Relating the importance of psychological science in addressing climate change to cities and health

References

• American Psychological Association, 2021. Psychology and global climate change: addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges. Available from: https://www.apa.org/science/about/publications/climate-change
   Google Scholar
• Beaute, F. and de Kort, Y.A.W., 2014. Natural resistance: exposure to nature and self regulation, mood, and physiology after ego-depletion. Journal of environmental psychology, 40, 167–178. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, M.C., Jonides, J., and Kaplan, S., 2008. The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological science, 19, 1207–1212. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, M.G., et al., 2012. Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression. Journal of affective disorders, 140, 300–305. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, M.S., et al., 2014. The nature of impulsivity: visual exposure to natural environments decreases impulsive decision-making in a delay discounting task. PLoS ONE, 9, e97915. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, A.M., et al., 2017. Nature-related mood effects: season and type of nature contact. Journal of environmental psychology, 54, 91–102. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Psychological Association, 2021. Climate change special issue. Psynopsis, 43, 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Carrus, G., et al., 2015. Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landscape and urban planning, 134, 221–228. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, J.T. and Lau, S., 2015. Nature gives us strength: exposure to nature counteracts ego depletion. The journal of social psychology, 155, 70–85. doi:10.1080/00224545.2014.972310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D.T.C., et al., 2017. Doses of nearby nature simultaneously associated with multiple health benefits. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14, 172–185. doi:10.3390/ijerph14020172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiGiacomo, A., et al., 2018. Convenience improves composting and recycling rates in high-density residential buildings. Journal of environmental planning and management, 61, 309–331. doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1305332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engemann, K., et al., 2019. Residential green space in childhood is associated with lower risk of psychiatric disorders from adolescence into adulthood. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America, 116, 5188–5193. doi:10.1073/pnas.1807504116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble, K.R., Howard, J.H., and Howard, D.V., 2014. Not just scenery: viewing nature pictures improves executive attention in older adults. Experimental aging research, 40, 513–530. doi:10.1080/0361073X.2014.956618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R., 2014. Environmental psychology matters. Annual review of psychology, 65 (541), 579. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115048.
   Google Scholar
• Hurst, M., et al., 2013. The relationship between materialistic values and environmental attitudes and behaviors: a meta-analysis. Journal of environmental psychology, 36, 257–269. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Association People-Environment Studies. (2021). Sustainability. Available from: https://iaps-association.org/networks/sustainability/
   Google Scholar
• James, L.E., et al., 2019. Integrating mental health and disaster preparedness in intervention: a randomized controlled trial with earthquake and flood-affected communities in Haiti. Psychological medicine, 6, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. and Berman, M.G., 2010. Directed attention as a common resource for executive functioning and self-regulation. Perspectives on psychological science, 5, 43–57. doi:10.1177/1745691609356784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, F.E. and Sullivan, W.C., 2001a. Environment and crime in the inner city: does vegetation reduce crime? Environment and behavior, 33, 343–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, F.E. and Sullivan, W.C., 2001b. Aggression and violence in the inner city: effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environment and behavior, 33, 543–571. doi:10.1177/00139160121973124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., et al., 2021. Green spaces mitigate racial disparity of health: a higher ratio of green spaces indicates a lower racial disparity in SARS-CoV-2 infection rates in the USA. Environment international, 152, 106465. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2021.106465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCunn, L.J., et al. (2021). Recommendations for using psychology to address climate change in Canada: a position paper for the Canadian Psychological Association. Available from: https://cpa.ca/docs/File/Position/ClimateChange_TASKFORCE_POSITIONPAPER_FINAL%20FEB%204%202021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McMahan, E.A. and Estes, D., 2015. The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative affect: a meta-analysis. The journal of positive psychology, 10, 507–519. doi:10.1080/17439760.2014.994224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neill, C., Gerard, J., and Arbuthnot, K.D., 2019. Nature contact and mood benefits: contact duration and mood type. The journal of positive psychology, 14, 756–767. doi:10.1080/17439760.2018.1557242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E.K. and Zelenski, J.M., 2011. Underestimating nearby nature: affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological science, 22, 1101–1106. doi:10.1177/0956797611418527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, D. and Lollo, N., 2015. Transforming consumption: from decoupling, to behavior change, to system changes for sustainable consumption. Annual review of environment and resources, 40, 233–259. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passmore, H.-A. and Howell, A.J., 2014. Nature involvement increases hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: a two-week experimental study. Ecopsychology, 6, 148–154.
   Google Scholar
• Piff, P.K., et al., 2015. Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 108, 883–899. doi:10.1037/pspi0000018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poore, J. and Nemecek, T., 2018. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 360 (6392), 987–992. doi:10.1126/science.aaq0216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scannell, L. and Gifford, R., 2013. Personally relevant climate change: the role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment & Behavior, 45, 60–85. doi:10.1177/0013916511421196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, K.M., Nichols, C.P., and Kasser, T., 2011. Americans recommend smaller ecological footprints when reminded of intrinsic American values of self-expression, family, and generosity. Ecopsychology, 3, 97–104. doi:10.1089/eco.2010.0078
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, C., Visschers, V.H.M., and Siegrist, M., 2011. Organic tomatoes versus canned beans: how do consumers assess the environmental friendliness of vegetables? Environment and behavior, 43, 591–611. doi:10.1177/0013916510372865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bosch, M.A., et al., 2015. Moving to serene nature may prevent poor mental health – results from a Swedish longitudinal cohort study. International journal of environmental research and public health, 12, 7974–7989. doi:10.3390/ijerph120707974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, N., et al., 2015. Seeing community for the trees: the links among contact with natural environments, community cohesion, and crime. BioScience, 65, 1141–1153. doi:10.1093/biosci/biv151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, N., Przybylski, A.K., and Ryan, R.M., 2009. Can nature make us more caring? Effects of immersion in nature on intrinsic aspirations and generosity. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 35, 1315–1329. doi:10.1177/0146167209341649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, N.M., 2000. At home with nature: effects of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32, 775–795. doi:10.1177/00139160021972793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, N.M. and Evans, G.W., 2003. Nearby nature: a buffer of life stress among ruralchildren. Environment and behavior, 35, 311–330. doi:10.1177/0013916503035003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, D., et al., 2018. How does the design of waste disposal signage influence waste disposal behavior? Journal of environmental psychology, 58, 77–85. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, D.W., DiGiacomo, A., and Kingstone, A., 2013. A sustainable building promotes pro-environmental be havior: an observational study on food disposal. PLoS one, 8, e53856. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynes, S., et al., 2018. Measuring what works: quantifying greenhouse gas emission reductions of behavioural interventions to reduce driving, meat consumption, and household energy use. Environmental research letters, 13, 113002. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aae5d7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynes, S., Zhao, J., and Donner, S., 2020. How well do people understand the climate impact of individual actions? Climatic change, 162, 1521–1534. doi:10.1007/s10584-020-02811-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar