The recognition of the sacred in theories of possible worlds: some hermeneutic orientations

References

• Abellán-García Barrio, A., 2020. “Le petit prince y la imaginación de lo invisible.” Anuario de Estudios Filológicos 43: 5–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.17398/2660-7301.43.5.
   Google Scholar
• Albaladejo Mayordomo, Tomás. 1992. Semántica de la narración: la ficción realista. Madrid: Taurus Universitaria.
   Google Scholar
• Albaladejo Mayordomo, Tomás. [1986] 1998. Teoría de los mundos posibles y macroestructura narrativa. Análisis de las novelas cortas de Clarín. Murcia: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alicante.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 1974. Poética. Translation of Valentín García Yebra. Madrid: Gredos.
   Google Scholar
• Bettetini, Gianfranco. 1982. “Prólogo.” In Poética del texto audiovisual, by Juan José García-Noblejas, 13–15. Pamplona: EUNSA.
   Google Scholar
• Chesterton, Gilbert Keith. 2009. Orthodoxy. Gutenberg Project. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/130.
   Google Scholar
• Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. 2010. Biographia literaria. Valencia: Pre-textos.
   Google Scholar
• Doležel, Lubomír. 1998. Heterocosmica. Fiction and Possible Worlds. London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doležel, Lubomír. 2010. Possible Worlds of Fiction and History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doležel, Lubomír. 2019. “Porfyry's Tree for the Concept of Fictional Worlds.” In Possible World Theory and Contemporary Narratology, edited by Marie-Laure Ryan and Alice Bell, 47–61. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, Umberto. 1984. The Role of the Reader. Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, Umberto. [1979] 1993. Lector in fabula. La cooperación interpretativa en el texto narrativo. Translation by Ricardo Pochtar. Barcelona: Lumen.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, Umberto. [1990] 1994. The Limits of Interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eliade, Mircea. 2011. Tratado de Historia de las Religiones. Morfología y dialéctica de lo sagrado. Translation by A. Medinaveitia. Madrid: Cristiandad.
   Google Scholar
• Eliade, Mircea. 2009. Mito y realidad. Translation by Luis Gil. Barcelona: Kairós.
   Google Scholar
• Eliade, Mircea. 1998. Lo sagrado y lo profano. Translation by Luis Gil Fernández and Ramón Alfonso Díez Aragón. Barcelona: Paidós.
   Google Scholar
• Espezúa Salmón, Dorian. 2006. “Ficcionalidad, mundos posibles y campo de referencia.” Dialogía: revista de lingüística, literatura y cultura 1: 69–96.
   Google Scholar
• Fořt, Bohumil. 2016. An Introduction to Fictional Worlds Theory. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• García-Noblejas, Juan José. 1982. Poética del texto audiovisual. Pamplona: EUNSA.
   Google Scholar
• García-Noblejas, Juan José. 1984. “Sobre la constitución de los mundos posibles poéticos.” Anuario filosófico 17 (1): 147–156.
   Google Scholar
• García-Noblejas, Juan José. [1996] 2005. Comunicación y mundos posibles. Navarra: EUNSA.
   Google Scholar
• García-Noblejas, Juan José. 2017. “Practical Philosophy and Television Drama. Ethical and Anthropological Remarks on Some European Television Series (2015).” Church, Communication and Culture 2 (1): 41–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2017.1287279.
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, Etienne. 1981. El espíritu de la filosofía medieval. Madrid: Rialp.
   Google Scholar
• Goldiş, Alex. 2015. “From the Linguistic Turn to the Referential Turn: The Metamorphosis of Theory in Thomas G. Pavel’s and Lubomír Doležel’s Criticism.” World Literature Studies 2 (7): 49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, Martin. 2009. Ser y tiempo. Translation by Jorge Eduardo Rivera Cruchaga, Madrid: Trotta.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández Ruiz, María Victoria. 2020. “Creación de mundos posibles. Claves articulatorias humanistas en Brideshead Revisited de Evelyn Waugh.” Phd. Diss., Universidad Francisco de Vitoria.
   Google Scholar
• Martín Jiménez, Alfonso. 2015. Literatura y ficción: la ruptura de la lógica ficcional. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez Bonati, Félix. 1972. La estructura de la obra literaria. Barcelona: Seix Barral.
   Google Scholar
• Pavel, Thomas G. 1975. “«Possible Worlds» in Literary Semantics.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34 (2): 165–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/430073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavel, Thomas G. 1983. “The Borders of Fiction.” Poetics Today 4 (1): 83–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1772153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavel, Thomas G. 1986. Fictional Worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pavel, Thomas G. 2010. “Immersion and Distance in Fictional Worlds.” Itinéraires 1: 99–109.  doi:https://doi.org/10.4000/itineraires.2183.
   Google Scholar
• Pavel, Thomas G. 2019. “Postface.” In Possible World Theory and Contemporary Narratology, edited by Marie-Laure Ryan and Alice Bell, 315–322. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prades, Javier. 2015. Dar testimonio: la presencia de los cristianos en la sociedad plural. Madrid: BAC.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul. [1980] 2001. La metáfora viva. Translated by Agustín Neira. Madrid: Cristiandad.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul. [1995–1996] 2004–2009. Tiempo y narración. 3 vols. Translation and edition by Agustín Neira. Madrid: Cristiandad.
   Google Scholar
• Roas, David. 2001. Teorías de lo fantástico. Madrid: Arco/Libros.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Pequeño, Francisco Javier. 2008. Géneros literarios y mundos posibles. Madrid: Eneida.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Pequeño, Francisco Javier. 1993. “Lo verosímil de Aristóteles y la teoría de los mundos posibles.” Castilla: Estudios de Literatura N.18: 139–144.
   Google Scholar
• Ronen, Ruth. 1994. Possible Worlds in Literary Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Marie-Laure. 1985. “The Modal Structure of Narrative Universe.” Poetics Today 6 (4): 717–755. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1771963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, Marie-Laure. 1991. Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence, and Narrative Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2001. Narrative as Virtual Reality. Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2006. “From Parallel Universes to Possible Worlds: Ontological Pluralism in Physics, Narratology, and Narrative.” Poetics Today 27 (4): 633–674. doi:https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-2006-006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2013. “Possible Worlds.” In The Living Handbook of Narratology, edited by Peter Hühn. Hamburg: Hamburg University. http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/possible-worlds.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2015. Narrative as Virtual Reality 2. Revisiting Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Marie-Laure, and Alice Bell. 2019. “Introduction: Possible Worlds Theory Revisited.” In Possible World Theory and Contemporary Narratology, edited by Marie-Laure Ryan and Alice Bell, 1–43. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tolkien, John Ronald Reuel. 2002. Árbol y hoja y el poema Mitopoieia. Translation by Julio César Santoyo, José María Santamaría and Luis Domènech. Barcelona: Minotauro.
   Google Scholar
• Tolkien, John Ronald Reuel. [1947] 2008. On Fairy-Stories, edition by V. Flieger and D. A. Anderson, Londres: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Vilar, Mariano. 2012. “Introducción a la teoría de los mundos posibles. Verdad, método y construcción de realidad.” Luthor 9 (2): 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Villen, Monique. 2019. “«Vi un mundo nuevo que se avecinaba velozmente»: estudio de la ucronía en Never Let Me Go de Kazuo Ishiguro.” Castilla. Estudios de Literatura 10: 195–222.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1973. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Madrid: Alianza.
   Google Scholar