The role of intragroup dynamics in nonprofit governance models: a systematic quantitative literature review

References

• The asterisk identifies articles included in the systematic review.
   Google Scholar
• Academy of Management. (2006). Code of ethics.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 235–258. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<235::AID-JOB837>3.0.CO;2-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *de Andrés-Alonso, P., Azofra-Palenzuela, V., & Romero-Merino, M. E. (2010). Beyond the disciplinary role of governance: How boards add value to Spanish foundations. British Journal of Management, 21(1), 100–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00645.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Balzac, H. (2011). Power and politics. In S. Robbins, T. A. Judge, B. Millett, & M. Boyle (Eds.), Organisational behaviour (pp. 366–394). Frenchs Forest: Pearson Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (2004). Conceptualizing the construct of interpersonal conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15(3), 216–244. doi: 10.1108/eb022913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y., & Ramalho, N. (2006). Communalities and distinctions in the measurement of organizational performance and effectiveness across for-profit and nonprofit sectors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(1), 39–65. doi: 10.1177/0899764005282468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bastedo, M. N. (2009). Conflicts, commitments, and cliques in the university: Moral seduction as a threat to trustee independence. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 354–386. doi: 10.3102/0002831208329439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayle, E., & Madella, A. (2002). Development of a taxonomy of performance for national sport organizations. European Journal of Sport Science, 2(2), 1–21. doi: 10.1080/17461390200072205
   Google Scholar
• Bayle, E., & Robinson, L. (2007). A framework for understanding the performance of national governing bodies of sport. European Sport Management Quarterly, 7(3), 249–268. doi: 10.1080/16184740701511037
   Google Scholar
• *Bradshaw, P., & Fredette, C. (2009). Academic governance of universities: Reflections of a senate chair on moving from theory to practice and back. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(2), 123–133. doi: 10.1177/1056492608326320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bradshaw, P., Murray, V., & Wolpin, J. (1992). Do nonprofit boards make a difference? An exploration of the relationships among board structure, process, and effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21(3), 227–249. doi: 10.1177/089976409202100304
   Google Scholar
• *Bradshaw, P., Murray, V., & Wolpin, J. (1996). Women on boards of nonprofits: What difference do they make? Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 6(3), 241–254. doi: 10.1002/nml.4130060304
   Google Scholar
• *Brown, W. A. (2005). Exploring the association between board and organizational performance in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 15(3), 317–339. doi: 10.1002/nml.71
   Google Scholar
• Cornforth, C. (2001). What makes boards effective? An examination of the relationships between board inputs, structures, processes and effectiveness in non-profit organisations. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9(3), 217–227. doi: 10.1111/1467-8683.00249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Cornforth, C. (2012). Nonprofit governance research: Limitations of the focus on boards and suggestions for new directions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 1116–1135. doi: 10.1177/0899764011427959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Doherty, A., & Carron, A. (2003). Cohesion in volunteer sport executive committees. Journal of Sport Management, 17, 116–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, J., Chambers, S. K., & Hyde, M. K. (2016). Systematic review of motives for episodic volunteering. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(1), 425–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrhart, M. G., & Naumann, S. E. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: A group norms approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 960. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ferkins, L., & Shilbury, D. (2012). Good boards are strategic: What does that mean for sport governance? Journal of Sport Management, 26(1), 67–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferkins, L., Shilbury, D., & McDonald, G. (2005). The role of the board in building strategic capability: Towards an integrated model of sport governance research. Sport Management Review, 8(3), 195–225. doi: 10.1016/S1441-3523(05)70039-5
   Google Scholar
• *Ferkins, L., Shilbury, D., & McDonald, G. (2009). Board involvement in strategy: Advancing the governance of sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 23(3), 245–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Fredette, C., & Bradshaw, P. (2012). Social capital and nonprofit governance effectiveness. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 22(4), 391–409. doi: 10.1002/nml.21037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, J. R. P. J., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Gill, M., Flynn, R. J., & Reissing, E. (2005). The governance self-assessment checklist: An instrument for assessing board effectiveness. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, *15(3), 271–294. doi: 10.1002/nml.69
   Google Scholar
• *Griffin, D., & Abraham, M. (2000). The effective management of museums: Cohesive leadership and visitor-focused public programming. Small Group Research, 18(4), 335–368.
   Google Scholar
• *Hamm-Kerwin, S., & Doherty, A. (2010). Intragroup conflict in nonprofit sport boards. Journal of Sport Management, 24(3), 245–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, G. S., & Wernerfelt, B. (1989). Determinants of firm performance: The relative importance of economic and organizational factors. Strategic Management Journal, 10(5), 399–411. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250100502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Kulich, C., Trojanowski, G., & Atkins, C. (2010). Investing with prejudice: The relationship between women’s presence on company boards and objective and subjective measures of company performance. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 484–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatch, M. J., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2006). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Heimovics, R. D., & Herman, R. D. (1990). Responsibility for critical events in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 19(1), 59–72. doi: 10.1177/089976409001900107
   Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1997). Multiple constituencies and the social construction of nonprofit organization effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26(2), 185–206. doi: 10.1177/0899764097262006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1999). Theses on nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(2), 107–126. doi: 10.1177/0899764099282001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2004). Doing things right: Effectiveness in local nonprofit organizations, a panel study. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 694–704. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00416.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Holland, T. P. (1991). Self-assessment by nonprofit boards. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 2(1), 25–36. doi: 10.1002/nml.4130020106
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Holland, T. P., & Jackson, D. K. (1998). Strengthening board performance. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 9(2), 121. doi: 10.1002/nml.9201
   Google Scholar
• Houle, C. (1997). Governing boards: Their nature and nurture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• *Hoye, R. (2004). Leader-member exchanges and board performance of voluntary sport organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 15(1), 55–70. doi: 10.1002/nml.53
   Google Scholar
• *Hoye, R. (2006). Leadership within Australian voluntary sport organization boards. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 16(3), 297–313. doi: 10.1002/nml.108
   Google Scholar
• *Hoye, R., & Cuskelly, G. (2003a). Board–executive relationships within voluntary sport organisations. Sport Management Review, 6(1), 53–73. doi: 10.1016/S1441-3523(03)70053-9
   Google Scholar
• *Hoye, R., & Cuskelly, G. (2003b). Board power and performance within voluntary sport organisations. European Sport Management Quarterly, 3(2), 103–119. doi: 10.1080/16184740308721943
   Google Scholar
• *Hoye, R., & Doherty, A. (2011). Nonprofit sport board performance: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Sport Management, 25(3), 272–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoye, R., & Inglis, S. (2003). Governance of nonprofit leisure organizations. Loisir et Société/Society and Leisure, 26(2), 369–387. doi: 10.1080/07053436.2003.10707627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jackson, D. K., & Holland, T. P. (1998). Measuring the effectiveness of nonprofit boards. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(2), 159–182. doi: 10.1177/0899764098272004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jäger, U. P., & Rehli, F. (2012). Cooperative power relations between nonprofit board chairs and executive directors. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 23(2), 219–236. doi: 10.1002/nml.21061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 187–242. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25005-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 99–130. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2001.2974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kerwin, S., Doherty, A., & Harman, A. (2011). “It’s not conflict, it’s differences of opinion”: An in-depth examination of conflict in nonprofit boards. Small Group Research, 42(5), 562–594. doi: 10.1177/1046496411398395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kreutzer, K. (2009). Nonprofit governance during organizational transition in voluntary associations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 20(1), 117–133. doi: 10.1002/nml.244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *LeRoux, K., & Wright, N. S. (2010). Does performance measurement improve strategic decision making? Findings from a national survey of nonprofit social service agencies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(4), 571–587. doi: 10.1177/0899764009359942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lewis, L. (2005). The civil society sector: A review of critical issues and research agenda for organizational communication scholars. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(2), 238–267. doi: 10.1177/0893318905279190
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Crossroads-organizational performance as a dependent variable. Organization Science, 8(6), 698–706. doi: 10.1287/orsc.8.6.698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *McDonagh, K. J. (2006). Hospital governing boards: A study of their effectiveness in relation to organizational performance. Journal of Healthcare Management, 51(6), 377–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller-Millesen, J. L. (2003). Understanding the behavior of nonprofit boards of directors: A theory-based approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(4), 521–547. doi: 10.1177/0899764003257463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millward, L. J., & Postmes, T. (2010). Who we are affects how we do: The financial benefits of organizational identification. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 327–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Morrison, J. B., & Salipante, P. (2007). Governance for broadened accountability: Blending deliberate and emergent strategizing. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 195–217. doi: 10.1177/0899764006295992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. A., & McIntyre, M. L. (2007). Board of director performance: A group dynamics perspective. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 7(2), 209–224. doi: 10.1108/14720700710739831
   Google Scholar
• *Murray, V., Bradshaw, P., & Wolpin, J. (1992). Power in and around nonprofit boards: A neglected dimension of governance. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 3(2), 165–182. doi: 10.1002/nml.4130030205
   Google Scholar
• *Nicholson, G., Newton, C., & McGregor-Lowndes, M. (2012). The nonprofit board as a team: Pilot results and initial insights. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 22(4), 461–481. doi: 10.1002/nml.21040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Nobbie, P. D., & Brudney, J. L. (2003). Testing the implementation, board performance, and organizational effectiveness of the policy governance model in nonprofit boards of directors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(4), 571–595. doi: 10.1177/0899764003257460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Obeng, K., & Ugboro, I. O. (2005). A study of the activities and roles of public transit boards. Transportation Journal, 44(3), 51–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Papadimitriou, D. (1999). Voluntary boards of directors in Greek sport governing bodies. European Journal For Sport Management, 6 (Special Issue), 78–103.
   Google Scholar
• *Parker, L. D. (2007). Internal Governance in the nonprofit boardroom: A participant observer study. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 923–934. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00607.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, C., & Byrne, J. (2013). The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(3), 534–548. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2013.841651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, C., Grignon, J., Steven, R., Guitart, D., & Byrne, J. (2015). Publishing not perishing: How research students transition from novice to knowledgeable using systematic quantitative literature reviews. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10), 1756–1769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Prybil, L. D. (2006). Size, composition, and culture of high-performing hospital boards. American Journal of Medical Quality, 21(4), 224–229. doi: 10.1177/1062860606289628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Reid, W., & Turbide, J. (2012). Board/staff relationships in a growth crisis: Implications for nonprofit governance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(1), 82–99. doi: 10.1177/0899764011398296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, S. (2011). Foundations of group behaviour. In S. Robbins, T. A. Judge, B. Millett, & M. Boyle (Eds.), Organisational behaviour (pp. 242–273). Frenchs Forest: Pearson Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, S., Byrne, J., & Pickering, C. (2012). A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(4), 351–363. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shilbury, D., & Ferkins, L. (2011). Professionalisation, sport governance and strategic capability. Managing Leisure, 16(2), 108–127. doi: 10.1080/13606719.2011.559090
   Google Scholar
• Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slack, T., & Parent, M. M. (2006). Understanding sport organizations: The application of organization theory (2nd ed.). Lower Mitcham: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Slesinger, L. H. (1991). Self-assessment for nonprofit governing boards. Washington, DC: National Centre for Nonprofit Boards.
   Google Scholar
• *Stephenson, M. O., Schnitzer, M. H., & Arroyave, V. M. (2008). Nonprofit governance, management, and organizational learning: Exploring the implications of one “mega-gift”. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(1), 43–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steven, R., Morrison, C., & Castley, J. G. (2015). Birdwatching and avitourism: A global review of research into its participant markets, distribution and impacts, highlighting future research priorities to inform sustainable avitourism management. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(8–9), 1257–1276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, M. M., & Cutcher-Gershenfeld, S. (2002). Challenges of measuring performance in nonprofit organizations. In P. Flynn, & V. A. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Measuring the impact of the nonprofit sector (pp. 33–57). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• *Thomsen, S. (2014). Comparative corporate governance of non-profit organizations. European Company & Financial Law Review, 11(1), 15–30. doi: 10.1515/ecfr-2014-0015
   Google Scholar
• *Turbide, J. (2012). Can good governance prevent financial crises in arts organizations? International Journal of Arts Management, 14(2), 4–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wells, P. (2012). The non-profit Sector and its challenges for governance. Journal of Leadership, Accountability & Ethics, 9(2), 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Winand, M., Vos, S., Claessens, M., Thibaut, E., & Scheerder, J. (2014). A unified model of non-profit sport organizations performance: Perspectives from the literature. Managing Leisure, 19(2), 121–150. doi: 10.1080/13606719.2013.859460
   Google Scholar
• Winand, M., Zintz, T., Bayle, E., & Robinson, L. (2010). Organizational performance of Olympic sport governing bodies: Dealing with measurement and priorities. Managing Leisure, 15(4), 279–307. doi: 10.1080/13606719.2010.508672
   Google Scholar