‘Cul-de-sacs make you fat’: homebuyer and land developer perceptions of neighbourhood walkability, bikeability, livability, vibrancy, and health

References

• American Planning Association, 2017. Health community policy guide. Available from: https://planning-org-uploaded-media.s3.amazonaws.com/document/Healthy-Communities-Policy-Guide.pdf [Accessed 10 March 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Badland, H. and Pearce, J., 2019. Liveable for whom? Prospects of urban liveability to address health inequities. Social Science & Medicine, 232, 94–105. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badland, H.M., et al., 2012. Association of neighbourhood residence and preferences with the built environment, work-related travel behaviours, and health implications for employed adults: findings from the URBAN study. Social Science & Medicine, 75 (8), 1469–1476. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.05.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreca, A., Curto, R., and Rolando, D., 2020. Urban vibrancy: an emerging factor that spatially influences the real estate market. Sustainability, 12 (1), 346. doi:10.3390/su12010346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, L.M. and Malizia, E., 2015. Downtown vibrancy influences public health and safety outcomes in urban counties. Journal of Transport & Health, 2 (4), 540–548. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2015.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, C. 2010 On a magazine’s list of the city’s ‘most livable neighborhoods,’ a few surprises. The New York Times 12 April 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Institute of Planners, 2018. Policy on health communies planning. Available from: https://www.cip-icu.ca/Files/Policy-2018/policy-healthy-eng-FINAL.aspx [accessed 10 March 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Carnoske, C., et al., 2010. Developer and realtor perspectives on factors that influence development, sale, and perceived demand for activity-friendly communities. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, Suppl 7 (s1), S48–59. doi:10.1123/jpah.7.s1.s48
   Google Scholar
• Cerin, E., et al., 2009. Cross-validation of the factorial structure of the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS) and its abbreviated form (NEWS-A). International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 6 (1), 32. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-6-32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark, M.I., et al., 2010. Key stakeholder perspectives on the development of walkable neighbourhoods. Health & Place, 16 (1), 43–50. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, D., 2020. It’s a livability issue’: core neighbourhoods calling for permanent enforcement to curb excessive vehicle noise. Edmonton Journal, 17 January, https://edmontonjournal.com/news/local-news/its-a-livability-issue-core-neighbourhoods-calling-for-permanent-enforcement-to-curb-excessive-vehicle-noise
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., 2013. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. 3rd. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Elo, S. and Kyngas, H., 2008. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62 (1), 107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferdinand, A.O., et al., 2012. The relationship between built environments and physical activity: a systematic review. American Journal of Public Health, 102 (10), e7–e13. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, A., 2015. What is a walkable place? The walkability debate in urban design. Urban Design International, 20 (4), 274–292. doi:10.1057/udi.2015.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, J.L., 2009. Theory and practice in planning the suburbs: challenges to implementing new urbanism, smart growth, and sustainability principles. Planning Theory & Practice, 10 (1), 11–33. doi:10.1080/14649350802661683
   Google Scholar
• Guhathakurta, S., et al., 2019. Mining social media to measure neighborhood quality in the City of Atlanta. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 8 (1), 1–18. doi:10.4018/IJEPR.2019010101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, A. and Fan, Y., 2016. Developers’ perspectives on transit-oriented development. Transport Policy, 51, 103–114. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, C.M. and Ram, Y., 2018. Walk score® and its potential contribution to the study of active transport and walkability: a critical and systematic review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 61, 310–324. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heesch, K.C., Giles-Corti, B., and Turrell, G., 2015. Cycling for transport and recreation: associations with the socio-economic, natural and built environment. Health & Place, 36, 152–161. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heesch, K.C., Sahlqvist, S., and Garrard, J., 2012. Gender differences in recreational and transport cycling: a cross-sectional mixed-methods comparison of cycling patterns, motivators, and constraints. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9 (1), 106. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, M., et al., 2011. How should we define health? BMJ, 343, d4163. doi:10.1136/bmj.d4163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humpel, N., et al., 2004. Changes in neighborhood walking are related to changes in perceptions of environmental attributes. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 27 (1), 60–67. doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2701_8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine, A., Drew, P., and Sainsbury, R., 2013. ‘Am I not answering your questions properly?’ Clarification, adequacy and responsiveness in semi-structured telephone and face-to-face interviews. Qualitative Research, 13 (1), 87–106. doi:10.1177/1468794112439086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, E. and McCormack, G.R., 2014. The associations between objectively-determined and self-reported urban form characteristics and neighborhood-based walking in adults. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11 (1), 71. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-11-71
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J., 1961. The death and life of Great American cities. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kellstedt, D.K., et al., 2021. A scoping review of bikeability assessment methods. Journal of Community Health, 46 (1), 211–224. doi:10.1007/s10900-020-00846-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krenn, P., Oja, P., and Titze, S., 2015. Development of a bikeability index to assess the bicycle-friendliness of urban environments. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 05 (04), 451–459. doi:10.4236/ojce.2015.54045
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, K., Fullagar, S., and Reid, S., 2016. Where is the ‘social’ in constructions of ‘liveability’? Exploring community, social interaction and social cohesion in changing urban environments. Urban Policy and Research, 34 (4), 343–355. doi:10.1080/08111146.2015.1118374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, M., et al., 2015. Planning healthy, liveable and sustainable cities: how can indicators inform policy? Urban Policy and Research, 33 (2), 1–14. doi:10.1080/08111146.2014.1002606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L., Dill, J., and Mohr, C., 2014. The objective versus the perceived environment: what matters for bicycling? Transportation, 41 (6), 1135–1152. doi:10.1007/s11116-014-9520-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, G., et al., 2019a. A scoping review on the relations between urban form and health: a focus on Canadian quantitative evidence. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can, 39 (5), 187–200. doi:10.24095/hpcdp.39.5.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, G.R., et al., 2019b. Differences in transportation and leisure physical activity by neighborhood design controlling for residential choice. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 8 (6), 532–539. doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2019.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, G.R., et al., 2020. realtors’ perceptions of social and physical neighborhood characteristics associated with active living: a Canadian perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (23), 9150. doi:10.3390/ijerph17239150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H., Witlox, F., and Tribby, C., 2013. Developing context-sensitive livability indicators for transportation planning: a measurement framework. Journal of Transport Geography, 26, 51–64. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montemurro, G.R., et al., 2011. “Walkable by willpower”: resident perceptions of neighbourhood environments. Health & Place, 17 (4), 895–901. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J., 1998. Making a city: urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3 (1), 93–116. doi:10.1080/13574809808724418
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J.M., et al., 2002. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1 (2), 13–22. doi:10.1177/160940690200100202
   Google Scholar
• Mouratidis, K., 2018. Rethinking how built environments influence subjective well-being: a new conceptual framework. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 11 (1), 24–40.
   Google Scholar
• Mouratidis, K., 2020. Commute satisfaction, neighborhood satisfaction, and housing satisfaction as predictors of subjective well-being and indicators of urban livability. Travel Behaviour and Society, 21, 265–278. doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2020.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhs, C.D. and Clifton, K.J., 2015. Do characteristics of walkable environments support bicycling? Toward a definition of bicycle-supported development. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 9, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhs, C.D. and Clifton, K.J., 2016. Do characteristics of walkable environments support bicycling? Toward a definition of bicycle-supported development. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 9 (2), 147–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan, A., Wood, L., and Giles-Corti, B., 2013. Selling new neighborhoods as good for walking: issues for measuring self-selection. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 10 (1), 5–9. doi:10.1123/jpah.10.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orstad, S.L., et al., 2017. A systematic review of agreement between perceived and objective neighborhood environment measures and associations with physical activity outcomes. Environment and Behavior, 49 (8), 904–932. doi:10.1177/0013916516670982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osama, A., et al., 2020. Determining if walkability and bikeability indices reflect pedestrian and cyclist safety. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2674 (9), 767–775. doi:10.1177/0361198120931844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, R., Garg, Y., and Bharat, A., 2013. Understanding qualitative conceptions of livability: an Indian perspective. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 2(12). doi:10.15623/ijret.2013.0212064
   Google Scholar
• Public Health Agency of Canada, 2017. Desiging health living. The chief publc health officer’s report on the state of public health in Canada. Government of Canada. Cat: HP2-10E-PDF Available from: Canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/documents/services/publications/chief-public-health-officer-reports-state-public-health-canada/2017-designing-healthy-living/PHAC_CPHO-2017_Report_E.pdf [Accessed 10 March 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Redaelli, E., 2016. Creative placemaking and the NEA: unpacking a multi-level governance. Policy Studies, 37 (4), 387–402. doi:10.1080/01442872.2016.1157857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remax, 2020. Best places to live: Canada liveability report (Fall 2020). https://blog.remax.ca/canada-liveability-report/
   Google Scholar
• Renalds, A., Smith, T.H., and Hale, P.J., 2010. A systematic review of built environment and health. Family & community health, 33 (1), 68–78. doi:10.1097/FCH.0b013e3181c4e2e5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs, W., 2017. Walkability: to quantify or not to quantify. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 10 (1), 125–127.
   Google Scholar
• Sallis, J.F., et al., 2010. Evaluating a brief self-report measure of neighborhood environments for physical activity research and surveillance: physical Activity Neighborhood Environment Scale (PANES). Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 7 (4), 533–540. doi:10.1123/jpah.7.4.533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvo, G., et al., 2018. Neighbourhood built environment influences on physical activity among adults: a systematized review of qualitative evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15 (5), 5. doi:10.3390/ijerph15050897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., 2000. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23 (4), 334–340. doi:10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanen, T. and Mokhtarian, P.L., 2005. What affects commute mode choice: neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods? Journal of Transport Geography, 13 (1), 83–99. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Shamsuddin, S., Hassan, N.R.A., and Bilyamin, S.F.I., 2012. Walkable environment in increasing the liveability of a city. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 167–178. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.025
   Google Scholar
• Stankov, I., et al., 2017. Research and residents’ perspectives on built environments implicated in heart disease: a concept mapping approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14 (2), 2. doi:10.3390/ijerph14020170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. and Koschinsky, J., 2013. The walkable neighborhood: a literature review. Int J Sustain Land Use Urban Plan, 1, 42–63.
   Google Scholar
• White, R., 2018. Reasons why Calgary is one of the most walkable cities on the planet. Calgary Herald, 16 March. https://calgaryherald.com/life/homes/condos/white-does-calgary-have-the-worlds-most-walkable-city-centre [Accessed 16 March 2020].
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, 1986. The Ottawa Charter for health promotion. Health Promotion International, 1, 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., et al., 2019. Towards a cycling-friendly city: an updated review of the associations between built environment and cycling behaviors (2007–2017). Journal of Transport & Health, 14, 100613. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2019.100613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuniga-Teran, A.A., et al., 2017. Designing healthy communities: testing the walkability model. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 6 (1), 63–73. doi:10.1016/j.foar.2016.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar