Co-creating solutions to complex urban problems with collaborative systems modelling - insights from a workshop on health co-benefits of urban green spaces in Guangzhou

References

• Arthur, W.B., 2013. Complexity economics: A different framework for economic thought [online]. Santa Fe, NM: Santa Fe Institute. Available from: www.santafe.edu [Accessed 15 October 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Behr, M., 2020. Dolmetschen: Komplexität, methodik, modellierung. (Interpreting: Complexity, methodology, modelling) [online]. Berlin: Frank & Timme. Available from: https://www.frank-timme.de/verlag/verlagsprogramm/buch/suchbegriff/behr/verlagsprogramm/bd-49-martina-behr-dolmetschen-komplexitaet-methodik-modellierung/backPID/suche.html?sword=behr [Accessed 10 August 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Berditchevskaia, A. and Baeck, P., 2020. The future of minds and machines - How artificial intelligence can enhance collective intelligence [online]. London: Nesta. Available from: https://www.nesta.org.Uk/report/future-minds-and-machines/ [Accessed 5 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., Luna Reyes, L.F., and Rich, E., eds., n.d. Enabling collaborative governance through systems modeling methods: public policy design and implementation. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42970-6
   Google Scholar
• Bisello, A., et al., 2021. Smart and sustainable planning for cities and regions. Cham: Springer Nature. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57764-3_17
   Google Scholar
• Bivona, E. and Noto, G., 2020. Fostering collaborative governance in chronic disease management programs: a dynamic performance management approach. In: C. Bianchi, L. F. Luna-Reyes and E. Rich, eds. Enabling collaborative governance through systems modeling methods. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 297–315. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42970-6_14
   Google Scholar
• European Union, 2020. Collective intelligence at EU level. Social and democratic dimensions. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/649356/EPRS_BRI(2020)649356_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gatzweiler, F.W., et al., 2016. Advancing health and wellbeing in the changing urban environment: implementing a systems approach. ICSU-UNU-IAMP program on urban health and wellbeing: a systems analysis approach. Xiamen: Institute of Urban Environment (IUE), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). Zhejiang University Press, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harrer, G., 2015. Cybersystemic tools for politics and business. In: R. Ison, ed. Governing the Anthropocene: The Greatest Challenge for Systems Thinking in Practice, 2-7 August 2015 Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Harrer-Puchner, G. and Mueller, J., 2017-2021. System logics simulation tools. web based professional tools for holistic system analysis. Software on demand. St. Gallen: System Logics T.T. GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Hassen, N. and Kaufman, P., 2016. Examining the role of urban street design in enhancing community engagement: a literature review. Health & place, 41 (2016), 119–132. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.08.005
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, M.M., Cosenz, F., and Dyner, I., 2020. Blending collaborative governance and dynamic performance management to foster policy coordination in renewable energy supply chains. In: C. Bianchi, L. F. Luna-Reyes and E. Rich, eds. Enabling collaborative governance through systems modeling methods. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 237–261. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42970-6_11
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, W., 2018. Systems design thinking: Theoretical, methodological and methodical considerations, a German narrative. In: P. Jones, Kijima, K., eds. Systemic Design. Translational Systems Sciences Series, vol. 8, Springer, Tokyo, 89–117. doi:10.1007/978-4-431-55639-8_4
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, A., et al., 2021. Cybernetics approaches and models. In: Metcalf, et al. eds. Handbook of systems sciences. Singapore: Springer Nature, 67–86.
   Google Scholar
• Levenda, A.M., et al., 2020. Rethinking public participation in the smart city. The Canadian geographer/Le géographe canadien. doi:10.1111/cag.12601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud, I.H., et al., 2021. Co-creation pathways to inform shared governance of urban living labs in practice: lessons from three european projects. Frontiers in sustainable cities, 3. doi:10.3389/frsc.2021.690458
   Google Scholar
• Meilvang, M.L., Carlsen, H.B., and Blok, A., 2018. Methods of engagement: On civic participation formats as composition devices in urban planning. European journal of cultural and political sociology, 5 (1–2), 12–41.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, A., Murie, A., and Groves, R., 2005. Social capital and neighbourhoods that work. Urban studies, 42 (10), 1711–1738. doi:10.1080/00420980500231589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbitt, L., et al., 2018. The dimensions of urban green equity: a framework for analysis. Urban forestry & urban greening, 34, 240–248. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plastrik, P. and Cleveland, J., 2018. Life after carbon: The next global transformation of cities. Washington, DC: Island Press, 3rd. 304.
   Google Scholar
• Rittgen, P., 2009. Collaborative modeling - a design science approach. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 5-8 January 2009 Hawaii. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Roe, D., et al., 2021. Investing in nature for development: Do nature‐based interventions deliver local development outcomes? [online]. London: International Institute for Environment and Development. Available from: https://pubs.iied.org/20206iied [Accessed 21 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Rusong, W., et al., 2014. A review of sensitivity models for urban ecosystems. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34 (1), 23–32. doi:10.5846/stxb201304280846
   Google Scholar
• Salevsky, H. and Mueller, I., 2011. Translation as systemic interaction -A new perspective and a new methodology. Berlin: Frank & Timme GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Sioen, G.B., Terada, T., and Yokohari, M., 2016. Sustainability science as the next step in developing urban planning and design. In: M. Esteban, et al., eds. Sustainability science: Field methods and exercises. 1st ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 117–135.
   Google Scholar
• Suberi, H.K., 2021. Sustainable mobility system and human well-being: Design enquiry and case study of Bhutan. Braunschweig: Dissertation University of Fine Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Thinyane, M., et al., 2020. The messy complexities of democratic engagement and empowerment in participatory design – an illustrative case with a community-based organisation. CoDesign, 16 (1), 29–44. doi:10.1080/15710882.2020.1722175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNDRR, 2019. Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva, Switzerland, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Thinkers Campus, 2016. Health and wellbeing in the city we need. UTC. Available from: https://www.worldurbancampaign.org/urban-thinkers-campus [Accessed 21 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Vester, F., 1976. Urban systems in crisis. Understanding and planning human living spaces: The biovcybernetic approach. Stuttgart: DVA.
   Google Scholar
• Vester, F., 1988. The biocybernetic approach as a basis for planning our environment. Systems practice, 1 (4), 399–413. doi:10.1007/BF01066582
   Google Scholar
• Vester, F., 2001. The art of interconnected thinking. Ideas and tools for tackling complexity . Munich: MCB Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• White, S.C., 1996. Depoliticizing development: the uses and abuses of participation. Development in Practice, 6 (1), 6–15.
   Google Scholar
• WHO Europe, 2017. Urban Green Spaces – A Brief for Action. Copenhagen: WHO. Available from: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/342289/Urban-Green-Spaces_EN_WHO_web3.pdf [Accessed 21 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, C., Person, F., and Jelse, K., 2012. A Logistic Analysis with the Sensitivity Model Prof. Vester [online]. Göteborg: IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd. Available from: http://ivl.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1552071/FULLTEXT01.pdf [Accessed 25 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum, 2021. The global risks report 2021 [online]. Available from: http://wef.ch/risks2021 [Accessed 10 Sep 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Wulfhorst, G., et al., 2013. What cities want. How cities plan future mobility. A system study. Editor MAN SE, Munich. Munich, and MAN: By Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., et al., 2020. Applying dynamic performance management to foster collaborative governance in higher education: a conceptual framework. In: C. Bianchi, L. F. Luna-Reyes and E. Rich, eds. Enabling collaborative governance through systems modeling methods. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 317–333. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42970-6_15
   Google Scholar
• Zia, A., 2020. Participatory multicriteria evaluation of metropolitan transportation planning system scenarios: Navigating trade-offs for collaborative design of sustainable communities. In: C. Bianchi, L. F. Luna-Reyes and E. Rich, eds. Enabling collaborative governance through systems modeling methods. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 191–211. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42970-6_9
   Google Scholar