Inspiring a generation: an examination of stakeholder relations in the context of London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics educational programmes

References

• Agha, N., Fairley, S., & Gibson, H. (2011). Considering legacy as a multi-dimensional construct: The legacy of the Olympic games. Sport Management Review, 15(1), 125–139. doi: 10.1016/j.smr.2011.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, D. (2012). Olympic values education: Evolution of a pedagogy. Educational Review, 64(3), 275–302. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2012.676539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Olympic Association. (2018). About us. Retrieved from https://www.teamgb.com/about-boa
   Google Scholar
• Brittain, I., & Beacom, A. (2016). Leveraging the London 2012 Paralympic Games: What legacy for disabled people? Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 40(6), 499–521. doi: 10.1177/0193723516655580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Chatziefstathiou, D. (2012). Olympic education and beyond: Olympism and value legacies from the Olympic and Paralympic Games. Educational Review, 64(3), 385–400. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2012.696094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., & Henry, I. (2019). Schools’ engagement with the Get Set London 2012 Olympic education programme: Empirical insights from schools in a non-hosting region. European Physical Education Review, 25(1), 254–272. doi: 10.1177/1356336X17721437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coalter, F. (2010). The politics of sport-for-development: Limited focus programmes and broad gauge problems? International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 45(3), 295–314. doi: 10.1177/1012690210366791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, A., & McCafferty, P. (2016). The real Olympic Games: Sponsorship, schools and the Olympics – the case of Coca-Cola. Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education, 15(1), 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Culture, Media and Sport. (2008). Before, during and after the Games: Legacy action plan. London: The Stationary Office Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Culture, Media and Sport. (2010). London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games Annual Report. London: The Stationary Office Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Get Set. (2018). Home Page. Retrieved from https://www.getset.co.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Girginov, V. (2013). Handbook of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Volume One: Making the Games. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Girginov, V. (2016). Has the London 2012 Olympic Inspire programme inspired a generation? A realist view. European Physical Education Review, 22(4), 490–505. doi: 10.1177/1356336X15623169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griggs, G., & Ward, G. (2013). The London 2012 legacy for primary physical education: Policy by the way? Sociological Research Online, 18(3), 1–7. doi: 10.5153/sro.3111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Guardian. (2010). Teachers stunned after Michael Gove scraps “sport for all” funding. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/education/2010/nov/20/schools-sports-funding-cuts-gove.
   Google Scholar
• The Guardian. (2013). Lord Coe: I’m quitting to make sure Olympic legacy is delivered. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2013/jul/19/lord-coe-quits-ambassador-olympic-legacy
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B. (2016). Sport policy making. In A. Bairner, J. Kelly, & J. W. Lee (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of sport and Politics (pp. 16–27). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B., & Green, M. (2006). The changing status of school sport and physical education: Explaining policy change. Sport, Education and Society, 11(1), 73–92. doi: 10.1080/13573320500453495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons Education Committee. (2013a). Appendix: School sport following London 2012: No more political football: Government Response to the committee’s third report of Session 2013-14. London: The Stationary Office Limitedhttps://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmeduc/723/723.pdf
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Education Committee. (2013b). Volume 1: School sport following London 2012: No more political football. London: The Stationary Office Limitedhttps://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmeduc/164/164.pdf
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Education Committee. (2013c). Volume II: School sport following London 2012: No more political football. London: The Stationary Office Limitedhttps://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmeduc/164/16402.htm
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Education Committee. (2013d). Volume III: School sport following London 2012: No more political football. London: The Stationary Office Limitedhttps://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmeduc/164/16402.htm
   Google Scholar
• IOC. (2013a). Olympic Charter. Retrieved from https://stillmed.olympic.org/Documents/olympic_charter_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IOC. (2013b). Factsheet London 2012 Facts and Figures. Retrieved from /https://stillmed.olympic.org/media/Document%20Library/OlympicOrg/IOC/Olympic_Games/Olympic_Legacy/London_2012/Legacy/EN_London_2012_Facts_and_Figures.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C. (2010). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 22(1), 32–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2010.00259.x
   Google Scholar
• Jung, H., Pope, S., & Kirk, D. (2016). Policy for physical education and school sport in England, 2003–2010: Vested interests and dominant discourses. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(5), 501–516. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2015.1050661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, S. (2018). The London 2012 Paralympic Games. In I. Brittain & A. Beacom (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Paralympic studies (pp. 481–505). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kohe, G. Z. (2017). London 2012 (Re) calling: Youth memories and Olympic ‘legacy’ ether in the hinterland. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 52(1), 24–44. doi: 10.1177/1012690215581604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohe, G. Z., & Bowen-Jones, W. (2016). Rhetoric and realities of London 2012 Olympic education and participation ‘legacies’: Voices from the core and periphery. Sport, Education and Society, 21(8), 1213–1229. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2014.997693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohe, G. Z, & Chatziefstathiou, D. (2017). Olympic Education in the United Kingdom: Rethinking London 2012, Learning ‘Legacies’ and their Pedagogical potential. In Olympic Education: An International Review (pp. 60–72). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kohe, G. Z., & Collison, H. (2019). Sport, education, Corporatisation: Spaces of connection, contestation and creativity. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. (2006). The race for the 2012 Olympics: The inside story of how London won the bid. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Lenskyj, H. J. (2012). Olympic education and Olympism: Still colonizing children’s minds. Educational Review, 64(3), 265–274. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2012.667389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopkey, B., & Parent, M. M. (2015). Stakeholder perspectives regarding the governance of legacy at the Olympic Games. Annals of Leisure Research, 18(4), 528–548. doi: 10.1080/11745398.2015.1092388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey, I. (2010). Governance of lottery sport programmes: National direction of local partnerships in the new opportunities for PE and sport programme. Managing Leisure, 15(3), 198–213. doi: 10.1080/13606719.2010.483831
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, I. (2018). Analysing policy change and continuity: physical education and school sport policy in England since 2010. Sport, Education and Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13573322.2018.1547274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LOCOG. (2012). Learning legacy: Lessons learned from planning and staging the London 2012 Games. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, K. (2008). Using documents. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life (pp. 285–303). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mackintosh, C. (2014). Dismantling the school sport partnership infrastructure: Findings from a survey of physical education and school sport practitioners. Education 3-13, 42(4), 432–449. doi: 10.1080/03004279.2012.714793
   Google Scholar
• Parent, M. M. (2008). Evolution and issue patterns for major-sport-event organizing committees and their stakeholders. Journal of Sport Management, 22(2), 135–164. doi: 10.1123/jsm.22.2.135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillpots, L. (2013). An analysis of the policy process for physical education and school sport: The rise and demise of school sport partnerships. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 5(2), 193–211. doi: 10.1080/19406940.2012.666558
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (2000). Debating governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Telegraph. (2010). Michael Gove forced into about-turn over scrapping School Sports Partnerships after outrage over cuts. Retrieved from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/schoolsports/8215108/Michael-Gove-forcedinto-about-turn-over-scrapping-School-Sports-Partnerships-after-outrage-over-cuts.html.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, A. (2014). Olympic legacies: Recurrent rhetoric and harsh realities. Contemporary Social Science, 9(2), 137–158. doi: 10.1080/21582041.2014.912792
   Google Scholar
• UK Government. (2010). Letter to the Youth Sport Trust. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/refocusing-sport-in-schools-to-build-a-lasting-legacy-of-the-2012-games
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. (1996). Discourse, power and access. In C. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices:readings in critical discourse analysis. (pp. 84–104). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Viollet, B., Minikin, B., Scelles, N., & Ferrand, A. (2016). Perceptions of key stakeholders regarding national federation sport policy: The case of the French rugby union. Managing Sport and Leisure, 21(5), 319–337. doi: 10.1080/23750472.2017.1280837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whigham, S., & Bairner, A. (2018). Analysing sport policy and politics: The promises and challenges of synthesising methodological approaches. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 10(4), 721–740. doi: 10.1080/19406940.2018.1450773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar