Incorporating practitioner knowledge to test and improve a new conceptual framework for healthy urban design and planning

References

• Agyeman, J., 2013. Introducing just sustainabilities: policy, planning and practice just sustainabilities. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Aletta, F., Oberman, T., and Kang, J., 2018. Associations between positive health-related effects and soundscapes perceptual constructs: A systematic review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15 (11), 2392. doi:10.3390/ijerph15112392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S.R., [1969] 2019. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85 (1), 24–34. doi:10.1080/01944363.2018.1559388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, P., Yearley, S., and Forrester, J., 1999. Involving the public in local air pollution assessment: a citizen participation case study. International journal of environment and pollution, 11 (3), 290–303. doi:10.1504/IJEP.1999.002262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, H. and Grant, M., 2006. A health map for the local human habitat. The journal of the royal society for the promotion of health, 126 (6), 252–253. doi:10.1177/1466424006070466.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barton, H. and Grant, M., 2008. Testing time for sustainability and health: striving for inclusive rationality in project appraisal. Journal of the royal society for the promotion of health, 128 (3), 130–139. doi:10.1177/1466424008089800.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Been, V., et al., 2010. Building environmentally sustainable communities: a framework for inclusivity. Washington, DC: Furman Center, Urban Institute, What Works Collaborative.
   Google Scholar
• Berger-González, M., et al., 2016. Transdisciplinary research on cancer-healing systems between biomedicine and the maya of guatemala: a tool for reciprocal reflexivity in a multi-epistemological setting. Qualitative health research, 26 (1), 77–91. doi:10.1177/1049732315617478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, D., et al., 2019. Moving health upstream in urban development: reflections on the operationalization of a transdisciplinary case study. Global challenges, 3 (4), 1700103. doi:10.1002/gch2.201700103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buse, C.G., et al., 2018. Public health guide to field developments linking ecosystems, environments and health in the Anthropocene. Journal of epidemiology and community health, 72 (5), 420–425. doi:10.1136/jech-2017-210082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmichael, L., et al., 2012. Integration of health into urban spatial planning through impact assessment: identifying governance and policy barriers and facilitators. Environmental impact assessment review, 32 (1), 187–194. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2011.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmichael, L., et al., 2019. Urban planning as an enabler of urban health: challenges and good practice in England following the 2012 planning and public health reforms. Land use policy, 84, 154–162. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, M., 2018. Securing constructive collaboration and consensus for planning healthy developments: A report from the developers and Wellbeing project. London: Town and Country Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Climate Interactive, 2020. En-ROADS. Available from: https://www.climateinteractive.org/tools/en-roads/ [Accessed 30 Apr 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Corburn, J., 2005. Street science: community knowledge and environmental health justice. Urban and industrial environments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corburn, J., 2009. Cities, climate change and urban heat island mitigation: localising global environmental science. Urban studies, 46 (2), 413–427. doi:10.1177/0042098008099361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corburn, J., et al., 2014. Health in all urban policy: city services through the prism of health. Journal of urban health, 91 (4), 623–636. doi:10.1007/s11524-014-9886-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corburn, J. and Cohen, A.K., 2012. Why we need urban health equity indicators: integrating science, policy, and community. PLoS medicine, 9 (8), e1001285. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culwick, C., et al., 2019. CityLab reflections and evolutions: nurturing knowledge and learning for urban sustainability through co-production experimentation. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 39, 9–16. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leeuw, E., et al., 2008. Theoretical reflections on the nexus between research, policy and practice. Critical public health, 18 (1), 5–20. doi:10.1080/09581590801949924.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, S.F., Jr, et al., 2009. Participatory photo mapping (PPM): exploring an integrated method for health and place research with young people. Health & place, 15 (2), 466–473. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Design Council, 2015. What is the framework for innovation? Design Council’s evolved double diamond. Available from: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/what-framework-innovation-design-councils-evolved-double-diamond [Accessed 30 April 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Design Council, 2018. Healthy placemaking: why do built environment practitioners create places that contribute to preventable disease and early death, despite evidence on healthy placemaking? London: Design Council.
   Google Scholar
• Durose, C., Richardson, L., and Perry, B., 2018. Craft metrics to value co-production. Nature, 562 (7725), 32–33. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-06860-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, K.V.L., 1994. Getting personal: reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The professional geographer, 46 (1), 80–89. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fam, D. and Sofoulis, Z., 2017. A ‘Knowledge Ecologies’ analysis of co-designing water and sanitation services in Alaska. Science and engineering ethics, 23 (4), 1059–1083. doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9830-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foth, T., et al., 2016. The use of Delphi and Nominal Group Technique in nursing education: A review. International journal of nursing studies, 60, 112–120. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.04.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S.O. and Ravetz, J.R., 1991. A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues. In: R. Costanza, ed. Ecological economics: the science and management of sustainability. New York: Columbia University Press, 137–152.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S.O. and Ravetz, J.R., 2015. Peer review and quality control. In: J. Wright, ed. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences [online]. Elsevier. 680–684. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780080970868850163 [Accessed 1 March 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Gatzweiler, F.W., et al., 2017. Advancing Health and wellbeing in the changing urban environment: implementing a systems approach urban health and Wellbeing. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gatzweiler, F.W., et al., 2018. Lessons from complexity science for urban health and well-being. Cities & health, 1 (2), 210–223. doi:10.1080/23748834.2018.1448551.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., 1999. Science’s new social contract with society. Nature, 402 (6761), C81–C84. doi:10.1038/35011576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, M., 2015. European healthy city network Phase V: patterns emerging for healthy urban planning. Health promotion international, 30 (suppl 1), i54–i70. doi:10.1093/heapro/dav033.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, M. and Barton, H., 2013. No weighting for healthy sustainable local planning: evaluation of a participatory appraisal tool for rationality and inclusivity. Journal of environmental planning and management, 56 (9), 1267–1289. doi:10.1080/09640568.2012.717887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P., 1997. Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies. Planning, environment, cities Y. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, Z. and Dooris, M., 2009. Community participation and empowerment in Healthy Cities. Health promotion international, 24 (suppl_1), i45–i55. doi:10.1093/heapro/dap054.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heron, J. and Reason, P., 2008. Extending Epistemology within a Co-operative Inquiry. In: P. Reason, and H. Bradbury eds. The SAGE handbook of action research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., 366–380.
   Google Scholar
• Holder, J., 2004. Environmental assessment: the regulation of decision making. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, -C.-C. and Sandford, B.A., 2007. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical assessment, research & evaluation, 12 (10), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J.E., 2004. Consensus building: clarifications for the critics. Planning theory, 3 (1), 5–20. doi:10.1177/1473095204042315.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E., 2010. Planning with complexity: an introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Israel, B.A., et al., 2019. Community-based participatory research: an approach to research in the urban context. In: S. Galea, C.K. Ettman, and D. Vlahov, eds. Urban health. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 272–282.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.P. and Russo, F., 2018. Causal narratives in public health: the difference between mechanisms of aetiology and mechanisms of prevention in non-communicable diseases. Sociology of health & illness, 40 (1), 82–99. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, J. and Thompson, S., 2019. Planning Australia’s healthy built environments Routledge research in planning and urban design. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kronsell, A. and Mukhtar-Landgren, D., 2018. Experimental governance: the role of municipalities in urban living labs. European planning studies, 26 (5), 988–1007. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1435631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., 2002. Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, D.J., et al., 2012. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability science, 7 (1), 25–43. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberatore, A. and Funtowicz, S., 2003. ‘Democratising’ expertise, ‘expertising’ democracy: what does this mean, and why bother? Science & public policy, 30 (3), 146–150. doi:10.3152/147154303781780551.
   Google Scholar
• Loukaitou-Sideris, A. and Fink, C., 2008. Addressing women’s fear of victimization in transportation settings: a survey of U.S. Transit Agencies. Urban affairs review, 44 (4), 554–587. doi:10.1177/1078087408322874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk, A.C., et al., 2019. Bicycle facilities safest from crime and crashes: perceptions of residents familiar with higher crime/lower income neighborhoods in Boston. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16 (3), 484. doi:10.3390/ijerph16030484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, J., 2006. It’s not easy being interdisciplinary. International journal of epidemiology, 35 (5), 1119–1122. doi:10.1093/ije/dyl200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, G.P., 2009. Public and user participation in public service delivery: tensions in policy and practice. Sociology Compass, 3 (2), 310–326. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2009.00200.x.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D.H. and Wright, D., 2008. Thinking in systems: a primer. White River Junction, Vt: Chelsea Green Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B., 2002. Manifesto of transdisciplinarity. SUNY series in Western esoteric traditions. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, K., Kothari, A., and Mays, N., 2019. The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? Health research policy and systems, 17 (1), 33. doi:10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opoku, A., 2019. Biodiversity and the built environment: implications for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Resources, conservation and recycling, 141, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilkington, P., et al., 2013. Engaging a wider public health workforce for the future: a public health practitioner in residence approach. Public health, 127 (5), 427–434. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2012.12.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pineo, H., et al., 2018a. Urban health indicator tools of the physical environment: a systematic review. Journal of urban health, 95 (5), 613–646. doi:10.1007/s11524-018-0228-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pineo, H., et al., 2018b. Promoting a healthy cities agenda through indicators: development of a global urban environment and health index. Cities & health, 2 (1), 27–45. doi:10.1080/23748834.2018.1429180.
   Google Scholar
• Pineo, H. (2019) A healthy urban design and planning framework integrating sustainability, equity and inclusion. 14 October Royal College of Physicians, London, UK. Available from: https://www.salus.global/article-show/a-healthy-urban-design-and-planning-framework-integrating-sustainability-equity-and-inclusion [Accessed 3 January 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Pineo, H., Zimmermann, N., and Davies, M., 2019. Urban planning: leveraging the urban planning system to shape healthy cities. In: S. Galea, C.K. Ettman, and D. Vlahov eds. Urban health. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pineo, H., 2020. Towards Healthy Urbanism: inclusive, Equitable and Sustainable (THRIVES): an urban design and planning framework from theory to praxis. Cities & health. doi:10.1080/23748834.2020.1769527.
   Google Scholar
• Pineo, H. and Rydin, Y., 2018. Cities, health and well-being. London: Royal Institution for Chartered Surveyors.
   Google Scholar
• Pineo, H., Zimmermann, N., and Davies, M., 2020. Integrating health into the complex urban planning policy and decision-making context: a systems thinking analysis. Palgrave communications, 6 (1), 1–14. doi:10.1057/s41599-020-0398-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Health England, 2019. Spatial planning and health: Getting Research Into Practice (GRIP): study report. London: Public Health England.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, G. and Lang, T., 2012. Ecological public health: reshaping the conditions for good health. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., 2007. Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Planning theory, 6 (1), 52–68. doi:10.1177/1473095207075161.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., et al. 2012. Shaping cities for health: complexity and the planning of urban environments in the 21st century. The Lancet, 379 (9831), 2079–2108. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60435-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., 2013. The future of planning: beyond growth dependence. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L., 1998. Towards cosmopolis: planning for multicultural cities. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Shrubsole, C., et al., 2014. 100 Unintended consequences of policies to improve the energy efficiency of the UK housing stock. Indoor and built environment, 23 (3), 340–352. doi:10.1177/1420326X14524586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokols, D., Hall, K., and Vogel, A., 2013. Transdisciplinary public health: definitions, core characteristics, and strategies for success. In: D. Joshu and T.D. McBride, eds. Transdisciplinary public health: research, methods, and practice. San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Street, J., et al., 2014. The use of citizens‘ juries in health policy decision-making: A systematic review. Social science & medicine, 109, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SUSTAIN, 2020. SUSTAIN game-based learning on urban sustainability. Available from: http://sustainerasmus.eu/wp/ [Accessed 30 April 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B., 1996. May the sheep safely graze?: a reflexive view of the expert lay knowledge divide. In: S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne, eds. Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology. Theory, culture & society. London: Sage, 44–84.
   Google Scholar
• Younger, M., et al., 2008. The built environment, climate change, and health. American journal of preventive medicine, 35 (5), 517–526. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar