Cohesion and leadership in individual sports: a social network analysis of participation in recreational running groups

References

• Anderson, A. J., & Warner, S. (2017). Social network analysis as a complementary tool to measuring team cohesion. Journal of Sport Behavior, 40, 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P. (2002). Netdraw software for network visualization. Lexington, KY: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Analyzing social networks (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, S. M., Davies, K. M., & Carron, A. V. (2014). Group cohesion in sport and exercise settings. In M. R. Beauchamp & M. A. Eys (Eds.), Group dynamics in exercise and sport psychology, pp. 147–163. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carnes, A. J., & Mahoney, S. E. (2016). Cohesion is associated with perceived exertion and enjoyment during group running. Journal of Exercise Physiology Online, 19, 24–39.
   Google Scholar
• Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1998). The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. Advances in Sport and Exercise Psychology Measurement, 23, 213–226.
   Google Scholar
• Carron, A. V., & Spink, K. S. (1992). Internal consistency of the group environment questionnaire modified for an exercise setting. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 304–306. doi: 10.2466/pms.1992.74.1.304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244–266. doi: 10.1123/jsp.7.3.244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, J., Jenkins, J. M., & Weatherford, J. (2015). Focus on freshman: Basic instruction programs enhancing physical activity. Physical Educator, 72, 621–639. doi: 10.18666/TPE-2015-V72-I4-6472
   Google Scholar
• Fransen, K., Van Puyenbroeck, S., Loughead, T. M., De Cuyper, B., Vanbeselaere, N., Vande Broeck, G., & Boen, F. (2015a). Who takes the lead? Social network analysis as pioneering tool to investigate shared leadership within sports teams. Social Networks, 43, 28–38. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2015.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransen, K., Van Puyenbroeck, S., Loughead, T. M., De Cuyper, B., Vanbeselaere, N., Vande Broek, G., & Boen, F. (2015b). The art of athlete leadership: Identifying high-quality athlete leadership at the individual and team level through social network analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 28, 347–360. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2014-0259
   Google Scholar
• Frayeh, A. L., & Lewis, B. (2017). Sport commitment among adult recreational soccer players: Test of an expanded model. International Journal of Exercise Science, 10, 4–24. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/ijes/vol10/iss1/2
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, L., Kremers, S., Walsh, A., & Brug, H. (2006). How is your walking group running? Health Education, 106, 21–31. doi: 10.1108/09654280610637175
   Google Scholar
• Loughead, T. M., Fransen, K., Van Puyenbroeck, S., Hoffman, M. D., De Cuyper, B., Vanbeselaere, N., & Boen, F. (2016). An examination of the relationship between athlete leadership and cohesion using social network analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 34, 2063–2073. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1150601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusher, D., Kremer, P., & Robins, G. (2014). Cooperative and competitive structures of trust relations in teams. Small Group Research, 45, 3–36. doi: 10.1177/1046496413510362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusher, D., & Robins, G. (2013). Example exponential random graph model analysis. In D. Lusher, J. Koskinen, & G. L. Robins (Eds.), Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, E., & Gill, D. (2017). An examination of the relationship between team cohesion and individual anxiety among recreational soccer players. Journal of Amateur Sport, 3(2), 1–26. doi: 10.17161/jas.v3i2.5883
   Google Scholar
• Running USA. (2017) . 2017 National Runner Survey. Retrieved from http://cdn.trustedpartner.com/docs/library/RunningUSA2012/RunningUSA_NRS_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2017). Social network analysis (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Spink, K. S., & Carron, A. V. (1994). Group cohesion effects in exercise groups. Small Group Research, 25, 26–42. doi: 10.1177/1046496494251003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spink, K. S., Ulvick, J. D., Crozier, A. J., & Wilson, K. S. (2014). Group cohesion and adherence in unstructured exercise groups. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(3), 293–298. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, P., Robins, G. L., & Pattison, P. E. (2009). PNet: A program for the simulation and estimation of exponential random graph models. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, S., Bowers, M., & Dixon, M. A. (2012). Team dynamics: A social network perspective. Journal of Sport Management, 26, 53–66. doi: 10.1123/jsm.26.1.53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, C. E., Jordan, J. S., Funk, D. C., & Clark, B. S. (2016). Black Girls Run: Facilitating a connection for black women to the “white” sport of running. Journal of Sport Management, 30, 382–395. doi: 10.1123/jsm.2015-0242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar