Matrix mechanophysical factor: pore size governs the cell behavior in cancer

References

• Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021;71:209–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charras G, Sahai E. Physical influences of the extracellular environment on cell migration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014Dec; 15: 813–824 PubMed PMID: 25355506; eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei J-H, Haddad A, K-J W, et al. A CpG-methylation-based assay to predict survival in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Nature Communications. 2015;6:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger B, KMJCSHpib Y. Molecular architecture and function of matrix adhesions. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2011;3:a005033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhmanova M, Osidak E, Domogatsky S, et al. Physical, spatial, and molecular aspects of extracellular matrix of in vivo niches and artificial scaffolds relevant to stem cells research. Stem Cells Int. 2015;2015:167025. PubMed PMID: 26351461; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiselt P, Yeh J, Latvala RK, et al. Porous carriers for biomedical applications based on alginate hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2000;21:1921–1927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh QL, Choong C. Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2013;19:485–502. PubMed PMID: 23672709; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salerno A, Di Maio E, Iannace S, et al. Tailoring the pore structure of PCL scaffolds for tissue engineering prepared via gas foaming of multi-phase blends. Journal of Porous Materials. 2012;19:181–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien FJ, Harley BA, Waller MA, et al. The effect of pore size on permeability and cell attachment in collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering. Technology and Health Care: Official Journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine. 2007;15:3–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frantz C, Stewart KM, Weaver VM. The extracellular matrix at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:4195–4200. PubMed PMID: 21123617; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henke E, Nandigama R, Ergun S. Extracellular matrix in the tumor microenvironment and its impact on cancer therapy. Front Mol Biosci. 2019;6:160. PubMed PMID: 32118030; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7025524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu P, Takai K, Weaver VM, et al. Extracellular matrix degradation and remodeling in development and disease. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2011;3:a005058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mecham RP. Overview of extracellular matrix. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2012 Dec; 57 Chapter 10:Unit 10 1. 10.1002/0471143030.cb1001s57. PubMed PMID: 23208544.
   Google Scholar
• Trappmann B, Chen CS. How cells sense extracellular matrix stiffness: a material’s perspective. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013;24:948–953. PubMed PMID: 23611564; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie RJ, Harlin HM, Korsak LIT, et al. Activating the nuclear piston mechanism of 3D migration in tumor cells. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2017;216:93–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimarães CF, Gasperini L, Marques AP, et al. The stiffness of living tissues and its implications for tissue engineering. Nat Rev Mater. 2020;5:351–370. 2020 May 01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gospodarowicz D, Greenburg G, Birdwell CR. Determination of cellular shape by the extracellular matrix and its correlation with the control of cellular growth. Cancer Res. 1978 Nov;38:4155–4171. PubMed PMID: 359133; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caswell PT, TJTicb Z. Actin-based cell protrusion in a 3D matrix. Trends in Cell Biology. 2018;28:823–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliviero O, Ventre M, PJAb N. Functional porous hydrogels to study angiogenesis under the effect of controlled release of vascular endothelial growth factor. Acta biomaterialia. 2012;8:3294–3301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez RA, Gjms M, E C. Role of pore size and morphology in musculo-skeletal tissue regeneration. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 2016;61:922–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artel A, Mehdizadeh H, Chiu Y-C, et al. An agent-based model for the investigation of neovascularization within porous scaffolds. Tissue Engineering. Part A. 2011;17:2133–2141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma T, Li Y, Yang ST, et al. Effects of pore size in 3‐D fibrous matrix on human trophoblast tissue development. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2000;70:606–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin Y, X-T H, Wang J, et al. Pore size-mediated macrophage M1-to-M2 transition influences new vessel formation within the compartment of a scaffold. Applied Materialstoday. 2020;18:100466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada KM, Sixt M. Mechanisms of 3D cell migration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019 2019 Dec 01;20:738–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatau SB, Bloom RJ, Bajpai S, et al. The distinct roles of the nucleus and nucleus-cytoskeleton connections in three-dimensional cell migration. Sci Rep. 2012;2:488. PubMed PMID: 22761994; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3388469. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renkawitz J, Kopf A, Stopp J, et al. Nuclear positioning facilitates amoeboid migration along the path of least resistance. Nature. 2019 Apr;568:546–550. PubMed PMID: 30944468; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7217284. eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang YL, Leone LM, Kaufman LJ. Elastic moduli of collagen gels can be predicted from two-dimensional confocal microscopy. Biophys J. 2009 Oct 7;97:2051–2060. PubMed PMID: 19804737; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2756380. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift J, Ivanovska IL, Buxboim A, et al. Nuclear lamin-A scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation. Science (New York, NY). 2013 Aug 30;341:1240104. PubMed PMID: 23990565; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3976548. eng.
   Google Scholar
• Harada T, Swift J, Irianto J, et al. Nuclear lamin stiffness is a barrier to 3D migration, but softness can limit survival. J Cell Biol. 2014 Mar 3;204:669–682. PubMed PMID: 24567359; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3941057. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irianto J, Pfeifer CR, Bennett RR, et al. Nuclear constriction segregates mobile nuclear proteins away from chromatin. Mol Biol Cell. 2016 Dec 15;27:4011–4020. PubMed PMID: 27798234; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5156542. eng.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolf K, Te Lindert M, Krause M, et al. Physical limits of cell migration: control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force. J Cell Biol. 2013 Jun 24;201:1069–1084. PubMed PMID: 23798731; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3691458. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisdom KM, Adebowale K, Chang J, et al. Matrix mechanical plasticity regulates cancer cell migration through confining microenvironments. Nat Commun. 2018 Oct 8;9:4144. PubMed PMID: 30297715; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6175826. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Z, Kotaki M, Inai R, et al. Potential of nanofiber matrix as tissue-engineering scaffolds. Tissue Engineering. 2005;11:101–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guarino V, Ambrosio L. Electrofluidodynamics: exploring a new toolbox to design biomaterials for tissue regeneration and degeneration. Future Med. 2016; 11(12). doi:10.2217/nnm-2016-0108 .
   Google Scholar
• Guarino V, ME AL, Part H. Journal of Engineering in Medicine. Temperature-driven processing techniques for manufacturing fully interconnected porous scaffolds in bone tissue engineering. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 2010;224:1389–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Pxjb M. Phase separation, pore structure, and properties of nanofibrous gelatin scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2009;30:4094–4103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granados‐Hernández MV, Serrano‐Bello J, Montesinos JJ, et al. In vitro and in vivo biological characterization of poly (lactic acid) fiber scaffolds synthesized by air jet spinning. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B, Applied Biomaterials. 2018;106:2435–2446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou Q, Grijpma DW, Feijen JJB. Porous polymeric structures for tissue engineering prepared by a coagulation, compression moulding and salt leaching technique. Biomaterials. 2003;24:1937–1947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon JJ, Song SH, Lee DS, et al. Immobilization of cell adhesive RGD peptide onto the surface of highly porous biodegradable polymer scaffolds fabricated by a gas foaming/salt leaching method. Biomaterials. 2004;25:5613–5620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TK, Yoon JJ, Lee DS, et al. Gas foamed open porous biodegradable polymeric microspheres. Biomaterials. 2006;27:152–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seck TM, Melchels FP, Feijen J, et al. Designed biodegradable hydrogel structures prepared by stereolithography using poly (ethylene glycol)/poly. Journal of Controlled Release: Official Journal of the Controlled Release Society. 2010 D, L-lactide)-based resins;148:34–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elomaa L, Teixeira S, Hakala R, et al. Preparation of poly (ε-caprolactone)-based tissue engineering scaffolds by stereolithography. Acta biomaterialia. 2011;7:3850–3856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan M, Tian X, Peng G, et al. Hierarchically porous materials prepared by selective laser sintering. Materials & Design. 2017;135:62–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong Z, Yan Y, Zhang R, et al. Fabrication of porous poly (L-lactic acid) scaffolds for bone tissue engineering via precise extrusion. Scripta Materialia. 2001;45:773–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soo Kim B, Ji Kim E, Suk Choi J, et al. Human collagen‐based multilayer scaffolds for tendon‐to‐bone interface tissue engineering. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A. 2014;102:4044–4054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultana N, Wang M. Fabrication of HA/PHBV composite scaffolds through the emulsion freezing/freeze-drying process and characterisation of the scaffolds. Journal of Materials Science. Materials in Medicine. 2008;19:2555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu Y-C, Larson JC, Isom JA, et al. Generation of porous poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels by salt leaching. Tissue Engineering. Part C, Methods. 2010;16:905–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Nardo L, Bertoldi S, Cigada A, et al. Preparation and characterization of shape memory polymer scaffolds via solvent casting/particulate leaching. Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials. 2012;10:119–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intranuovo F, Gristina R, Brun F, et al. Plasma modification of PCL porous scaffolds fabricated by solvent‐casting/particulate‐leaching for tissue engineering. Plasma Processes and Polymers. 2014;11:184–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu Z, Fu J, Lin H, et al. Development of 3D bioprinting: from printing methods to biomedical applications. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2020;15:529–557. 2020 Sep 01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickel W, Münster S, Jawerth LM, et al. Robust pore size analysis of filamentous networks from three-dimensional confocal microscopy. Biophys J. 2008 Dec 15;95:6072–6080. PubMed PMID: 18835899; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2599830. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raub CB, Unruh J, Suresh V, et al. Image correlation spectroscopy of multiphoton images correlates with collagen mechanical properties. Biophys J. 2008 Mar 15;94:2361–2373. PubMed PMID: 18065452; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2257909. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang YL, Motte S, Kaufman LJ. Pore size variable type I collagen gels and their interaction with glioma cells. Biomaterials. 2010Jul; 31: 5678–5688 PubMed PMID: 20430434; eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanes-Cuevas OA, Perez-Soria A, Cruz-Maya I, et al. Macro-, micro-and mesoporous materials for tissue engineering applications. AIMS Materials Science. 2018;5:1124–1140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden LR, Mortisen DJ, Sussman EM, et al. Proangiogenic scaffolds as functional templates for cardiac tissue engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:15211–15216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy CM, O’Brien FJ. O”Brien FJJCa, migration. Understanding the effect of mean pore size on cell activity in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Cell Adhesion & Migration. 2010;4:377–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal BB, Scjb K. Osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow cells on non-mulberry and mulberry silk gland fibroin 3D scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2009;30:5019–5030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rnjak-Kovacina J, Wise SG, Li Z, et al. Tailoring the porosity and pore size of electrospun synthetic human elastin scaffolds for dermal tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2011;32:6729–6736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffon DJ, Sedighi MR, Schaeffer DV, et al. Chitosan scaffolds: interconnective pore size and cartilage engineering. Acta biomaterialia. 2006;2:313–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uematsu K, Hattori K, Ishimoto Y, et al. Cartilage regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells and a three-dimensional poly-lactic-glycolic acid (PLGA) scaffold. Biomaterials. 2005;26:4273–4279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Pei H, Zhang L, et al. Hepatogenesis of adipose-derived stem cells on poly-lactide-co-glycolide scaffolds: in vitro and in vivo studies. Tissue Engineering. Part C, Methods. 2010;16:1041–1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasten P, Beyen I, Niemeyer P, et al. Porosity and pore size of β-tricalcium phosphate scaffold can influence protein production and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells: an in vitro and in vivo study. Acta Biomaterialia. 2008;4:1904–1915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuboki Y, Jin Q, Takita HJJ. Geometry of carriers controlling phenotypic expression in BMP-induced osteogenesis and chondrogenesis. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume. 2001;83:S105–S115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takahashi Y, BS TY, Edition P. Effect of the fiber diameter and porosity of non-woven PET fabrics on the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Journal of Biomaterials Science. Polymer Edition. 2004;15:41–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yannas I, Lee E, Orgill DP, et al. Synthesis and characterization of a model extracellular matrix that induces partial regeneration of adult mammalian skin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1989;86:933–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho S-W, Kim I-K, Lim SH, et al. Smooth muscle-like tissues engineered with bone marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials. 2004;25:2979–2986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy CM, Haugh MG, O’Brien FJ. The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen–glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2010 2010 Jan 01;31:461–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conde CM, Demarco FF, Casagrande L, et al. Influence of poly-L-lactic acid scaffold’s pore size on the proliferation and differentiation of dental pulp stem cells. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2015;26:93–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geiger F, Rüdiger D, Zahler S, et al. Fiber stiffness, pore size and adhesion control migratory phenotype of MDA-MB-231 cells in collagen gels. PloS one. 2019;14:e0225215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleivaitė V, RJArj M. Electrospinning-100 years of investigations and still open questions of web structure estimination. AUTEX Research Journal. 2018;18:398–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anton F. Process and apparatus for preparing artificial threads. Google Patents; 1934.
   Google Scholar
• Li D, YJAm X. Electrospinning of nanofibers: reinventing the wheel?. Advanced Materials. 2004;16:1151–1170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang D, Hsiao BS, BJAddr C. Functional electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for biomedical applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2007;59:1392–1412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet DR, Forsythe JS, Shen W, et al. A review of the cellular response on electrospun nanofibers for tissue engineering. Journal of Biomaterials Applications. 2009;24:7–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal S, Wendorff JH, Greiner AJP. Use of electrospinning technique for biomedical applications. Polymer. 2008;49:5603–5621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IJCm Y. Tissue regeneration by use of collagen-glycosaminoglycan copolymers. Clinical Materials. 1992;9:179–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Girard YK, Wang C, Ravi S, et al. A 3D fibrous scaffold inducing tumoroids: a platform for anticancer drug development. PloS one. 2013;8:e75345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foroni L, Vasuri F, Valente S, et al. The role of 3D microenvironmental organization in MCF-7 epithelial–mesenchymal transition after 7 culture days. Exp Cell Res. 2013;319:1515–1522. 2013 Jun 10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vashisth P, Sharma M, Nikhil K, et al. Antiproliferative activity of ferulic acid-encapsulated electrospun PLGA/PEO nanofibers against MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cells. 3 Biotech. 2015;5:303–315. 2015 Jun 01.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sahoo SK, Panda AK, Labhasetwar V. Characterization of porous PLGA/PLA microparticles as a scaffold for three dimensional growth of breast cancer cells. Biomacromolecules. 2005 2005 Mar 01;6:1132–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Qian J, Liu T, et al. Electrospun PBLG/PLA nanofiber membrane for constructing in vitro 3D model of melanoma. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;76:313–318. 2017 Jul 01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo V, Tammaro L, Di Marcantonio L, et al. Amniotic epithelial stem cell biocompatibility for electrospun poly (lactide-co-glycolide), poly (ε-caprolactone), poly (lactic acid) scaffolds. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 2016;69:321–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almajhdi FN, Fouad H, Khalil KA, et al. In-vitro anticancer and antimicrobial activities of PLGA/silver nanofiber composites prepared by electrospinning. J Mater Sci. 2014;25:1045–1053. 2014 Apr 01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aboutalebi Anaraki N, Roshanfekr Rad L, Irani M, et al. Fabrication of PLA/PEG/MWCNT electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for anticancer drug delivery. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2015;132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampath M, Lakra R, Korrapati P, et al. Curcumin loaded poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid nanofiber for the treatment of carcinoma. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2014;117:128–134. 2014 May 01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye C, Zhao J, Zheng Y, et al. Preparation of poly (lactic‐co‐glycolic acid)‐based composite microfibers for postoperative treatment of tumor in NIR I and NIR II biowindows. Macromolecular Biosciences. 2018;18:1800206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto E, Mojares E, Cortez J, et al. Electrospun nanofiber scaffolds for the propagation and analysis of breast cancer stem cells in vitro. Biomedical Materials (Bristol, England). 2021;16:035004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabionet M, Yeste M, Puig T, et al. Electrospinning PCL scaffolds manufacture for three-dimensional breast cancer cell culture. Polymers. 2017;9:328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha S, Duan X, Wu L, et al. Electrospun fibrous scaffolds promote breast cancer cell alignment and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Langmuir. 2012;28:2028–2034. PubMed PMID: 22182057; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obayemi JD, Danyuo Y, Dozie-Nwachukwu S, et al. PLGA-based microparticles loaded with bacterial-synthesized prodigiosin for anticancer drug release: effects of particle size on drug release kinetics and cell viability. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;66:51–65. 2016 Sep 01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusu SM, Obayemi JD, Salifu AA, et al. Drug-encapsulated blend of PLGA-PEG microspheres: in vitro and in vivo study of the effects of localized/targeted drug delivery on the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2020;10:14188. PubMed PMID: 32843673; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim T-E, Kim CG, Kim JS, et al. Three-dimensional culture and interaction of cancer cells and dendritic cells in an electrospun nano-submicron hybrid fibrous scaffold. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2016;11:823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie X, Zheng X, Han Z, et al. A biodegradable stent with surface functionalization of combined‐therapy drugs for colorectal cancer. Advanced Healthcare Materials . 2018;7:1801213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domura R, Sasaki R, Okamoto M, et al. Comprehensive study on cellular morphologies, proliferation, motility, and epithelial–mesenchymal transition of breast cancer cells incubated on electrospun polymeric fiber substrates. Journal of Materials Chemistry. B. 2017;5:2588–2600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Permlid AM, Roci P, Fredlund E, et al. Unique animal friendly 3D culturing of human cancer and normal cells. Toxicology in Vitro . 2019;60:51–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonbol HS. Extracellular matrix remodeling in human disease. J Microsc Ultrastruct. 2018Jul-Sep; 6: 123–128 PubMed PMID: 30221137; eng
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belgodere JA, King CT, Bursavich JB, et al. Engineering breast cancer microenvironments and 3D bioprinting [Review]. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2018; 6: English 2018 May 24 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubashkin MG, Ou G, Vmjb W. Deconstructing signaling in three dimensions. Biochemistry. 2014;53:2078–2090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caswell PT, Zech T. Actin-based cell protrusion in a 3D matrix. Trends Cell Biol. 2018Oct; 28: 823–834 PubMed PMID: 29970282; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6158345. eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruprecht V, Monzo P, Ravasio A, et al. How cells respond to environmental cues - insights from bio-functionalized substrates. J Cell Sci. 2017 Jan 1;130:51–61. PubMed PMID: 27856508; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirt C, Papadimitropoulos A, Muraro MG, et al. Bioreactor-engineered cancer tissue-like structures mimic phenotypes, gene expression profiles and drug resistance patterns observed “in vivo”. Biomaterials. 2015 Sep;62:138–146. PubMed PMID: 26051518; eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micalet A, Moeendarbary E, Ujabs C, et al. 3D in vitro models for investigating the role of stiffness in cancer invasion. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. 2021. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeger A, Krause M, Wolf K, et al. Cell jamming: collective invasion of mesenchymal tumor cells imposed by tissue confinement. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2014;1840:2386–2395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qazi TH, Mooney DJ, Duda GN, et al. Biomaterials that promote cell-cell interactions enhance the paracrine function of MSCs. Biomaterials. 2017;140:103–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyden S. THE CHEMOTACTIC EFFECT OF MIXTURES OF ANTIBODY AND ANTIGEN ON POLYMORPHONUCLEAR LEUCOCYTES. J Exp Med. 1962;115:453–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinman HK, McGarvey ML, Liotta LA, et al. Isolation and characterization of type IV procollagen, laminin, and heparan sulfate proteoglycan from the EHS sarcoma. Biochemistry. 1982;21:6188–6193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barcellos-Hoff M, Aggeler J, Ram T, et al. Functional differentiation and alveolar morphogenesis of primary mammary cultures on reconstituted basement membrane. Development (Cambridge, England). 1989;105:223–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Berre M, Aubertin J, Piel M. Fine control of nuclear confinement identifies a threshold deformation leading to lamina rupture and induction of specific genes. Integr Biol. 2012;4:1406–1414.
   Google Scholar
• Liu YJ, Le Berre M, Lautenschlaeger F, et al. Confinement and low adhesion induce fast amoeboid migration of slow mesenchymal cells. Cell. 2015 Feb 12;160:659–672. PubMed PMID: 25679760; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson PM, Denais C, Bakshi MC, et al. Nuclear deformability constitutes a rate-limiting step during cell migration in 3-D environments. Cell Mol Bioeng. 2014 Sep 1;7:293–306. PubMed PMID: 25436017; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4243304. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holle AW, Govindan Kutty Devi N, Clar K, et al. Cancer cells invade confined microchannels via a self-directed mesenchymal-to-amoeboid transition. Nano Lett. 2019; 19, 2280–2290. 2019 Apr PubMed PMID: 30775927; eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath B, Raza A, Sethi V, et al. Understanding flow dynamics, viability and metastatic potency of cervical cancer (HeLa) cells through constricted microchannel. Sci Rep. 2018;8:17357. 2018 Nov 26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf K, Alexander S, Schacht V, et al. Collagen-based cell migration models in vitro and in vivo. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2009;20:931–941. 2009 Oct 01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian W, Zhang Y, Chen W. Capturing cancer: emerging microfluidic technologies for the capture and characterization of circulating tumor cells. Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany). 2015;11:3850–3872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen MB, Whisler JA, Fröse J, et al. On-chip human microvasculature assay for visualization and quantification of tumor cell extravasation dynamics. Nat Protoc. 2017 May;12:865–880. PubMed PMID: 28358393; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5509465. eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlin MF, Kamm RD. The use of microfluidic platforms to probe the mechanism of cancer cell extravasation Advanced Healthcare Materials . 2020;9:1901410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naderi S, Khayat Zadeh J, Mahdavi Shahri N, et al. Three-dimensional scaffold from decellularized human gingiva for cell cultures: glycoconjugates and cell behavior. Cell J. 2013; Summer 15: 166–175. PubMed PMID: 23862119; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3712778. eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiva MC, Garre E, Gustafsson A, et al. Breast cancer patient-derived scaffolds as a tool to monitor chemotherapy responses in human tumor microenvironments. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2021;236:4709–4724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijal G, Li W. A versatile 3D tissue matrix scaffold system for tumor modeling and drug screening. Sci Adv. 2017Sep; 3: e1700764 PubMed PMID: 28924608; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5597314. eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrmann RL, Gey GO. The growth of cells on a transparent gel of reconstituted rat-tail collagen2. Jnci. 1956;16:1375–1403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raub CB, Unruh J, Suresh V, et al. Image correlation spectroscopy of multiphoton images correlates with collagen mechanical properties. Biophys J. 2008;94:2361–2373. 2008 Mar 15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raub CB, Suresh V, Krasieva T, et al. Noninvasive assessment of collagen gel microstructure and mechanics using multiphoton microscopy. Biophys J. 2007;92:2212–2222. 2007 Mar 15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobeaux F, Mosser G, Anglo A, et al. Fibrillogenesis in dense collagen solutions: a physicochemical study. J Mol Biol. 2008;376:1509–1522. 2008 Mar 07.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinner S, Sahai E. Imaging amoeboid cancer cell motility in vivo. J Microsc. 2008Sep; 231: 441–445 PubMed PMID: 18754999; eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laronda M, Rutz A, Xiao S, et al. A bioprosthetic ovary created using 3D printed microporous scaffolds restores ovarian function in sterilized mice. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis DM, Tang V, Jain N, et al. Collagen fiber architecture regulates hypoxic sarcoma cell migration. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. 2018;4:400–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar