5,576
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Scholarship - Empirical

Social return on investment analysis of an urban greenway

, , , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 693-710 | Received 17 Dec 2019, Accepted 29 Apr 2020, Published online: 04 Jun 2020

References

  • Arem, H., et al., 2015. Leisure time physical activity and mortality: a detailed pooled analysis of the dose-response relationship. JAMA internal medicine, 175 (6), 959–967. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0533.
  • Atkinson, R. Does gentrification help or harm urban neighbourhoods?: an assessment of the evidence-base in the context of the new urban agenda (CNR paper 5); 2002; Urban Studies.
  • Bach, M., et al., 2017. Participatory epidemiology: the contribution of participatory research to epidemiology. Emerging themes in epidemiology, 14, 2. doi:10.1186/s12982-017-0056-4
  • Beatley, T. and Newman, P., 2013. Biophilic cities are sustainable, resilient cities. Sustainability, 5, 3328–3345.
  • Bird, E., et al. Health economic assessment of walking and cycling interventions in the physical environment: interim findings from the iConnect study. In: South West Public Health Scientific Conference, Weston-Super-Mare, UK, 5 February 2014. Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/23015
  • Black, C., 2008. Working for a healthier tomorrow. London: The Stationery Office (TSO).
  • Bogar, S. and Beyer, K.M., 2015. Green space, violence, and crime: A systematic review. Trauma, violence & abuse, 1, 12. doi:10.1177/1524838015576412
  • Bots, P.W.G. and van Daalen, E., 2008. Participatory model construction and model use in natural resource management: A framework for reflection. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 21, 389–407. doi:10.1007/s11213-008-9108-6
  • Claxton, K.P., Sculpher, M.J., and Culyer, A.J. Mark versus Luke? Appropriate methods for the evaluation of public health interventions. Centre for Health Economics Research Paper 31 200, University of York. 2007.
  • Cobiac, L.J., Vos, T., and Barendregt, J.J., 2009. Cost-effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity: a modelling study. PLoS medicine, 6 (7), e1000110. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000110.
  • Cohen, D.A., et al., 2012. Impact and cost-effectiveness of family Fitness Zones: a natural experiment in urban public parks. Health & place, 18, 39–45.
  • Cohen, D.A., et al., 2013. Physical activity in parks: A randomized controlled trial using community engagement. American journal of preventive medicine, 45, 590–597.
  • Cohen, D.A., et al., 2014. The potential for pocket parks to increase physical activity. American journal of health promotion: AJHP, 28, S19–26.
  • Confederation of British Industry (CBI), 2004. The lost billions: 2003 CBI absence and labour turnover survey. London: CBI Publications.
  • Connolly, C., et al., 2019. Capitalization of interconnected active transportation infrastructure. Landscape and urban planning, 182, 67. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.09.010
  • Crompton, J.L., 2001. Perceptions of how the presence of greenway trails affects the value of proximate properties. Journal of park and recreation administration, 19 (3), 114–132.
  • Dallat, M.A., et al., 2014. Urban greenways have the potential to increase physical activity levels cost-effectively. European journal of public health, 24, 190–195. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckt035
  • Deidda, M., et al., 2019. A framework for conducting economic evaluations alongside natural experiments. Social science & medicine (1982), 220, 353–361.
  • Department for Transport. Transport Analysis Guidance. 2010. Available at: www.dft.gov.uk/webtag/documents/expert/unit3.9.5.php#04
  • Department of Enterprise Trade and Development, Northern Ireland. Northern Ireland Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2013. Available at: https://www.nisra.gov.uk/sites/nisra.gov.uk/files/publications/NI-ASHE-2013-Bulletin.pdf
  • Economics and Resource Analysis Research. Development and Statistics Home Office. The economic and social costs of crime against individuals and households 2003/04; 2005.
  • Edwards, R.T., Charles, J.M., and Lloyd-Williams, H., 2013. Public health economics: a systematic review of guidance for the economic evaluation of public health interventions and discussion of key methodological issues. BMC public health, 13 (1), 1001. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-1001.
  • Fitzhugh, E.C., Bassett, D.R., Jr, and Evans, M.F., 2010. Urban trails and physical activity: a natural experiment. American journal of preventive medicine, 39 (3), 259–262. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.010.
  • Foster-Fishman, P.G. and Behrens, T.R., 2007. Systems change reborn: rethinking our theories, methods, and efforts in human services reform and community-based change. American journal of community psychology, 39, 191–196. doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9104-5
  • Frumkin, H., et al., 2017. Nature contact and human health: A research agenda. Environmental health perspectives, 125 (7), 075001. doi:10.1289/EHP1663.
  • Gascon, M., et al., 2016. Residential green spaces and mortality: a systematic review. Environment international, 86, 60–67.
  • Genecon, L.L.P. Building natural value for sustainable economic development: the green infrastructure valuation toolkit user guide (version 1.3); 2012. Available at: https://ecosystemsknowledge.net/green-infrastructure-valuation-toolkit-gi-val
  • Giles-Corti, B., et al., 2005. Increasing walking: how important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? American journal of preventive medicine, 28 (2 Suppl 2), 169–176. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018.
  • Griffin, S., et al., 2019. Evaluation of intervention impact on health inequality for resource allocation. Medical decision making: an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 39 (3), 171–182.
  • Harnik, P. and Welle, B., 2009. Measuring the economic value of a city park system. Washington DC, US: The Trust for Public Land.
  • Hirsch, G.B., Levine, R., and Miller, R.L., 2007. Using system dynamics modeling to understand the impact of social change initiatives. American journal of community psychology, 39, 239–253. doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9114-3
  • HM Treasury, 2013. The Green Book: appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-green-book-appraisal-and-evaluation-in-central-governent last accessed 23 July 2019.
  • Hunter, R.F., et al., 2019. Environmental, health, wellbeing, social and equity effects of urban green space interventions: A meta-narrative evidence synthesis. Environment international, 130, 104923. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.104923
  • Hutchinson, G., et al., 2001. Parametric and non-parametric estimates of willingness to pay for forest recreation in Northern Ireland: A discrete choice contingent valuation study with follow-ups. Journal of agricultural economics, 52 (1), 104–122.
  • Hutchinson, G., Davis, J., and Chilton, S., 1995. Theoretical and spatial limits to the value of rural environmental benefits: evidence from the Forestry Sector. Journal of rural studies, 11 (4), 397–404.
  • Kimpton, A., Corcoran, J., and Wickes, R., 2017. Greenspace and crime: an analysis of greenspace types, neighboring composition, and the temporal dimensions of crime. The Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 54 (3), 303–337. doi:10.1177/0022427816666309.
  • Klaiber, H.A. and Phaneuf, D.J., 2010. Valuing open space in a residential sorting model of the Twin Cities. Journal of environmental economics and management, 60 (2), 57–77. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2010.05.002.
  • Kuminoff, N.V., Smith, V.K., and Timmins, C., 2013. The new economics of equilibrium sorting and policy evaluation using housing markets. Journal of economic literature, 51 (4), 1007–1062. doi:10.1257/jel.51.4.1007.
  • Kuo, F., 2015. How might contact with nature promote human health? Promising mechanisms and a possible central pathway. Frontiers of Psychology, 25, 1093.
  • Lee, A.C.K. and Maheswaran, R., 2011. The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. Journal of public health, 33, 212–222. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdq068
  • Longo, A., et al., 2015. Demand response to improved walking infrastructure: A study into the economics of walking and health behaviour change. Social science & medicine (1982), 143, 107–116. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.033
  • Loo, C.K., et al., 2017. Association between neighbourhood walkability and metabolic risk factors influenced by physical activity: a cross-sectional study of adults in Toronto, Canada. BMJ open, 7 (4), e013889. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013889.
  • Mason, S.G., 2010. Can community design build trust? A comparative study of design factors in Boise, Idaho neighborhoods’. Cities, 27 (6), 456–465. doi:10.1016/J.CITIES.2010.07.003.
  • McAuley, A., et al., 2016. Informing investment to reduce inequalities: A modelling approach. PloS one, 11 (8), e0159256. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159256.
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), 2008. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. London: NICE.
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). How should NICE assess future costs and health benefits?, 2012a. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/newsroom/features/HowShouldNICEAssessFutureCostsAndHealthBenefits.jsp.
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), 2012b. Methods for the development of NICE public health guidance. third ed. London: NICE. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg4/chapter/introduction.
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), 2012c. Physical activity: walking and cycling. London: NICE. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph41/chapter/1-Recommendations.
  • National Statistics. Reported road casualties Great Britain: annual report, 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/reported-road-casualties-great-britain-annual-report-2013 (last accessed 24 July 2019).
  • Northern Ireland Roads Service, 2011. Traffic and travel information 2011 incorporating annual traffic census and vehicle kilometres of travel. UK: Department for Infrastructure.
  • Northwest Regional Development Agency, 2008. The economic benefits of green infrastructure – an assessment framework. UK: Northwest Development Agency.
  • O’Mahony, J.F. and Paulden, M., 2014. NICE’s selective application of differential discounting: ambiguous, inconsistent, and unjustified. Value in Health, 17 (5), 493–496.
  • Painter, K.A. and Farrington, D.P., 2001. The financial benefits of improved street lighting, based on crime reduction. Lighting research & technology (London, England: 2001), 33 (1), 3–10. doi:10.1177/136578280103300102.
  • Pope, D.G. and Pope, J.C., 2012. Crime and property values: evidence from the 1990s crime drop. Regional science and urban economics, 42 (1–2), 177–188. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.08.008.
  • Proper, K. and van Mechelen, W., 2008. Effectiveness and economic impact of worksite interventions to promote physical activity and healthy diet. Geneva: WHO, 1–63.
  • Roué Le Gall, A., et al. (2017) Causal pathway model between green spaces and health: levers for decision making. In: 14th ISUH conference on urban health, health equity: the new urban agenda and sustainable development goals, 25–29 September 2017 Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Saelens, B.E., et al., 2003. Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. American journal of public health, 93 (9), 1552–1558.
  • Sallis, J.F., et al., 2004. Active transportation and physical activity: opportunities for collaboration on transportation and public health research. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, 38 (4), 249–268. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2003.11.003.
  • Sallis, J.F., et al., 2009. Neighborhood built environment and income: examining multiple health outcomes. Social science & medicine (1982), 68 (7), 1285–1293. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.017.
  • Saraev, V., 2012. Economic benefits of greenspace. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission Research report.
  • Savills, F., et al., 2015. Does money grow on trees?
  • Sen, A., et al., 2014. Economic assessment of the recreational value of ecosystems: methodological development and national and local application. Environmental and Resource Economics, 57 (2), 233–249. doi:10.1007/s10640-013-9666-7.
  • Shiell, A., Hawe, P., and Gold, L., 2008. Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation. BMJ, 336, 1281–1283.
  • Sloman, L., et al., 2010. The effects of smarter choice programmes in the sustainable travel towns: summary Report. London: Department for Transport.
  • Spangenberg, J.H. and Settele, J., 2010. Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services. Ecological Complexity, 7 (3), 327–337. doi:10.1016/J.ECOCOM.2010.04.007.
  • Starnes, H.A., et al., 2011. Trails and physical activity: a review. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 8 (8), 1160–1174.
  • Sundquist, K., et al., 2011. Neighborhood walkability, physical activity, and walking behavior: the Swedish Neighborhood and Physical Activity (SNAP) study. Social science & medicine (1982), 72 (8), 1266–1273. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.004.
  • Tully, M.A., et al., 2013. Physical Activity and the Rejuvenation of Connswater (PARC Study): protocol for a natural experiment investigating the impact of urban regeneration on public health. BMC Public Health 13, 774. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-774.
  • Twohig-Bennett, C. and Jones, A., 2018. The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. Environmental research, 166, 628–637. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.030
  • Ulster University. Quarterly house price index; 2014. https://www.ulster.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/103033/q1-2014.pdf (last accessed 24 July 2019).
  • UN Sustainable Development Goals. http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
  • United Nations, 2015. Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development A/RES/70/1. New York: UN.
  • United Nations General Assembly, 2016. New Urban Agenda: quito declaration on sustainable cities and human settlements for all (71/256). New York, NY: United Nations.
  • Van Dyck, D., et al., 2010. Neighborhood SES and walkability are related to physical activity behavior in Belgian adults. Preventive medicine, 50 (Suppl 1), S74–9. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.027.
  • Walker, S., et al., 2019. Striving for a societal perspective: A framework for economic evaluations when costs and effects fall on multiple sectors and decision makers. Applied health economics and health policy, 17, 577–590. doi:10.1007/s40258-019-00481-8
  • Weatherly, H., et al., 2009. Methods for assessing the cost-effectiveness of public health interventions: key challenges and recommendations. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 93 (2–3), 85–92. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.07.012.
  • Welsh, B. and Farrington, D., 2008. Effects of improved street lighting on crime. Campbell systematic reviews, 13. doi:10.4073/csr.2008.13.
  • West, S.T. and Shores, K.A., 2011. The impacts of building a greenway on proximate resident’s physical activity. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 8 (8), 1092–1097.
  • WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2014. Health economic assessment tools (HEAT) for walking and for cycling. Methodology and user guide. Economic assessment of transport infrastructure and policies. 2014 Update. http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/environment-and-health/Transport-and-health/publications/2014/health-economic-assessment-tools-heat-for-walking-and-for-cycling.-methodology-and-user-guide.-economic-assessment-of-transport-infrastructure-and-policies.-2014-update
  • WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2016. Urban green spaces and health. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Denmark: Copenhagen.
  • WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2017a. Urban green space interventions and health. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Denmark: Copenhagen.
  • WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2017b. Action brief on urban green spaces. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Denmark: Copenhagen.
  • Woods, B., et al., 2016. Country-level cost-effectiveness thresholds: initial estimates and the need for further research. Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 19 (8), 929–935. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.017.
  • Woolley, H., et al., 2004. The value of public space. London: Commission for Architecture and Built Environment (CABE).