Topological data analysis and machine learning

References

• Hasan MZ, Kane CL. Colloquium: topological insulators. Rev Mod Phys. 2010;82:3045. DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozawa T, Price HM, Amo A, et al. Topological photonics. Rev Mod Phys. 2019;91:015006. DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.91.015006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma G, Xiao M, Chan TC. Topological phases in acoustic and mechanical systems. Nat Rev Phys. 2019;1:281. DOI:10.1038/s42254-019-0030-x
   Google Scholar
• Kim M, Jacob Z, Rho J. Recent advances in 2D, 3D and higher-order topological photonics. Light: Sci & Appl. 2020;9:130. DOI:10.1038/s41377-020-0331-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Klitzing K, Chakraborty T, Kim P, et al. 40 years of the quantum Hall effect. Nat Rev Phys. 2020;2:397. DOI:10.1038/s42254-020-0209-1
   Google Scholar
• Carleo G, Cirac I, Cranmer K, et al. Machine learning and the physical sciences. Rev Mod Phys. 2019;91:045002. DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.91.045002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta P, Bukov M, Wang C-H, et al. A high-bias, low-variance introduction to machine learning for physicists. Phys Rep. 2019;810:1. DOI:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasquilla J. Machine learning for quantum matter. Adv Phys: X. 2020;5:1797528. DOI:10.1080/23746149.2020.1797528
   Google Scholar
• Yun J, Kim S, So S, et al. Deep learning for topological photonics. Adv Phys: X. 2022;7:2046156. DOI:10.1080/23746149.2022.2046156
   Google Scholar
• Dawid A, Arnold J, Requena B, et al. Modern applications of machine learning in quantum sciences. arXiv:2204.04198. 2022. DOI:10.48550/ARXIV.2204.04198
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson G. Topological methods for data modelling. Nat Rev Phys. 2020;2:697. DOI:10.1038/s42254-020-00249-3
   Google Scholar
• Murugan J, Robertson D. An introduction to topological data analysis for physicists: from LGM to FRBs. arXiv:1904.11044. 2019. DOI:10.48550/ARXIV.1904.11044
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson G. Topology and data. Bull Amer Math Soc. 2009;46:255. DOI:10.1090/S0273-0979-09-01249-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman L. Topological data analysis. Annu Rev Stat Appl. 2018;5:501. DOI:10.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-100045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensel F, Moor M, Rieck B. A survey of topological machine learning methods. Front Artif Intell. 2021;4:681108. DOI:10.3389/frai.2021.681108
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hausmann J-C. On the Vietoris-Rips complexes and a cohomology theory for metric spaces. Ann Math Stud. 1995;138:175.
   Google Scholar
• Robins V. Towards computing homology from finite approximations. Topology Proc. 1999;24:503.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen-Steiner D, Edelsbrunner H, Harer J. Stability of persistence diagrams. Discrete Comput Geom. 2007;37:103. DOI:10.1007/s00454-006-1276-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chintakunta H, Gentimis T, Gonzalez-Diaz R, et al. An entropy-based persistence barcode. Pattern Recognition. 2015;48:391. DOI:10.1016/j.patcog.2014.06.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucco M, Castiglione F, Merelli E, et al., Characterisation of the idiotypic immune network through persistent entropy, in Proceedings of ECCS 2014, editors Battiston S, Pellegrini FD, Caldarelli G, and Merelli E (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016) pp. 117–24.
   Google Scholar
• Atienza N, Gonzalez-Díaz R, Soriano-Trigueros M. On the stability of persistent entropy and new summary functions for topological data analysis. Pattern Recognition. 2020;107:107509. DOI:10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bubenik P. Statistical topological data analysis using persistence landscapes. J Mach Learn Res. 2015;16:77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bubenik P, Dłotko P. A persistence landscapes toolbox for topological statistics. J Symb Comput. 2017;78:91. DOI:10.1016/j.jsc.2016.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maria C, Boissonnat J-D, Glisse M, et al. The gudhi library: simplicial complexes and persistent homology. In: Hong H Yap C, editors. Mathematical Software – ICMS 2014. Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014. pp. 167–174.
   Google Scholar
• Tralie C, Saul N, Bar-On R. Ripser.Py: a lean persistent homology library for python. J Open Source Software. 2018;3:925. DOI:10.21105/joss.00925
   Google Scholar
• Tauzin G, Lupo U, Tunstall L, et al. Giotto-tda: a topological data analysis toolkit for machine learning and data exploration. J Mach Learn Res. 2021;22:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer U. Ripser: efficient computation of Vietoris–Rips persistence barcodes. J Appl Comput. 2021;5:391. DOI:10.1007/s41468-021-00071-5
   Google Scholar
• Otter N, Porter MA, Tillmann U, et al. A roadmap for the computation of persistent homology. EPJ Data Sci. 2017;6:17. DOI:10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0109-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendich P, Edelsbrunner H, Kerber M. Computing robustness and persistence for images. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2010;16:1251. DOI:10.1109/TVCG.2010.139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins V, Wood PJ, Sheppard AP. Theory and algorithms for constructing discrete Morse complexes from grayscale digital images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2011;33:1646. DOI:10.1109/TPAMI.2011.95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh G, Memoli F, Carlsson G. Topological methods for the analysis of high dimensional data sets and 3D object recognition. In: Botsch M, Pajarola R, Chen B, and Zwicker M, editors. Eurographics symposium on point-based graphics. The Eurographics Association; 2007:91. DOI:10.2312/SPBG/SPBG07/091-100
   Google Scholar
• Yao Y, Sun J, Huang X, et al. Topological methods for exploring low-density states in biomolecular folding pathways. J Chem Phys. 2009;130:144115. DOI:10.1063/1.3103496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolz BJ, Tanner J, Harrington HA, et al. Geometric anomaly detection in data. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2020;117:19664. DOI:10.1073/pnas.2001741117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson G, de Silva V. Zigzag persistence, foundations of computational mathematics. Found Comut Math. 2010;10:367. DOI:10.1007/s10208-010-9066-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson G, Zomorodian A. The theory of multidimensional persistence. Discrete Comput Geom. 2009;42. DOI:10.1007/s00454-009-9176-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins V, Rooney N, Bradley E. Topology-based signal separation. Chaos Inter J Nonlinear Sci. 2004;14:305. DOI:10.1063/1.1705852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins V. Betti number signatures of homogeneous Poisson point processes. Phys Rev E. 2006;74:061107. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.74.061107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horak D, Maletić S, Rajković M. Persistent homology of complex networks. J Stat Mech Theory Exp. 2009:P03034. DOI:10.1088/1742-5468/2009/03/p03034
   Google Scholar
• Krishan K, Kurtuldu H, Schatz MF, et al. Homology and symmetry breaking in Rayleigh-Bénard convection: experiments and simulations. Phys Fluids. 2007;19:117105. DOI:10.1063/1.2800365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtuldu H, Mischaikow K, Schatz MF. Extensive scaling from computational homology and Karhunen-Loève decomposition analysis of Rayleigh-Bénard convection experiments. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;107:034503. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.034503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocks JW, Liu AJ, Katifori E. Hidden topological structure of flow network functionality. Phys Rev Lett. 2021;126:028102. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.028102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocks JW, Liu AJ, Katifori E. Revealing structure-function relationships in functional flow networks via persistent homology. Phys Rev Res. 2020;2:033234. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033234
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura T, Hiraoka Y, Hirata A, et al. Persistent homology and many-body atomic structure for medium-range order in the glass. Nanotechnology. 2015;26:304001. DOI:10.1088/0957-4484/26/30/304001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiraoka Y, Nakamura T, Hirata A, et al. Hierarchical structures of amorphous solids characterized by persistent homology. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2016;113:7035. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1520877113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong S, Kim D. Medium-range order in amorphous ices revealed by persistent homology. J Phys Cond Mat. 2019;31:455403. DOI:10.1088/1361-648x/ab3820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardanza-Trevijano S, Zuriguel I, Arévalo R, et al. Topological analysis of tapped granular media using persistent homology. Phys Rev E. 2014;89:052212. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.89.052212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saadatfar M, Takeuchi H, Robins V, et al. Pore configuration landscape of granular crystallization. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15082, DOI:10.1038/ncomms15082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsthoorn B, Hellsvik J, Balatsky AV. Finding hidden order in spin models with persistent homology. Phys Rev Res. 2020;2:043308. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043308
   Google Scholar
• Sehayek D, Melko RG. Persistent homology of Z2 gauge theories. Phys Rev B. 2022;106:085111. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.085111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormrod Morley D, Salmon PS, Wilson M. Persistent homology in two-dimensional atomic networks. J Chem Phys. 2021;154:124109. DOI:10.1063/5.0040393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muldoon M, MacKay R, Huke J, et al. Topology from time series. Phys D. 1993;65:1–16. DOI:10.1016/0167-2789(92)00026-U
   Google Scholar
• Maletić S, Zhao Y, Rajković M. Persistent topological features of dynamical systems. Chaos Inter J Nonlinear Sci. 2016;26:053105. DOI:10.1063/1.4949472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal K, Gupta S. Topological characterization and early detection of bifurcations and chaos in complex systems using persistent homology. Chaos Inter J Nonlinear Sci. 2017;27:051102. DOI:10.1063/1.4983840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran QH, Hasegawa Y. Topological time-series analysis with delay-variant embedding. Phys Rev E. 2019;99:032209. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.99.032209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tempelman JR, Khasawneh FA. A look into chaos detection through topological data analysis. Phys D. 2020;406:132446. DOI:10.1016/j.physd.2020.132446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarenko N, Karimova L, Novak M. Investigation of global solar magnetic field by computational topology methods. Phys A. 2007;380:98. DOI:10.1016/j.physa.2007.02.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondic L, Goullet A, O’Hern CS et al. Topology of force networks in compressed granular media. EPL (Europhysics Letters). 2012;97:54001. DOI:10.1209/0295-5075/97/54001
   Google Scholar
• Pugnaloni LA, Carlevaro CM, Kramár M, et al. Structure of force networks in tapped particulate systems of disks and pentagons. I. clusters and loops. Phys Rev E. 2016;93:062902. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.93.062902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole A, Shiu G. Persistent homology and non-Gaussianity. J Cosmol Astropart Phys. 2018;025:025. DOI:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/025
   Google Scholar
• Leykam D, Angelakis DG. Photonic band structure design using persistent homology. APL Photonics. 2021;6:030802. DOI:10.1063/5.0041084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitz D, Berges J, Oberthaler M, et al. Finding self-similar behavior in quantum many-body dynamics via persistent homology. SciPost Phys. 2021;11:60. DOI:10.21468/SciPostPhys.11.3.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leykam D, Rondón I, Angelakis DG. Dark soliton detection using persistent homology. Chaos Inter J Nonlinear Sci. 2022;32:073133. DOI:10.1063/5.0097053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole A, Loges GJ, Shiu G. Quantitative and interpretable order parameters for phase transitions from persistent homology. Phys Rev B. 2021;104:104426. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.104426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sale N, Giansiracusa J, Lucini B. Quantitative analysis of phase transitions in two-dimensional XY models using persistent homology. Phys Rev E. 2022;105:024121. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.105.024121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Membrillo Solis I, Orlova T, Bednarska K, et al. Tracking the time evolution of soft matter systems via topological structural heterogeneity. Commun Mater. 2022;3:1. DOI:10.1038/s43246-021-00223-1
   Google Scholar
• He Y, Xia S, Angelakis DG, et al. Persistent homology analysis of a generalized Aubry-André-Harper model. Phys Rev B. 2022;106:054210. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.054210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki A, Miyazawa M, Minto JM, et al. Flow estimation solely from image data through persistent homology analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11:17948. DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-97222-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirafici M. Persistent homology and string vacua. J High Energy Phys. 2016;2016:45. DOI:10.1007/JHEP03(2016)045
   Google Scholar
• Cole A, Shiu G. Topological data analysis for the string landscape. J High Energy Phys. 2019;2019:54. DOI:10.1007/JHEP03(2019)054
   Google Scholar
• Hirakida T, Kashiwa K, Sugano J, et al. Persistent homology analysis of deconfinement transition in effective Polyakov-line model. Int J Mod Physics A. 2020;35:2050049. DOI:10.1142/S0217751X20500499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• di Pierro A, Mancini S, Memarzadeh L, et al. Homological analysis of multi-qubit entanglement. EPL (Europhysics Letters). 2018;123:30006. DOI:10.1209/0295-5075/123/30006
   Google Scholar
• Mengoni R, Di Pierro A, Memarzadeh L, et al. Persistent homology analysis of multiqubit entanglement. Quantum Inf Computation. 2020;20:375. DOI:10.26421/QIC20.5-6-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsthoorn B. Persistent homology of quantum entanglement. Phys Rev B. 2021;107:115174. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.115174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran QH, Chen M, Hasegawa Y. Topological persistence machine of phase transitions. Phys Rev E. 2021;103:052127. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.103.052127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donato I, Gori M, Pettini M, et al. Persistent homology analysis of phase transitions. Phys Rev E. 2016;93:052138. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.93.052138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, Hwang Y, Yang B-J. Unsupervised learning of topological phase diagram using topological data analysis. Phys Rev B. 2022;105:195115. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.195115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirelli A, Costa NC. Learning quantum phase transitions through topological data analysis. Phys Rev B. 2021;104:235146. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.235146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirelli A, Carvalho DO, Oliveira LA, et al. Unsupervised machine learning approaches to the q-state Potts model. Eur Phys J B. 2022;95:189. DOI:10.1140/epjb/s10051-022-00453-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Nieva JF, Scheurer MS. Identifying topological order through unsupervised machine learning. Nat Phys. 2019;15:790. DOI:10.1038/s41567-019-0512-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long Y, Ren J, Chen H. Unsupervised manifold clustering of topological phononics. Phys Rev Lett. 2020;124:185501. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.185501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheurer MS, Slager R-J. Unsupervised machine learning and band topology. Phys Rev Lett. 2020;124:226401. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.226401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Che Y, Gneiting C, Liu T, et al. Topological quantum phase transitions retrieved through unsupervised machine learning. Phys Rev B. 2020;102:134213. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.102.134213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustig E, Yair O, Talmon R, et al. Identifying topological phase transitions in experiments using manifold learning. Phys Rev Lett. 2020;125:127401. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.127401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidiak A, Gong Z. Unsupervised machine learning of quantum phase transitions using diffusion maps. Phys Rev Lett. 2020;125:225701. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.225701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long Y, Zhang B. Unsupervised data-driven classification of topological gapped systems with symmetries. Phys Rev Lett. 2023;130:036601. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.036601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertsson K, Altoe P, Anderson D, et al. Machine learning in high energy physics community white paper. J Phys Conf Series. 2018;1085:022008. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1085/2/022008
   Google Scholar
• Zahavy T, Dikopoltsev A, Moss D et al . Deep learning reconstruction of ultrashort pulses. Optica. 2018;5:666. DOI:10.1364/OPTICA.5.000666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo S, Fritsch AR, Greenberg C, et al. Machine-learning enhanced dark soliton detection in Bose–Einstein condensates. Mach Learn: Sci Technol. 2021;2:035020. DOI:10.1088/2632-2153/abed1e
   Google Scholar
• Baum Y, Amico M, Howell S, et al. Experimental deep reinforcement learning for error-robust gate-set design on a superconducting quantum computer. PRX Quantum. 2021;2:040324. DOI:10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040324
   Google Scholar
• Itabashi K, Tran QH, Hasegawa Y. Evaluating the phase dynamics of coupled oscillators via time-variant topological features. Phys Rev E. 2021;103:032207. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.103.032207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar D, Manhart A, Milzman J et al . Analyzing collective motion with machine learning and topology. Chaos Inter J Nonlinear Sci. 2019;29:123125. DOI:10.1063/1.5125493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran QH, Vo VT, Hasegawa Y. Scale-variant topological information for characterizing the structure of complex networks. Phys Rev E. 2019;100:032308. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.100.032308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams H, Emerson T, Kirby M, et al. Persistence images: a stable vector representation of persistent homology. J Mach Learn Res. 2017;18:218–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rem BS, Käming N, Tarnowski M et al . Identifying quantum phase transitions using artificial neural networks on experimental data. Nat Phys. 2019;15:917. DOI:10.1038/s41567-019-0554-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibaldi S, Magnifico G, Vodola D et al . Unsupervised and supervised learning of interacting topological phases from single-particle correlation functions. SciPost Physics. 2022;14. DOI:10.21468/SciPostPhys.14.1.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le MQ, Taylor D. Persistent homology of convection cycles in network flows. Phys Rev E. 2022;105:044311. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.105.044311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers A, Khasawneh F, Munch E. Temporal network analysis using zigzag persistence. EPJ Data Sci. 2022;12. DOI:10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00379-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner DJ, Song B, Jeckel H, et al. Topological metric detects hidden order in disordered media. Phys Rev Lett. 2021;126:048101. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.048101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd S, Garnerone S, Zanardi P. Quantum algorithms for topological and geometric analysis of data. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10138. DOI:10.1038/ncomms10138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang H-L, Wang X-L, Rohde PP, et al. Demonstration of topological data analysis on a quantum processor, Optica. Optica. 2018;5:193. DOI:10.1364/OPTICA.5.000193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann N, den Breeijen S. Limitations of clustering using quantum persistent homology. arXiv:1911.10781. 2019. DOI:10.48550/ARXIV.1911.10781
   Google Scholar
• McArdle S, Gilyén A, Berta M. A streamlined quantum algorithm for topological data analysis with exponentially fewer qubits. arXiv:2209.12887. 2022. DOI:10.48550/ARXIV.2209.12887
   Google Scholar
• Berry DW, Su Y, Gyurik C et al . Quantifying quantum advantage in topological data analysis. arXiv:2209.13581. 2022. DOI:10.48550/ARXIV.2209.13581
   Google Scholar
• Vlasic A, Pham A. Understanding the mapping of encode data through an implementation of quantum topological analysis. arXiv:2209.10596. 2022. DOI:10.48550/ARXIV.2209.10596
   Google Scholar
• Ameneyro B, Maroulas V, Siopsis G. Quantum persistent homology. arXiv:2202.12965. 2022. DOI:10.48550/ARXIV.2202.12965
   Google Scholar
• Hayakawa R. Quantum algorithm for persistent Betti numbers and topological data analysis. Quantum. 2022;6:873. DOI:10.22331/q-2022-12-07-873
   Google Scholar
• Berwald JJ, Gottlieb JM, Munch E. Computing Wasserstein distance for persistence diagrams on a quantum computer. arXiv:1809.06433. 2018. DOI:10.48550/ARXIV.1809.06433
   Google Scholar
• Ubaru S, Akhalwaya IY, Squillante MS, et al. Quantum topological data analysis with linear depth and exponential speedup. arXiv:2108.02811. 2021. DOI:10.48550/ARXIV.2108.02811
   Google Scholar
• Akhalwaya IY, He Y-H, Horesh L, et al. Representation of the fermionic boundary operator. Phys Rev A. 2022;106:022407. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.106.022407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerenidis I, Prakash A. Quantum machine learning with subspace states. arXiv:2202.00054. 2022. DOI:10.48550/ARXIV.2202.00054
   Google Scholar
• Akhalwaya IY, Ubaru S, Clarkson KL et al . Towards quantum advantage on noisy quantum computers. arXiv:2209.09371. 2022. DOI:10.48550/ARXIV.2209.09371
   Google Scholar
• Gyurik C, Cade C, Dunjko V. Towards quantum advantage via topological data analysis. Quantum. 2022;6:855. DOI:10.22331/q-2022-11-10-855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidhuber A, Lloyd S. Complexity-theoretic limitations on quantum algorithms for topological data analysis. arXiv:2209.14286. 2022. DOI:10.48550/ARXIV.2209.14286
   Google Scholar
• Apers S, Sen S, Szabó D. A (simple) classical algorithm for estimating Betti numbers. arXiv:2211.09618. 2022. DOI:10.48550/ARXIV.2211.09618
   Google Scholar