Water adsorption and dynamics on graphene and other 2D materials: computational and experimental advances

References

• Maier S, Salmeron M. Adsorption of water. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2016. Chapter 37; p. 357–42. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9783527680573.ch37.
   Google Scholar
• Verdaguer A, Sacha GM, Bluhm H, et al. Molecular structure of water at interfaces: wetting at the nanometer scale. Chem Rev. 2006;106:1478–1510. Available from: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/cr040376l
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson A, Haq S. Water adsorption and the wetting of metal surfaces. Surf Sci Rep. 2009;64:381–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco J, Michaelides A, Forster M, et al. A one-dimensional ice structure built from pentagons. Nat Mater. 2009;8:427–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones G, Jenkins SJ. Water and ammonia on Cu(110): comparative structure and bonding. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2013;15: 4785–4798. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3CP42658K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco J, Hodgson A, Michaelides A. A molecular perspective of water at metal interfaces. Nat Mater. 2012;11:667–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björneholm O, Hansen MH, Hodgson A, et al. Water at Interfaces. Chem Rev. 2016;116:7698–7726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier S, Lechner BAJ, Somorjai GA, et al. Growth and structure of the first layers of ice on Ru(0001) and Pt(111). J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:3145–3151. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b13133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu TK, Maier S, Verdaguer A, et al. Water at surfaces and interfaces: from molecules to ice and bulk liquid. Prog Surf Sci Special Issue in Honor of Prof. Maki Kawai;2018 93;87–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou G, Huang L. A review of recent advances in computational and experimental analysis of first adsorbed water layer on solid substrate. Mol Simul. 2021;47:925–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreder MJ, Alvarenga J, Kim P, et al. Design of anti-icing surfaces: smooth, textured or slippery? Nat Rev Mater. 2016;1:15003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parent O, Ilinca A. Anti-icing and de-icing techniques for wind turbines: critical review. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 2011;65:88–96.
   Google Scholar
• Lv J, Song Y, Jiang L, et al. Bio-inspired strategies for anti-icing. ACS Nano. 2014;8:3152–3169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels-Rausch T. Ten things we need to know about ice and snow. Nature. 2013;494:27–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier S, Salmeron M. How does water wet a surface? Acc Chem Res. 2015;48:2783–2790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo J, Meng X, Chen J, et al. Real-space imaging of interfacial water with submolecular resolution. Nat Mater. 2014;13:184–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidorn SC, Bertram C, Cabrera-Sanfelix P, et al. Consecutive mechanism in the diffusion of D2O on a NaCl(100) bilayer. ACS Nano. 2015;9:3572–3578. Available from: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acsnano.5b00691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auras SV, van Bree RAB, Bashlakov DL, et al. It’s not just the defects – a curved crystal study of H2O desorption from Ag. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2019;21:15422–15430. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C9CP02609F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duong DL, Yun SJ, Lee YH. van der waals layered materials: opportunities and challenges. ACS Nano. 2017;11:11803–11830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehling T, Black-Schaffer A, Balatsky A. Dirac materials. Adv Phys. 2014;63:1–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen BH, Nguyen VH. Advances in graphene-based optoelectronics, plasmonics and photonics. Adv Nat Sci Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2016;7: 013002. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1088/2043-6262/7/1/013002
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari AC, Bonaccorso F, Fal’ko V, et al. Science and technology roadmap for graphene, related two-dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems. Nanoscale. 2015;7:4598–4810. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4NR01600A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song N, Gao X, Ma Z, et al. A review of graphene-based separation membrane: materials, characteristics, preparation and applications. Desalination. 2018;437:59–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Tanugi D, Grossman JC. Water desalination across nanoporous graphene. Nano Lett. 2012;12:3602–3608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Q, Alibakhshi MA, Jiao S, et al. Fast water transport in graphene nanofluidic channels. Nat Nanotechnol. 2018;13:238–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Qiao J, Yang L, et al. A review of graphene-based nanostructural materials for both catalyst supports and metal-free catalysts in pem fuel cell oxygen reduction reactions. Adv Energy Mater. 2014;4:1301523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosi A, Chua CK, Bonanni A, et al. Electrochemistry of graphene and related materials. Chem Rev. 2014;114:7150–7188. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500023c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Li C, Shi G. Graphene based catalysts. Energy Environ Sci. 2012;5: 8848–8868. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C2EE22238H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Yu J, Wageh S, et al. Graphene in photocatalysis: a review. Small. 2016;12:6640–6696. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/smll.201600382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks A, Jenkins SJ, Wrabetz S, et al. The dehydrogenation of butane on metal-free graphene. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;619:377–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasai D, Tuberquia JC, Harl RR, et al. Graphene: corrosion-inhibiting coating. ACS Nano. 2012;6:1102–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Liu XY. Control of ice nucleation: freezing and antifreeze strategies. Chem Soc Rev. 2018;47: 7116–7139. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00626A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhtar N, Thomas PJ, Svardal B, et al. Pillars or pancakes? Self-cleaning surfaces without coating. Nano Lett. 2018;18:7509–7514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyrkjebø S, Cassidy A, Akhtar N, et al. Graphene and graphene oxide on Ir(111) are transparent to wetting but not to icing. Carbon. 2021;174:396–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melios C, Giusca CE, Panchal V, et al. Water on graphene: review of recent progress. 2D Mater. 2018;5:022001.
   Google Scholar
• Xu K, Cao P, Heath JR. Graphene visualizes the first water adlayers on mica at ambient conditions. Science. 2010;329:1188–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knopf DA, Alpert PA, Wang B. The role of organic aerosol in atmospheric ice nucleation: a review. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2018;2:168–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hama T, Watanabe N. Surface processes on interstellar amorphous solid water: adsorption, diffusion, tunneling reactions, and nuclear-spin conversion. Chem Rev. 2013;113:8783–8839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuppen HM, Walsh C, Lamberts T, et al. Grain surface models and data for astrochemistry. Space Sci Rev. 2017;212:1–58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-016-0319-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potapov A, Jäger C, Henning T. Ice coverage of dust grains in cold astrophysical environments. Phys Rev Lett. 2020;124:221103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molpeceres G, Kästner J, Fedoseev G, et al. Carbon atom reactivity with amorphous solid water: H2O-catalyzed formation of H2CO. J Phys Chem Lett. 2021;12:10854–10860. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minissale M, Aikawa Y, Bergin E, et al. thermal desorption of interstellar ices: a review on the controlling parameters and their implications from snowlines to chemical complexity. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2022;6:597–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsui T, Rose MK, Fomin E. Water diffusion and clustering on Pd(111). Science. 2002;297:1850–1852. 00270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma M, Tocci G, Michaelides A, et al Fast diffusion of water nanodroplets on graphene. Nat Mater. 2016;15:66–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avidor N, Allison W. Helium diffraction as a probe of structure and proton order on model ice surfaces. J Phys Chem Lett. 2016;7: 4520–4523. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo J, Li XZ, Peng JB, et al. Atomic-scale investigation of nuclear quantum effects of surface water: experiments and theory. Prog Surf Sci. 2017;92:203–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nihonyanagi S, Yamaguchi S, Tahara T. Ultrafast dynamics at water interfaces studied by vibrational sum frequency generation spectroscopy. Chem Rev. 2017;117:10665–10693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit WJ, Bakker HJ. The surface of ice is like supercooled liquid water. Angew Chem. 2017;129:15746–15750.
   Google Scholar
• Thämer M, De Marco L, Ramasesha K, et al. Ultrafast 2D IR spectroscopy of the excess proton in liquid water. Science. 2015;350:78–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jardine A, Hedgeland H, Alexandrowicz G, et al. Helium-3 spin-echo: Principles and application to dynamics at surfaces. Prog Surf Sci. 2009;84:323. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsurf.2009.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedgeland H, Fouquet P, Jardine AP, et al. Measurement of single-molecule frictional dissipation in a prototypical nanoscale system. Nat Phys. Aug 2009;5:561–564. 00051. Available fromhttp://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nphys1335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamtögl A, Sacchi M, Avidor N, et al. Nanoscopic diffusion of water on a topological insulator. Nat Commun. 2020;11:278. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14064-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C, Corem G, Godsi O, et al. Ice nucleation on a corrugated surface. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140:15804–15811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamtögl A, Carter EA, Ward DJ, et al. Note: a simple sample transfer alignment for ultra-high vacuum systems. Rev Sci Instrum. 2016;87:066108. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4954728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamtögl A, Bahn E, Zhu J, et al. Graphene on Ni(111): electronic corrugation and dynamics from helium atom scattering. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119:25983–25990. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b08284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamtögl A, Bahn E, Sacchi M, et al. Motion of water monomers reveals a kinetic barrier to ice nucleation on graphene. Nat Commun. 2021;12:3120. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23226-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel PA, Madey TE. The interaction of water with solid surfaces: fundamental aspects. Surf Sci Rep. 1987;7:211–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Zhu S, Wang F. Metals supported water monomers: the bonding nature revisited. J Mater Sci Technol. 2010;26:97–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnur S, Groß A. Properties of metal-water interfaces studied from first principles. New J Phys. 2009;11: 125003. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/12/125003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Ying Y, Xu M, et al. Atomic steps induce the aligned growth of ice crystals on graphite surfaces. Nano Lett. 2020;20:8112–8119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Xu JY, Tu YB, et al. Hexagonal monolayer ice without shared edges. Phys Rev Lett. 2018;121:256001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma J, Michaelides A, Alfè D, et al. Adsorption and diffusion of water on graphene from first principles. Phys Rev B. 2011;84:033402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Wagner LK, Aluru NR. The interaction between hexagonal boron nitride and water from first principles. J Chem Phys. 2015;142:234702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hamdani YS, Rossi M, Alfè D, et al. Properties of the water to boron nitride interaction: from zero to two dimensions with benchmark accuracy. J Chem Phys. 2017;147:044710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kysilka J, Rubeš M, Grajciar L, et al. Accurate description of argon and water adsorption on surfaces of graphene-based carbon allotropes. J Phys Chem A. 2011;115:11387–11393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandenburg JG, Zen A, Fitzner M, et al. Physisorption of water on graphene: subchemical accuracy from many-body electronic structure methods. J Phys Chem Lett. 2019;10:358–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestrelli PL, Ambrosetti A, Puppin E. Inclusion of van der waals interactions in DFT using wannier functions without empirical parameters. EPJ Web Conf. 2020;230:00010.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelides A, Ranea VA, de Andres PL, et al. General model for water monomer adsorption on close-packed transition and noble metal surfaces. Phys Rev Lett. 2003;90:216102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leenaerts O, Partoens B, Peeters FM. Adsorption of H2O, NH3, CO, NO2, and NO on graphene: a first-principles study. Phys Rev B. 2008;77: 125416. Available from: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.125416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosetti A, Silvestrelli PL. Adsorption of rare-gas atoms and water on graphite and graphene by van der waals-corrected density functional theory. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115:3695–3702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenness GR, Karalti O, Jordan KD. Benchmark calculations of water-acene interaction energies: extrapolation to the water-graphene limit and assessment of dispersion-corrected DFT methods. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010;12:6375–6381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voloshina E, Usvyat D, Schütz M, et al. On the physisorption of water on graphene: a CCSD(T) study. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011;13:12041–12047. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C1CP20609E
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubeš M, Nachtigall P, Vondrášek J, et al. Structure and stability of the water-graphite complexes. J Phys Chem C. 2009;113:8412–8419. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/jp901410m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas RRQ, Rivelino R, FdB M, et al. DFT studies of the interactions of a graphene layer with small water aggregates. J Phys Chem A. 2011;115:12348–12356. Available from: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp208279a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih CJ, Strano MS, Blankschtein D. Wetting translucency of graphene. Nat Mater. 2013;12:866–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böttcher S, Weser M, Dedkov YS, et al. Graphene on ferromagnetic surfaces and its functionalization with water and ammonia. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2011;6:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Feng J, Wang E, et al. Influence of water on the electronic structure of metal-supported graphene: insights from van der Waals density functional theory. Phys Rev B. 2012;85:085425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leenaerts O, Partoens B, Peeters FM. Water on graphene: hydrophobicity and dipole moment using density functional theory. Phys Rev B. 2009;79:235440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abe S, Nagoya Y, Watari F, et al Interaction of water molecules with graphene. A density functional theory and molecular dynamics study. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2010;49:01AH07/1–01AH07/4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhs WF, Lehmann MS. Bond-lengths, bond angles and transition barrier in ice ih by neutron scattering. Nature. 1981;294:432–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortes AD. Accurate and precise lattice parameters of H2O and D2O ice I h between 1.6 and 270 K from high-resolution time-of-flight neutron powder diffraction data. Acta Crystallogr B. 2018;74: 196–216. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520618002159
   Google Scholar
• Gasser TM, Thoeny AV, Fortes AD, et al. Structural characterization of ice XIX as the second polymorph related to ice VI. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farias D, Rieder KH. Atomic beam diffraction from solid surfaces. Rep Prog in Phys. 1998;61:1575–1664.
   Google Scholar
• Tamtögl A, Ruckhofer A, Campi D, et al. Atom-surface van der Waals potentials of topological insulators and semimetals from scattering measurements. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2021;23:7637–7652. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP05388K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thürmer K, Nie S. Formation of hexagonal and cubic ice during low-temperature growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110:11757–11762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun J, Glebov A, Graham AP, et al. Structure and phonons of the ice surface. Phys Rev Lett. 1998 Mar;80:2638–2641. Available from https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glebov A, Graham AP, Menzel A, et al. A helium atom scattering study of the structure and phonon dynamics of the ice surface. J Chem Phys. 2000;112:11011–11022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corem G, Kole PR, Zhu J, et al. Ordered H2O structures on a weakly interacting surface: a helium diffraction study of H2O/Au(111). J Phys Chem C. 2013;117:23657–23663. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp405101q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahn E, Tamtögl A, Ellis J, et al. Structure and dynamics investigations of a partially hydrogenated graphene/Ni(111) surface. Carbon. 2017;114:504–510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traeger F, Langenberg D, Gao YK, et al. Water on a close-packed ru surface: a high-order commensurate adlayer with a high sensitivity towards electron beam damage. Phys Rev B. 2007;76:033410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avidor N, Hedgeland H, Held G, et al. Highly proton-ordered water structures on oxygen precovered Ru{0001}. J Phys Chem A. Jun 2011;115:7205–7209. 00004. Available fromhttp://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp200221b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan JA, Los SC. Vitreous ice: irreversible transformations during warm-up. Nature. 1965;206:806–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondo T, Kato HS, Bonn M, et al. Morphological change during crystallization of thin amorphous solid water films on Ru(0001). J Chem Phys. 2007;126:181103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble JA, Cuppen HM, Coussan S, et al. Infrared resonant vibrationally induced restructuring of amorphous solid water. J Phys Chem C. 2020;124:20864–20873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter MT, Andersson PU, Pettersson JBC. Surface properties of water ice at 150–191 K studied by elastic helium scattering. J Chem Phys. 2006;125: 174704. 00000. Available from: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jcp/125/17/10.1063/1.2359444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson PU, Suter MT, Marković N, et al. Water condensation on graphite studied by elastic helium scattering and molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111:15258–15266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfgren P, Ahlström P, Lausma J, et al. Crystallization kinetics of thin amorphous water films on surfaces. Langmuir. 2003;19:265–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmel GA, Matthiesen J, Baer M, et al. No confinement needed: observation of a metastable hydrophobic wetting two-layer ice on graphene. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:12838–12844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aria AI, Kidambi PR, Weatherup RS, et al. Time evolution of the wettability of supported graphene under ambient air exposure. J Phys Chem C. 2016;120:2215–2224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao G, Li X, Huang M, et al. The physics and chemistry of graphene-on-surfaces. Chem Soc Rev. 2017;46:4417–4449. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7CS00256D
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standop S, Michely T, Busse C. H2O on graphene/Ir(111): a periodic array of frozen droplets. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119: 1418–1423. Available from: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp510140a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakarov D, Österlund L, Kasemo B. Water adsorption on graphite (0001). Vacuum. 1995;46:1109–1112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakarov DV, Oesterlund L, Kasemo B. Water adsorption and coadsorption with potassium on graphite(0001). Langmuir. 1995;11:1201–1214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolina AS, Wolff AJ, Brown WA. Reflection absorption infrared spectroscopy and temperature-programmed desorption studies of the adsorption and desorption of amorphous and crystalline water on a graphite surface. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:16836–16845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulbricht H, Zacharia R, Cindir N, et al. Thermal desorption of gases and solvents from graphite and carbon nanotube surfaces. Carbon. 2006;44:2931–2942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RS, Matthiesen J, Kay BD. Desorption kinetics of methanol, ethanol, and water from graphene. J Phys Chem A. 2014;118:8242–8250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souda R, Aizawa T. Crystallization kinetics of water on graphite. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018;20: 21856–21863. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8CP03000F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng X, Maier S, Salmeron M. Water splits epitaxial graphene and intercalates. J Am Chem Soc. 2012 Mar;134:5662–5668. 00079. Available from http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja3003809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Politano A, Cattelan M, Boukhvalov DW, et al. Unveiling the mechanisms leading to h2 production promoted by water decomposition on epitaxial graphene at room temperature. ACS Nano. 2016;10:4543–4549. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b00554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrighi L, Perilli D, Selli D, et al. Water at the interface between defective graphene and Cu or Pt (111) surfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:29932–29941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An S, Joshi BN, Lee JG, et al. A comprehensive review on wettability, desalination, and purification using graphene-based materials at water interfaces. Catal Today. 2017;295:14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao P, Huang Y, Shen Y, et al. A modified Wenzel model for water wetting on van der Waals layered materials with topographic surfaces. Nanoscale. 2017;9:3843–3849. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7NR00521K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung SW, Hsiao PY, Chen CP, et al. Wettability of graphene-coated surface: free energy investigations using molecular dynamics simulation. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119:8103–8111. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/jp511036e
   Google Scholar
• Andrews JE, Sinha S, Chung PW, et al. Wetting dynamics of a water nanodrop on graphene. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016;18:23482–23493. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6CP01936F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Jia K, Huang Y, et al Intrinsic wettability in pristine graphene. Adv Mater. 2022;34:2103620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler SZ, Hollen SM, Cao L, et al. Progress, challenges, and opportunities in two-dimensional materials beyond graphene. ACS Nano. Apr 2013;7:2898–2926. Available fromhttps://doi.org/10.1021/nn400280c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Weiss NO, Duan X, et al. Van der waals heterostructures and devices. Nat Rev Mater. 2016;1:16042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snapp P, Kim JM, Cho C, et al. Interaction of 2D materials with liquids: wettability, electrochemical properties, friction, and emerging directions. Npg Asia Mater. 2020;12:22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Joseph T, Ghorbani-Asl M, et al. Mirror twin boundaries in MoSe2 monolayers as one dimensional nanotemplates for selective water adsorption. Nanoscale. 2021;13:1038–1047. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D0NR08345C
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow PK, Singh E, Viana BC, et al. Wetting of mono and few-layered WS2 and MoS2 films supported on Si/SiO2 substrates. ACS Nano. Mar 2015;9:3023–3031. Available fromhttps://doi.org/10.1021/nn5072073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaur APS, Sahoo S, Ahmadi M, et al. Surface energy engineering for tunable wettability through controlled synthesis of mos2. Nano Lett. 2014;14:4314–4321. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/nl501106v
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bampoulis P, Teernstra VJ, Lohse D, et al. Hydrophobic ice confined between graphene and mos2. J Phys Chem C. 2016;120:27079–27084. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong D, Dang W, Cha JJ, et al. Few-layer nanoplates of Bi2Se3 and Bi2Te3 with highly tunable chemical potential. Nano Lett. 2010;10:2245–2250. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl101260j
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosi A, Sofer Z, Luxa J, et al. Exfoliation of layered topological insulators Bi2Se3 and Bi2Te3 via electrochemistry. ACS Nano. 2016;10:11442–11448. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b07096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benia HM, Lin C, Kern K, et al. Reactive chemical doping of the Bi2Se3 topological insulator. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;107:177602. Available from: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.177602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K-W, Ding D, Yang C-L, et al. Real-space characterization of reactivity towards water at the Bi2Te3(111) surface. Phys Rev B. 2016;93:235445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashina LV, Sánchez-Barriga J, Scholz MR, et al. Negligible surface reactivity of topological insulators Bi2Se3 and Bi2Te3 towards oxygen and water. ACS Nano. 2013;7:5181–5191. Available from: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nn400908b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantzeskakis E, Ramankutty SV, de Jong N, et al. Trigger of the ubiquitous surface band bending in 3D topological insulators. Phys Rev X. 2017;7:041041. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.041041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajamathi CR, Gupta U, Pal K, et al. Photochemical water splitting by bismuth chalcogenide topological insulators. ChemPhysChem. 2017;18:2322–2327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Politano A, Vitiello M, Viti L, et al. The role of surface chemical reactivity in the stability of electronic nanodevices based on two-dimensional materials “beyond graphene” and topological insulators. FlatChem. 2017;1:60–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Wang C, Ju H, et al. integrated quasiplane heteronanostructures of MoSe2/Bi2Se3 hexagonal nanosheets: synergetic electrocatalytic water splitting and enhanced supercapacitor performance. Adv Funct Mater. 2017;27:1703864. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adfm.201703864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagemann E, Wang Y, Das S, et al. On the wetting translucency of hexagonal boron nitride. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2020;22:7710–7718. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D0CP00200C
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Wagner LK, Aluru NR. Hexagonal boron nitride and water interaction parameters. J Chem Phys. 2016;144:164118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Zeng XC. Wetting and interfacial properties of water nanodroplets in contact with graphene and monolayer boron-nitride sheets. ACS Nano. 2012;6: 2401–2409. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/nn204661d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golze D, Hutter J, Iannuzzi M. Wetting of water on hexagonal boron nitride@Rh(111): a qm/mm model based on atomic charges derived for nano-structured substrates. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17: 14307–14316. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4CP04638B
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruckhofer A, Sacchi M, Payne A, et al. Evolution of ordered nanoporous phases during h-BN growth: controlling the route from gas-phase precursor to 2D material by in-situ monitoring. Nanoscale Horiz. 2022; 7: 1388–1396. Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D2NH00353H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma H, Brugger T, Berner S, et al. Nano-ice on boron nitride nanomesh: accessing proton disorder. ChemPhysChem. 2010;11:399–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding Y, Iannuzzi M, Hutter J. Nano-ice models for the water aggregates observed on the h-BN/Rh(111) nanomesh. J Phys: Condens Matter. 2012;24: 445002. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/24/44/445002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tocci G, Joly L, Michaelides A. Friction of water on graphene and hexagonal boron nitride from ab initio methods: very different slippage despite very similar interface structures. Nano Lett. 2014;14: 6872–6877. Available from: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nl502837d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Zhu J, Cao R, et al. Liquefaction of water on the surface of anisotropic two-dimensional atomic layered black phosphorus. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Yu Y, Ye GJ, et al Black phosphorus field-effect transistors. 2014;9: 372–377. Nat Nanotechnology.;:. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.35
   Google Scholar
• Du Y, Liu H, Deng Y, et al. Device perspective for black phosphorus field-effect transistors: contact resistance, ambipolar behavior, and scaling. ACS Nano. 2014;8:10035–10042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma M, Tocci G, Michaelides A, et al. Fast diffusion of water nanodroplets on graphene. Nat Mater. 2015;15:66–71. Available from: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nmat4449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ala-Nissila T, Ferrando R, Ying SC. Collective and single particle diffusion on surfaces. Adv Phys. 2002;51:949–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bampoulis P, Sotthewes K, Dollekamp E, et al Water confined in two-dimensions: fundamentals and applications. Surf Sci Rep. 2018;73:233–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Z, Giovambattista N, Sahin O. Phase diagram of water confined by graphene. Sci Rep. 2018;8:6228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapil V, Schran C, Zen A, et al. The first-principles phase diagram of monolayer nanoconfined water. Nature. 2022;609:512–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu M, Mi B. Enabling graphene oxide nanosheets as water separation membranes. Environ Sci Technol. Apr 2013;47:3715–3723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair RR, Blake P, Blake JR, et al. Graphene as a transparent conductive support for studying biological molecules by transmission electron microscopy. Appl Phys Lett. 2010;97:153102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traversi F, Raillon C, Benameur SM, et al. Detecting the translocation of DNA through a nanopore using graphene nanoribbons. 2013;8: 939–945. Nat Nanotechnology. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.240
   Google Scholar
• Cai X, Xie WJ, Yang Y , et al. Structure of water confined between two parallel graphene plates. J Chem Phys. 2019;150:12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calero C, Franzese G. Water under extreme confinement in graphene: oscillatory dynamics, structure, and hydration pressure explained as a function of the confinement width. J Mol Liq. 2020;317:8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao W, Wang J, Ma M. Water diffusion in wiggling graphene membranes. J Phys Chem Lett. 2019;10:7251––7258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao SP, Duan CH, Xu ZP. Structures and thermodynamics of water encapsulated by graphene. Sci Rep. 2017;7. 10.1038/s41598-017-02582-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kargar M, Lohrasebi A. Water flow modeling through a graphene-based nanochannel: theory and simulation. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2019;21:3304–3309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Korotkin IA, Karabasov SA. Rheology of water flows confined between multilayer graphene walls. Langmuir. 2020;36:5633–5646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulod M, Hwang G. Water self-diffusivity confined in graphene nanogap using molecular dynamics simulations. J Appl Phys. 2016;120:7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan JC, Xiao SB, Zhang ZL, et al. Nanoconfined water dynamics in multilayer graphene nanopores. J Phys Chem C. 2020 Aug;124:17819–17828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao Z, Xie WJ, Cai X, et al. Interlayer hopping dynamics of bilayer water confined between graphene sheets. Chem Phys Lett. 2019;722:153–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu M, Wei W, Liu X, et al. Structure and dynamic properties of stretched water in graphene nanochannels by molecular dynamics simulation: effects of stretching extent. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2019;21:19163–19171. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C9CP03981C
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Guo Y. Dynamics of water confined in a graphene nanochannel: dependence of friction on graphene chirality. Nanotechnology. 2020;31:235702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao M, Yang X, Yang X. Molecular dynamics simulation of water molecules in confined slit pores of graphene. Acta Phys-Chim Sin. 2015;31:1489–1498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbaspour M, Akbarzadeh H, Salemi S, et al. Structure, dynamics, and morphology of nanostructured water confined between parallel graphene surfaces and in carbon nanotubes by applying magnetic and electric fields. Soft Matter. 2021;17:3085–3095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao YZ, Huang DC, Su JY, et al. Coupled transport of water and ions through graphene nanochannels. J Phys Chem C. 2020 Aug;124:17320–17330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu ED, Wang PH, Hong YZ, et al. Frictional characteristics of nano-confined water mediated hole-doped single-layer graphene on silica surface. Nanotechnology. 2019;30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Liu B, Wu M, et al. Transport of salty water through graphene bilayer in an electric field: a molecular dynamics study. Comp Mater Sci. 2017;131:100–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Guo YJ, Diao DF. Structure and dynamics of water confined in a graphene nanochannel under gigapascal high pressure: dependence of friction on pressure and confinement. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017;19:14048–14054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahbabaei M, Kim D. Molecular dynamics simulation of water transport mechanisms through nanoporous boron nitride and graphene multilayers. J Phys Chem B. 2017;121:4137–4144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero-Aviles R, Orellana W. Energetics and diffusion of liquid water and hydrated ions through nanopores in graphene: ab initio molecular dynamics simulation. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017;19:20551–20558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan SH, Matei G, Patil S, et al. Dynamic solidification in nanoconfined water films. Phys Rev Lett. 2010 Aug;105:106101. Available from https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.106101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Ko JH, Choi JS, et al. Enhancement of friction by water intercalated between graphene and mica. J Phys Chem Lett. 2017;8:3482–3487. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Ko JH, Song HC, et al. Isotope- and thickness-dependent friction of water layers intercalated between graphene and mica. Tribology Letters. 2018;66.
   Google Scholar
• Arif T, Colas G, Filleter T. Effect of humidity and water intercalation on the tribological behavior of graphene and graphene oxide. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:22537–22544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seki R, Takamatsu H, Suzuki Y, et al. Hydrophobic-to-hydrophilic affinity change of sub-monolayer water molecules at water–graphene interfaces. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2021;628:127393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Guo X, Tang H, et al. Unidirectional self-driving liquid droplet transport on a monolayer graphene-covered textured substrate. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:28562–28570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulou E, Megaridis CM, Walther JH, et al. Ultrafast propulsion of water nanodroplets on patterned graphene. ACS Nano. 2019;13:5465–5472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Liu Z, Gao X, et al. Ultrafast self-propelled water droplet transport on a graphene-covered nanocone. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2021;54:505307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Zhang Z, Guo W. Mechanistic insight into electricity generation from moving ionic droplets on graphene. Sci China Mater. 2021;64: 2242–2250. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-020-1615-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin J, Li X, Yu J, et al. Generating electricity by moving a droplet of ionic liquid along graphene. Nat Nanotechnol. 2014;9:378–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurya M, Metya A, Singh J, et al. Effects of interfaces on structure and dynamics of water droplets on a graphene surface: a molecular dynamics study. J Chem Phys. 2021;154:12.
   Google Scholar
• Chen S, Cheng Y, Zhang G, et al. Anisotropic wetting characteristics of water droplets on phosphorene: roles of layer and defect engineering. J Phys Chem C. 2018;122:4622–4627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tortora L, Lavrentovich O. Chiral symmetry breaking by spatial confinement in tactoidal droplets of lyotropic chromonic liquid crystals. 2011; Proc Natl Acad. 108:5163–5168.
   Google Scholar
• Bée M. Quasielastic neutron scattering. Bristol: Adam Hilger; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo-Almazán I, Sacchi M, Tamtögl A, et al. Ballistic diffusion in polyaromatic hydrocarbons on graphite. J Phys Chem Lett. 2016;7:5285–5290. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamtögl A, Sacchi M, Calvo-Almazán I, et al. Ultrafast molecular transport on carbon surfaces: the diffusion of ammonia on graphite. Carbon. 2018;126:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.09.104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedek G, Toennies JP. Atomic scale dynamics at surfaces. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Jones A, Tamtögl A, Calvo-Almazán I, et al. Continuous compressed sensing for surface dynamical processes with helium atom scattering. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27776. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep27776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward DJ, Raghavan A, Tamtögl A, et al. Inter-adsorbate forces and coherent scattering in helium spin-echo experiments. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2021;23:7799–7805. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D0CP04539J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chudley CT, Elliott RJ. Neutron scattering from a liquid on a jump diffusion model. Proc Phys Soc. 1961;77:353.
   Google Scholar
• Miret-Artés S, Pollak E. The dynamics of activated surface diffusion. J Phys: Condens Matter. 2005;17: S4133–S4150. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/17/49/009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth J. Transport of adsorbates at metal surfaces: from thermal migration to hot precursors. Surf Sci Rep. 2000;40:75–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avidor N, Townsend P, Ward D, et al. PIGLE - Particles Interacting in Generalized Langevin Equation simulator. Comput Phys Commun. 2019;242:145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2019.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JH, Aluru NR. Ordering-induced fast diffusion of nanoscale water film on graphene. J Phys Chem C. 2010;114:2595–2599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perakis F, Amann-Winkel K, Lehmkühler F, et al. Diffusive dynamics during the high-to-low density transition in amorphous ice. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017; Available from: https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2017/06/23/1705303114
   Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Petrik NG, Smith RS, et al. Growth rate of crystalline ice and the diffusivity of supercooled water from 126 to 262 K. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113:14921–14925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho TA, Striolo A. Molecular dynamics simulation of the graphene–water interface: comparing water models. Mol Simul. 2014;40:1190–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandrowicz G, Jardine AP, Hedgeland H, et al. Onset of 3D collective surface diffusion in the presence of lateral interactions: Na/Cu(001). Phys Rev Lett. 2006;97:156103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stradner A, Sedgwick H, Cardinaux F, et al. Equilibrium cluster formation in concentrated protein solutions and colloids. Nature. 2004;432:492–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadhukhan M, Tkatchenko A. Long-range repulsion between spatially confined van der waals dimers. Phys Rev Lett. 2017;118:210402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhtar N, Anemone G, Farias D, et al. Fluorinated graphene provides long lasting ice inhibition in high humidity. Carbon. 2019;141:451–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ianconescu R, Pollak E. A study of kramers’ turnover theory in the presence of exponential memory friction. J Chem Phys. 2015;143:104104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittmeyer SP, Bukas VJ, Reuter K. Energy dissipation at metal surfaces. Adv Phys X. 2018 Jan;3:1381574. Available from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23746149.2017.1381574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamtögl A, Campi D, Bremholm M, et al. Nanoscale surface dynamics of Bi2Te3(111): observation of a prominent surface acoustic wave and the role of van der Waals interactions. Nanoscale. 2018;10:14627–14636. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8NR03102A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz D, Kisiel M, Gysin U, et al. Mechanical dissipation via image potential states on a topological insulator surface. Nat Mater. 2019;18:1201–1206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram C, Fang W, Pedevilla P, et al. Anomalously low barrier for water dimer diffusion on Cu(111). Nano Lett. 2019;19:3049–3056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthiesen J, Hansen JO, Wendt S, et al. Formation and diffusion of water dimers on rutile TiO2(110). Phys Rev Lett. 2009;102:226101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang W, Chen J, Pedevilla P, et al. Origins of fast diffusion of water dimers on surfaces. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang W, Meyer Auf der Heide KM, Zaum C, et al. Rapid water diffusion at cryogenic temperatures through an inchworm-like mechanism. Nano Lett. 2022;22:340–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie S, Bartelt NC, Thürmer K. Observation of surface self-diffusion on ice. Phys Rev Lett. 2009;102:136101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Si N, Shen T, Zhou D, et al. Imaging and dynamics of water hexamer confined in nanopores. ACS Nano. 2019;13:10622–10630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meisner J, Lamberts T, Kästner J. Atom tunneling in the water formation reaction H2 + OH → H2O + H on an ice surface. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2017;1: 399–410. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slocombe L, Sacchi M, Al-Khalili J. An open quantum systems approach to proton tunnelling in DNA. Communications Physics. 2022;5:109. 10.1038/s42005-022-00881-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang B, Li J, Guo H. High-fidelity potential energy surfaces for gas-phase and gas-surface scattering processes from machine learning. J Phys Chem Lett. 2020;11: 5120–5131. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrido Torres JA, Jennings PC, Hansen MH, et al. Low-scaling algorithm for nudged elastic band calculations using a surrogate machine learning model. Phys Rev Lett. 2019;122:156001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartók AP, De S, Poelking C, et al. Machine learning unifies the modeling of materials and molecules. Sci Adv. 2017;3:e1701816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar