Community wellbeing in the built environment: towards a relational building assessment

References

• Amaratunga, D., et al. 2002. Quantitative and qualitative research in the built environment: application of “mixed” research approach. Work study.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, S., et al. 2017. What is community wellbeing? Conceptual review. What Works Wellbeing. https://whatworkswellbeing.org/resources/what-is-community-wellbeing-conceptual-review/.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1990. The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R., 2017. Critical posthuman knowledges. The South Atlantic quarterly, 116 (1), 83–96. doi:10.1215/00382876-3749337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R., 2018. A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, culture & society, 0263276418771486. doi:10.1177/0263276418771486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buot, M.M., et al., 2017. Developing community wellbeing index (CWBi) in disaster-prone area of the Philippines. Journal of nature studies, 16 (1), 63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Buot, M.M. and Dulce, M.Z.C., 2019. An index to determine community wellbeing along coastal community in Leyte, Philippines. Environment Asia, 12 (1), 56–67.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D.E. and Campbell, T.A., 1988. A new look at informal communication—the role of the physical environment. Environment and behavior, 20 (2), 211–226. doi:10.1177/0013916588202005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christakopoulou, S., Dawson, J., and Gari, A., 2001. The community well-being questionnaire: theoretical context and initial assessment of its reliability and validity. Social indicators research, 56 (3), 321–351. doi:10.1023/A:1012478207457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloutier, S., Ehlenz, M.M., and Afinowich, R., 2019. Cultivating community wellbeing: guiding principles for research and practice. International Journal of community well-being, 2 (3–4), 277–299. doi:10.1007/s42413-019-00033-x
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, D., et al., 2003. Population health in Canada: a brief critique. American journal of public health, 93 (3), 392–396. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.3.392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, S., 2016. Normalizing sustainability in a regenerative building: the social practice of being at CIRS. doi:10.14288/1.0319909
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S., et al., 2018. Rethinking performance gaps: a regenerative sustainability approach to built environment performance assessment. Sustainability, 10 (12), 4829. doi:10.3390/su10124829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, S. and Robinson, J., 2018. Introducing the qualitative performance gap: stories about a sustainable building. Building research & information, 46 (5), 485–500. doi:10.1080/09613218.2017.1366138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D., et al., 2010. Developing and using local community wellbeing indicators: Learning from the experience of community indicators Victoria. The Australian journal of social issues, 45 (1), 71–88. doi:10.1002/j.1839-4655.2010.tb00164.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davern, M.T., et al., 2017. Best practice principles for community indicator systems and a case study analysis: how community indicators Victoria is creating impact and bridging policy, practice and research. Social indicators research, 131 (2), 567–586. doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1259-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J., et al., 2012. Creating sense of community: the role of public space. Journal of environmental psychology, 32 (4), 401–409. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, M.G., 2017. Great spatial expectations: on three objects, two communities and one house. Current sociology, 65 (4), 603–622. doi:10.1177/0011392117694071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatti, F. and Procentese, F., 2020. Open neighborhoods, sense of community, and Instagram use: disentangling modern local community experience through a multilevel path analysis with a multiple informant approach. TPM - testing, psychometrics, methodology in applied psychology, 27 (3), 313–329. doi:10.4473/TPM27.3.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatti, F. and Procentese, F., 2021. Experiencing urban spaces and social meanings through social media:unravelling the relationships between Instagram city-related use, sense of place, and sense of community. Journal of environmental psychology, 78, 101691. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1984. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gram-Hanssen, K., 2019. Automation, smart homes and symmetrical anthropology: non-humans as performers of practices? In: Y. Strengers, ed. Social practices and dynamic non-humans. Palgrave Macmillan, 235–253. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92189-1_12
   Google Scholar
• Hanc, M., McAndrew, C., and Ucci, M., 2019. Conceptual approaches to wellbeing in buildings: a scoping review. Building research & information, 47 (6), 767–783. doi:10.1080/09613218.2018.1513695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, D.C.W., et al., 2008. A survey of the health and safety conditions of apartment buildings in Hong Kong. Building and environment, 43 (5), 764–775. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.01.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S.C.L., 2006. A study of outdoor interactional spaces in high-rise housing. Landscape and urban planning, 78 (3), 193–204. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, S.S.K., et al., 2018. Composing new understandings of sustainability in the Anthropocene. Cultural studies of science education, 13 (1), 299–315. doi:10.1007/s11422-017-9829-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-J., 2008. Subjective quality of life measurement in Taipei. Building and environment, 43 (7), 1205–1215. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Je, H., and Byun, J., 2011. Well-being index of super tall residential buildings in Korea. Building and environment, 46 (5), 1184–1194. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S.J. and Kim, Y., 2015. Searching for the meaning of community well-being. In: S.J. Lee, et al, ed. Community well-being and community development. springerbriefs in well-being and quality of life research. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12421-6_2
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.J. and Kim, Y., 2016. Structure of well-being: an exploratory study of the distinction between individual well-being and community well-being and the importance of intersubjective community well-being. In: Y. Kee, S.J. Lee, R. Phillips, eds. Social factors and community wellbeing. Switzerland: Springer, pp. 13–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lehoux, P., Poland, B., and Daudelin, G., 2006. Focus group research and “the patient’s view. Social science & medicine, 63 (8), 2091–2104. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, M., et al., 2013. Liveable, healthy, sustainable: what are the key indicators for Melbourne neighbourhoods? Place, health and liveability research program. Melbourne, AU: University of Melbourne. https://socialequity.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/1979574/Liveability-Indicators-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Markovich, J., Angelo, M.S.D., and Dinh, T., 2018. Community wellbeing: a framework for the design professions. Ottawa: The Conference Board of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, R.L., et al., 2008. Measuring community wellbeing: a Central Queensland case study. The Australasian journal of regional studies, 14 (1), 73.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G., et al., 2022. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Ospina, S.M., Burns, D., and Howard, J., 2021. Introduction to the handbook: navigating the complex and dynamic landscape of participatory research and inquiry. In: D. Burns, J. Howard, & S. Ospina. The SAGE handbook of participatory research and inquiry. SAGE Publications Ltd, 3–16. doi:10.4135/9781529769432.n1
   Google Scholar
• Poland, B., et al., 1998. Wealth, equity and health care: a critique of a “population health” perspective on the determinants of health. Social science & medicine, 46 (7), 785–798. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00197-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poland, B., et al., 2021. A connected community approach: citizens and formal institutions working together to build community-centred resilience. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18 (19), 10175. doi:10.3390/ijerph181910175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poldma, T., et al., 2014. Understanding people’s needs in a community public space: about accessibility and lived experience. ALTER— European journal of disability research, journal européen de recherche sur le handicap, 8 (3), 206–216.
   Google Scholar
• Raphael, D., et al., 2001. Making the links between community structure and individual: community quality of life in Riverdale. Toronto, Canada. Health & place, 7 (3), 179e96. doi:10.1016/S1353-8292(01)00008-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A., 2002. Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. European journal of social theory, 5 (2), 243–263. doi:10.1177/13684310222225432
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, A., 2020. Creating connected communities: can ‘neighbourhood nests’ help foster social resilience? Novae Res Urbis, 24 (22), 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T.R., 1996. Social practices: a Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. and Pantzar, M., 2005. Consumers, producers and practices: understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic walking. Journal of consumer culture, 5 (1), 43–64. doi:10.1177/1469540505049846
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., Pantzar, M., and Watson, M., 2012. The dynamics of social practice: everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, K. and Robinson, J., 2020. Social learning and transdisciplinary co-production: a social practice approach. Sustainability, 12 (18), 7511. doi:10.3390/su12187511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smale, B., and Hilbrecht, M. 2017. From national to local: measuring well-being at the community level. In: R. Phillips and C. Wong, eds. Handbook of Community Well-Being Research. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Dordrecht: Springer, 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0878-2_16
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T.S.J., ed., 2019. Our calculable selves: the rise and hegemony of well-being discourse. In: Sustainability, wellbeing and the posthuman turn. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 43–61.
   Google Scholar
• Syhlonyk, A. and Seasons, M., 2020. The concept and measurement of community well-being: lessons for planners. Planning practice and research, 36 (2), 141156, doi:10.1080/02697459.2020.1780386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M., 2007. Community participation in the real world: opportunities and pitfalls in new governance spaces. Urban studies, 44 (2), 297–317. doi:10.1080/00420980601074987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toronto Public Health and the Centre for Urban Growth and Renewal, 2012. Toward healthier apartment neighbourhoods: a healthy Toronto by design report. Toronto: City of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• VanderWeele, T.J., 2019. Measures of community well-being: a template. International journal of community well-being, 2 (3–4), 253–275. doi:10.1007/s42413-019-00036-8
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, Z., Böhme, J., and Wamsler, C., 2020. Towards a relational paradigm in sustainability research, practice, and education. Ambio: a journal of the human environment, 50 (1), 7484. doi:10.1007/s13280-020-01322-y
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C.C., et al., 2004. Flint photovoice: community building among youths, adults, and policymakers. American journal of public health, 94 (6), 911–913. doi:10.2105/AJPH.94.6.911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. and Burris, M.A., 1997. Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health education & behavior, 24 (3), 369–387. doi:10.1177/109019819702400309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S., et al., 2020. A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations. Ecosystems and people, 16 (1), 304–325. doi:10.1080/26395916.2020.1814417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, J. and Brasher, K., 2008. Community wellbeing in an unwell world: trends, challenges, and possibilities. Journal of public health policy, 29 (3), 353–366. doi:10.1057/jphp.2008.16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, L., Frank, L.D., and Giles-Corti, B., 2010. Sense of community and its relationship with walking and neighborhood design. Social science & medicine, 70 (9), 1381–1390. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, L., Giles-Corti, B., and Bulsara, M., 2012. Streets apart: does social capital vary with neighbourhood design? Urban studies research, 2012, 1–11. doi:10.1155/2012/507503
   Google Scholar
• Wu, D., DiGiacomo, A., and Kingstone, A., 2013. A sustainable building promotes pro-environmental behavior: an observational study on food disposal. Plos one, 8(1), e53856. Available from: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar