Biophilic cities and health

References

• Abdelaal, M.S. and Soebarto, V., 2019. Biophilia and Salutogenesis as restorative design approaches in healthcare architecture. Architectural science review, 62 (3), 195–205. doi:10.1080/00038628.2019.1604313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aerts, R., Honnay, O., and Van Nieuwenhuyse, A., 2018. Biodiversity and human health: mechanisms and evidence of the positive health effects of diversity in nature and green spaces. British medical bulletin, 127 (1), 5–22. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldy021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anguelovski, I., et al., 2020. Gentrification and health in two global cities: a call to identify impacts for socially vulnerable residents. Cities & health, 4 (1), 40–49. doi:10.1080/23748834.2019.1636507.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, H. and Grant, M., 2006. A health map for the local human habitat. The journal of the royal society for the promotion of health, 126 (6), 252–253. doi:10.1177/1466424006070466.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basnou, C., et al., 2020. Co-design processes to address nature-based solutions and ecosystem services demands: the long and winding road towards inclusive urban planning. Frontiers in sustainable cities, 2, 572556. doi:10.3389/frsc.2020.572556.
   Google Scholar
• Beatley, T., 2008. Toward biophilic cities: strategies for integrating nature into urban design. In: S.R. Kellert, J. Heerwagen, and M. Mador, eds. Biophilic design: the theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 277–295.
   Google Scholar
• Beatley, T., 2011. Biophilic cities: integrating nature into urban design and planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beatley, T., 2016. Handbook of biophilic city planning and design. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beatley, T. and Newman, P., 2013. Biophilic cities are sustainable, resilient cities. Sustainability, 5 (8), 3328–3345. doi:10.3390/su5083328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratman, G.N., et al., 2019. Nature and mental health: an ecosystem service perspective. Science advances, 5, eaax0903. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aax0903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning, W., Ryan, C., and Clancy, J., 2014. 14 patterns of biophilic design: improving health and well-being in the built environment. New York: Terrapin Bright Green LLC. Available from: https://www.terrapinbrightgreen.com/reports/14-patterns/.
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan, A., et al., 2020. The impact of green spaces on mental health in urban settings: a scoping review. Journal of mental health, 30 (2), 2. doi:10.1080/09638237.2020.1755027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chronéer, D., Ståhlbröst, A., and Habibipour, A., 2019. Urban living labs: towards an integrated understanding of their key components. Technology innovation management review, 9 (3), 50–62. doi:10.22215/timreview/1224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, A., et al., 2017. Exploring potential mechanisms involved in the relationship between eudaimonic wellbeing and nature connection. Landscape and urban planning, 158, 119–128. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, H.V.S., et al., 2021. Breaking down and building up: gentrifications, its drivers, and urban health inequality. Current environmental health reports, 8 (2), 157–166. doi:10.1007/s40572-021-00309-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collins, R.M., et al., 2020. A systematic map of research exploring the effect of greenspace on mental health. Landscape and urban planning, 201, 103823. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzhambov, A.M., et al., 2018. Urban residential greenspace and mental health in youth: different approaches to testing multiple pathways yield different conclusions. Environmental research, 160, 47–59. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2017.09.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzhambov, A.M., et al., 2020. Analytical approaches to testing pathways linking greenspace to health: a scoping review of the empirical literature. Environmental research, 186, 109613. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzhambov, A.M., et al., 2021. Does greenery experienced indoors and outdoors provide an escape and support mental health during the COVID-19 quarantine? Environmental research, 196, 110420. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.110420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsadek, M., Liu, B., and Lian, Z., 2019. Green façades: their contribution to stress recovery and well-being in high-density cities. Urban forestry & urban greening, 46, 126446. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, L.S., Shanahan, D.F., and Fuller, R.A., 2017. A review of the benefits of nature experiences: more than meets the eye. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14 (8), 864. doi:10.3390/ijerph14080864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, D., et al., 2021. Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on urban park visitation: a global analysis. Journal of forestry research, 32 (2), 553–567. doi:10.1007/s11676-020-01249-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou, M., et al., 2021. Mechanisms of impact of blue spaces on human health: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18 (5), 2486. doi:10.3390/ijerph18052486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaziani, R., Lemon, M., and Atmodiwirjo, P., 2021. Biophilic design patterns for primary schools. Sustainability, 13 (21), 12207. doi:10.3390/su132112207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeffner, M., et al., 2017. Accessing blue spaces: social and geographic factors structuring familiarity with, use of, and appreciation of urban waterways. Landscape and urban planning, 167, 136–146. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.008.
   Google Scholar
• Hartig, T.H., et al., 2014. Nature and health. Annual review of public health, 35 (1), 207–228. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032103-182443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, O., Jackson, J., Goode, E., and Interface Inc, 2022. Design guide summary: creating positive spaces by designing for community. Cities & Health, 6 (5), 898–905. doi:10.1080/23748834.2020.1821978.
   Google Scholar
• Houlden, V., Jani, A., and Hong, A., 2021. Is biodiversity of greenspace important for human health and wellbeing? A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Urban forestry & urban greening, 66, 127385. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelks, N.O., Jennings, V., and Rigolon, A., 2021. Green gentrification and health: a scoping review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18 (3), 907. doi:10.3390/ijerph18030907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, V. and Bakmole, O., 2019. The relationship between social cohesion and urban green space: an avenue for health promotion. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16 (3), 452. doi:10.3390/ijerph16030452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez, M.P., et al., 2021. Associations between nature exposure and health: a review of the evidence. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18 (9), 4790. doi:10.3390/ijerph18094790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellert, S.R., 2005. Building for life: designing and understanding the human–nature connection. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S.R., 2008. Dimensions, elements, and attributes of biophilic design. In: S.R. Kellert, J. Heerwagen, and M. Mador, eds. Biophilic design: the theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S.R. and Calabrese, E.F., 2015. The practice of biophilic design. Available from: https://www.biophilic-design.com.
   Google Scholar
• Krabbendam, L., et al., 2021. Understanding urbanicity: how interdisciplinary methods help to unravel the effect of the city on mental health. Psychological medicine, 51 (7), 1099–1110. doi:10.1017/S0033291720000355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, M., 2015. How might contact with nature promote human health? Promising mechanisms and a possible central pathway. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 1093. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl, J. and Magnusson, U., 2020. Zoonotic pathogens in urban animals: enough research to protect the health of the urban population? Animal health research reviews, 21 (1), 50–60. doi:10.1017/S1466252319000100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lõhmus, M., et al., 2021. Mental health, greenness, and nature related behaviors in the adult population of Stockholm County during COVID-19-related restrictions. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18 (6), 3303. doi:10.3390/ijerph18063303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, M., et al., 2022. Urgent biophilia: green space visits in Wellington, New Zealand, during the COVID-19 lockdowns. Land, 11 (6), 793. doi:10.3390/land11060793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markevych, I., et al., 2017. Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: theoretical and methodological guidance. Environmental research, 158, 301–317. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marselle, M.R., et al., 2019. Review of the mental health and well-being benefits of biodiversity. In: M.R. Marcelle, ed. Biodiversity and health in the face of climate change. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 175–211. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02318-8_9.
   Google Scholar
• Marselle, M.R., et al., 2021a. Biodiversity and health in the urban environment. Current environmental health reports, 8 (2), 146–156. doi:10.1007/s40572-021-00313-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marselle, M.R., et al., 2021b. Pathways linking biodiversity to human health: a conceptual framework. Environment international, 150, 106420. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2021.106420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, D.W. and Chavis, D.M., 1986. Sense of community: a definition and theory. Journal of community psychology, 14 (1), 6–23. doi:10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6:AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mell, I. and Whitten, M., 2021. Access to nature in a post COVID-19 world: opportunities for green infrastructure financing, distribution and equitability in urban planning. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18 (4), 1527. doi:10.3390/ijerph18041527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesimäki, M., Hauru, K., and Lehvävirta, S., 2019. Do small green roofs have the possibility to offer recreational and experiential benefits in a dense urban area? A case study in Helsinki, Finland. Urban forestry & urban greening, 40, 114–124. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie, S., van Stralen, M.M., and West, R., 2011. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation science, 6 (1), 42. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, J.G., et al., 2019. Relating urban biodiversity to human health with the ‘holobiont’ concept. Frontiers in microbiology, 10, 550. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroy, M. and Keltner, D., 2022. Awe as a pathway to mental and physical health. Perspectives on psychological science. doi:10.1177/17456916221094856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panlasigui, S., et al., 2021. Biophilia beyond the building: applying the tools of urban biodiversity planning to create biophilic cities. Sustainability, 13 (5), 2450. doi:10.3390/su13052450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S.J. and Lee, H.C., 2019. Spatial design of childcare facilities based on biophilic design patterns. Sustainability, 11 (10), 2851. doi:10.3390/su11102851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, T. and D’Penna, K., 2020. Biophilic design for restorative university learning environments: a critical review of literature and design recommendations. Sustainability, 12 (17), 7064. doi:10.3390/su12177064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, T. and Verderber, S., 2021. Biophilic design strategies in long-term residential care environments for persons with dementia. Journal of aging and environment. doi:10.1080/26892618.2021.1918815.
   Google Scholar
• Pipitone, J.M. and Jović, S., 2021. Urban green equity and COVID-19: effects on park use and sense of belonging in New York City. Urban forestry & urban greening, 65, 127338. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouso, S., et al., 2021. Contact with blue-green spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown beneficial for mental health. The science of the total environment, 756, 143984. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, E., 2021. Sound and soundscape in restorative natural environments: a narrative literature review. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 570563. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.570563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, C.E., Rieves, E.S., and Carlson, K., 2022. Perceptions of green space usage, abundance, and quality of green spaces were associated with better mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic among residents in Denver. Plos one, 17 (3), e0263779. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remme, R.P., et al., 2021. An ecosystem service perspective on urban nature, physical activity, and health. PNAS, 118 (22), e2018472118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2018472118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., et al., 2021. Moments, not minutes: the nature-wellbeing relationship. International journal of wellbeing, 11 (1), 8–33. doi:10.5502/ijw.v11i1.1267.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J.M., Mills, J.G., and Breed, M.F., 2018. Walking ecosystems in microbiome-inspired green infrastructure: an ecological perspective on enhancing personal and planetary health. Challenges, 9 (2), 40. doi:10.3390/challe9020040.
   Google Scholar
• Roe, J. and McCay, L., 2021. Restorative cities: urban design for mental health and wellbeing. London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Rohr, J.R., et al., 2020. Towards common ground in the biodiversity-disease debate. Nature ecology & evolution, 4, 24–33. doi:10.1038/s41559-019-1060-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallis, J., et al., 2006. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annual review of public health, 27 (1), 297–322. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santamouris, M., 2020. Recent progress on urban overheating and heat island research. Integrated assessment of the energy, environmental vulnerability and health impact. Synergies with the global climate change. Energy & buildings, 207, 109482. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N., et al., 2021. Urban blue spaces and human health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative studies. Cities, 119, 103413. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderlund, J., 2019. The emergence of biophilic design. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Soga, M., et al., 2021a. A room with a green view: the importance of nearby nature for mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ecological applications, 31 (2), e2248. doi:10.1002/eap.2248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soga, M., et al., 2021b. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on human–nature interactions: pathways, evidence and implications. People and nature, 3 (3), 518–527. doi:10.1002/pan3.10201.
   Google Scholar
• Tabb, P.J., 2020. Biophilic urbanism: designing resilient communities for the future. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tidball, K.G., 2012. Urgent biophilia: human–nature interactions and biological attractions. Ecology and society, 17 (2), 5. doi:10.5751/ES-04596-170205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasso, L.P., et al., 2021. The relationship between nature deprivation and individual wellbeing across urban gradients under COVID-19. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18 (4), 1511. doi:10.3390/ijerph18041511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonne, C., et al., 2021. Defining pathways to healthy sustainable urban development. Environment international, 146, 106236. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.106236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugolini, F., et al., 2020. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use and perceptions of urban green space: an international exploratory study. Urban forestry & urban greening, 56, 126888. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venter, Z.S., et al., 2020. Urban nature in a time of crisis: recreational use of green space increases during COVID-19 outbreak in Oslo, Norway. Environmental research letters, 15 (10), 104075. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abb396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, C., Shen, G.Q., and Choi, S., 2021. Underlying relationships between public urban green spaces and social cohesion: a systematic literature review. City, culture and society, 24, 100383. doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2021.100383.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, H., et al., 2020. Microbiome-inspired green infrastructure: a toolkit for multidisciplinary landscape design. Trends in biotechnology, 38 (12), 1305–1308. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K.J.H., et al., 2019. Appraising the psychological benefits of green roofs for city residents and workers. Urban forestry & urban greening, 44, 126399. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E.O., 1984. Biophilia: the human bond with other species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E.O., 1993. Biophilia and the conservation ethic. In: S.R. Kellert and E.O. Wilson, eds. The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press, 31–41.
   Google Scholar
• Witze, A., 2021. The deadly impact of urban heat. Nature, 595 (7867), 349–351. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01181-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortzel, J.D., et al., 2021. Association between urban greenspace and mental wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic in a U.S. cohort. Frontiers in sustainable cities, 3, 686159. doi:10.3389/frsc.2021.686159.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Z., et al., 2020. Critical review on the cooling effect of urban blue-green space: a threshold-size perspective. Urban forestry & urban greening, 49, 126630. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., et al., 2020. Links between green space and public health: a bibliometric review of global research trends and future prospects from 1901 to 2019. Environmental research letters, 15 (6), 063001. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab7f64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, R., Zhang, C.-Q., and Rhodes, R.E., 2021. The pathways linking objectively-measured greenspace exposure and mental health: a systematic review of observational studies. Environmental research, 198, 111233. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2021.111233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar