The relationship between housing created through Permitted Development Rights and health: a systematic review

References

• Association for Public Service Excellence (APSE), Town and Country Planning Association (TCPA), 2019. Housing for a fairer society: the role of councils in ensuring stronger communities. Manchester: Association for public service excellence. [Accessed 18 Jun 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. and Parker, G., 2018. Permitted development rights liberalisation in rural England: love’s labour’s lost? Town and country planning, 87, 117–123.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, H. and Grant, M., 2006. A health map for the local human habitat. The journal of the royal society for the promotion of health, 126 (6), 252–253. doi:10.1177/1466424006070466.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bibby, P., et al., 2018. The exercise of permitted development rights in England since. Vol. 2010, London: Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, E., et al., 2018. Built and natural environment planning principles for promoting health: an umbrella review. BMC public health, 18 (1), 13. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5870-2.
   Google Scholar
• Butter, J., 2013. RTPI criticises government’s permitted rights proposals. Planning, 1951, 23.
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael, L., et al., 2020. Healthy buildings for a healthy city: is the public health evidence base informing current building policies? Science of the total environment, 719, 11. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., 2019. Place value: place quality and its impact on health, social, economic and environmental outcomes. Journal of urban design, 24 (1), 1–48. doi:10.1080/13574809.2018.1472523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, B. and Canelas, P., 2018. Extended permitted development rights in England: the implications for public authorities and communities. London: Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS).
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, B., et al., 2020. Research into the quality standard of homes delivered through change of use permitted development rights. London: Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, B., et al., 2018. Assessing the impacts of extending permitted development rights to office-to-residential change of use in England. London: Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, B., et al., 2019a. Understanding the impacts of deregulation in planning: turning offices into homes? London: Palgrave Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, B., et al., 2019b. Healthy homes? Thirty examples of permitted development conversions. London: Bartlett school of planning, UCL.
   Google Scholar
• de Bell, S., et al., 2020. Spending time in the garden is positively associated with health and wellbeing: results from a national survey in England. Landscape and urban planning, 200, 103836. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Communities and Local Government, 2013. Relaxation of planning rules for change of use from offices to residential: impact assessment. London: Department for Communities and Local Government. [Accessed 18 Jun 2020].
   Google Scholar
• East Sussex County Council, 2020. Director of public health annual report 2019/20. Lewes. [Accessed 18 Jun 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Ecofys, Fraunhofer IBP, Copenhagen Economics, 2017. Healthy homes barometer 2017. London: Ecofys. [Accessed 18 Jun 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Ferm, J. and Jones, E., 2016. Mixed-use ‘regeneration’ of employment land in the post-industrial city: challenges and realities in London. European planning studies, 24 (10), 1913–1936. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1209465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitwel, 2020. Fitwel. New York, NY: Fitwel. Available from: https://www.fitwel.org/ [Accessed 7 Sept 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Grimwood, G. and Barton, C., 2019. Permitted development rights: briefing paper. London: House of Commons Library.
   Google Scholar
• Holman, N., Mossa, A., and Pani, E., 2018. Planning, value(s) and the market: an analytic for “What comes next?”. Environment and planning, 50 (3), 608–626. doi:10.1177/0308518X17749730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International WELL Building Institute, 2020. WELL v1 revolutionizing buildings New York: International WELL building institute. Available from: https://www.wellcertified.com/certification/v1/standard [Accessed 19 Jun 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, R., et al., 2019. The association between crowding within households and behavioural problems in children: longitudinal data from the Southampton women’s survey. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 33 (3), 195–203. doi:10.1111/ppe.12550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, S., The Developer, 2020. Harlow homes: how PDR destroys local communities and builds Britain’s worst housing. England. 00:23:00. [Accessed 7 Jul 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government, 2014. Code for sustainable homes: technical guidance. London: Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government. [Accessed 7 Sept 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government, 2019. Live tables on housing supply: net additional dwellings. London: Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government. [Accessed 18 Jun 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government, 2020a. Living with beauty: report of the building better, building beautiful commission. London: Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government, 2020b. Open consultation: planning for the future. London: Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government. [Accessed 4 Sept 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Muldoon-Smith, K. and Greenhalgh, P., 2016. Greasing the wheels, or a spanner in the works? Permitting the adaptive re-use of redundant office buildings into residential use in England. Planning theory & practice, 17 (2), 175–191. doi:10.1080/14649357.2016.1156144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), 2014. Interim methods guide for developing service guidance 3024, process and methods [PMG8], Appendix 2 Checklists, 1.9 checklist: grey literature London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg8/chapter/appendix-2-checklists#19-checklist-grey-literature [Accessed 18 Jun 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Nedin, O., 2018. Planning matters [Internet]. London: Lichfields. Available from: https://lichfields.uk/blog/2018/february/9/article-4-directions-exemptions-for-the-exempt/ [Accessed 19 June 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, S., Roys, M., and Garrett, H., 2015. The cost of poor housing to the NHS: briefing paper. Watford: BRE Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuijsen, M. and Khries, M., editors, 2019. Integrating human health into urban and transport planning. New York: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics, 2013. 2011 Census: population and household estimates for the United Kingdom, March 2011 London: Office for National Statistics. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/bulletins/populationandhouseholdestimatesfortheunitedkingdom/2011-03-21 [Accessed 3 Sept 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Pineo, H., et al., 2018. Promoting a healthy cities agenda through indicators: development of a global urban environment and health index. Cities & health, 2 (1), 27–45. doi:10.1080/23748834.2018.1429180.
   Google Scholar
• PM, 2020. Build, build, build [press release]. London: Prime Minister’s Office, 10 Downing Street. [Accessed 7 Jul 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Remøy, H. and Street, E., 2018. ‘The dynamics of “post-crisis” spatial planning: a comparative study of office conversion policies in England and The Netherlands. Land use policy, 77, 811–820. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, S., et al., 2018. Health impact, and economic value, of meeting housing quality standards: a retrospective longitudinal data linkage study. Public health research, 6 (8), 1–104. doi:10.3310/phr06080.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Institute of British Architects, 2019. RIBA condemns plan to extend permitted development London: Royal Institution of British Architects. Available from: https://www.architecture.com/knowledge-and-resources/knowledge-landing-page/riba-condemns-plan-to-extend-permitted-development [Accessed 27 Jul 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), 2020. May 2020: UK residential market survey. London: Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS). [Accessed 7 Sept 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI), 2020. Zoning: an RTPI briefing. London: Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI). Available from: https://www.rtpi.org.uk/policy/2020/july/zoning-an-rtpi-briefing/ [Accessed 11 Sept 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Rutter, H., et al., 2017. The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health. The lancet, 390 (10112), 2602–2604. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31267-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, K. and Blackie, J., 2013. New directions in planning: beyond localism. Newcastle: Department of Social Sciences, Northumbria University.
   Google Scholar
• Shelter, 2019. Shelter briefing: extending permitted development rights. London: Shelter. [Accessed 10 Jun 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H., 2019. Lifting the curtain on PDR. London: Town and Country Planning Association (TCPA). Available from: https://www.tcpa.org.uk/blog/lifting-the-curtain-on-pdr [Accessed 10 Jun 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Swartz, M., 2011. The PRISMA statement: a guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Journal of pediatric health care, 25 (1), 1–2. doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2010.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2020, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Town and Country Planning Association (TCPA), 2020. Planning 2020 ‘One year on’ - 20th century slums? Raynsford review of planning in England. London: Town and Country Planning Association (TCPA). [Accessed 10 Jun 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Tyndall, J., 2010. AACODS checklist for appraising grey literature. Adelaide: Flinders University.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation (WHO), 2017. Urban green space interventions and health. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation. [Accessed 19 Jun 2020].
   Google Scholar