Postsecular rhetoric of the Pope: a discourse analysis of Pope Francis’ TED Talks

References

• Anderson, Chris. 2016. TED Talks: The Official TED Guide to Public Speaking. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Bettiza, Gregorio, and Filippo Dionigi. 2015. “How Do Religious Norms Diffuse? Institutional Translation and International Change in a Post-Secular World Society.” European Journal of International Relations 21 (3): 621–646. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066114542663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyers, Jaco. 2014. “The Church and the Secular: The Effect of the Post-Secular on Christianity.” Hervormde Teologiese Studies 70 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v70i1.2605
   Google Scholar
• Boeve, Lieven. 2005. “Religion after Detraditionalization: Christian Faith in a Post-Secular Europe.” Irish Theological Quarterly 70 (2): 99–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002114000507000201.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, Dustin. 2016. Islam in a Post-Secular Society: Religion, Secularity, and the Antagonism of Recalcitrant Faith. Studies in Critical Social Sciences, v. 98. Boston: Brill, Lam Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, Anabela. 2008. “Media(ted) Discourse and Society: Rethinking the Framework of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Journalism Studies 9 (2): 161–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701848162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casanova, José. 2013. “Exploring the Postsecular: Three Meanings of ‘the Secular’ and Their Possible Transcendence.” In Habermas and Religion edited by Craig Calhoun, Eduardo Mendieta, and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, 27–48. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cherry, M. J. 2015. “Pope Francis, Weak Theology, and the Subtle Transformation of Roman Catholic Bioethics.” Christian Bioethics 21 (1): 84–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cbu045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalferth, I. U. 2010. “Post-Secular Society: Christianity and the Dialectics of the Secular.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 78 (2): 317–345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfp053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, Michele. 2018. Postsecular Catholicism: relevance and Renewal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emrich, Cynthia G., Holly H. Brower, Jack M. Feldman, and Howard Garland. 2001. “Images in Words: Presidential Rhetoric, Charisma, and Greatness.” Administrative Science Quarterly 46 (3): 527–557. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3094874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faggioli, Massimo. 2017. “Evangelii Gaudium as an Act of Reception of Vatican II.” In Pope Francis and the Future of Catholicism: Evangelii Gaudium and the Papal Agenda, edited by Gerard Mannion, 38–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, Víctor Manuel, and Paolo Rodari. 2016. The Francis Project: Where He Wants to Take the Church. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gage, Beverly. 2017. “How ‘Elites’ Became One of the Nastiest Epithets in American Politics.” New York Times January 3.
   Google Scholar
• Gallo, Carmine. 2016. The Storyteller's Secret: From TED Speakers to Business Legends, Why Some Ideas Catch on and Others Don't. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guzik, Paulina. 2018. “Communicating Migration–Pope Francis’ Strategy of Reframing Refugee Issues.” Church, Communication and Culture 3 (2): 106–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2018.1478230.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 2006. “Religion in the Public Sphere.” European Journal of Philosophy 14 (1): 1–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00241.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 2008. “Notes on Post‐Secular Society.” New Perspectives Quarterly 25 (4): 17–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5842.2008.01017.x.
   Google Scholar
• Maibach, Edward W. 2015. “The Francis Effect: How Pope Francis Changed the Conversation About Global Warming.” Available at SSRN: doi:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2695199.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, William. 2021. “The Populist Pope?: Politics, Religion, and Pope Francis.” Politics and Religion 14 (1): 159–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048319000506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLennan, Gregor. 2010. “The Postsecular Turn.” Theory, Culture & Society 27 (4): 3–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276410372239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Vincent J. 2017. The Theological and Ecological Vision of Laudato Si’: Everything is Connected. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Molendijk, Arie L., Justin Beaumont, and Christoph Jedan. 2010. Exploring the Postsecular the Religious, the Political and the Urban. Leiden; Boston: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Monagle, Clare. 2017. “The Politics of Extra/Ordinary Time: Encyclical Thinking.” Cogent Arts & Humanities 4 (1): 1390918. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2017.1390918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narbona, Juan. 2016. “Digital Leadership, Twitter and Pope Francis.” Church, Communication and Culture 1 (1): 90–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2016.1181307.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenburg, Christopher J. 2018. The Rhetoric of Pope Francis: Critical Mercy and Conversion for the Twenty-First Century. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Pope Francis. 2013. “Evangelii Gaudium.” Apostolic Exhortation on the Proclamation of the Gospel in Today’s World, 24 November. AAS 105: 1019–1137.
   Google Scholar
• Pope Francis. 2015. “Laudato Si’.” Encyclical Letter of the Holy Father Francis on care for our common home, 24 May. https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html
   Google Scholar
• Regan, Ethna. 2019. “The Bergoglian Principles: Pope Francis’ Dialectical Approach to Political Theology.” Religions 10 (12): 670. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10120670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. 2009. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Troy, Jodok. 2019. “The Papal Human Rights Discourse: The Difference Pope Francis Makes.” Human Rights Quarterly 41 (1): 66–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2019.0003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, Teun A. 1992. “Denying Racism: Elite Discourse and Racism.” Discourse & Society 3 (1): 87–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003001005.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, Teun A. 1995. “Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis.” In Language & Peace, edited by Christina Schäffner & Anita L. Wenden, 17–33. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, Teun A. 2006. “Ideology and Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Political Ideologies 11 (2): 115–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, Teun. 1977. “Semantic Macro-Structures and Knowledge Frames in Discourse Comprehension.” In Cognitive Processes in Comprehension, edited by Marcel Adam Just and Patricia Carpenter, 3–32. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wilce, James M. 2005. “Narrative Transformation.” A Companion to Psychological Anthropology: Modernity and Psychocultural Change, 123–139. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar