heterogeneous soft materials. Nat Commun. 2018;9:p. 3584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galluzzi M, Biswas CS, Wu Y, et al. Space-resolved quantitative mechanical measurements of soft and supersoft materials by atomic force microscopy. Npg Asia Mater. 2016;8:p. e327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puricelli L, Galluzzi M, Schulte C, et al. Nanomechanical and topographical imaging of living cells by atomic force microscopy with colloidal probes. Rev Sci Instrum. 2015;86:p. 033705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan Y, Wang H. The structure and function of cell membranes examined by atomic force microscopy and single-molecule force spectroscopy. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44:p. p. 3617–3638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufrene YF, Pelling AE. Force nanoscopy of cell mechanics and cell adhesion. Nanoscale. 2013;5:p. p. 4094–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mescola A, Vella S, Scotto M, et al. Probing cytoskeleton organisation of neuroblastoma cells with single-cell force spectroscopy. J Mol Recognit. 2012;25:p. p. 270–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roduit C, Saha B, Alonso-Sarduy L, et al. OpenFovea: open-source AFM data processing software. Nat Methods. 2012;9:p. p. 774–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermanowicz P, Sarna M, Burda K, et al. AtomicJ: an open source software for analysis of force curves. Rev Sci Instrum. 2014;85:p. 063703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieg M, Fläschner G, Alsteens D, et al. Atomic force microscopy-based mechanobiology. Nat Rev Phys. 2019;1:p. p. 41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Guz N, Dokukin M, Kalaparthi V, et al. If cell mechanics can be described by elastic modulus: study of different models and probes used in indentation experiments. Biophys J. 2014;107:p. p. 564–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borodich FM. The hertz-type and adhesive contact problems for depth-sensing indentation. Adv Appl Mech. 2014;47:p. p. 225–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneddon IN. The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int J Eng Sci. 1965;3:p. p. 47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Derjaguin BV, Muller VM, Toporov YP. Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1975;53:p. p. 314–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson KL, Kendall K, Roberts AD. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc R Soc A. 1971;324:p. p. 301–313.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis EK, Horkay F, Maresca J, et al. Determination of elastic moduli of thin layers of soft material using the atomic force microscope. Biophys J. 2002;82:p. p. 2798–2810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavara N, Chadwick RS. Determination of the elastic moduli of thin samples and adherent cells using conical atomic force microscope tips. Nat Nanotechnol. 2012;7:p. p. 733–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos JAC, Rebêlo LM, Araujo AC, et al. Thickness-corrected model for nanoindentation of thin films with conical indenters. Soft Matter. 2012;8:p. p. 4441–4448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia PD, Garcia R. Determination of the elastic moduli of a single cell cultured on a rigid support by force microscopy. Biophys J. 2018;114:p. p. 2923–2932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efremov YM, Wang W-H, Hardy SD, et al. Measuring nanoscale viscoelastic parameters of cells directly from AFM force-displacement curves. Sci Rep. 2017;7:p. 1541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia PD, Garcia R. Determination of the viscoelastic properties of a single cell cultured on a rigid support by force microscopy. Nanoscale. 2018;10:p. p. 19799–19809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia PD, Guerrero CR, Garcia R. Nanorheology of living cells measured by AFM-based force-distance curves. Nanoscale. 2020;12:p. p. 9133–9143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Sousa JS, Freire RS, Sousa FD, et al. Double power-law viscoelastic relaxation of living cells encodes motility trends. Sci Rep. 2020;10:p. 4749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roduit C, Longo G, Benmessaoud I, et al. Stiffness tomography exploration of living and fixed macrophages. J Mol Recog. 2012;25:p. p. 241–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo G, Rio LM, Roduit C, et al. Force volume and stiffness tomography investigation on the dynamics of stiff material under bacterial membranes. J Mol Recog. 2012;25:p. p. 278–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roduit C, Sekatski S, Dietler G, et al. Stiffness tomography by atomic force microscopy. Biophys J. 2009;97:p. p. 674–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janel S, Popoff M, Barois N, et al. Stiffness tomography of eukaryotic intracellular compartments by atomic force microscopy. Nanoscale. The Royal Society of Chemistry (London, UK); 2019;11:p. p. 10320-10323.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero CR, Garcia PD, Garcia R. Subsurface imaging of cell organelles by force microscopy. ACS Nano. 2019;13:p. p. 9629–9637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte MF, Bochenek S, Brugnoni M, et al. Stiffness tomography of ultra‐soft nanogels by atomic force microscopy. Angew Chem. 2020; 132:p. p. 2-9.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen N, Shao Y, Wineman A, et al. Atomic force microscopy indentation and inverse analysis for non-linear viscoelastic identification of breast cancer cells. Math Biosci. 2016;277:p. p. 77–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Mollaeian K, Ren J. Finite element modeling of living cells for AFM indentation-based biomechanical characterization. Micron. 2019;116:p. p. 108–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarry JG, Prendergast PJ. A three-dimensional finite element model of an adherent eukaryotic cell. European Cells and Materials. 2004;7:p. p. 27–33. [ discussion 33–4]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen J, Lu G. Finite element modelling of nanoindentation based methods for mechanical properties of cells. J Biomech. 2012;45:p. p. 2810–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caille N, Thoumine O, Tardy Y, et al. Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells. J Biomech. 2002;35:p. p. 177–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Tian L, Zhang W, et al. Effect of AFM nanoindentation loading rate on the characterization of mechanical properties of vascular endothelial cell. Micromachines (Basel). 2020;11:p. 562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levental I, Georges PC, Janmey PA. Soft biological materials and their impact on cell function. Soft Matter. 2007;3:p. p. 299–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chighizola M, Dini T, Lenardi C, et al. Mechanotransduction in neuronal cell development and functioning. Biophys Rev. 2019;11:p. p. 701–720.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schulte C. Cluster-assembled nanostructured materials for cell biology. In: Cluster beam deposition of functional nanomaterials and devices. Frontiers of Nanoscience (Elsevier, Netherlands); 2020. ;p. p. 271–289.
   Google Scholar
• Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, et al. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 2006;126:p. p. 677–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte C, Rodighiero S, Cappelluti MA, et al. Conversion of nanoscale topographical information of cluster-assembled zirconia surfaces into mechanotransductive events promotes neuronal differentiation. J Nanobiotechnology. 2016;14:p. 18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Abrego C, Zaunz S, Toprakhisar B, et al. Towards mimicking the fetal liver niche: the influence of elasticity and oxygen tension on hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells cultured in 3D fibrin hydrogels. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:p. 6367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou Y, Yu L, Xie W, et al. surface roughness and substrate stiffness synergize to drive cellular mechanoresponse. Nano Lett. 2020;20:p. p. 748–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcaraz J, Otero J, Jorba I, et al. Bidirectional mechanobiology between cells and their local extracellular matrix probed by atomic force microscopy. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2018;73:p. p. 71–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimenez A, Uriarte JJ, Vieyra J, et al. Elastic properties of hydrogels and decellularized tissue sections used in mechanobiology studies probed by atomic force microscopy. Microsc Res Tech. 2017;80:p. p. 85–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorba I, Beltran G, Falcones B, et al. Nonlinear elasticity of the lung extracellular microenvironment is regulated by macroscale tissue strain. Acta Biomater; 2019;92:p. p. 265-276.
   Google Scholar
• Jorba I, Uriarte JJ, Campillo N, et al. Probing micromechanical properties of the extracellular matrix of soft tissues by atomic force microscopy. J Cell Physiol. 2017;232:p. p. 19–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouw JK, Yui Y, Damiano L, et al. Tissue mechanics modulate microRNA-dependent PTEN expression to regulate malignant progression. Nat Med. 2014;20:p. 360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rianna C, Kumar P, Radmacher M. The role of the microenvironment in the biophysics of cancer. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2018; 73:p. p. 107- 114.
   Google Scholar
• Lu P, Weaver VM, Werb Z. The extracellular matrix: A dynamic niche in cancer progression. J Cell Biol. 2012;196:p. p. 395–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollaeian K, Liu Y, Bi S, et al. Investigation of the effect of substrate morphology on MDCK cell mechanical behavior using atomic force microscopy. Appl Phys Lett. 2019;115:p. 063701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginhoux F, Schultze JL, Murray PJ, et al. New insights into the multidimensional concept of macrophage ontogeny, activation and function. Nat Immunol. 2016;17:p. p. 34–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn TA, Chawla A, Pollard JW. Macrophage biology in development, homeostasis and disease. Nature. 2013;496:p. p. 445–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWhorter FY, Davis CT, Liu WF. Physical and mechanical regulation of macrophage phenotype and function. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72:p. p. 1303–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWhorter FY, Wang T, Nguyen P, et al. Modulation of macrophage phenotype by cell shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:p. p. 17253–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao XY, Sørensen MH, Xia X, et al. Beading of injured axons driven by tension- and adhesion-regulated membrane shape instability. J Royal Soc Interface. 2020;17:p.168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faroni A, Mobasseri SA, Kingham PJ, et al. Peripheral nerve regeneration: experimental strategies and future perspectives. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;82-83:p. p. 160–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay L, Khadra A. The bioenergetics of integrin-based adhesion, from single molecule dynamics to stability of macromolecular complexes. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020;18:p. p. 393–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orre T, Rossier O, Giannone G. The inner life of integrin adhesion sites: from single molecules to functional macromolecular complexes. Exp Cell Res. 2019;379:p. p. 235–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kechagia JZ, Ivaska J, Roca-Cusachs P. Integrins as biomechanical sensors of the microenvironment. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20:p. p. 457–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maffioli E, Schulte C, Nonnis S, et al. Proteomic dissection of nanotopography-sensitive mechanotransductive signaling hubs that foster neuronal differentiation in pc12 cells. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;11:p. 417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte C, Ripamonti M, Maffioli E, et al. Scale invariant disordered nanotopography promotes hippocampal neuron development and maturation with involvement of mechanotransductive pathways. Front Cell Neurosci. 2016;10:p. 267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chighizola M, Previdi A, Dini T, et al. Adhesion force spectroscopy with nanostructured colloidal probes reveals nanotopography-dependent early mechanotransductive interactions at the cell membrane level. Nanoscale. The Royal Society of Chemistry (London, UK); 2020;27:p. p. 1-33.
   Google Scholar
• Vorselen D, Labitigan RLD, Theriot JA. A mechanical perspective on phagocytic cup formation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2020;66:112–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain N, Moeller J, Vogel V. Mechanobiology of macrophages: how physical factors coregulate macrophage plasticity and phagocytosis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2019;21:p.p. 267–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Li Y, Gao B, et al. Engineering mechanical microenvironment of macrophage and its biomedical applications. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2018;13:p. p. 555–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu XY, Yan F, Niu LL, et al. Strong correlation between early stage atherosclerosis and electromechanical coupling of aorta. Nanoscale. 2016;8:p. p. 6975–6980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bossche J, Saraber DL. Metabolic regulation of macrophages in tissues. Cell Immunol. 2018;330:p. p. 54–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray PJ. Macrophage polarization. Annu Rev Physiol. 2017;79:p. p. 541–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann EJ, Ponik SM. Biomechanical contributions to macrophage activation in the tumor microenvironment. Front Oncol. 2020;10:p. 787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Ishibashi K, Okada T, et al. Mechanical property changes in breast cancer cells induced by stimulation with macrophage secretions in vitro. Micromachines. 2019;10:p. 738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakoschky B, Pleli T, Schmithals C, et al. Selective targeting of tumor associated macrophages in different tumor models. Plos One. 2018;13:p. e0193015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pi J, Li T, Liu J, et al. Detection of lipopolysaccharide induced inflammatory responses in RAW264.7 macrophages using atomic force microscope. Micron. 2014;65:p. p. 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Mahajan G, Kothapalli CR, et al. Sialylation status and mechanical properties of THP-1 macrophages upon LPS stimulation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;518:p. p. 573–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Cui J, Ping Y, et al. Probing cell internalisation mechanics with polymer capsules. Nanoscale. 2016;8:p. p. 17096–17101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusko EC, Asbury CL, Bement W. Force is a signal that cells cannot ignore. Mol Biol Cell. 2014;25:p. p. 3717–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell DG, Huang L, VanderVen BC. Immunometabolism at the interface between macrophages and pathogens. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;19:p. p. 291–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weavers H, Evans IR, Martin P, et al. Corpse engulfment generates a molecular memory that primes the macrophage inflammatory response. Cell. 2016;165:p. p. 1658–1671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Yang L, Cui Y, et al. Cytoskeleton-centric protein transportation by exosomes transforms tumor-favorable macrophages. Oncotarget. 2016;7:p. p. 67387–67402.
   Google Scholar
• Liu YX, Karsai A, Anderson DS, et al. Single-cell mechanics provides an effective means to probe in vivo interactions between alveolar macrophages and silver nanoparticles. J Phys Chem A. 2015;119:p. p. 15118–15129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pati R, Das I, Mehta RK, et al. Zinc-Oxide nanoparticles exhibit genotoxic, clastogenic, cytotoxic and actin depolymerization effects by inducing oxidative stress responses in macrophages and adult mice. Toxicol Sci. 2016;150:p. p. 454–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer CC, Liu YX, Morgan JT, et al. New approach to investigate the cytotoxicity of nanomaterials using single cell mechanics. J Phys Chem A. 2014;118:p. p. 1246–1255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Gaffrey MJ, Qian WJ, et al. Oxidative stress and redox modifications in nanomaterial–cellular interactions. in: Bonner JC, BrownJMeditors. Interaction of nanomaterials with the immune system. Springer International Publishing: Cham; 2020;p. p. 127–148.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Zhu M, Li Z, et al. Cellular fate of deformable needle-shaped PLGA-PEG fibers. Acta Biomater. 2020;112:p. p. 182–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou G, Zhang B, Wei L, et al. Spatially resolved correlation between stiffness increase and actin aggregation around nanofibers internalized in living macrophages. Materials (Basel). 2020;13:p. 3235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu J, Chen S, Huang D, et al. Global mapping of live cell mechanical features using PeakForce QNM AFM. Biophysics Reports. 2020;6:p. p. 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Schillers H, Medalsy I, Hu S, et al. PeakForce Tapping resolves individual microvilli on living cells. J Mol Recog. 2016;29:p. p. 95–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benaglia S, Amo CA, Garcia R. Fast, quantitative and high resolution mapping of viscoelastic properties with bimodal AFM. Nanoscale. 2019;11:p. p. 15289–15297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocun M, Labuda A, Meinhold W, et al. Fast, high resolution, and wide modulus range nanomechanical mapping with bimodal tapping mode. ACS Nano. 2017;11:p. p. 10097–10105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labuda A, Kocuń M, Meinhold W, et al. Generalized Hertz model for bimodal nanomechanical mapping. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2016;7:p. p. 970–982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman A, Trigueros S, Cartagena A, et al. Mapping nanomechanical properties of live cells using multi-harmonic atomic force microscopy. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6:p. p. 809–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efremov YM, Cartagena-Rivera AX, Athamneh AIM, et al. Mapping heterogeneity of cellular mechanics by multi-harmonic atomic force microscopy. Nat Protoc. 2018;13:p. p. 2200–2216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartagena-Rivera AX, Wang WH, Geahlen RL, et al. Fast, multi-frequency, and quantitative nanomechanical mapping of live cells using the atomic force microscope. Sci Rep. 2015;5:p. 11692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartagena A, Raman A. Local viscoelastic properties of live cells investigated using dynamic and quasi-static atomic force microscopy methods. Biophys J. 2014;106:p. p. 1033–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou L, Cai M, Tong T, et al. Progress in the correlative atomic force microscopy and optical microscopy. Sensors (Basel). 2017;17:4:p. 938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Varela AI, Stamov DR, Miranda A, et al. Simultaneous co-localized super-resolution fluorescence microscopy and atomic force microscopy: combined SIM and AFM platform for the life sciences. Sci Rep. 2020;10:p. 1122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chacko JV, Canale C, Harke B, et al. Sub-diffraction nano manipulation using STED AFM. Plos One. 2013;8:p. e66608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chacko JV, Harke B, Canale C, et al. Cellular level nanomanipulation using atomic force microscope aided with superresolution imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2014Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2014;19:p. 105003
   Google Scholar
• Chacko JV, Zanacchi FC, Diaspro A. Probing cytoskeletal structures by coupling optical superresolution and AFM techniques for a correlative approach. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 2013;70:p. p. 729–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosentino M, Canale C, Bianchini P, et al. AFM-STED correlative nanoscopy reveals a dark side in fluorescence microscopy imaging. Sci Adv. 2019;5:p. eaav8062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibata T, Furukawa H, Ito Y, et al. photocatalytic nanofabrication and intracellular raman imaging of living cells with functionalized AFM probes. Micromachines (Basel). 2020;11:p. 495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelsen E, Hobson CM, Kern ME, et al. Combined atomic force microscope and volumetric light sheet system for correlative force and fluorescence mechanobiology studies. Sci Rep. 2020;10:p. 8133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolov I, Dokukin ME, Kalaparthi V, et al. Noninvasive diagnostic imaging using machine-learning analysis of nanoresolution images of cell surfaces: detection of bladder cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:p. p. 12920–12925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyberg KD, Bruce SL, Nguyen AV, et al. Predicting cancer cell invasion by single-cell physical phenotyping. Integr Biol (Camb). 2018;10:p. p. 218–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar