Perceptual evaluation of the citizen’s acoustic environment from classic noise monitoring

References

• Alsina-Pagès, R.M., et al., 2019. A wasn-based suburban dataset for anomalous noise event detection on dynamic road-traffic noise mapping. Sensors, 19 (11), 2480. doi:10.3390/s19112480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bech, S. and Zacharov, N., 2007. Perceptual audio evaluation – theory, method and application. England, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Berglund, B., Lindvall, T., and Schwela, D.H., 1999. Guidelines for community noise. World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Botteldooren, D., Dekoninck, L., and Gillis, D., 2011. The influence of traffic noise on appreciation of the living quality of a neighborhood. International journal of environmental research and public health, 8 (3), 777–798. doi:10.3390/ijerph8030777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, J.M., Research Team at Ruhr University, et al., 2001. Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: research and a recommendation. Journal of sound and vibration, 242 (4), 641–679. doi:10.1006/jsvi.2000.3384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goines, L. and Hagler, L., 2007. Noise pollution: a modern plague. Southern medical journal-Birmingham Alabama-, 100 (3), 287–294. doi:10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3180318be5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guite, H.F., Clark, C., and Ackrill, G., 2006. The impact of the physical and urban environment on mental well-being. Public health, 120 (12), 1117–1126. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2006.10.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guski, R., Schreckenberg, D., and Schuemer, R., 2017. WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European region: a systematic review on environmental noise and annoyance. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14 (12), 1539. doi:10.3390/ijerph14121539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hänninen, O., et al., 2014. Environmental burden of disease in Europe: assessing nine risk factors in six countries. Environmental health perspectives, 122 (5), 439. doi:10.1289/ehp.1206154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO FDIS. 12913-2, 2018. 2018 acoustics – soundscape – part 2: data collection and reporting requirements. In: International Organization for Standardization. Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• ITURBS Recommendation, 2003. 1534-1: method for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality level of coding systems. In: International Telecommunication Union.
   Google Scholar
• Jakovljevic, B., Paunovic, K., and Belojevic, G., 2009. Road-traffic noise and factors influencing noise annoyance in an urban population. Environment international, 35 (3), 552–556. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2008.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labairu-Trenchs, A., et al., 2018. Noise annoyance in urban life: the citizen as a key point of the directives. In: Multidisciplinary digital publishing institute proceedings. Vol. 6, 1. Basel, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Lercher, P., et al., 2016. Perceived soundscapes and health-related quality of life, context, restoration, and personal characteristics. In: J. Kang and B. Schulte-Fortkamp, eds. Soundscape and the built environment, 133–160.
   Google Scholar
• Likert, R., 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology, 22 (140), 55.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, N., et al., 2017. Health impacts related to urban and transport planning: a burden of disease assessment. Environment international, 107, 243–257. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2017.07.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oded Nov, R., et al., 2019. SONYC: a system for monitoring, analyzing, and mitigating urban noise pollution. Communications of the ACM, 62 (2), 68–77. doi:10.1145/3224204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orga, F., Alías, F., and Alsina-Pagès, R.M., 2017. On the impact of anomalous noise events on road traffic noise mapping in urban and suburban environments. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15 (1), 13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevillano, X., et al., 2016. DYNAMAP – development of low cost sensors networks for real time noise mapping. Noise mapping, 3 (May), 172–189. doi:10.1515/noise-2016-0013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stansfeld, S.A., et al., 1993. Road traffic noise, noise sensitivity and psychological disorder. Psychological medicine, 23 (4), 977–985. doi:10.1017/S0033291700026441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, N.D., 1978. Individual differences in reactions to noise: a longitudinal study in a college dormitory. Journal of applied psychology, 63 (4), 458. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, 2018. Environmental noise guidelines for the European region. Technical report.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization and the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, 2011. Burden of disease from environmental noise: quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe. Technical report. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker, E. and Fastl, H., 2013. Psychoacoustics: facts and models. Vol. 22. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar